scholarly journals Seismogeological structure model of the Anabar-Olenek region

Georesursy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-77
Author(s):  
Igor A. Gubin ◽  
Vladimir A. Kontorovich
Keyword(s):  
Sedimentary Cover ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Seismic Facies ◽  
Structure Model ◽  
Middle Cambrian ◽  
Wave Velocities ◽  
Upper Proterozoic ◽  
Upper Riphean ◽  
Seismic Facies Analysis ◽  
Deep Boreholes

The velocity characteristics of the Upper Proterozoic-Phanerozoic sedimentary cover of the Anabar-Olenek region were studied, in particular, the bimodal character of the distribution interval P-wave velocities was established. Taking into account modern ideas about the chronostratigraphy of sediments encountered by the Charchykskaya-1, Burskaya-3410 and Khastakhskaya-930 deep boreholes, stratification of reflecting horizons was carried out and time sections from previous years were reinterpreted. From the perspective of seismic stratigraphic and seismic facies analysis, the Cambrian, Vendian, and Riphean intervals of the section were examined in detail. In the course of the analysis, adjustments to the stratigraphic breakdown of the Burskaya-3410 and Charchykskaya-1 boreholes are proposed. The study shows that the Lapar Formation, which underwent Prepermian erosion, increase in the thickness multiple in an eastward direction. The distribution areas of the Tuessal Formation, the Lower and Middle Cambrian clinoform complex, as well as the areas of the Upper Riphean Formations reaching the Prevendian erosion surface are contoured. An Intrariphean tectonic disagreement between the Kulady Formation and older deposits was established.

Full-azimuth differential seismic facies analysis for predicting oil-saturated fractured reservoirs

First Break ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 48-52
Author(s):  
Alexander Inozemtsev ◽  
Zvi Koren ◽  
Alexander Galkin ◽  
Igor Stepanov
Keyword(s):  
Facies Analysis ◽  
Fractured Reservoirs ◽  
Seismic Facies ◽  
Seismic Facies Analysis

Effect of Fluids on the Elastic Properties of 3D-Printed Anisotropic Rock Models

2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 537-552
Author(s):  
Suresh Dande ◽  
◽  
Robert R. Stewart ◽  
Nikolay Dyaur ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wave Propagation ◽  
Elastic Properties ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Engine Oil ◽  
Rock Properties ◽  
Anisotropic Rock ◽  
Wave Velocities ◽  
Inclusion Model ◽  
3D Printed ◽  
Primary Porosity

Laboratory physical models play an important role in understanding rock properties and wave propagation, both theoretically and at the field scale. In some cases, 3D-printing technology can be adopted to construct complex rock models faster, more inexpensively, and with more specific features than previous model-building techniques. In this study, we use 3D-printed rock models to assist in understanding the effects of various fluids (air, water, engine oil, crude oil, and glycerol) on the models’ elastic properties. We first used a 3D-printed, 1-in. cube-shaped layered model. This model was created with a 6% primary porosity and a bulk density of 0.98 g/cc with VTI anisotropy. We next employed a similar cube but with horizontal inclusions embedded in the layered background, which contributed to its total 24% porosity (including primary porosity). For air to liquid saturation, P-velocities increased for all liquids in both models, with the highest increase being with glycerol (57%) and an approximately 45% increase for other fluids in the inclusion model. For the inclusion model (dry and saturated), we observed a greater difference between two orthogonally polarized S-wave velocities (Vs1 and Vs2) than between two P-wave velocities (VP0 and VP90). We attribute this to the S2-wave (polarized normal to both the layering and the plane of horizontal inclusions), which appears more sensitive to horizontal inclusions than the P-wave. For the inclusion model, Thomsen’s P-wave anisotropic parameter (ɛ) decreased from 26% for the air case to 4% for the water-saturated cube and to 1% for glycerol saturation. The small difference between the bulk modulus of the frame and the pore fluid significantly reduces the velocity anisotropy of the medium, making it almost isotropic. We compared our experimental results with theory and found that predictions using Schoenberg’s linear slip theory combined with Gassmann’s anisotropic equation were closer to actual measurements than Hudson’s isotropic calculations. This work provides insights into the usefulness of 3D-printed models to understand elastic rock properties and wave propagation under various fluid saturations.

Sr Isotope Chemostratigraphy and Pb–Pb Age of the Riphean Carbonate Deposits of the Kharaulakh Uplift (Northeastern Margin of the Siberian Platform)

2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (03) ◽  
pp. 377-387
Author(s):  
B.B. Kochnev ◽  
A.B. Kuznetsov ◽  
D.R. Sitkina ◽  
A.Yu. Kramchaninov
Keyword(s):  
Siberian Platform ◽  
Sedimentary Cover ◽  
Complex Structure ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
86Sr Ratio ◽  
Sr Isotope ◽  
Upper Riphean ◽  
Carbonate Deposits

Abstract —The least altered limestones of the Ukta and Eselekh formations in the Precambrian section of the Kharaulakh uplift have a minimum 87Sr/86Sr ratio of 0.70673–0.70715. The lowest 87Sr/86Sr ratio of the overlying Neleger and Sietachan formations is 0.70791–0.70817. Based on these data, along with the earlier obtained positive δ13С values (up to 8‰) for the Kharaulakh section, we have estimated the age of the Ukta and Eselekh formations at 800–670 Ma and the age of the Neleger and Sietachan formations at ~640–580 Ma. The Pb–Pb isochron age of the least altered limestones of the Eselekh Formation calculated from eight samples is 720 ± 30 Ma. This age permits us to define the lower part of the Kharaulakh section of the Ukta and Eselekh formations to be the late Tonian of the International Chronostratigraphic Chart or to the Upper Riphean of the General Stratigraphic Scale of Russia. The presence of reliably dated Upper Riphean sediments in the Kharaulakh uplift indicates a more complex structure of the Precambrian sedimentary cover on the Arctic margin of the Siberian Platform than assumed earlier.

GEOTECHNICAL PARAMETERS STUDY USING SEISMIC REFRACTION TOMOGRAPHY

2016 ◽  
Vol 78 (8-6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rose Nadia ◽  
Rosli Saad ◽  
Nordiana Muztaza ◽  
Nur Azwin Ismail ◽  
Mohd Mokhtar Saidin
Keyword(s):  
Parameter Estimation ◽  
Seismic Refraction ◽  
Standard Penetration Test ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Cohesive Soils ◽  
Penetration Test ◽  
Geotechnical Parameters ◽  
Wave Velocities ◽  
Refraction Tomography ◽  
Loose Medium

In this study, correlation is made between seismic P-wave velocities (Vp) with standard penetration test (SPT-N) values to produce soil parameter estimation for engineering site applications. A seismic refraction tomography (SRT) line of 69 m length was spread across two boreholes with 3 m geophones spacing. The acquired data were processed using Firstpix, SeisOpt2D and surfer8 software. The Vp at particular depths were pinpointed and correlated with geotechnical parameters (SPT-N values) from the borehole records. The correlation between Vp and SPT-N values has been established. For cohesive soils, it is grouped into three categories according to consistencies; stiff, very stiff and hard, having velocity rangesof 575-314 m/s, 808-1483 m/s and 1735-2974 m/s, respectively. For non-cohesive soils, it is also divided into three categories based on the denseness as loose, medium dense and dense with Vp ranges of 528-622 m/s, 900-2846 m/s and 2876-2951 m/s, respectively

scholarly journals Upper Proterozoic and Lower Palaeozoic strata in northern East Greenland

1989 ◽  
Vol 145 ◽  
pp. 103-108
Author(s):  
M.J Hambrey ◽  
J.S Peel ◽  
M.P Smith
Keyword(s):  
North Atlantic ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
North Atlantic Region ◽  
Atlantic Region ◽  
East Greenland ◽  
Upper Proterozoic ◽  
Clastic Sediments ◽  
Upper Riphean ◽  
Lower Palaeozoic ◽  
The Subject

The Caledonides of East Greenland contain the best exposures of Upper Riphean to Ordovician sediments in the Arctic - North Atlantic region. At its thickest the sequence contains 13 km of Eleonore Bay Group clastic sediments and carbonates, the 0.8 km thick Tillite Group and 3 km of Cambro-Ordovician strata (Henriksen & Higgins, 1976; Henriksen, 1985). These sediments crop out in a belt stretching for nearly 300 km through the fjord region, between 71° 38' and 74° 25'N. Those in the northern part of the region, between Brogetdal in Strindberg Land and southern Payer Land, and especiaIly Albert Heim Bjerge and C. H. Ostenfeld Nunatak, were the subject of investigation during 1988 (figs 1, 2).

scholarly journals Sensitivities of surface wave velocities to the medium parameters in a radially anisotropic spherical Earth and inversion strategies

2015 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sankar N. Bhattacharya
Keyword(s):  
Surface Wave ◽  
Phase Velocity ◽  
Group Velocity ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Love Waves ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Nonlinear Inversion ◽  
Wave Velocities ◽  
Spherical Earth

<p>Sensitivity kernels or partial derivatives of phase velocity (<em>c</em>) and group velocity (<em>U</em>) with respect to medium parameters are useful to interpret a given set of observed surface wave velocity data. In addition to phase velocities, group velocities are also being observed to find the radial anisotropy of the crust and mantle. However, sensitivities of group velocity for a radially anisotropic Earth have rarely been studied. Here we show sensitivities of group velocity along with those of phase velocity to the medium parameters <em>V<sub>SV</sub>, V<sub>SH </sub>, V<sub>PV</sub>, V<sub>PH , </sub></em><em>h</em><em> </em>and density in a radially anisotropic spherical Earth. The peak sensitivities for <em>U</em> are generally twice of those for <em>c</em>; thus <em>U</em> is more efficient than <em>c</em> to explore anisotropic nature of the medium. Love waves mainly depends on <em>V<sub>SH</sub></em> while Rayleigh waves is nearly independent of <em>V<sub>SH</sub></em> . The sensitivities show that there are trade-offs among these parameters during inversion and there is a need to reduce the number of parameters to be evaluated independently. It is suggested to use a nonlinear inversion jointly for Rayleigh and Love waves; in such a nonlinear inversion best solutions are obtained among the model parameters within prescribed limits for each parameter. We first choose <em>V<sub>SH</sub></em>, <em>V<sub>SV </sub></em>and <em>V<sub>PH</sub></em> within their corresponding limits; <em>V<sub>PV</sub></em> and <em>h</em> can be evaluated from empirical relations among the parameters. The density has small effect on surface wave velocities and it can be considered from other studies or from empirical relation of density to average P-wave velocity.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document