scholarly journals Comparative Study of Upper Lip Bite Test & Modified Mallampati Score in Predicting Difficult Intubation

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr Saahir Boolaky ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Difficult Intubation ◽  
Upper Lip ◽  
Mallampati Score

A comparative study of acromio-axillo-suprasternal notch index with upper lip bite test and modified Mallampati score to predict difficult laryngoscopy

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
VinayakSeenappa Pujari ◽  
Rupesh Sunkam ◽  
BalakrishnaKailasnatha Shenoy ◽  
Yatish Bevinaguddaiah ◽  
LeenaHarshad Parate
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Difficult Laryngoscopy ◽  
Upper Lip ◽  
Suprasternal Notch ◽  
Mallampati Score

scholarly journals Comparison of Upper Lip Bite Test with Modified Mallampati Score in Predicting Difficult Intubation

2022 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Monish Thomas ◽  
Nichelle M. Saldanha
Keyword(s):  
Difficult Airway ◽  
Endotracheal Intubation ◽  
Difficult Intubation ◽  
Anaesthetic Management ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Upper Lip ◽  
Intubation Difficulty ◽  
Mallampati Score ◽  
Difficulty Scale ◽  
A Prospective Study

Background and Aims: Identifying a patient with a difficult airway is important in planning anaesthetic management so that endotracheal intubation can be achieved safely. This study aims to compare modified Mallampati score with Upper Lip Bite Test to predict difficult intubation using intubation difficulty scale. Materials and methods: A prospective study was carried on 104 patients, both sexes aged between 18 to 60 years scheduled for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patient airway was evaluated by MMT and ULBT preoperatively. Predictors of difficult endotracheal intubation were assigned to MMT class III and IV, ULBT class III. After premedication and induction laryngoscopy was performed. After successful intubation Intubation difficulty score was noted down based on the sum of seven assessing parameters. A score >5 was considered difficult intubation. Results: The incidence of difficult intubation in the study was 10.6% (i.e. 11 out of 104 patients). In this study ULBT had a higher sensitivity (90.9% v/s 18.20%), specificity (95.7% v/s 75.3%) PPV (71.4% v/s 8%) and NPV (98.9% v/s 88.6%) than that of MMT Conclusion: Upper lip bite test is better at predicting difficult intubation with higher accuracy when compared to Modified Mallampati test. Both the tests are good predictors of easy intubation. Keywords: Upper Lip Bite Test (ULBT), Modified Mallampati test (MMT), Intubation Difficulty scale (IDS), airway assessment. Difficult intubation prediction, Difficult airway

PREDICTION OF DIFFICULT INTUBATION BY USING UPPER LIP BITE, THYROMENTAL DISTANCE AND MALLAMPATI SCORE IN COMPARISON TO CORMACK AND LEHANE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (9) ◽  
pp. 2305-2314
Author(s):  
Ahmed Salam Dawood ◽  
Bashar Zuhair Talib ◽  
Istabraq Sadoon Sabri
Keyword(s):  
Endotracheal Intubation ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Difficult Intubation ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Upper Lip ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Mallampati Score ◽  
Routine Monitoring ◽  
Venous Cannula

The aim: To evaluate efficacy of Modified Mallampati test (MMT), upper lip bite test (ULBT) and Thyromental distance (TMD) or combination of two method Modified Mallampati test (MMT)+ upper lip bite test (ULBT), Thyromental distance (TMD) + upper lip bite test (ULBT) in prediction of difficult intubation in patients undergoing GA. Materials and methods: Three tests were carried out in all patients by a single anesthesiologist. These were MMT, ULBT and TMD. Laryngoscopy was performed with patient’s head in the sniffing position. The laryngoscopy view was graded according to modified Cormack and Lehane classification system. Study was prospective, single cross sectional, in 151 adult patients who required GA with endotracheal intubation for elective surgery. On arrival in the operating room, routine monitoring and venous cannula were introduced. Midazolam, Fentanyl. and rocuronium, ketamine , propofol were given to facilitate endotracheal intubation. Results: Out of 150 assessed patients, 18 (12%) had difficult intubation. Of those 18 patients, 17 (83.33%) patients had Cormack and Lehane classification III and one patient (16.67%) had classification IV. Compared with Cormack and Lehane classification system as the gold standard for difficult intubation, the sensitivity and specificity of MMT was 66.67% and 96.97% respectively, while ULBT had a sensitivity of 77.78% and a specificity of 93.18%, and TMD had a sensitivity of 55.56% and specificity of 94.97% respectively. A combination of different tests improved their efficiencies. The sensitivity and specificity MMT and TMD combinations was 77.78% and 92.42% respectively, while it was 88.89% and 93.18%, respectively for MMT and ULPT. The combination of TMD and ULBT has a sensitivity of 88.33% and a specificity of 91.67%. Conclusions: Upper lip biting test has the best sensitivity while MMT had the best specificity. No single test alone can be reliable for predicting of difficult intubation. The combination of ULBT and MMT was the best in terms of both sensitivity and specificity for prediction of difficult intubation.

scholarly journals ACCURACY OF THE UPPER LIP BITE TEST;

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (01) ◽  
pp. 132-138
Author(s):  
MUHAMMAD ATIF ◽  
MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH ◽  
MUHAMMAD JAVAD YOUSAF ◽  
Khalid Buland
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Difficult Intubation ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
Upper Lip ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Objective: To compare the accuracy of Upper lip bite test with modified Mallampati classification for predicting the difficultlaryngoscopic intubation. Study Design: Cross sectional Study. Place and duration of study: The study was carried out at Department ofAnaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain management, Combined Military hospital, Rawalpindi from September 2008 to August 2009.Patients and Methods: Four hundred patients undergoing elective surgery meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria were enrolled afterwritten informed consent. The airways of the patients were evaluated by using the modified Mallampati classification (MMP) and theUpper lip bite test (ULBT). MMP class 3 or 4 and ULBT class 3 were considered as indicators of difficult intubation. The laryngeal view wasgraded by Cormack and Lehane classification (Gold standard). Grade 1 or 2 was considered to represent easy intubation and grade 3 or 4to represent difficult intubation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy werecalculated for both the tests separately by using the 2×2 table. Results: ULBT had a higher accuracy of 94%, specificity of 99.2% andpositive predictive value 70% compared to MMP accuracy of 82.7%, specificity of 84.4% and positive predictive value of 22.7%.Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of the Upper lip bite test was more than the modified Mallampati classification. We suggest that itbe compared with the other prevailing tests as well which are often used to assess difficult intubations.

scholarly journals Comparison of Upper Lip Bite Test with Modified Mallampati Test and Thyromental Distance for Prediction of Difficult Intubation

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-9
Author(s):  
Sabin Koirala ◽  
Bigen Man Shakya ◽  
Moda Nath Marhatta
Keyword(s):  
Difficult Intubation ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Upper Lip ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Airway Assessment ◽  
Total Percentage ◽  
Bedside Test ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Introduction: The prediction of difficult intubation using simple bedside test is of great importance to prevent mismanagement of airway. This study was conducted to compare Upper Lip Bite Test (ULBT) with Modified Mallampati Test (MMT) and Thyromental Distance (TMD) for the prediction of difficult intubation. Method: This was descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in 121 patients of  American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA PS) I and II patients scheduled for elective surgery requiring general anaesthesia with endotracheal tube. The airway assessment of the patients was done one day prior to the surgery using Upper Lip Bite Test (ULBT), Modified Mallampati Test (MMT) and measurement of Thyromental Distance (TMD) . On the day of surgery during laryngoscopy, Cormack-Lehane (CL) grading was recorded. The CL grading of III and IV was labeled as difficult intubation. The Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV), Likelihood Ratio (LR) of ULBT, MMT and TMD were calculated and compared. Results: The total percentage of difficult intubation, defined by Cormack-Lehane (CL) III and IV was 16.52 %. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of Upper Lip Bite Test (ULBT) was 50%, 100%, 100%, 91% and 91.74% respectively. ULBT had a significantly higher sensitivity, specificity and PPV when compared to MMT or  TMD or MMT and TMD when combined together. Conclusions:  Upper Lip Bite Test (ULBT) is better   predictor of difficult intubation  and it should be used along with other test during airway assessment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document