Dual Diagnosis: Does Race Affect Vocational Rehabilitation Outcomes?

2008 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 19-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mona Robinson ◽  
Michael Klein

The study examined vocational rehabilitation outcomes of persons who were dually diagnosed with mental health and substance abuse disorders. The study sought to examine whether differences existed in vocational rehabilitation outcomes based upon the individuals' race by examining the 2002 RSA-911 database containing successful and unsuccessful closures (status 26 and 28). MANOVA and Chi-square analyses showed that minorities earned lower wages and received less college training than their non-minority counterparts. The results of the study indicated that statistically significant differences existed in vocational rehabilitation outcomes for individuals who are dually diagnosed, with minorities faring worse than their non-minority counterparts.

Author(s):  
Faye S. Taxman

Substance abuse and mental illness are concentrated in correctional populations. Further, nearly half of female inmates and one-third of male inmates with substance use disorders have a diagnosable mental illness. Even with the higher rates of comorbid disorders of substance use and mental health, studies find that justice-involved individuals with mental illness tend to subscribe to a criminal lifestyle, criminal identity, and criminal values. Treatment for this population needs to address the syndemic of criminal lifestyle, mental illness, and substance abuse in order to effectively reduce recidivism and symptoms. The substance abuse population in most correctional settings is not homogeneous in terms of the type of drug abuse, the age and gender of the population, the criminal justice history, criminal lifestyle and value system, and mental health needs. In the justice system, there is a temptation to provide generic types of drug treatment. Treatment services need to be tailored to the individual in order to reduce symptoms and improve overall justice outcomes. For dually diagnosed patients, the need to provide treatment for both substance abuse and mental illness along with criminal lifestyle and thinking is widely recognized. This chapter reviews current knowledge about treatments for dually diagnosed patients. Included is a discussion of the factors that are unknown or unclear in the literature. Best practices and implementation issues regarding treatment for dual diagnosis patients are then discussed. An important part of these implementation issues are the systems factors required to support treatment in correctional settings. The chapter concludes with a research agenda for the future of dual diagnosis treatment in corrections.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria P

Introduction: Dual diagnosis is undoubtedly one of the most important problems that mental health services are currently facing. The common problem of all patients is that they resort to psychiatric services due to complications caused by the use or abuse of legal and illegal substances and at the same time due to the presence of another psychiatric disorder. The literature supports the hypothesis that psychiatric disorders and substance abuse disorders coexist more frequently than initially estimated. Aim: The aim of this study is to examine, assess and compare the characteristics and the psychopathology between patients with dual diagnosis receiving treatment for mental disorders and those receiving treatment for substance abuse disorders within the framework of the substance abuse treatment programs provided by the Mental Health Services of Cyprus. Furthermore, this study examines the differences in psychopathology in correlation with alcohol dependence, duration of treatment and the number of hospitalizations in relation with dual diagnosis. Methods: In this study three hundred patients were used: 150 of them were dually diagnosed and admitted to drug addiction therapeutic and rehabilitation centers for legal and illegal substances and 150 were dually diagnosed and admitted to psychiatric units in the Mental Health Center in Cyprus. The EuropASI the AUDIT, and the PDQ4 were administered individually to each participant. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 was used for data analysis. Results: The results revealed that the dually diagnosed patients who were admitted to psychiatric units had higher figures of diagnosis (mhuM=3.03, duM=2.55, pvalue), higher figures of hospitalization in Mental Health Services (mhuM=12.25, duM=7.73) and significantly more psychological problems (mhuM=63.02, duM=18.78), as well as longer prison time (mhuM=5.55, duM=2.10), compared to those that entered substance abuse treatment programs. The mean age of first use for men was 17.88 for psychiatric patients and 17.52 for patients entering substance abuse treatment programs (p value=0.001). For women, the mean starting age was 17.50 in psychiatric units and 17.60 in substance abuse treatment programs (p value=0.01).In most cases, the main substance of dependence was cannabis, followed by cocaine, in both study groups (57.5% the case of cannabis, 20% for cocaine in psychiatric units and 30% for cannabis, 20% for cocaine in substance abuse treatment programs). A total of 53.4% of the patients admitted to substance abuse treatment programs had a family history of alcoholism, while the corresponding figure for those in psychiatric units was 46.6%; 50% of both groups had a family history of drug addiction. The patients with anti-social disorder according to the PDQ-4 questionnaire had a higher incidence of alcohol dependence than patients without anti-social disorder. The use of alcohol over the last 30 days was associated with an increase in the frequency of alcohol dependency. Implications for Mental Health Nursing: The results indicate that the lack of a specialized treatment center creates a significant gap for treatment, which leads to Mental Health Services overuse and misuse, and to continuous hospitalizations and relapses, leading dual diagnosis patients to disorganization and isolation. Mental health specialists should learn and be educated in new therapeutic approaches in order to treat dually diagnosed patients holistically.


1997 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 43-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan D. M. Kelley ◽  
John J. Benshoff

The term “dual diagnosis” is used to designate persons who have co-occurring mental health and substance abuse disorders. Clinically, their problems are complex and their rehabilitation needs are multi-faceted. Persons with dual diagnosis are increasingly coming to the attention of service systems that, as yet, are ill-equipped to provide integrated interventions. Moreover, many staff remain untrained in contemporary treatment and rehabilitation strategies. This article presents information about the prevalence and clinical characteristics of dual diagnosis clients and the influences of psychopathology on outcome, treatment and rehabilitation; staff development, professional issues, and training concerns are also addressed.


Author(s):  
Kirstin Painter ◽  
Maria Scannapieco

Substance abuse, including the use of alcohol and other drugs, is one of the most prevalent disorders among adolescents and young adults, co-occurring with many other psychiatric and mental health disorders. Some use of alcohol and drugs can be expected during adolescence; however, it is necessary to use screening tools to differentiate between misuse of drugs and alcohol and substance abuse. Some brief and comprehensive screening instruments are mentioned in this chapter for future reference. General indicators of substance abuse disorders such as physical and emotional symptoms, family issues, and social problems are explored, and the chapter discusses some of the most commonly abused drugs. Emphasis is put on incorporating treatments of substance abuse with treatments of mental illness for a more comprehensive intervention strategy for people with co-occurring disorders.


2002 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 687-710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison Hamilton Brown ◽  
Christine E. Grella ◽  
Leslie Cooper

This article examines mental health and substance abuse treatment providers' attitudes and beliefs regarding the relative values of academic knowledge and experiential knowledge. These two forms of “knowing” increasingly come into conflict as providers from the two service systems work together to provide services to individuals with co-occurring disorders. Data to address this issue were obtained from seven focus groups conducted with 48 substance abuse and mental health treatment providers and stakeholders in Los Angeles County. Findings suggest the tenuous role of experience-based knowledge within the emergent framework of dual diagnosis treatment and its emphasis on the professionalization of providers. The article raises concerns as to how differing, and often competing, treatment approaches affect the provision of care for this population and questions how these tensions will be resolved within efforts to increase collaboration between the two systems in providing services to dually diagnosed patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document