scholarly journals Associação da Intensidade de Dor no Tempo Até à Morte dos Doentes Oncológicos Referenciados aos Cuidados Paliativos

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 694
Author(s):  
Pedro Barata ◽  
Filipa Santos ◽  
Graça Mesquita ◽  
Alice Cardoso ◽  
Maria Paula Custódio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Severe Pain ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Pain Severity ◽  
Common Symptom ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale

Introduction: Pain is a common symptom experienced by cancer patients, especially in those with advanced disease. Our aim was to describe pain intensity in advanced cancer patients, referred to the palliative care unit, the factors underlying moderate to severe pain and its prognostic values.Material and Methods: This was a prospective observational study. All patients with mestastatic solid tumors and with no specific oncologic treatment were included. Pain intensity was accessed using the pain scale from Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale, rated from 0 to 10 on a numerical scale, where zero = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain.Results: Between October 2012 and June 2015, a total of 301 patients participated in the study. The median age was 69 years, (37 - 94); most of the patients were men (57%) and 64.8% had a performance status of 3/4. About 42% reported pain severity ≥ 4 and 74% were medicated with opioids. Multivariate analysis indicated a correlation between performance status and reported pain (OR: 1.7; IC 95%: 1.0 - 2.7; p = 0.045). Median overall survival was 37 days (IC 95%: 28 - 46). Patients reporting moderate to severe pain (pain severity ≥ 4) had a median survival of 29 days (IC 95%: 21 - 37), comparing with those who had no or moderate pain with median survival of 49 days (IC 95%: 35 - 63) (p = 0.022).Discussion: The performance status was associated with more intense pain. The performance status, hospitalization, intra-abdominal metastization and opioid analgesia were associated with shorter time to death in advanced cancer patients referred to palliative care.Conclusion: Cancer pain continues to be a major clinical problem in advanced cancer patients.

Differences in performance status assessments between palliative care specialists, nurses, and oncologists.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 19-19
Author(s):  
YuJung Kim ◽  
Yi Zhang ◽  
Ji Chan Park ◽  
David Hui ◽  
Gary B. Chisholm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Care Clinic ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Ecog Ps

19 Background: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) is one of the most commonly used assessment tools among oncologists and palliative care specialists caring advanced cancer patients. However, the inter-observer difference between the oncologist and palliative care specialist has never been reported. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients who were first referred to an outpatient palliative care clinic in 2013 and identified 278 eligible patients. The ECOG PS assessments by palliative care specialists, nurses, and oncologists, and the symptom burden measured by Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) were analyzed. Results: According to the pairwise comparisons using Sign tests, palliative care specialists rated the ECOG PS grade significantly higher than oncologists (median 0.5 grade, P<0.0001) and nurses also rated significantly higher (median 1.0 grade, P<0.0001). The assessments of palliative care specialists and nurses were not significantly different (P=0.10). Weighted kappa values for inter-observer agreement were 0.26 between palliative care specialists and oncologists, and 0.61 between palliative care specialists and nurses. Palliative care specialists’ assessments showed a moderate correlation with fatigue, dyspnea, anorexia, feeling of well-being, and symptom distress score measured by ESAS. The ECOG PS assessments by all three groups were significantly associated with survival (P<0.001), but the assessments by oncologists could not distinguish survival of patients with PS 2 from 3. Independent predictors of discordance in PS assessments between palliative care specialists and oncologists were the presence of an effective treatment option (odds ratio [OR] 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-5.23) and poor feeling of well-being (≥4) by ESAS (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.34-4.21). Conclusions: ECOG PS assessments by the palliative care specialists and nurses were significantly different from the oncologists. Systematic efforts to increase regular interdisciplinary meetings and communications might be crucial to bridge the gap and establish a best care plan for each advanced cancer patients.

Early versus delayed palliative/supportive care in advanced cancer: an observational study

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. e32-e32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Bandieri ◽  
Federico Banchelli ◽  
Fabrizio Artioli ◽  
Claudia Mucciarini ◽  
Giorgia Razzini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Early Palliative Care ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale

ObjectiveThe positive impact of early palliative care interventions in advanced cancer patients has so far been largely evaluated in randomised controlled trials. This study aimed at providing information on the value of early palliative/supportive care, integrated with standard oncologic care, in a real-life setting.MethodsThis was a retrospective observational study of 292 advanced cancer patients consecutively admitted at Carpi Hospital in Modena, Italy, between 2014 and 2017. For the purpose of this analysis, patients were classified into two groups (early and delayed palliative/supportive care patients), and analysed for different clinical indicators. Early and delayed palliative/supportive care were classified according to the time elapsed from advanced cancer diagnosis until palliative/supportive care start.ResultsA total of 200 patients (68%), with at least three visits, were included in the analyses. The frequency of chemotherapy use in the last 60 days of life was 3.4% and 24.6% in the early and delayed groups, respectively (adjusted OR=0.1; 95% CI 0.0 to 0.4; p=0.002). The estimated survival probability at 1 year was 74.5% (95% CI 65.0% to 85.4%) and 45.5% (95% CI 37.6% to 55.0%), in the early and delayed groups, respectively. Performance status, pain and all the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale items, assessed at baseline and at 1 to 12 weeks after the intervention, showed significant improvement over time. However, no between-group differences were found with regard to symptom outcomes.ConclusionsAn earlier palliative/supportive care intervention was associated with reduced aggressiveness of therapy, in patients receiving community oncology care. Symptom burden was improved by early palliative/supportive care, independently of the timing of patient referral.

scholarly journals Palliative Care and COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Study of Factors Associated With Infection and Death at an Oncological Palliative Care Reference Center

2021 ◽  
pp. 104990912098696
Author(s):  
Livia Costa de Oliveira ◽  
Karla Santos da Costa Rosa ◽  
Ana Luísa Durante ◽  
Luciana de Oliveira Ramadas Rodrigues ◽  
Daianny Arrais de Oliveira da Cunha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Reactive Protein

Background: Advanced cancer patients are part of a group likely to be more susceptible to COVID-19. Aims: To describe the profile of advanced cancer inpatients to an exclusive Palliative Care Unit (PCU) with the diagnosis of COVID-19, and to evaluate the factors associated with death in these cases. Design: Retrospective cohort study with data from advanced cancer inpatients to an exclusive PCU, from March to July 2020, with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Diagnostic of COVID-19 and death were the dependent variables. Logistic regression analyses were performed, with the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: One hundred fifty-five patients were selected. The mean age was 60.9 (±13.4) years old and the most prevalent tumor type was breast (30.3%). Eighty-three (53.5%) patients had a diagnostic confirmation of COVID-19. Having diabetes mellitus (OR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.1-6.6) and having received chemotherapy in less than 30 days before admission (OR: 3.8; 95% CI: 1.2-12.2) were associated factors to diagnosis of COVID-19. Among those infected, 81.9% died and, patients with Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) < 30% (OR: 14.8; 95% CI 2.7-21.6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) >21.6mg/L (OR: 9.3; 95% CI 1.1-27.8), had a greater chance of achieving this outcome. Conclusion: Advanced cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy in less than 30 days before admission and who had diabetes mellitus were more likely to develop Coronavirus 2019 disease. Among the confirmed cases, those hospitalized with worse KPS and bigger CRP were more likely to die.

scholarly journals Meaningful cut-off pain intensity for breakthrough pain changes in advanced cancer patients

2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastiano Mercadante ◽  
Claudio Adile ◽  
Riccardo Torta ◽  
Antonella Varetto ◽  
Fabio Fulfaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Breakthrough Pain ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients

scholarly journals Home Artificial Nutrition in Advanced Cancer

1997 ◽  
Vol 90 (11) ◽  
pp. 597-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loris Pironi ◽  
Enrico Ruggeri ◽  
Stephan Tanneberger ◽  
Stefano Giordani ◽  
Franco Pannuti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Enteral Nutrition ◽  
Parenteral Nutrition ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Artificial Nutrition ◽  
Utilization Rate ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Score ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
At Home

Attitudes to home artificial nutrition (HAN) in cancer vary greatly from country to country. A 6-year prospective survey of the practice of HAN in advanced cancer patients applied by a hospital-at-home programme in an Italian health district was performed to estimate the utilization rate, to evaluate efficacy in preventing death from cachexia, maintaining patients at home without burdens and distress and improving patients' performance status, and to obtain information about costs. Patients were eligible for HAN when all the following were present: hypophagia; life expectancy 6 weeks or more, suitable patient and family circumstances; and verbal informed consent. From July 1990 to June 1996, 587 patients were evaluated; 164 were selected for HAN (135 enteral and 29 parenteral) and were followed until 31 December 1996. The incidence of HAN per million inhabitants was 18.4 in the first year of activity and 33.2–36.9 in subsequent years, being 4–10 times greater than rates reported by the Italian HAN registers. On 31 December 1996, 158 patients had died because of the disease and 6 were on treatment. Mean survival was 17.2 weeks for those on enteral nutrition and 12.2 weeks for those on parenteral nutrition. Prediction of survival was 72% accurate. 95 patients had undergone 155 readmissions to hospital, where they spent 15–23% of their survival time. Burdens due to HAN were well accepted by 124 patients, an annoyance or scarcely tolerable in the remainder. The frequency of major complications of parenteral nutrition was 0.67 per year for catheter sepsis and 0.16 per year for deep vein thrombosis. Karnofsky performance score increased in only 13 patients and body weight increased in 43. The fixed direct costs per patient-day (in European Currency Units) were 14.2 for the nutrition team, 18.2 for enteral nutrition and 61 for parenteral nutrition. The results indicate that definite entry criteria and local surveys are required for the correct use of HAN in advanced cancer patients, that HAN can be applied without causing additional burdens and distress, and that its costs are not higher than hospital costs.

Pain, opioid use, and survival in hospitalized patients with advanced cancer.

1992 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
F J Brescia ◽  
R K Portenoy ◽  
M Ryan ◽  
L Krasnoff ◽  
G Gray
Keyword(s):  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Clinical Data ◽  
Severe Pain ◽  
Pain Severity ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Incurable Cancer ◽  
Wide Variability ◽  
Cancer Of The Cervix ◽  
Ongoing Assessment

PURPOSE Pain is a common and feared symptom for patients with incurable cancer. Comprehensive assessment provides the foundation for effective pain management, and data that clarify the relationship between pain and other relevant factors also facilitate this process. The main objective of the study was to develop a clinical data base for advanced cancer patients and to survey data to determine (1) pain severity at admission, (2) opioid use at admission, (3) change in opioid use during the hospital stay, and (4) survival in the hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS Information was collected prospectively on 1,103 patients admitted and on 1,017 patients who died within 6 months of the study's end. Demographic and clinical data were recorded 72 hours after admission and soon after death or discharge. RESULTS Seventy-three percent of patients had pain at admission. Cancer of the cervix was frequently (68%) associated with severe pain, as were prostate (52%) and rectal/sigmoid tumors (49%). Severe pain was more probable in those with bone metastasis, those admitted from home, and in those younger than 55 years of age. The majority (71.7%) of patients had a stable dosing pattern, and only 4.2% of the patients required dose increases of at least 10% per day. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated the wide variability in opioid doses required. No reliable predictor of opioid requirement was identified, and this lack of predictability of cancer pain severity underscores the need for ongoing assessment.

The Importance of a Home Care Program for Patients with Advanced Cancer Pain

1985 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. 449-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vittorio Ventafridda ◽  
Marcello Tamburini ◽  
Silvana Selmi ◽  
Luigi Valera ◽  
Franco De Conno
Keyword(s):  
Home Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Pain Clinic ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Sample Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Quality Of Life Index

At the Pain Clinic of the National Cancer Institute of Milan, a special Home Care Program has been set up to assist advanced cancer patients with pain and their families during their remaining survival. The Home Care Unit comprises a team of physicians, nurse clinicians, psychologists and many volunteers who are active both in the hospital and at the patient's home. This entire operation provides a continuous relationship between the family, the patient and the Home Care Unit. This Home Care Program, which is one of a kind with other forms of treatment for advanced cancer patients (i.e. hospices), has produced interesting results. Out of a sample group of 50 patients, 33 were monitored at home by the Home Care Unit while 17 had their families to do the monitoring. Over a six-week period the following results were reported: a) Improvement of psycho-emotional factors such as anxiety, weakness and mood for both patients and their families who entered the Home Care Program. b) The Quality of Life Index remained unchanged for the sample group that entered the Home Care Program whereas it deteriorated for patients monitored by their families. c) A decrease in the Integrated Pain Score for both groups; however, results showed a statistically significant difference in favor of patients on the Home Care Program. d) The Performance Status decreased by very little over the study period, and there was little difference between the two groups. These results confirm the need for a Home Care Program which must go hand in hand with the Pain Clinic as an effective way to control Total Pain.

Use of parenteral nutrition in patients with advanced cancer

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isaac Soo ◽  
Leah Gramlich
Keyword(s):  
Parenteral Nutrition ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Bowel Obstruction ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Intestinal Failure ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
End Stage ◽  
Northern Alberta

The purpose of this study is to describe patient-related variables in a cohort of advanced cancer patients (ACPs) enrolled in a home parenteral nutrition (HPN) program. This study reviewed the cohort of ACPs enrolled in the Northern Alberta Home Total Parenteral Nutrition Program (NAHTPNP). Thirty-eight ACPs received HPN during the study period, 24% of all patients admitted for PN. Of these, 27 (71%) were female. Mean age was 48.76 y (SD 13.8 y). Bowel obstruction was the most common indication for initiating HPN (84%, 32) and ovarian cancer was the most common malignancy (34%, 13). Patients who began HPN with a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of greater than 50 (median of 70) were found to have a longer duration of life (median: 6 months) compared with patients who began HPN with a KPS of 50 or below (median = 50; median 3 months; p = 0.01; two-tailed). There was no difference in survival between malignancy type (p = NS). Advanced cancer is the fastest growing indication for enrollment in the HPN program. ACP demonstrated a 3% average annual increase proportionate to all indications for HPN starts, accounting for 7%–48% of HPN starts from 1999–2006. HPN is an increasingly used therapy for patients with advanced cancer, most commonly for intestinal failure in the setting of bowel obstruction. Initiation of HPN at a higher KPS was associated with a longer duration of life. Further studies are needed to validate the use of TPN in end-stage cancer patients.

Placebo and nocebo effects in randomized double-blind clinical trials for fatigue in advanced cancer patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9640-9640
Author(s):  
M. de la Cruz ◽  
D. Hui ◽  
H. A. Parsons ◽  
P. Lynn ◽  
C. Parker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Placebo Response ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Nocebo Effects

9640 Background: We have previously reported significant placebo response in randomized controlled treatment trials for cancer related fatigue (CRF). We conducted a retrospective study to determine the frequency and predictors of response to placebo and nocebo effect in patients with CRF. Methods: We reviewed patients that received placebo in two previous randomized clinical trials conducted by our group and determined the proportion of patients who demonstrated clinical response to fatigue using an increase (ΔFACIT-F score) > 7 from baseline to day 8, and those with nocebo response as those who reported side effects. Baseline patient characteristics and symptoms recorded from the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) were analyzed to determine their association with placebo and nocebo effects. Results: A total of 105 advanced cancer patients received placebo. 59 (56%) patients responded to placebo (median Δ FACIT-F score of 22). Worse baseline anxiety and well-being subscale score (univariate) and well-being (multivariate, MR) were significantly associated with placebo response. Common side effects reported were insomnia (79%), anorexia (53%), nausea (38%) and restlessness (34%). MR analysis showed that worse baseline (ESAS) sleep, appetite, nausea, and restless are associated with increased reporting of these side effects ( Table ). Conclusions: Nearly half of advanced cancer patients enrolled in the fatigue trials responded to placebo. Worse physical well-being score was associated with placebo response. Patients experiencing specific symptoms at baseline were more likely to report these as side effects of the medication. These findings should be considered in fatigue clinical trial design. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document