scholarly journals Structural features of potential new mineral of eudialyte group from the Lovozero massif, Kola Peninsula

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 3-7
Author(s):  
R. K. Rastsvetaeva ◽  
◽  
N. V. Chkanov ◽  
I. V. Pekov ◽  
D. A. Varlamov ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 421-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikita V. Chukanov ◽  
Sergey M. Aksenov ◽  
Igor V. Pekov ◽  
Dmitriy I. Belakovskiy ◽  
Svetlana A. Vozchikova ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The new eudialyte-group mineral sergevanite, ideally Na15(Ca3Mn3)(Na2Fe)Zr3Si26O72(OH)3·H2O, was discovered in highly agpaitic foyaite from the Karnasurt Mountain, Lovozero alkaline massif, Kola Peninsula, Russia. The associated minerals are microcline, albite, nepheline, arfvedsonite, aegirine, lamprophyllite, fluorapatite, steenstrupine-(Ce), ilmenite, and sphalerite. Sergevanite forms yellow to orange-yellow anhedral grains up to 1.5 mm across and the outer zones of some grains of associated eudialyte. Its luster is vitreous, and the streak is white. No cleavage is observed. The Mohs' hardness is 5. Density measured by equilibration in heavy liquids is 2.90(1) g/cm3. Calculated density is equal to 2.906 g/cm3. Sergevanite is nonpleochroic, optically uniaxial, positive, with ω = 1.604(2) and ε = 1.607(2) (λ = 589 nm). The infrared spectrum is given. The chemical composition of sergevanite is (wt.%; electron microprobe, H2O determined by HCN analysis): Na2O 13.69, K2O 1.40, CaO 7.66, La2O3 0.90, Ce2O3 1.41, Pr2O3 0.33, Nd2O3 0.64, Sm2O3 0.14, MnO 4.15, FeO 1.34, TiO2 1.19, ZrO2 10.67, HfO2 0.29, Nb2O5 1.63, SiO2 49.61, SO3 0.77, Cl 0.23, H2O 4.22, –O=Cl –0.05, total 100.22. The empirical formula (based on 25.5 Si atoms pfu, in accordance with structural data) is H14.46Na13.64K0.92Ca4.22Ce0.27La0.17Nd0.12Pr0.06Sm0.02Mn1.81Fe2+0.58Ti0.46Zr2.67Hf0.04Nb0.38Si25.5S0.30Cl0.20O81.35. The crystal structure was determined using single-crystal X-ray diffraction data. The new mineral is trigonal, space group R3, with a = 14.2179(1) Å, c = 30.3492(3) Å, V = 5313.11(7) Å3, and Z = 3. In the structure of sergevanite, Ca and Mn are ordered in the six-membered ring of octahedra (at the sites M11 and M12), and Na dominates over Fe2+ at the M2 site. The strongest lines of the powder X-ray diffraction pattern [d, Å (I, %) (hkl)] are: 7.12 (70) (110), 5.711 (43) (202), 4.321 (72) (205), 3.806 (39) (033), 3.551 (39) (220, 027), 3.398 (39) (313), 2.978 (95) (), 2.855 (100) (404). Sergevanite is named after the Sergevan' River, which is near the discovery locality.


Minerals ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 219
Author(s):  
Victor Yakovenchuk ◽  
Yakov Pakhomovsky ◽  
Taras Panikorovskii ◽  
Andrey Zolotarev ◽  
Julia Mikhailova ◽  
...  

Chirvinskyite, (Na,Ca)13(Fe,Mn,□)2(Ti,Nb)2(Zr,Ti)3(Si2O7)4(OH,O,F)12, is a new wöhlerite–related zirconotitano–sorosilicate. It is triclinic, P1, a = 7.0477(5), b = 9.8725(5), c = 12.2204(9) Å, α = 77.995(5), β = 82.057(6), γ = 89.988(5)°, V = 823.35(9) Å3, Z = 1. The mineral was found in albitized alkaline pegmatites in a foyaite of the Mt. Takhtarvumchorr (Khibiny alkaline massif, Kola Peninsula, Russia, N 67°40’, E 33°33’). Chirvinskyite forms sheaf–like and radiated aggregates (up to 6 mm in diameter) of split fibrous crystals hosted by saccharoidal fluorapatite and albite. The mineral is pale cream in color, with a silky luster and a white streak. The cleavage is not recognized. Mohs hardness is 5. Chirvinskyite is biaxial (–), α 1.670(2), β 1.690(2), γ 1.705(2) (589 nm), 2Vcalc = 80.9°. The calculated and measured densities are 3.41 and 3.07(2) g·cm−3, respectively. The empirical formula based on Si = 8 apfu is (Na9.81Ca3.28K0.01)∑13.10(Fe0.72Mn0.69□0.54Mg0.05)∑2.00 (Ti1.81Nb0.19)∑2.00(Zr2.27Ti0.63)∑2.90(Si2O7)4{(OH)5.94O3.09F2.97}∑12.00. Chirvinskyite belongs to a new structure type of minerals and inorganic compounds and is related to the wöhlerite-group minerals. Its modular “wallpaper” structure consists of disilicate groups Si2O7 and three types of “octahedral walls”. The mineral is named in honor of Petr Nikolaevich Chirvinsky (1880–1955), Russian geologist and petrographer, head of the Petrography Department of the Perm’ State University (1943–1953), for his contributions to mineralogy and petrology, including studies of the Khibiny alkaline massif.


2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 523-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor V. Subbotin ◽  
Anna Vymazalová ◽  
František Laufek ◽  
Yevgeny E. Savchenko ◽  
Chris J. Stanley ◽  
...  

AbstractMitrofanovite, Pt3Te4, is a new telluride discovered in low-sulfide disseminated ore in the East Chuarvy deposit, Fedorovo–Pana intrusion, Kola Peninsula, Russia. It forms anhedral grains (up to ~20 μm × 50 μm) commonly in intergrowths with moncheite in aggregates with lukkulaisvaaraite, kotulskite, vysotskite, braggite, keithconnite, rustenburgite and Pt–Fe alloys hosted by a chalcopyrite–pentlandite–pyrrhotite matrix. Associated silicates are: orthopyroxene, augite, olivine, amphiboles and plagioclase. Mitrofanovite is brittle; it has a metallic lustre and a grey streak. Mitrofanovite has a good cleavage, along {001}. In plane-polarised light, mitrofanovite is bright white with medium to strong bireflectance, slight pleochroism, and strong anisotropy on non-basal sections with greyish brown rotation tints; it exhibits no internal reflections. Reflectance values for the synthetic analogue of mitrofanovite in air (Ro, Re’ in %) are: 58.4, 54.6 at 470 nm; 62.7, 58.0 at 546 nm; 63.4, 59.1 at 589 nm; and 63.6, 59.5 at 650 nm. Fifteen electron-microprobe analyses of mitrofanovite gave an average composition: Pt 52.08, Pd 0.19, Te 47.08 and Bi 0.91, total 100.27 wt.%, corresponding to the formula (Pt2.91Pd0.02)Σ2.93(Te4.02Bi0.05)Σ4.07 based on 7 atoms; the average of eleven analyses on synthetic analogue is: Pt 52.57 and Te 47.45, total 100.02 wt.%, corresponding to Pt2.94Te4.06. The density, calculated on the basis of the formula, is 11.18 g/cm3. The mineral is trigonal, space group R$\overline 3 $m, with a = 3.9874(1), c = 35.361(1) Å, V = 486.91(2) Å3 and Z = 3. The crystal structure was solved and refined from the powder X-ray-diffraction data of synthetic Pt3Te4. Mitrofanovite is structurally and chemically related to moncheite (PtTe2). The strongest lines in the powder X-ray diffraction pattern of synthetic mitrofanovite [d in Å (I) (hkl)] are: 11.790(23)(003), 5.891(100)(006), 2.851(26)(107), 2.137(16)(1013), 2.039(18)(0114), 1.574(24)(0120), 1.3098(21)(0027). The structural identity of natural mitrofanovite with synthetic Pt3Te4 was confirmed by electron backscatter diffraction measurements on the natural sample. The mineral name is chosen to honour Felix P. Mitrofanov, a Russian geologist who was among the first to discover platinum-group element mineralisation in the Fedorova–Pana complex.


2018 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 1049-1055 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Atencio ◽  
Marcelo B. Andrade ◽  
Luca Bindi ◽  
Paola Bonazzi ◽  
Matteo Zoppi ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTThis study presents a complete characterization of kenoplumbomicrolite, (Pb,□)2Ta2O6[□,(OH),O], occurring in an amazonite pegmatite from Ploskaya Mountain, Western Keivy Massif, Kola Peninsula, Murmanskaja Oblast, Northern Region, Russia.Kenoplumbomicrolite occurs in yellowish brown octahedral, cuboctahedral and massive crystals, up to 20 cm, has a white streak, a greasy lustre and is translucent. The Mohs hardness is ~6. Attempts to measure density (7.310–7.832 g/cm3) were affected by the ubiquitous presence of uraninite inclusions. Reflectance values were measured in air and immersed in oil. Kenoplumbocrolite is optically isotropic. The empirical formula is (Pb1.30□0.30Ca0.29Na0.08U0.03)Σ2.00(Ta0.82Nb0.62Si0.23Sn4+0.15Ti0.07Fe3+0.10Al0.01)Σ2.00O6[□0.52(OH)0.25O0.23]Σ1.00 (from the crystal used for the structural study) and (Pb1.33□0.66Mn0.01)Σ2.00(Ta0.87Nb0.72Sn4+0.18Fe3+0.11W0.08Ti0.04)Σ2.00O6[□0.80(OH)0.10O0.10]Σ1.00 (average including additional fragments). The mineral is cubic, space group Fd$\overline 3 $m. The unit-cell parameters refined from powder X-ray diffraction data are a = 10.575(2) Å and V = 1182.6(8) Å3, which are in accord with those obtained previously from a single crystal of a = 10.571(1) Å, V = 1181.3(2) Å3 and Z = 8. The mineral description and its name have been approved by the Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification of the International Mineralogical Association (IMA2015-007a).


2006 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 1331-1339 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. M. Kartashov ◽  
G. Ferraris ◽  
S. V. Soboleva ◽  
N. V. Chukanov

Minerals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1070
Author(s):  
Julia A. Mikhailova ◽  
Yakov A. Pakhomovsky ◽  
Taras L. Panikorovskii ◽  
Ayya V. Bazai ◽  
Victor N. Yakovenchuk

The Lovozero Alkaline Massif intruded through the Archean granite-gneiss and Devonian volcaniclastic rocks ca. 360 Ma ago and formed a large laccolith-type body. The lower part of the massif (the Layered complex) is composed of regularly repeating rhythms: melanocratic nepheline syenite (lujavrite, at the top), leucocratic nepheline syenite (foyaite), foidolite (urtite). The upper part of the massif (the Eudialyte complex) is indistinctly layered, and lujavrite enriched with eudialyte-group minerals (EGM) prevails there. In this article, we present the results of a study of the chemical composition and petrography of more than 400 samples of the EGM from the main types of rock of the Lovozero massif. In all types of rock, the EGM form at the late magmatic stage later than alkaline clinopyroxenes and amphiboles or simultaneously with it. When the crystallization of pyroxenes and EGM is simultaneous, the content of ferrous iron in the EGM composition increases. The Mn/Fe ratio in the EGM increases during fractional crystallization from lujavrite to foyaite and urtite. The same process leads to an increase in the modal content of EGM in the foyaite of the Layered complex and to the appearance of primary minerals of the lovozerite group in the foyaite of the Eudialyte complex.


1997 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 1327-1336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anatoly N. Zaitsev ◽  
Viktor N. Yakovenchuk ◽  
George Y. Chao ◽  
Robert A. Gault ◽  
Viktor V. Subbotin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 835-845 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inna S. Lykova ◽  
Igor V. Pekov ◽  
Nikita V. Chukanov ◽  
Dmitry I. Belakovskiy ◽  
Vasiliy O. Yapaskurt ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. N. Yakovenchuk ◽  
G. Y. Ivanyuk ◽  
Y. A. Pakhomovsky ◽  
E. A. Selivanova ◽  
Y. P. Men'Shikov ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document