Agorafobia, czyli ukryte curriculum. Pole akademickie i dylematy intelektualizmu krytycznego

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-57
Author(s):  
Agata Skórzyńska

Agoraphobia, or hidden curriculum: Academic field and dilemmas of critical intellectualismThe key topic of this volume is the critical attitude in cultural studies. In the article, this topic is understood in a specific way. The ability to conduct critical cultural studies depends on the recog­nition of the attitude that we can call “public intelectualism” and its opportunities and limitations. According to a well-known concept of Jürgen Habermas, the position of public intellectuals is con­ditioned by the forms of human interests related to knowledge. However, today the forms of knowl­edge work, practical and emancipatory need to be rethought, as Pierre Bordieu has shown. Dif­ferent forms of human interests can be combined in one scientific venture. Futhermore, there is no way to achive the full autonomy of the academic field from the metafield of power and other social fields because of the internal conditions of the academic world. The recognition of these internal properties is the prerequisite of “public intellectualism.” According to the conceptual view of cur­riculum studies, some of these conditions belong to the so-called explicit curriculum, but the others create a hidden curriculum — the uconscious components of habitus or unarticulated circumstances of the academic form of life. The argument presented in this article is inspired by two sources: firstly by the very important biographical episode in the academic life of Bourdieu who at the end of his career became strongly involved in public criticism of neoliberalism. Secondly, I refer to several public statements of Polish intellectuals who criticised the neoliberalisation of the academy in the context of the present reforms of the public higher education and science. As I try to show, ignor­ing the hidden curriculum may lead to a specific and risky attitude — agoraphobia — which means the fear of involvement in the public sphere and helplesness in the defence of critical research and emancipatory forms of academic knowledge.

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-73
Author(s):  
Andrei Tiukhtiaev

Abstract This article examines how esoteric traditionalism in contemporary Russia searches for legitimisation using alternative archaeology. Although New Age spirituality is often considered a private religion, some of its manifestations have a significant impact on the public sphere. The author demonstrates that the New Age in Russia contributes to redefining of categories of religion, science, and cultural heritage through the construction of sacred sites and discursive opposition to academic knowledge. The research is based on analysis of media products that present esoteric interpretations of archaeological sites in southern Russia and ethnographic data collected in a pilgrimage to the dolmens of the Krasnodar region.


2020 ◽  

Since the unexpected death of Ulrich Beck, there has largely been an absence of studies and debate on the continuation of his sociological work. One reason for this might be the fact that Beck’s writings revolve strongly around public resonance and everyday political issues. His approach to sociology, which straddles the border between academia and the public sphere, therefore represents a challenge for an academic discipline which is increasingly trying to overcome its own flawed and entrenched academic unity by demanding a more public form of sociology, but which has only just begun to tackle the work of one of its most important representatives in the public domain. This special edition aims to reassess the dialogue between the sociologist Ulrich Beck and the contemporary academic field of sociology.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Fedi Bhakti Patria

Women are still often imaged positively by the authorities in the public sphere. This can be seen from some of the elements contained in the images, including in the text "Dear Sweet Wife / Mother wearing the left lane" on banner safety riding ads. The prominence of the term 'WIFE' and the term 'MOM' instead shows the passive position of women who are only positioned as 'silent' subjects to wait for their partner to return. But in this case, the rules of traffic order become the representation of the symbolic phallus. This study uses a qualitative method which in the study of cultural studies is described by Paul Willis as a model of reflexive methodology, where the emphasis lies in theoretical awareness and interest, to reach the depth of 'reality'. The results emphasize that the image of women remains served as a passive subject and tend to be obedient to all transcendent rules. So, it is not excessive if in the end, this image also represents an inferiority in women. However, it really directs, herds, and encourages its viewers to always bring their own narcissistic desires. The woman in the image has been mythical, and soon she becomes part of the banality in the spaces of society. 


1998 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Jones

This essay reviews John Hartley's Popular Reality: Journalism, Modernity, Popular Culture. The significance of this text is that it provides one of the most developed engagements with the public sphere literatures from an author within cultural studies. The article necessarily addresses the considerable weaknesses in Hartley's understanding of the public sphere case. However, the aim is not to dismiss Popular Reality out of hand. Rather, the critique highlights the methodological and ethical differences between analyses based in cultural studies and ‘critical sociology’. Hartley does partially recognise the significance of recent feminist critiques to the much-needed critical reconstruction of the public sphere thesis. The article acknowledges this insight and then moves to a discussion of the ways in which a reconstructed conception of the public sphere thesis might not only be of value to media studies but also to a settlement between cultural studies and ‘critical sociology’.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigel G. Fielding

Critical qualitative research is at a troubled juncture. Web 2.0 has stimulated an appetite for Big Data across the policy community that maps to quantitative research, less to qualitative work. Evidence-based policy places qualitative research at the bottom of the scientific credibility scale. A lurch to the hard Right in the political world marginalizes critical research and sets back the indigenous and alienated, with whom many qualitative researchers most naturally ally. Qualitative research has a long tradition of impact in the policy world. Current trends are set against that tradition to take stock of where we are now.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document