scholarly journals Utilization of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Three Common Abdominal Surgeries, Adherence to Standard Guidelines and Surgeons' Perception in Teaching Hospitals, Islamabad, Pakistan

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zakir Khan ◽  
Naveed Ahmed ◽  
Asim ur Rehman ◽  
Faiz ullah Khan ◽  
Hazir Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Correct Choice ◽  
Teaching Hospitals ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Appropriate Use ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Validated Questionnaire ◽  
Stewardship Program

Background and objectives: The appropriate use of antibiotics is the main strategy of Antimicrobial stewardship program. This study was planned to evaluate the quality of antibiotic prescriptions, its adherence with standard guidelines and surgeons’ perception regarding antibiotic use in surgeries. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional observational and survey-based study comprised of two sections: Phase 1; to investigate the antibiotic utilization in three most common abdominal surgical procedures during 9 months (January 2017 to September 2017). The appropriateness of antibiotics was compared with evidence-based guidelines. Phase 2; the surgeon’s perspectives were evaluated through a self-administered questionnaire (13 items) during the next three months (October 2017 to December 2017). Descriptive statistics, chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests analysis were used through SPSS Statistical Package 21.0. Results: A total of 866 eligible surgical cases out of 1015 were investigated. An acute appendectomy (n= 418; 48.2%) was most common surgical intervention followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n= 278; 32.1%) and inguinal hernia (n= 170; 19.7%). About 97.5% of patients received antibiotics. Among these, 9.5% adhered according to guidelines with respect to correct choice, 40% for timing, 100% for dose and route (optimal value 100%). The ceftriaxone (J01XD04; n= 503; 59.5%) was most frequently prescribed antibiotic. A 200 participants (response rate 70.6%) filled out a validated questionnaire (internal consistency; α ≥ 0.7). One hundred and thirty-eight (69%) reported the overuse of antibiotics and most of them (97%) preferred broad-spectrum antibiotics instead of narrow-spectrum. The participants reported that non-availability hospital-based guidelines (n=193; 96.5%), prescribing of antibiotics without guidelines (n=186; 93%), underestimation of infection (n=177; 88.5%), lack of consensus (n=135; 67.5%) and poor awareness about guidelines (n=122; 61%) were the main determinants in their health care settings. Conclusions: The compliance of Surgical antibiotic was far below the recommendations of guidelines. The urgent needs of awareness among surgeons and implementation of antimicrobial stewardship program were important recommended interventions for appropriate use antibiotics.

scholarly journals Cumulative Effect of an Antimicrobial Stewardship and Rapid Diagnostic Testing Bundle on Early Streamlining of Antimicrobial Therapy in Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections

2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
P. B. Bookstaver ◽  
E. B. Nimmich ◽  
T. J. Smith ◽  
J. A. Justo ◽  
J. Kohn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Beta Lactams ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Tof Ms

ABSTRACT The use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) enhances antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) interventions in optimization of antimicrobial therapy. This quasi-experimental cohort study evaluated the combined impact of an ASP/RDT bundle on the appropriateness of empirical antimicrobial therapy (EAT) and time to de-escalation of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents (BSAA) in Gram-negative bloodstream infections (GNBSI). The ASP/RDT bundle consisted of system-wide GNBSI treatment guidelines, prospective stewardship monitoring, and sequential introduction of two RDTs, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and the FilmArray blood culture identification (BCID) panel. The preintervention period was January 2010 through December 2013, and the postintervention period followed from January 2014 through June 2015. The postintervention period was conducted in two phases; phase 1 followed the introduction of MALDI-TOF MS, and phase 2 followed the introduction of the FilmArray BCID panel. The interventions resulted in significantly improved appropriateness of EAT (95% versus 91%; P = 0.02). Significant reductions in median time to de-escalation from combination antimicrobial therapy (2.8 versus 1.5 days), antipseudomonal beta-lactams (4.0 versus 2.5 days), and carbapenems (4.0 versus 2.5 days) were observed in the postintervention compared to the preintervention period (P < 0.001 for all). The reduction in median time to de-escalation from combination therapy (1.0 versus 2.0 days; P = 0.03) and antipseudomonal beta-lactams (2.2 versus 2.7 days; P = 0.04) was further augmented during phase 2 compared to phase 1 of the postintervention period. Implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program and RDT intervention bundle in a multihospital health care system is associated with improved appropriateness of EAT for GNBSI and decreased utilization of BSAA through early de-escalation.

scholarly journals 229. The Role of Antimicrobial Stewardship Program on Appropriate Use, Dose, and Duration of Vancomycin Treatment

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S98-S99
Author(s):  
Olga Kaplun ◽  
Melinda Monteforte ◽  
Samad Tirmizi ◽  
Mersema Abate ◽  
George Psevdos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Appropriate Use ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Vancomycin Treatment

scholarly journals Long-Term Outcomes of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Implemented in a Hospital with Low Baseline Antibiotic Use

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 664-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy C. Jenkins ◽  
Bryan C. Knepper ◽  
Katherine Shihadeh ◽  
Michelle K. Haas ◽  
Allison L. Sabel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Safety Net ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Stewardship Program

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the long-term outcomes of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) implemented in a hospital with low baseline antibiotic use.DESIGNQuasi-experimental, interrupted time-series study.SETTINGPublic safety net hospital with 525 beds.INTERVENTIONImplementation of a formal ASP in July 2008.METHODSWe conducted a time-series analysis to evaluate the impact of the ASP over a 6.25-year period (July 1, 2008–September 30, 2014) while controlling for trends during a 3-year preintervention period (July 1, 2005–June 30, 2008). The primary outcome measures were total antibacterial and antipseudomonal use in days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 patient-days (PD). Secondary outcomes included antimicrobial costs and resistance, hospital-onset Clostridium difficile infection, and other patient-centered measures.RESULTSDuring the preintervention period, total antibacterial and antipseudomonal use were declining (−9.2 and −5.5 DOT/1,000 PD per quarter, respectively). During the stewardship period, both continued to decline, although at lower rates (−3.7 and −2.2 DOT/1,000 PD, respectively), resulting in a slope change of 5.5 DOT/1,000 PD per quarter for total antibacterial use (P=.10) and 3.3 DOT/1,000 PD per quarter for antipseudomonal use (P=.01). Antibiotic expenditures declined markedly during the stewardship period (−$295.42/1,000 PD per quarter, P=.002). There were variable changes in antimicrobial resistance and few apparent changes in C. difficile infection and other patient-centered outcomes.CONCLUSIONIn a hospital with low baseline antibiotic use, implementation of an ASP was associated with sustained reductions in total antibacterial and antipseudomonal use and declining antibiotic expenditures. Common ASP outcome measures have limitations.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;00(0): 1–9

scholarly journals The outcome of implementing antimicrobial stewardship program for hospitalized children

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 3737
Author(s):  
Ahmed A. El-Nawawy ◽  
Reham M. Wagdy ◽  
Ahmed Kh. Abou Ahmed ◽  
Marwa A. Moustafa
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Hospitalized Children ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient’S Outcome ◽  
The Impact

Background: An effective approach to improve antimicrobial use for hospitalized patients is an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP). The present study aimed to implement ASP for inpatient children based on prospective-audit-with-feedback intervention in order to evaluate the impact on patient’s outcome, antimicrobial use, and the hospital cost.Methods: The study was conducted throughout 6 months over 275 children admitted with different infections at Main Children’s hospital in Alexandria included; group I (with ASP) and group II (standard antimicrobials as controls).Results: The study revealed that on patient’s admission, single antibiotic use was higher among the ASP group while double antimicrobial therapy was higher among the non-ASP with significant difference (p=0.001). Less percentage of patients who consumed vancomycin, meropenem amoxicillin-clavulanic and metronidazole was observed among ASP group with a significant difference of the last two drugs when compared to controls (p=<0.001, 0.011, respectively). The study reported the higher percent of improved ASP patient’s after 72 hours of admission with a significant difference to controls (73.2% versus 62.5%, p=0.038). Complications occurred more likely for the non-ASP group (odds ratio 7.374 with 95% CI 1.68-32.33). In general, there was a clear reduction of the patient antibiotic cost/day and overall cost per patient, however, it was not significant among the studied patients.Conclusions:  Our local ASP model provided a high quality of care for hospitalized children and effectively reduced the antimicrobial consumption.

scholarly journals An Audit-Based, Infectious Disease Specialist-Guided Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Profoundly Reduced Antibiotic Use Without Negatively Affecting Patient Outcomes

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah Nilholm ◽  
Linnea Holmstrand ◽  
Jonas Ahl ◽  
Fredrik Månsson ◽  
Inga Odenholt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Disease ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Control Period ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Infectious Disease Specialist ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Intervention Period ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Disease Specialist

Abstract Background.  Antimicrobial stewardship programs are increasingly implemented in hospital care. They aim to simultaneously optimize outcomes for individual patients with infections and reduce financial and health-associated costs of overuse of antibiotics. Few studies have examined the effects of antimicrobial stewardship programs in settings with low proportions of antimicrobial resistance, such as in Sweden. Methods.  An antimicrobial stewardship program was introduced during 5 months of 2013 in a department of internal medicine in southern Sweden. The intervention consisted of audits twice weekly on all patients given antibiotic treatment. The intervention period was compared with a historical control consisting of patients treated with antibiotics in the same wards in 2012. Studied outcome variables included 28-day mortality and readmission, length of hospital stay, and use of antibiotics. Results.  A reduction of 27% in total antibiotic use (2387 days of any antibiotic) was observed in the intervention period compared with the control period. The reduction was due to fewer patients started on antibiotics as well as to significantly shorter durations of antibiotic courses (P &lt; .001). An earlier switch to oral therapy and a specific reduction in use of third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones was also evident. Mortality, total readmissions, and lengths of stay in hospital were unchanged compared with the control period, whereas readmissions due to a nonresolved infection were fewer during the intervention of 2013. Conclusions.  This study demonstrates that an infectious disease specialist-guided antimicrobial stewardship program can profoundly reduce antibiotic use in a low-resistance setting with no negative effect on patient outcome.

scholarly journals Eight-Year Experience of Antimicrobial Stewardship Program and the Trend of Carbapenem Use at a Tertiary Acute-Care Hospital in Japan—The Impact of Postprescription Review and Feedback

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsubasa Akazawa ◽  
Yoshiki Kusama ◽  
Haruhisa Fukuda ◽  
Kayoko Hayakawa ◽  
Satoshi Kutsuna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Car Use ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Objective We implemented a stepwise antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP). This study evaluated the effect of each intervention and the overall economic impact on carbapenem (CAR) use. Method Carbapenem days of therapy (CAR-DOT) were calculated to assess the effect of each intervention, and antipseudomonal DOT were calculated to assess changes in use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. We carried out segmented regression analysis of studies with interrupted time series for 3 periods: Phase 1 (infectious disease [ID] consultation service only), Phase 2 (adding monitoring and e-mail feedback), and Phase 3 (adding postprescription review and feedback [PPRF] led by ID specialist doctors and pharmacists). We also estimated cost savings over the study period due to decreased CAR use. Results The median monthly CAR-DOT, per month per 100 patient-days, during Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 was 5.46, 3.69, and 2.78, respectively. The CAR-DOT decreased significantly immediately after the start of Phase 2, but a major decrease was not observed during this period. Although the immediate change was not apparent after Phase 3 started, CAR-DOT decreased significantly over this period. Furthermore, the monthly DOT of 3 alternative antipseudomonal agents also decreased significantly over the study period, but the incidence of antimicrobial resistance did not decrease. Cost savings over the study period, due to decreased CAR use, was estimated to be US $150 000. Conclusions Adding PPRF on the conventional ASP may accelerate antimicrobial stewardship. Our CAR stewardship program has had positive results, and implementation is ongoing.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) on Unrestricted Use of Meropenem at an Academic Medical Center

2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-33
Author(s):  
Priyam Mithawala ◽  
Edo-abasi McGee
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Objective The primary objectives were to evaluate the prescriber acceptance rate of Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) pharmacist recommendation to de-escalate/discontinue meropenem, and estimate the difference in duration of meropenem therapy. The secondary objective was to determine incidence of adverse events in the two groups. Methods It was a retrospective study. All patients admitted to Gwinnett Medical Center and receiving meropenem from January–November 2015 were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were: patients admitted to intensive care unit, one-time dose, infectious disease consultation, and age <18 years. Electronic medical records were reviewed for data collection. The control group consisted of patients from January–July 2015 when there was no ASP pharmacist. The intervention group consisted of patients from August–November 2015 during which period the ASP pharmacist recommended de-escalation/discontinuation of meropenem based on culture and sensitivity results. Results A total of 41 patients were studied, 21 in the control group and 20 in the intervention group. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics in the two groups and in terms of prior hospitalization or antibiotic use (within 90 days) and documented or suspected MDRO infection at the time of admission. De-escalation/discontinuation was suggested in 16/20 patients in the intervention group (80%), and intervention was accepted in 68%. The mean duration of therapy was significantly decreased in the intervention group (5.6 days vs. 8.1 days, p =0.0175). Two patients had thrombocytopenia (unrelated to meropenem), and none of the patients had seizure. Conclusion Targeted antibiotic review is an effective ASP strategy, which significantly decreases the duration of meropenem therapy.

scholarly journals 1035. Implementation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program-Led, Multifactorial Pneumonia Diagnosis and Treatment Bundle

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S364-S364
Author(s):  
Jefferson L Cua ◽  
Ryan L Crass ◽  
Vince Marshall ◽  
Mohammad Ateya ◽  
Jerod Nagel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Surveillance Culture ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Intervention Period ◽  
Surveillance Cultures ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Suspected Pneumonia ◽  
Pneumonia Diagnosis

Abstract Background Pneumonia remains a leading cause of hospitalization and accounts for significant antibiotic use. This study aims to evaluate the impact of bundled antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) interventions, including procalcitonin and surveillance cultures, on broad-spectrum antimicrobial use in patients with suspected pneumonia. Methods This is a pre-post, quasi-experimental study conducted at Michigan Medicine. During the intervention period, an ASP member reviewed adult patients admitted to 3-floor medical services with antibiotics initiated for suspected pneumonia. The ASP member (1) recommended the use of procalcitonin when clinically appropriate, (2) used institutional guidelines to guide empiric antibiotic selection based on risk for drug-resistant pathogens, and (3) ordered a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) surveillance culture in patients receiving empiric anti-MRSA therapy. The primary endpoint was anti-MRSA and anti-pseudomonal (PSA) antibiotic use measured as days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 days-present on the services of interest. Antibiotic use and clinical data were extracted from an electronic database. Pneumonia diagnosis codes were used to identify the study population. Results A total of 549 patients were included: 310 in the pre-intervention (December 1/2017 - 3/31/2018) and 239 in the intervention (December 1/2018 - 3/31/2019) periods. Baseline demographics were similar between groups (Table 1). Less than 15% of patients had a microbiological diagnosis via respiratory culture in both study periods (Table 2). Respiratory cultures were ordered less commonly in the intervention period; however, the rate of culture positivity was higher (28% vs. 48%, P < 0.01). Process measures improved in the intervention period with an increase in the proportion of patients with MRSA surveillance cultures (13% vs. 39%, P < 0.01) and procalcitonin monitoring (77% vs. 83%, P = 0.07). Compared with the pre-intervention period, anti-MRSA antibiotic use decreased from 172 to 158 DOT per 1000 days-present (Δ -8%) and the use of anti-PSA antibiotics decreased from 348 to 316 DOT per 1000 days present (Δ -9%). Conclusion The implementation of an ASP-led pneumonia bundle led to reductions in anti-MRSA and anti-PSA antibiotic use. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document