scholarly journals Academic training in the certification of medical facilities in mexico

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Juán Pedro Herranz-Sanmartín
Keyword(s):  
Free Trade Agreement ◽  
Trade Agreement ◽  
Medical Services ◽  
Academic Training ◽  
Government Program ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
The North ◽  
Medical Facilities ◽  
The Us ◽  
The Republic

The certification of healthcare facilities in Mexico is a established government program, depending of the Presidency of the Republic, as well as global need of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) signed by Canada, the US and Mexico, that aligns our country with the progress and development towards a better quality in medical services and with other countries that have developed the accreditation and certification of medical services as a general policy.

scholarly journals Academic training in the certification of medical facilities in mexico

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Juán Pedro Herranz-Sanmartín
Keyword(s):  
Free Trade Agreement ◽  
Trade Agreement ◽  
Medical Services ◽  
Academic Training ◽  
Government Program ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
The North ◽  
Medical Facilities ◽  
The Us ◽  
The Republic

The certification of healthcare facilities in Mexico is a established government program, depending of the Presidency of the Republic, as well as global need of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) signed by Canada, the US and Mexico, that aligns our country with the progress and development towards a better quality in medical services and with other countries that have developed the accreditation and certification of medical services as a general policy.

NAFTA's Threat to Central American and Caribbean Basin Exports: A Revealed Comparative Advantage Approach

1994 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gladstone A. Hutchinson ◽  
Ute Schumacher
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Free Trade Agreement ◽  
Economies Of Scale ◽  
Trade Agreement ◽  
The United States ◽  
Central American ◽  
Medium Term ◽  
The North ◽  
The Us ◽  
Potential Benefits

The recent passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) between Canada, Mexico and the United States (US) marks an important step in the movement towards greater regionalism of trade among the countries in the Americas. From the perspective of the United States, the potential benefits to be gained from the anticipated increase in trade, economies of scale in production, increased access to the resources of production, and lower prices for the US market (due to the increased competition for consumer goods) combine to make its involvement in NAFTA desirable despite whatever limitations are posed, in the short and medium term, by Mexican underdevelopment (SerraPuche, 1992;US-ITC, 1991a).

US-Mexico Free Trade: Implications for the United States

1992 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 29-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sidney Weintraub
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Free Trade ◽  
Free Trade Agreement ◽  
Trade Agreement ◽  
The United States ◽  
Us Congress ◽  
The North ◽  
The Us ◽  
The Moment ◽  
Changing Attitudes

The Moment of Truth has come for the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The US Congress will have to stop talking and vote to accept or reject the agreement negotiated among Canada, Mexico, and the United States. The disagreement on NAFTA in the United States is about free trade with Mexico, not with Canada. A US-Canada free trade agreement (FTA) already exists.This controversy over NAFTA has been fierce in the United States, much more so than in Mexico. This comparison speaks volumes about changing attitudes. It was almost unthinkable a decade ago that Mexico would so drastically alter its traditional position of maintaining economic and political distance from the United States. This change would not have been possible but for la decena trágica, the years of the 1980s. Beyond that, Mexico has more at stake in a free trade agreement. It has the smaller economy (about 1/27th that of the United States) so that changes, for better or worse, are magnified.

NAFTA and USMCA

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne O. Krueger
Keyword(s):  
Free Trade ◽  
North American ◽  
Free Trade Agreement ◽  
Trade Agreement ◽  
The North ◽  
The Us ◽  
Preferential Trading ◽  
Trading Arrangement

How are NAFTA and USMCA different? The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) came into force at the beginning of 1994. It was an “FTA plus” between Canada, Mexico, and the US. There had been some strenuous opposition to the preferential trading arrangement (PTA)...

Tight monetary policy to strengthen Mexican peso

2017 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Monetary Policy ◽  
Free Trade Agreement ◽  
Trade Agreement ◽  
Target Range ◽  
First Year ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The North ◽  
The Us ◽  
Us Government ◽  
Mexican Peso

Significance Banxico justified the move as an attempt to curb inflationary expectations and eventually reduce inflation. It should also boost the peso, making the currency more attractive to investors. Partly thanks to the tighter monetary policy and a programme of foreign-exchange hedge auctions, the peso has strengthened significantly since January 19, the day before US President Donald Trump took office. Also on May 18, the US government sent a letter to Congress to begin officially a 90-day consultation period required before renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) can start. Impacts Tight monetary policy looks likely to pull the Mexican economy through the turbulence of Trump’s first year. Any US government requests for protectionist measures in NAFTA will rattle the peso. The Central Bank expects inflation to fall back towards the target range by 2018.

scholarly journals Striking a Trade Deal With President Trump? an Assessment of The Potential of Bilateral Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between the Republic of Indonesia and the United States of America

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3.21) ◽  
pp. 125
Author(s):  
Ranti Yulia Wardani ◽  
Patrick Ziltener ◽  
. .
Keyword(s):  
Free Trade ◽  
Free Trade Agreement ◽  
Research Study ◽  
Bilateral Trade ◽  
Trade Agreement ◽  
The United States ◽  
The Us ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Level Of Analysis

The US President Donald Trump announced that US would have some bilateral trade consent, as averse to multilateral trade deal such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). This research study investigates empirically the economic potential of bilateral Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between Indonesia and the US. The goal is to calculate the maximum savings potential for exporters. The savings potential is defined as duties that have been paid by any WTO exporter countries to another country based on the combination of its exports and the duties that  not reduce at FTA based. The “maximum savings” is the  from the presumption of all export products from the country origin will have zero tariff to enter another country who have an FTA. By using this measurement, country could have ex ante scenarios close to the real calculation tariff without FTA. The data is collected from the UNCOMTRADE and applied tariff rate (ATR) from the WTO. In this research, the level of analysis is the Harmonized System Code (HS Code) 6 digit level. The research findings show that duties of foodstuffs (HS Code 16-24) Indonesian import from the US is the biggest duties compare to other import item products. On the other side the biggest duties export from Indonesia to the U.S is mainly textile (HS Code 50-63). Therefore, the potential  saving from striking a trade deal would be considerable for both side countries. This research study gives more insight about the savings potential for mutual trade bilateral agreement for both countries. Once both countries agree on trade deal, it would encourage more export, raise the competitiveness level for some companies then lead to the economic growth.  

scholarly journals Agricultural Trade Policy: ‘America First’?

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 89-93
Author(s):  
Bruce L. Ahrendsen
Keyword(s):  
Free Trade Agreement ◽  
Trade Agreement ◽  
The United States ◽  
Agricultural Trade ◽  
Farm Income ◽  
Trade Surplus ◽  
The North ◽  
The Us ◽  
Partnership Agreement ◽  
Jel Code

There has been a growing openness and importance in trade over time as indicated by an increasing ratio of trade to gross domestic product for the World. However, some recent movements have been more protectionist and less open to trade. The potential impacts of less trade are explored with the United States (US) taken as an example. Trade agreements have been important in increasing trade by the US, particularly for US agriculture which has had a trade surplus since 1959. Countries should benefit from trade according to economic theory. However, stances taken by the US administration during the first half of 2017 have resulted in the withdrawal of the US from the Trans-Partnership Agreement and an announced renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement. With falling US farm income, the potential undoing of trade agreement benefits, and possible trade retaliations, US agriculture is concerned about any potential disruption in exports and losses from less trade. In addition, US consumers and importers of US agriculture should be concerned about a potential decrease in trade. JEL Code: Q18

scholarly journals O Congresso dos Estados Unidos e os impasses na aprovação do NAFTA | The Congress of the United States and the impasses in the approval of NAFTA

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. e57624
Author(s):  
Angelo Raphael Mattos
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Free Trade ◽  
North American ◽  
Democratic Party ◽  
Free Trade Agreement ◽  
Trade Agreement ◽  
The United States ◽  
Bill Clinton ◽  
The North ◽  
The Us

A partir das competências constitucionais do Congresso dos Estados Unidos em política externa, das plataformas dos partidos Democrata e Republicano de 1992, bem como dos argumentos a favor e contra a implementação do North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), o artigo objetiva compreender e discutir as razões da dificuldade enfrentada por Bill Clinton para aprovar o NAFTA no Congresso dos EUA em 1993. Os resultados das análises dos diferentes grupos domésticos, incluindo os atores Executivo e Legislativo, indicam que posições ideológicas, sobretudo presentes no Partido Democrata, como questões trabalhistas e ambientais, representaram o principal fator de resistência ao NAFTA no Capitólio.Palavras-chave: Congresso; Estados Unidos; NAFTA.ABSTRACTBased on the constitutional powers of the United States Congress in foreign policy, the platforms of the Democratic and Republican parties of 1992, as well as the arguments for and against the implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the article aimed to understand and discuss the reasons for Bill Clinton's difficulty in passing NAFTA to the US Congress in 1993. The results of the analyzes of different domestic groups, including the Executive and Legislative actors, indicate that ideological positions, especially present in the Democratic Party, as labor and environmental issues, represented the main factor of resistance to NAFTA in the Capitol. Keywords: Congress; United States; NAFTA. Recebido em: 08 fev. 2021 | Aceito em: 20 set. 2021.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document