scholarly journals PRINSIP-PRINSIP HUKUM TENTANG TINDAK PIDANA PENGHINAAN DAN PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK DALAM PERPSPEKTIF PERLINDUNGAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA

Yuridika ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
Nanda Yoga Rohmana
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Freedom Of Speech ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
International Convention ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Construction Law ◽  
The Right

International Convention on both the UDHR and ICCPR which guarantee the right of freedom of speech and protection of one's honor and good name. While the Constitution has also guaranteed by Article 28E, 28F and 28G. In the rate level the Act still contained their conflict of law rules among specific law, but it also contained vagueness of the rule of law contained in Article 27 paragraph 3 of the Act ITE and Articles 310 and 311 of the Criminal Code that do not reflect the lex certa and lex scripta. Although there have been special criminal eraser reasons contained in Article 310 paragraph 3 Penal Code in the form of a defense of necessity and in the public interest, but in theory difficult to apply because of lack of the concept of the special criminal eraser reasons. In addition, there is a void laws that have not been regulated in the Indonesian national law as a reason for a special criminal eraser. Legal issues discussed are ) The offenses insult and defamation in terms of the principles and laws of human rights, 2 Formulation of law and/or construction law related criminal offenses insult and defamation in order to balance the protection of freedom of speech and respect the individual's good name. 

ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PENGGELAPAN YANG TIMBUL DARI HUBUNGAN SEWA MENYEWA MOBIL DIKAITKAN DENGAN PASAL 372 KUHP

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-216
Author(s):  
Hurip Agustina ◽  
Dadang Suprijatna ◽  
Aal Lukmanul Hakim
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Bottom Layer ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Car Rental

Crime embezzlement car rentals are lately often devastating car rental owner. This is an issue where the meaning of a rule of law if the crime committed community can not be followed by the rule of law, such as crimes by way of evasion is one of the types of crimes against human wealth which is stated in Article 372 of the Criminal Code, which is a crime that does not exist inexhaustible, both from the bottom layer to the top layer of society can also be committing a criminal act embezzlement is a crime that originated from the existence of a trust in others, and that trust is lost because of the lack of an honesty. It is stated that the crime of embezzlement have a problem that is closely linked to attitudes, moral, mental, honesty and trust humans as individuals. The purpose of this study are as follows: 1) To determine and analyze the occurrence of the crime of embezzlement car rental. 2) To know and analyze the application of Article 372 of the Criminal Code the crime of embezzlement in the rental car. 3) To know and analyze the efforts of the police in preventing crime of embezzlement car lease. This study uses normative juridical approach that is used to make the description clear, systematic, transparent and precise about the facts / specific nature of the area and population which is then analyzed to obtain the desired facts. Criminal offense embezzlement rental car can be imprisoned if they meet the overall elements of the offenses charged by the public prosecutor and the offender accountable for his actions. If the offender does not meet one of the elements of which the accused, then it can not be convicted. The elements of criminal responsibility are: 1) committing illegal or criminal acts; 2) for the criminal should be able to be responsible; 3) to have a fault; 4) absence of an excuse. The conclusion from this study is the adoption of Article 372 of the Criminal Code in criminal offenses of embezzlement car rental where the incidence of criminal acts committed tenants for the rented goods belonging to the owner of the rental rights because of misuse or abuse of trust in which the crime of embezzlement are set in the provisions of Article 372 of the Criminal Code.

scholarly journals Analisis terhadap Larangan Analogi dalam ‎Rancangan Undang-Undang Kitab Undang-Undang ‎Hukum Pidana

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 408-419
Author(s):  
Ikhsan Fatah Yasin
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
The People ◽  
Draft Bill ◽  
Good Analogy

Abstract: This article discusses the analysis of the prohibition of analogy in the Draft Bill. The majority of the experts of jurisprudence against analogy. The author does not agree with the ban on using the analogy in the Draft Bill, but justifies the analogy with the record, the judge must be competent and with integrity. If the judge is unable to make analogy, then he could use self-interpretation to find a legal decition. The argument of usage of analogy is to seek substantial justice for the people without setting aside the individual’s rights, because by using the analogy, the rule of law will remain unfulfilled. It is because the crime, in its various forms, is still contrary to morality even though it is not written, and even if the crime has an impact to the public. In Islamic law, the method of qiyâs compiled by Imam Shafi’i in may be used as a good analogy, because qiyâs method has been tested by producing many laws.Keywords: Analogy, draft bill, the criminal code. Abstrak: Artikel ini membahas tentang analisis terhadap larangan analogi dalam RUU KUHP. Mayoritas para ahli ilmu hukum menentang analogi. Penulis tidak sepakat dengan larangan menggunakan analogi dalam RUU KUHP, tetapi membenarkan analogi dengan catatan, hakimnya harus kompeten dan berintegritas. Jika hakimnya memang tidak mampu untuk beranalogi, maka ia masih bisa menggunakan interpretasi untuk menemukan hukumnya.   Argumen diperbolehkannya analogi adalah untuk mencari keadilan substansial bagi masyarakat tanpa menyampingkan perlindungan individu, sebab dengan menggunakan analogi kepastian hukum akan tetap terpenuhi. Karena kejahatan, dalam berbagai bentuknya, tetap saja bertentangan dengan kesusilaan meskipun ia tidak tertulis, apalagi jika kejahatan tersebut membawa pengaruh kepada masyarakat luas. Dalam hukum Islam, metode qiyâs yang disusun oleh Imam Syafi’i dalam berijtihad mungkin dapat digunakan sebagai proses analogi yang baik, sebab metode qiyâs ini sudah teruji dengan memproduksi banyak hukum. Kata Kunci: Analogi, Rancangan Perundang-undangan, KUHP.

scholarly journals Perspektif Gender dalam Putusan Pengadilan Pada Kasus Pelecehan Seksual

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 345-362
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Yulia Rana Sinta Dewi ◽  
Melina Gabrila Winata ◽  
Ella Yolanda Sakerebau
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Harassment ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
National Commission ◽  
Court System ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Right

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghapuskan pandangan diskriminatif akibat dipengaruhi oleh budaya patriarki yang menyebabkan terabaikannya nilai-nilai keadilan moral, sehingga diperlukan kesadaran akan kesetaraan gender dalam kepastian hukum dan dalam sistem peradilan. Metode dalam penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis empiris dengan bahan primer berupa wawancara dan putusan pengadilan yang diambil secara random sampling, serta bahan hukum sekunder berupa buku, literatur, jurnal serta peraturan perundang-undangan. Substansi Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana dalam penanganan kasus pelecehan seksual saat ini tidak lagi memadai, karena per-kembangan jenis macam pelecehan seksual menurut Komnas Perempuan. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pertimbangan hukum yang dilakukan oleh hakim lebih memper-timbangkan faktor perbuatan daripada faktor korban. Dalam tiga kasus yang penulis teliti penjatuhan pidana jauh di bawah hukuman maksimal akibat penafsiran KUHP yang dilakukan hakim secara gramatikal yang terkurung oleh positivisme. Padahal penemuan hukum oleh hakim akan membentuk yurisprudensi dapat digunakan pada masa mendatang dengan lebih memperhatikan keadilan dan hak pemulihan bagi korban. Gender Perspective in the Court System on Sexual Harassion Cases This study aims to eradicate discriminatory views influenced by patriarchal culture which results in the neglect of moral values, so that awareness of gender equality is needed in the rule of law and in the justice system. This study uses empirical juridical methods. Primary legal materials was collected by conducting interviews and analyzing court decisions taken by random sampling method, as well as secondary legal materials was collected from books, literature, journals and statutory regulations. The substance of the Criminal Code in handling sexual harassment cases is currently no longer adequ-ate, due to the development of types of sexual harassment according to the National Commission on Women. This research concludes that the judge considers the act factor rather than the victim factor. In the three cases the author examined, criminal conviction was far below the maximum sentence due to grammatically interpretation of the Criminal Code by judges confined by positivism perspective. Though the legal finding (rechtvinding) by the judge will form jurisprudence, which can be used in the future by focusing more to justice and the right of recovery for victims.

scholarly journals THE CONCEPT OF PENAL MEDIATION FOR DEFAMATION DELICT IN THE INDONESIA ITE LAW AS A MANIFESTATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 363
Author(s):  
Yaris Adhial Fajrin ◽  
Ach. Faisol Triwijaya
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Research Result ◽  
Self Esteem ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Impact

<em>The paper aimed to analyze the position of defamation as a complaint delict in the ITE Law and  the chances of applying penal mediation in the settlement of criminal defamation charges in the ITE Law. This research uses a normative legal research with qualitative analysis</em><em> techniques. The research result shows that defamation in the field of ITE is a complaint delict that the settlement of the case can be done through the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) outside the court through penal mediation mechanism. The settlement of criminal cases through penal mediation has been in line with the direction of the renewal of Indonesian criminal law which is moving towards improving the impact of a criminal act as part of the purpose of criminalization. Penal mediation that promotes the values of consensus deliberation is also in line with the basic values of Pancasila, to encourage peace between the conflicting parties and improve the reputation, self-esteem, and dignity of victims damaged by defamation committed by the perpetrators. The advantages of penal mediation have not been followed by the rule of law of the event that regulates specifically the procedure of penal mediation so that not a few cases of defamation are ultimately decided by criminal sanctions to the perpetrators. Therefore, the mechanism of penal mediation needs to be regulated in the Indonesian Criminal Code in the future, to provide guarantees of a fair and beneficial criminal settlement for all parties, as well as a guarantee of the right to free responsible speech.</em>

scholarly journals PROSPEK PENEGAKAN HUKUM UNDANG-UNDANG PENGHAPUSAN KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA (UU PKDRT)

Jurnal HAM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Sabungan Sibarani
Keyword(s):  
Domestic Violence ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
Pain And Suffering ◽  
The Government

AbstrakKekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga (KDRT) dalam ketentuan perundang-undangan di Indonesia tergolong sebuah kejahatan dengan ancaman hukum pidana karena mengakibatkan kesakitan dan penderitaan fisik maupun mental terhadap korbannya. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui prospek penegakan hukum Undang-Undang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga. Metode penelitian hukum yang digunakan pada penelitian ini penelitian hukum normatif yaitu suatu proses untuk menemukan aturan hukum, prinsip-prinsip hukum, maupun doktrin-doktrin hukum guna menjawab isu hukum yang dihadapi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa menghapus tindak kekerasan dalam rumah tangga dapat dimulai dengan menghilangkan sebab-sebab dan unsur-unsur pemicunya. Dalam kaitan ini, sekurang-kurang terdapat banyak cara dan usaha yang patut dilakukan agar kekerasan dalam rumah tangga terelakkan atau setidak-tidaknya dapat dikurangi intensitasnya. Prospek penegakan hukum UU PKDRT akan sulit ditegakkan karena banyak kendala dalam pelaksanaannya.Hendaknya Pemerintah mensosialisasikan UUPKDRT kepada publik atau masyarakat secara jelas dan transparan guna menghindari bias atau ketidakjelasan akan isi dan kandungan dari UUPKDRT.Kata Kunci: Penegakan Hukum, KDRT.AbstractViolence in the home (domestic violence) in the provisions of law in Indonesia is a crime with the threat of criminal law, because it caused pain and suffering to the victim physically and mentally. The purpose of this study was to determine the prospects for law enforcement Law on the Elimination of Domestic Violence. Legal research methods were used in this study is a normative legal research process to find the rule of law, principles of law, and the legal doctrines in order to address the legal issues at hand. The results showed that removing the acts of domestic violence can begin by eliminating the causes and elements of the trigger. In this regard, at less there are many ways and efforts that should be done so that domestic violence inevitable or at least be reduced in intensity. Prospects the act, Law enforcement will be difficult to enforce because a lot of problems in implementation. The government should disseminate the act to the public or public is clear and transparent manner in order to avoid bias or lack of clarity of the contents and the contents of the act.Keywords: Law Enforcement, domestic violence.

scholarly journals KEDUDUKAN DISSENTING OPINION DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-217
Author(s):  
Dewi Ratnasari Rustam
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Freedom Of Speech ◽  
The Other ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Difference Of Opinion ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Difference

Dissenting opinion is the difference of opinion between the Tribunal judges who handle certain a matter with other judges of the Tribunal dealing with certain cases. Dissenting opinion does not have the force of law because it cannot be the Foundation for the inception of the award. Dissenting opinion itself is an aspect of the law that need to be examined in order to prevent the formation of false opinion among the public. So, nowadays have started to formed the perception that dissenting opinion was an engineering law, instead of enforcing the rule of law but rather media that gave the opportunity for the defendant in corruption regardless of criminal trapping; but on the other hand is a form of difference of opinion and the independence of the judges as the metre is guaranteed by the provisions of the law; that the importance of dissenting opinion in the Court ruling was the judge's opinion be weighted, in an attempt of law appeal or cassation; as an indicator to determine the career judge, as an attempt to avoid the practice of corruption, Collusion and Nepotism (KKN) and the judicial mafia; as a real step towards the transparency of judicial democratization; the judiciary; and kemandiarian the judge require the freedom of speech.

Zasada szybkości w postępowaniach w sprawach przygotowania i realizacji inwestycji infrastrukturalnych

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 174-188
Author(s):  
Przemysław Ostojski ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
Constitutional Principle ◽  
Infrastructure Investments ◽  
Principle Of Proportionality ◽  
Administrative Proceedings ◽  
The Right

The article concerns the principle of speed in the proceedings regarding the implementation of infrastructure investments. The analysis of individual legal institutions is aimed at assessing statutory regulations of investment acts in the scope of the principle of speed. The aim of the analysis is to verify the assertion that the implementation of specific law-related rules in special investment documents connected with giving priority to the speed of administrative proceedings followed the constitutional principle of proportionality. As a result of the conducted analysis, it should be stated that the implementation of the principle of speed of proceedings to investment acts does not fundamentally violate the essence of constitutional rights of individuals – including the right to challenge decisions and the right to protect of rightly acquired rights. The legislator limits the principles of transparency, as well as the principle of active participation of the party in administrative proceedings, but does not eliminate these principles. Regardless of this, the legislator infringes in the analyzed Acts the essence of the party’s right to submit an application for temporary protection in administrative proceedings. The legislator violates in a qualified manner – due to the public interest – the rule of law and two-instance, preventing the appeals authority in the course of the instance of repealing the decision in its entirety, if the defect affects only its part concerning the property.

scholarly journals PROSPEK PENEGAKAN HUKUM UNDANG-UNDANG PENGHAPUSAN KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA (UU PKDRT)

Jurnal HAM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Sabungan Sibarani
Keyword(s):  
Domestic Violence ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
Pain And Suffering ◽  
The Government

AbstrakKekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga (KDRT) dalam ketentuan perundang-undangan di Indonesia tergolong sebuah kejahatan dengan ancaman hukum pidana karena mengakibatkan kesakitan dan penderitaan fisik maupun mental terhadap korbannya. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui prospek penegakan hukum Undang-Undang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga. Metode penelitian hukum yang digunakan pada penelitian ini penelitian hukum normatif yaitu suatu proses untuk menemukan aturan hukum, prinsip-prinsip hukum, maupun doktrin-doktrin hukum guna menjawab isu hukum yang dihadapi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa menghapus tindak kekerasan dalam rumah tangga dapat dimulai dengan menghilangkan sebab-sebab dan unsur-unsur pemicunya. Dalam kaitan ini, sekurang-kurang terdapat banyak cara dan usaha yang patut dilakukan agar kekerasan dalam rumah tangga terelakkan atau setidak-tidaknya dapat dikurangi intensitasnya. Prospek penegakan hukum UU PKDRT akan sulit ditegakkan karena banyak kendala dalam pelaksanaannya.Hendaknya Pemerintah mensosialisasikan UUPKDRT kepada publik atau masyarakat secara jelas dan transparan guna menghindari bias atau ketidakjelasan akan isi dan kandungan dari UUPKDRT.Kata Kunci: Penegakan Hukum, KDRT.AbstractViolence in the home (domestic violence) in the provisions of law in Indonesia is a crime with the threat of criminal law, because it caused pain and suffering to the victim physically and mentally. The purpose of this study was to determine the prospects for law enforcement Law on the Elimination of Domestic Violence. Legal research methods were used in this study is a normative legal research process to find the rule of law, principles of law, and the legal doctrines in order to address the legal issues at hand. The results showed that removing the acts of domestic violence can begin by eliminating the causes and elements of the trigger. In this regard, at less there are many ways and efforts that should be done so that domestic violence inevitable or at least be reduced in intensity. Prospects the act, Law enforcement will be difficult to enforce because a lot of problems in implementation. The government should disseminate the act to the public or public is clear and transparent manner in order to avoid bias or lack of clarity of the contents and the contents of the act.Keywords: Law Enforcement, domestic violence.

scholarly journals Penegakan Hukum terhadap Tindak Pidana Tanpa Hak Menguasai Senjata Tajam dalam Aksi Unjuk Rasa Penolakan RUU KUHP

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 1075-1080
Author(s):  
Imanuel Sembiring ◽  
Ediwarman Ediwarman ◽  
Marlina Marlina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Preventive Measure ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
District Court ◽  
Penal Policy ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Right

This paper aims to examine and analyze the rule of law, law enforcement and criminal policy against criminal acts without the right to control sharp weapons. To approach this problem, the theory of the legal system is used. The data were collected through interview guidelines and analyzed qualitatively. This study concludes that the rule of law regarding law enforcement against criminal acts without the right to control sharp weapons in demonstrations is regulated in Emergency Law Number 12 of 1951 in Article 2 paragraph (1), Law no. 9 of 1998 concerning Freedom to Express Opinions in Public in Article 16, Perkapolri No. 7 of 2012 concerning Procedures for the Implementation of Services, Security, and Handling of Public Opinion Cases in Article 8 letter j. Law enforcement against criminal acts without the right to control sharp weapons in demonstrations against the Criminal Code Bill at the Medan District Court is carried out through investigations, prosecutions and judges' decisions. The criminal law policy against people who carry sharp weapons in Medan City consists of a penal policy carried out by legally processing the perpetrators, followed by examining the defendants at trial. Non-penal policies as a preventive measure for criminal acts without the right to control sharp weapons are counseling, raids and community participation.

scholarly journals A REVISIT ON THE APPEALS HEARD BY THE SELANGOR APPEAL BOARD: IS JUSTICE HEARD A JUSTICE SERVED?

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (18) ◽  
pp. 12-18
Author(s):  
Noraziah Abu Bakar ◽  
Siti Sarah Sulaiman
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Local Level ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Local Planning ◽  
High Court ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Town ◽  
Planning Authority

This study tries to review the roles and functions of the Selangor Appeal Board in disposing of appeal cases registered at the tribunal. It is imperative to ascertain that the right of appeal provided under the Town Country and Planning Act 1976 (TCPA 1976) is carried out in order to serve justice to the aggrieved parties whose application for planning orders have been rejected by the Planning Authority at the local level. The decision of the Appeal Board is final and can only be brought to the High Court for judicial review. Thus, the tribunal should be independent and fair in disposing of any appeal. The study employs a combination of doctrinal and empirical research. In the doctrinal analysis, the study analyses the primary and secondary data that include the TCPA 1976 and analysing the statistics of appeal cases from 1991 until 2019. Interviews were carried out in order to examine the law in reality. Accordingly, it can reflect the impartiality of the tribunal in the disposal of the appeals. In brief, the Selangor Appeal Board has proven its ability to hear appeals according to the rule of law since in recent years lesser appeals have been filed that indicate fewer grievances of the public against the decision of the local planning authority.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document