An Exploratory Approach to the Conflict Resolution Process of Miryang Transmission Tower Construction Based on a Modified Principled Negotiation

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-53
Author(s):  
Yujin Choi ◽  
Na Yeon Ahn
2002 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 299-311
Author(s):  
Barbara F. Walter

Although the literature on international negotiation is rich with studies attempting to explain why some wars end in negotiated settlements while others do not, the theoretical and empirical work focuses almost entirely on explaining a single dichotomous variable: whether parties reach agreement or not. This article argues that in order to truly understand how conflicts end, the resolution process must be viewed as taking place in three distinct stages which begins with the decision to initiate negotiations, continues with the decision to strike a mutually agreeable bargain, and ends with the decision to implement the terms of a treaty. Each of these stages is likely to be driven by very different causal factors, and only by drawing clear conceptual and theoretical distinctions between the stages (and then testing them this way) can we begin to understand the full range of factors that truly bring peace.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Hardi Alunaza SD ◽  
Dewa Anggara

The Moro Nationalism Liberation Front (MNLF) has long been perceived by the Philippine government as a threat. The continuity of this conflict resulted in the instability of the Philippine state which also affects its relations with other countries. Indonesia as a neighboring country and one region with the Philippines helped to resolve the conflict between the Philippine government and MNLF. The presence of Indonesia became a history of Indonesian diplomacy for the world peace struggle contained in Indonesia’s Preamble of the 1945 Constitution. This paper is attempts to answer that question using conflict theory from Max Weber which focuses on interaction in conflict resolution. The results of this paper indicates that Indonesian’s role in mediating the conflict resolution process resulted in a Final Peace Agreement which is the final peace agreement between the Philippine Government and MNLF.Keywords: Moro Nationalism Liberation Front (MNLF), Philippine, Indonesia, conflict resolution, Final Peace Agreement, mediation


2001 ◽  
Vol 2 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Boštjan M. Zupancic

There are a few premises underlying this discourse on the relationship between constitutional law and European human-rights law which I should reveal before we explore the relationship itself. I start with a functionalistic designation of the general legal process as being no more (and no less!) than a conflict-resolution process. From this perspective, the most important of my starting premises is what I consider to be an empirical fact, that is to say that the constitutional courts now produce jurisprudence(2) overtly and explicitly transcending the Enlightenment's illusion of complete separation between the competencies of the legislative and judicial branches of power.


2008 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 926-927 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Kendall ◽  
Robert M. Arnold

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maia Carter Hallward ◽  
Jennifer P. Berg

Author(s):  
Richard Rubenstein

A daunting obstacle to clarity in formulating ideas about conflict resolution and social justice is the fact that each of these terms has multiple meanings. There is widespread recognition that "social justice" is a multivalent phrase. Commentators since Aristotle have written of distributive, restitutive, retributive, procedural, and relational justice, and each of these types has been further subdivided to reflect differences in social philosophy and in common usage. Less well recognized is the ambiguity of "conflict resolution," a term that refers to a mélange of theories and practices that, although interrelated, do not constitute a cleanly demarcated and coherently defined whole. To name a few large subdivisions in this evolving field, we are accustomed to speak of alternative dispute resolution, principled negotiation, relational transformation, public dispute resolution, analytical conflict resolution, and individual or communal reconciliation processes.


2012 ◽  
Vol 44 (10) ◽  
pp. 14-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Amroune ◽  
Jean Michel Inglebert ◽  
Nacereddine Zarour ◽  
Pierre Jean Charrel

Author(s):  
Sri Khairunnisa Ariyati

<p>The conflict in the Western Sahara is a conflict disputed by Morocco and the Polisario Front. This conflict is caused by differences in views on ownership of the territory and the authority of who has the right to manage the region. This paper aims to examine the causes, actors, interests of actors, and of the conflict. The method used in this paper is descriptive through a literature study. The findings of this study indicate that the failure of the correct analysis in the conflict hampered the conflict resolution process, and how the lack of cooperation and compromise from the conflicting parties impacted the process.</p><p><strong>BAHASA INDONESIA ABSTRAK:</strong> Konflik wilayah Sahara Barat merupakan konflik yang disengketakan oleh Maroko dan Front Polisario. Konflik ini disebabkan oleh perbedaan pandangan atas kepemilikan wilayah dan otoritas yang berhak mengelola wilayah tersebut. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji penyebab, aktor, kepentingan aktor, dan resolusi yang mungkin hadir dalam penyelesaian konflik. Metode yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini adalah deskriptif melalui studi kepustakaan. Temuan kajian ini menunjukkan bahwa kegagalan analisis yang tepat dalam konflik membuat proses penyelesaian konflik menjadi terhambat. Selain itu, kerjasama dan kompromi dari pihak-pihak yang terlibat dalam konflik juga turut mempengaruhi proses resolusi konflik.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document