Survey On The Differential Effects Of Time Deadline Pressure Versus Time Budget Pressure On Auditor Behavior

2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Kelly ◽  
Loren Margheim ◽  
Diane Pattison

<span>The study examines the differential effects of time deadline pressure versus time budget pressure by surveying both senior and staff auditors in public accounting firms. The responding senior auditors reported experiencing time deadline pressure more frequently than time budget pressure over the preceding year and a majority of them indicated they experienced more stress from time deadline pressure than from time budget pressure. However, the responding staff auditors experienced time deadline and time budget pressures about equally over the preceding year and experience3d about equal levels of stress from the two types of time pressure. In contract to the frequency and stress results noted above, the results also indicated that both senior an staff auditors perceived time budget pressure to be more associated with reduced audit quality, reduced job satisfaction, and increased underreporting of chargeable time than time deadline pressure.</span>

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 80
Author(s):  
Dewi Sutjahyani

The job of the auditor is to provide useful information, therefore when the audited report is delayed it will reduce the use value of the financial statements presented. Therefore, it is important to identify and have a deeper look at several factors related to the occurrence of audit report lag. Thus, it is necessary to study whether these factors significantly influence the audit report lag. This is important because the audit report lag phenomenon can reduce client interest and affect the reputation of auditors and public accounting firms where auditors work. Hypothesis 1 in this study is rejected, this means that the experience of auditors does not significantly affect the Audit Report Tag. work and the number of inspection tasks. The experience variable does not have a significant effect because audit quality is not determined by the length of work and the number of audit tasks. Hypothesis 2, namely that time budget pressure has an effect on audit report lag, is rejected. Time budget pressure is vital in the process of completing an audit report. In this case the time budget pressure does not have a significant effect because the budget pressure is determined when planning to determine the audit task but the implementation of the audit can be different influenced by the existing situation. For example during a pandemic, uncontrollable situations lead to leeway in the completion of audited reports. So that the existing time budget pressure must be adjusted. The hypothesis in this study is accepted, this is because the size of KAP basically determines the level of efficiency and effectiveness of each auditor's task. In medium and large KAPs, there is usually a structured system and maturity from the audit planning process to the audit. This is because large public accounting firms usually try to maintain quality and reputation to keep their clients interested


2019 ◽  
pp. 1231
Author(s):  
Ni Luh Dwi Ariestanti ◽  
Made Yenni Latrini

At this time competition between companies is increasing accompanied by various problems faced by companies in Indonesia. In dealing with this problem, the company managers need accountant services, especially public accounting services. Audit quality is one of the important things in approaching the existence of a company. This study aims to prove empirically the effect of task complexity, time budget pressure and auditor experience on audit quality. This research is associative quantitative research. The data used in this study is primary data obtained by distributing questionnaires to each auditor at 9 Public Accounting Firms (KAP) in Province of Bali. The analysis technique used in this study is multiple linear analysis. The test results aimed at task complexity have a negative and significant effect on audit quality. Time budget pressure has a positive and significant effect on audit quality. The auditor's experience has a positive and significant effect on audit quality. Keywords: Task complexity, time budget pressure, auditor experience, audit quality


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 119
Author(s):  
Mega Rosdiana

 Premature sign off of audit procedure is one of those behaviors that can reduce audit quality. The present study was intended to examine whether time pressure, supervision, and  locus of control affect  the premature sign off of the audit procedure. The population used in this study is all auditors working at Public Accounting Firms in Surabaya. The data used is the primary data in the form of questionnaires distributed to the respondents.  The sampling technique used is purposive sampling. The sample of research is 50 auditors from 17 Public Accounting Firms in Surabaya. Data analysis techniques used is multiple regressions. The results of this research  showed  that time pressure, supervision and locus of control affected the premature sign off  of  the audit procedures. The implication of this research result for the auditor is the higher the premature discontinuation of the audit procedure performed by the auditor will result in decreased audit quality and increased audit risk.  


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Putri Rahmawati ◽  
Halmawati Halmawati

This study aims to examine the effect of locus of control and time budget pressure on the auditor's dysfunctional behavior. The population in this study are all public accounting firms in the city of Padang, using a total sampling method, there are 8 public accounting firms that can be used as research samples and collected as many as 47 questionnaires. Data analysis methods used in this study was multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this study support the second and third hypotheses, internal locus of control has a negative influence on the auditor's dysfunctional behavior and budget time pressure has a positive influence on the auditor's dysfunctional behavior. However the results of this study reject the first hypothesis that external locus of control does not have a positive and significant effect on the dysfunctional behavior of auditors working in public accounting firms in the city of Padang.Keywords: Auditor's Dysfunctional Behavior; External Locus of Control; Internal Locus of Control; Time Budget Pressure.


2006 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Blokdijk ◽  
Fred Drieenhuizen ◽  
Dan A. Simunic ◽  
Michael T. Stein

A significant body of prior research has shown that audits by the Big 5 (now Big 4) public accounting firms are quality differentiated relative to non-Big 5 audits. This result can be derived analytically by assuming that Big 5 and non-Big 5 firms face different loss functions for “audit failures” and is consistent with a variety of empirical evidence from studies of audit fees, auditor changes, and the stock price reaction to audited earnings. However, there is no existing evidence (of which we are aware) concerning the underlying production differences between Big 5 and non-Big 5 audits. As a result, existing empirical evidence cannot distinguish between the possibility that Big 5 audits are simply perceived to be different (e.g., by investors) or actually differ in how they are produced. Our research objective is to identify the production characteristics of audit engagements that may explain the differences in expected audit quality between Big 5 and non-Big 5 firms. In this archival study, we examine the total audit effort and the allocation of effort to four audit phases—planning, (control) risk assessment, substantive testing, and completion—for a cross-section sample of 113 audits of Dutch companies in 1998/99 by 14 public accounting firms. We find that, after controlling for client characteristics: (1) both types of auditors exert about the same amount of total audit effort; (2) Big 5 auditors allocate relatively more effort to planning and (control) risk assessment, and relatively less to substantive testing and completion; and (3) client size, use of the business-risk-based audit approach, and reliance on client internal controls affect audit hours differently for the two auditor types. We conclude that the Big 5 firms actually produce a higher audit quality level, and that this quality difference is related to how audit hours are deployed in a more contextual and less procedural audit approach.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-156
Author(s):  
Isna Farhani ◽  
Vita Elisa Fitriana

ABSTRACTThis study aims to examine whether time budget pressure and organizational-professional conflict have an effect on audit quality in the public accounting firm. This research uses quantitative methods. The primary questionnaire and data used in this study were obtained from auditors who work in public accounting firms in Indonesia. Sampling was done using purposive sampling method. To test the hypothesis, researchers used Structural Equation Model with the Partial Least Square approach. The result shows that both time budget pressure and organizational-professional conflict have the negative effect on audit quality. It implies that to maintain audit quality, is not enough just relied on the competence of the auditor, but also the psychological or behavioral experienced by the auditor.ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji apakah tekanan anggaran waktu dan konflik organisasi-profesional berpengaruh terhadap kualitas audit pada Kantor Akuntan Publik. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif. Kuesioner primer dan data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini diperoleh dari auditor yang bekerja pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Indonesia. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode purposive sampling. Untuk menguji hipotesis peneliti menggunakan Structural Equation Model dengan pendekatan Partial Least Square. Hasil pengujian menunjukkan bahwa baik tekanan anggaran waktu maupun konflik organisasi-profesional memberikan dampak negatif terhadap kualitas audit. Hal tersebut mengindikasikan bahwa untuk menjaga kualitas audit, tidak cukup hanya berdasarkan pada sisi kompetensi yang dimiliki auditor, tetapi juga sisi psikologis atau perilaku yang dialami oleh auditor terkait.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 483-498
Author(s):  
Kenneth J. Smith ◽  
David J. Emerson ◽  
Charles R. Boster ◽  
George S. Everly, Jr

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the potential counteracting influence of individual resilience levels on the tendency of role stressors, stress arousal and burnout to reduce job satisfaction and increase turnover intentions. Design/methodology/approach This study surveys 332 auditors from the offices of nine public accounting firms. The structural equations modeling procedures examine an expanded role stress model to assess the nature and extent of the role that resilience plays in reducing stress, burnout, job dissatisfaction and turnover intentions. Findings Resilience has a significant direct negative association with stress arousal and burnout, a significant indirect positive association with job satisfaction and a significant indirect negative association with turnover intentions. Research limitations/implications As a cross-sectional study that incorporates self-report instruments, no definitive statements can be made about causality. However, the results extend the extant knowledge related of the role of resilience as a coping mechanism within the role stress paradigm in auditor work settings. Practical implications This study’s findings suggest the potential value of resilience training programs at public accounting firms to reduce staff burnout. In turn, reduced burnout has an increased likelihood ceteris paribus of increasing job satisfaction and reducing auditor turnover intentions. Originality/value This study’s findings suggest that resilience training for public accounting staff to reduce burnout may provide the organizational and personal benefits associated with enhancing job satisfaction and decreasing turnover intentions.


2019 ◽  
pp. 651
Author(s):  
I Gusti Diah Agung Prabawati Suteja ◽  
Ni Luh Sari Widhiyani

This study aims to determine the effect of time budget pressure (TBP) and professionalism on audit quality with auditor experience and job satisfaction as moderating in KAP in Bali. The population in this study were all auditors who worked in KAP in Bali, amounting to 77 auditors. Determination of samples in this study using non probability sampling method with purposive sampling technique. The sample amounted to 42 auditors. The results of this research questionnaire were measured using a Likert scale. The data analysis technique used is Moderated Regression Analysis. The results of this study indicate that time budget pressure has a negative and significant effect on audit quality; professionalism has a positive and significant effect on audit quality; auditor experience weakens the effect of time budget pressure on audit quality, and strengthens the influence of professionalism on audit quality; and job satisfaction weakens the effect of time budget pressure on audit quality, and strengthens the influence of professionalism on audit quality. Keywords: time budget pressure, professionalism, auditor experience, job satisfaction, audit quality


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document