Respiratory distress syndrome in neonates with extremely low body weight: non-invasive respiratory therapy in the early neonatal period

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 94-102
Author(s):  
O.V. Zavyalov ◽  
◽  
V.V. Marenkov ◽  
A.A. Dementyev ◽  
I.N. Pasechnik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Body Weight ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Neonatal Period ◽  
Respiratory Therapy ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Early Neonatal Period

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of non-invasive respiratory therapy using the method of dual positive airway pressure (DuoPAP) via nasal prongs performed in the intensive care unit and neonatal intensive care unit in premature newborns with extremely low body weight and respiratory distress syndrome in the early neonatal period. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 55 medical records of premature newborns treated in the intensive care unit of the Perinatal Center at S.S. Yudin City Clinical Hospital during the first 7 days of their life. We included patients treated between January 2018 and December 2019. All newborns had extremely low body weight (850 ± 149 g); mean gestational age was 28 ± 4 weeks; Apgar score at the first minute of life varied between 3 and 6; Silverman Anderson score (severity of respiratory disorders) was between 3 and 5 s. Standard examination was performed in accordance with current protocols developed by Russian and foreign specialists in neonatal medicine. A specially developed clinical protocol of the study was approved by the local ethics committee. Study participants were divided into 3 groups according to their type of spontaneous respiratory efforts, target level of preductal saturation, and Silverman Anderson score. Patients in Group I received synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV); patients in Group II received ventilation using DuoPAP via nasal prongs (if it was ineffective, we considered SIMV via tube); patients in group III received ventilation using DuoPAP only. In this study, we have identified indications and contraindications for initial and prolonged respiratory therapy with DuoPAP and developed main practical recommendations for effective and safe application of DuoPAP. The efficacy and safety of non-invasive respiratory therapy with DuoPAP via nasal prongs in extremely premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome in the early neonatal period is primarily determined by the newborn’s readiness for active spontaneous and productive respiratory movements, but not only by the compensated parameters of the acid-base state and gas composition of the capillary blood. The assessment of feasibility and limitations of non-invasive respiratory therapy with DuoPAP is an important step towards developing a clinical protocol for respiratory therapy in the early neonatal period in a neonatal intensive care unit; it will help to reduce the use of invasive lung ventilation. Key words: premature newborns, non-invasive respiratory therapy, respiratory distress syndrome, extremely low body weight

Non-invasive pulmonary ventilation in the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 92-99
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Premature Infants ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Neonatal Period ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Early Neonatal Period ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation

Objective. To assess the effectiveness of differentiated approach and the safety of non-invasive ventilation in the DuoPAP mode in infants with respiratory distress syndrome and extremely low birth weight in the early neonatal period. Patients and methods. A retrospective and prospective analysis in the period from January 2018 to April 2020. 80 children were included in the study (46 girls and 34 boys), who were born prematurely at the gestational age of 24 to 29 weeks with a body weight of 700 to 999 grams and with the main clinical nosology of the early neonatal period – respiratory distress syndrome (68.7%; n = 55) and congenital pneumonia (31.3%; n = 25). Results. The clinical manifestations and features of the diagnosis of respiratory distress syn-drome in premature infants with extremely low body weight in the early neonatal period were studied. A differentiated approach to the tactics of conducting initial respiratory therapy in the ventilation mode with biphasic positive airway pressure was presented. Indications, contraindications and clinical and laboratory predictors of the effective and safe implementation of initial respiratory support in the DuoPAP mode (analogous to the BiPAP regimen) in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome were formed. Conclusion. Generation of indications, contraindications and timely developed clinical and laboratory predictors make it possible to personify the initial tactics of respiratory therapy in premature infants with extremely low body weight in the conditions of neonatal intensive care unit. A differentiated approach to initial non-invasive ventilation in infants with respiratory distress syndrome is an important preventive tool to minimize ventilator-associated lung injury and intraventricular hemorrhage in the early neonatal period. Key words: premature birth, premature infants, extremely low body weight, respiratory support, respiratory distress syndrome in infants, non-invasive mechanical ventilation, surfactant

Does proning on NIV improve oxygenation?

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. e235243
Author(s):  
Syed Muhammad Tahir Nasser ◽  
Madan Narayanan
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Potential Risks

Proning intubated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is an established practice to improve oxygenation temporarily. We present two cases of patients on our intensive care unit with ARDS, on non-invasive ventilation (NIV), in whom proning improved oxygenation at a stage when intubation was the next step. We discuss the mechanisms by which proning improves oxygenation as well as the potential risks proning on NIV brings, for which we make specific recommendations.

Nursing Management of Prone Positioning in Patients With COVID-19

2020 ◽  
pp. e1-e9
Author(s):  
Filippo Binda ◽  
Federica Marelli ◽  
Alessandro Galazzi ◽  
Riccardo Pascuzzo ◽  
Ileana Adamini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Prone Positioning ◽  
Improvement Project

Background At the height of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, Italy had the highest number of deaths in Europe; most occurred in the Lombardy region. Up to 4% of patients with COVID-19 required admission to an intensive care unit because they developed a critical illness (eg, acute respiratory distress syndrome). Numerous patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome who had been admitted to the intensive care unit required rescue therapy like prone positioning. Objectives To describe the respiratory management of and the extensive use of prone positioning in patients with COVID-19 at the intensive care unit hub in Lombardy, Italy. Methods A total of 89 patients (67% male; median age, 59 years [range, 23-80 years]) with confirmed COVID-19 who were admitted between February 23 and March 31, 2020, were enrolled in this quality improvement project. Results Endotracheal intubation was required in 86 patients (97%). Prone positioning was used as rescue therapy in 43 (48%) patients. Significantly more younger patients (age ≤ 59 years) were discharged alive (43 of 48 [90%]) than were older patients (age ≥ 60 years; 26 of 41 [63%]; P < .005). Among the 43 patients treated with prone ventilation, 15 (35% [95% CI, 21%-51%]) died in the intensive care unit, of which 10 (67%; P < .001) were older patients. Conclusions Prone positioning is one strategy available for treating acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with COVID-19. During this pandemic, prone positioning can be used extensively as rescue therapy, per a specific protocol, in intensive care units.

scholarly journals Síndrome de Dificuldade Respiratória Aguda: Casuística de Dois Anos numa Unidade de Cuidados Intensivos

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lúcia Taborda ◽  
Filipa Barros ◽  
Vitor Fonseca ◽  
Manuel Irimia ◽  
Ramiro Carvalho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Interquartile Range ◽  
The Mean

<strong>Introduction:</strong> Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome has a significant incidence and mortality at Intensive Care Units. Therefore, more studies are necessary in order to develop new effective therapeutic strategies. The authors have proposed themselves to characterize Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome patients admitted to an Intensive Care Unit for 2 years.<br /><strong>Material and Methods:</strong> This was an observational retrospective study of the patients filling the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome criteria from the American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS, being excluded those non invasively ventilated. Demographic data, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome etiology, comorbidities, Gravity Indices, PaO2/FiO2, ventilator modalities and programmation, pulmonary compliance, days of invasive mechanical ventilation, corticosteroids use, rescue therapies, complications, days at<br />Intensive Care Unit and obits were searched for and were submitted to statistic description and analysis.<br /><strong>Results:</strong> A 40 patients sample was obtained, with a median age of 72.5 years (interquartile range = 22) and a female:male ratio of ≈1:1.86. Fifty five percent of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome cases had pulmonary etiology. The mean minimal PaO2/FiO2 was 88mmHg (CI 95%: 78.5–97.6). The mean maximal applied PEEP was 12.4 cmH2O (Standard Deviation 4.12) and the mean maximal used tidal volume was 8.2 mL/ Kg ideal body weight (CI 95%: 7.7–8.6). The median invasive mechanical ventilation days was 10. Forty seven and one half percent of the patients had been administered corticosteroids and 52.5% had been submitted to recruitment maneuvers. The most frequent complication was Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (20%). The median Intensive Care Unit stay was 10.7 days (interquartile range 10.85). The fatality rate was 60%. The probability of the favorable outcome ‘non-death in Intensive Care Unit’ was 4.4x superior for patients who were administered corticosteroids and 11x superior for patients &lt; 65 years old.<br /><strong>Discussion and Conclusions:</strong> Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome is associated with long hospitalization and significant mortality. New prospective studies will be necessary to endorse the potential benefit of steroid therapy and to identify the subgroups of patients that warrant its use.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document