scholarly journals PROSPEK PEMBENTUKAN ASEAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS (AICHR) (Harapan Baru, Kelemahan dan Solusi)

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Prasetyo Hadi Purwandoko ◽  
Sasmini
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
Asean Countries

<p align="center"><strong><em>ABSTRACT</em></strong></p><p><em>ASEAN</em><em> Charter gives new expectation for the protection of human rights in ASEAN. One of the innovations contained in the ASEAN Charter is a provision regulating the promotion and protection of human rights. Regulations concerning the promotion and protection of human rights contained in the preamble, purposes, principles and Article 14 of the ASEAN Charter. ASEAN finally recorded a new history in an effort to promote and protect human rights s15by signing the Terms of Reference (TOR) of ASEAN </em><em>Intergovernmental </em><em>Commission on Human</em><em> Rights (AICHR) as a result of the implementation of the 15th ASEAN Summit to held in</em><em> Hua Hin </em><em>, Thailand. However, the formation of AICHR still</em><em> not perfect</em><em>. There are a number of weaknesses and challenges that must be completed by the ASEAN countries, especially concerning the strengthening of the mandate and functions of AICHR on human rights protection.</em></p><p align="center"><strong><em>ABSTRAK</em></strong></p><p>Piagam ASEAN memberikan harapan baru  bagi perlindungan hak asasi manusia di ASEAN. Salah satu inovasi yang terkandung dalam Piagam ASEAN adalah ketentuan yang mengatur pengembangan  dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia. Peraturan mengenai pengembangan  dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia yang terkandung dalam pembukaan, tujuan, prinsip, dan Pasal 14  Piagam ASEAN. ASEAN akhirnya mencatat sejarah baru dalam upaya untuk mempromosikan/mengembangkan  dan melindungi hak asasi manusia dengan menandatangani Kerangka Acuan <em>(TOR</em>) <em>of ASEAN</em><em> </em><em>Intergovernmental </em><em>Commission on Human</em><em> Rights (AICHR) </em>  sebagai pelaksanaan KTT-15 ASEAN yang akan diadakan di Hua Hin, Thailand. Namun, pembentukan AICHR tidak/belum sempurna . Ada sejumlah kelemahan dan tantangan yang harus diselesaikan oleh negara-negara ASEAN, khususnya pada penguatan mandat dan fungsi AICHR tentang Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia.</p>

scholarly journals PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN SOUTHEAST ASIA WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE ROHINGYA IN MYANMAR: A CRITICAL STUDY OF THE EFFECT OF ASEAN’S POLICY AND ACTION ON ASEAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS (AICHR)

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-180
Author(s):  
Rachminawati ◽  
Khairil Azmin Mokhtar
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Critical Study ◽  
South East Asia ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Member States ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
Asean Countries ◽  
Rights Issues

AbstractSince its inception over four decades ago ASEAN has always worked towards improving the lives of its citizens. Year 2009 has opened another chapter with the inauguration of AICHR pursuant to Article 14 of the ASEAN Charter at the 15th ASEAN Summit. Since then AICHR has conducted various activities. In the midst of these ‘progress’ the vital question remains unanswered; To what extent AICHR has been successful in protecting human rights of citizens in ASEAN countries? This shall be answered through qualitative legal research. This study serves as an analytical basis to predict the future development of the AICHR as well as human rights protection in South East Asia. Furthermore, it contributes to the reform of both ASEAN and AICHR toward implementation of human rights in the region. This research focuses on human rights issues of the Rohingya in Myanmar whereby ASEAN’s policy and action relating to the issue are examined. The finding shows that the policy and action of ASEAN does not provide much support in protecting the rights of the Rohingya. On the contrary, the policy has hindered the effort of AICHR in protecting human rights. AICHR is considered not independent since it almost completely relies on ASEAN. As therefore, it is recommended that ASEAN and its member states take real and concrete measures to protect human rights. Hence, to achieve AICHR and ASEAN’s objectives, lASEAN and its member states must respect human rights and support AICHR with necessary power and measure. Keywords: AICHR, ASEAN, Human Rights, Myanmar, Rohingya.   Abstrak Sejak kelahirannya empat dekade yang lalu, ASEAN selalu berupaya meningkatkan taraf hidup rakyatnya. Tahun 2009 membuka lembaran baru ASEAN dengan adanya inaugurasi AICHR berdasarkan Pasal 14 dari Piagam ASEAN pada Konferensi Tingkat Tinggi ASEAN ke-15. Semenjak itu, AICHR telah melaksanakan berbagai kegiatan. Dalam perkembangannya, masih terdapat pertanyaan penting yang belum terjawab; sejauh mana keberhasilan AICHR dalam melindungi hak asasi dari warga negara-negara di ASEAN? Untuk menjawabnya, pertanyaan ini akan dijawab melalui penelitian hukum kualitatif. Penelitian ini berfungsi sebagai dasar analisis untuk memprediksi perkembangan AICHR juga perlindungan HAM di ASEAN. Selain itu, penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan berkontribusi terhadap reformasi ASEAN dan juga AICHR dalam perlindungan HAM di ASEAN. Penelitian ini memfokuskan pada isu HAM kelompok Rohingya di Myanmar dengan menelaah kebijakan dan tindakan ASEAN terhadap isu tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan dan tindakan ASEAN tidak memberikan cukup dukungan dalam perlindungan HAM terhadap Rohingya, namun sebaliknya, kebijakan-kebijakan yang ada telah menghalangi upaya AICHR dalam melindungi HAM. Sehingga AICHR tidak benar-benar independen sebab AICHR bergantung nyaris sepenuhnya pada ASEAN. Oleh karenanya, ASEAN dan negara-negara anggotanya sebaiknya melakukan berbagai upaya yang nyata dan konkret untuk melindungi HAM. Agar AICHR bisa merealisasikan maksud dan tujuannya, ASEAN dan negara-negara anggotanya harus menghormati HAM dan mendukung AICHR melalui berbagai upaya dan kekuatan yang diperlukan. Kata Kunci: AICHR, ASEAN, Hak Asasi Manusia, Myanmar, Rohingya

Regional Human Rights

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
International Human Rights ◽  
Protective Mechanisms ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
Protection Systems ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
International Human ◽  
Local Languages ◽  
Specific Country

Regional human rights mechanism are now in place covering nearly all five continents with the notable exception of Australia. Regional and international human rights protection are not meant to thwart each other. On the contrary, the regional protection of human rights is intended to back up and strengthen the international one by translating human rights into local languages and supporting them with additional protective mechanisms like commissions and courts that enforce regional human rights documents. In this volume, five experts from various continents will introduce regional human rights protection systems in Europe, Africa, Asia, Latin America and Australia providing an overview of the regional protections vis-à-vis the international one and then contextualising it in specific country context.

scholarly journals Politics Of Law Human Rights Protection In Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 513
Author(s):  
Pradikta Andi Alvat
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Political Development ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Reform Era ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
Source Data ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights

This study aims to know how political development of legal protection of human rights in Indonesia and political objectives of the legal protection of human rights itself. The research method using normative juridical approach. Specification of the research is descriptive. Provide an overview and critical analysis and conclusions of the research object. Source data using secondary data sources through books and legislation. The data collection method through the study of literature. Analysis of data using qualitative approach. The results showed that the political development of the legal protection of human rights has undergone discourse tight since the formulation of the Constitution and found basic juridical-constitutional is ideal since the reform era with the birth of Chapter XA in the constitution on human rights, born Law of Human Rights, and the formation of the court of HAM. The purpose of a political human rights protection law contains three dimensions, namely the dimensions of philosophical, sociological dimension and juridical dimension.Keywords: Protection Of Human Rights; Political Law; State Law.

scholarly journals HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION FOR INDONESIAN MIGRANT WORKERS: CHALLENGES FOR ASEAN

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 123
Author(s):  
Win Sherly Tan ◽  
Rina Shahriyani Shahrullah
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Migrant Workers ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Good News ◽  
The Political ◽  
Political Commitment ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
Asean Countries

AbstractThe AEC is good news for Indonesian migrant workers wanting to work overseas. Unfortunately, many Indonesian migrant workers have been deported from ASEAN countries because of having problems. This study adopts the normative legal research method. It argues that AICHR may be slow in resolving the problems of human rights. It is also argued that the ASEAN Committee on Migrant Workers works in the absence of the political commitment of ASEAN leaders to implement the Cebu Declaration. Therefore, the best solution is public participation in the ASEAN countries to protect migrant workers.IntisariKomunitas Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN adalah berita baik untuk Tenaga Kerja Indonesia (TKI) untuk bekerja di luar negeri. Namun, banyak TKI yang kembali dari negara-negara ASEAN dikarenakan mendapatkan berbagai permasalahan. Penelitian ini mengadopsi jenis penelitian hukum normatif. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa AICHR lamban dalam menyelesaikan permaslahan tentang hak asasi manusia. Penelitian ini juga menyimpulkan bahwa komunitas ASEAN tentang Pekerja Migran bekerja dengan tidak adanya komitmen politik dari para pemimpim ASEAN dalam menerapkan Deklarasi Cebu. Oleh sebab itu, dibutuhkan partisipasi ASEAN dalam melindungi TKI.

scholarly journals The Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence in the Polish Social Safeguard System

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Tabernacka
Keyword(s):  
Domestic Violence ◽  
Human Rights ◽  
Violence Against Women ◽  
Council Of Europe ◽  
Protective Function ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
Heated Debate ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
The Common

The ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence in Poland was preceded by a heated debate. From the very beginning it was be object of political battles between the conservative and liberal circles. Culturally and socially conditioned position of women has influenced its operation and the scope of its implementation. The Convention is a universally binding tool which guarantees the protection of human rights in events of violence against the woman and children. The case of this Convention in Poland proofs the existence of a universal European understanding of human rights protection standards. The Convention thus has a protective function not only for individuals but also, in a broader context, for the common European cultural identity.

scholarly journals Law, Cosmopolitan Law and the Protection of Human Rights

2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Sorial
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Legal Order ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
Rights Discourse ◽  
Cosmopolitan Law ◽  
Human Rights Discourse ◽  
Subjective Rights

In Between Facts and Norms, Habermas articulates a system of rights, including human rights, within the democratic constitutional state. For Habermas, while human rights, like other subjective rights have moral content, they do not structurally belong to a moral system; nor should they be grounded in one. Instead, human rights belong to a positive and coercive legal order upon which individuals can make actionable legal claims. Habermas extends this argument to include international human rights, which are realised within the context of a cosmopolitan legal order. The aim of this paper is to assess the relevance of law as a mechanism for securing human rights protection. I argue that positive law does make a material difference to securing individual human rights and to cultivating and augmenting a general rights culture both nationally and globally. I suggest that Habermas' model of law presents the most viable way of negotiating the tensions that human rights discourse gives rise to: the tensions between morality and law, between legality and politics, and between the national and international contexts of human rights protection.

25. International Human Rights Law

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigel Rodley
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
International Human Rights Law ◽  
Political Rights ◽  
Political Factors ◽  
International Protection ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
Cultural Rights ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
Human Rights Treaties ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights

This chapter considers the background to, and current developments concerning the manner in which international law has engaged with the protection of human rights, including both civil and political rights and economic, social, and cultural rights. It looks at historical, philosophical, and political factors which have shaped our understanding of human rights and the current systems of international protection. It focuses on the systems of protection developed by and through the United Nations through the ‘International Bill of Rights’, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the UN human rights treaties and treaty bodies, and the UN Special Procedures as well as the work of the Human Rights Council. It also looks at the systems of regional human rights protection which have been established.

The Increasingly Marginal Appreciation of the Margin-of-Appreciation Doctrine

2006 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 611-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignacio de la Rasilla del Moral
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Cultural Relativism ◽  
European Convention ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
Margin Of Appreciation ◽  
Rome Convention ◽  
Related Notion ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
Sensitive Issues

What song the Syrens sang, or what name Achilles assumed when he hid himself among the women, although puzzling questions are not beyond all conjecture.What is so fundamental in terms of the protection of human rights in Europe that it requires the same standards for all countries and what, by contrast, would be better dealt with by each State's organs in line with verbigratia Michael Walzer's-related notion of “thick morality”?. Where should the line be drawn between unity and diversity notwithstanding the resulting risk of human rights cultural relativism associated to the latter?. On what grounds could the axiomatic universality of human rights possibly be connoted in a continent which prides itself on possessing the most developed regional system for the protection of human rights world-wide in view of the resulting risk of legal contagion to other systems for the protection of human rights and, even, to general international law that such a practice can trigger?. At the end of the day, these are the sort of questions that the study of the margin-of- appreciation doctrine raises. The Trojan Horse-like character of the Strasbourg's judge-made margin-of-appreciation doctrine within the European human rights protection system has long since bothered human rights lawyers. Cases of reliance on this review doctrine have been generally criticised as denials of justice for individuals, abdications by the Court of its duty of adjudication in difficult or sensitive issues or as a judicial diluting technique of the strict conditions laid down in the European Convention of Human Rights. This line of criticism, aimed at what from the viewpoint of some occupants of the bench is seen as “a well established and legitimate part of the convention's jurisprudence”, has been reinforced by the entry of 21 new Eastern and Central European contracting parties to the Council of Europe following the 1989-1991 events. With a current membership of 46 States, all of which have ratified the 1950 Rome Convention, it is further feared that the doctrine will increasingly become an open door for abusive limitations in the exercise of human rights in states who traditionally leaned towards human rights cultural relativism. Against this background, I will briefly look into the technical criteria used by Strasbourg's judicial interpreters to factually implement this “much maligned notion” or, as one commentator has put it, this “manière pseudo-technique d'évoquer le pouvoir discrétionnaire que les organes de Strasbourg ont estimé reconnu aux Etats par la Convention dans certains cas”. I will, secondly, provide a basic overview of the general doctrinal positions one can adopt regarding this long debated question.

“Not Taking Rights Seriously”. Opting for the Primacy of eu Law over Broader Human Rights Protection

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 277-302
Author(s):  
Fisnik Korenica ◽  
Dren Doli
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Eu Law ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
Charter Of Fundamental Rights ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
The Relationship

The European Union (eu) accession to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (echr) has been a hot topic in the European legal discourse in this decade. Ruling on the compliance of the Draft Agreement on eu accession to the echr with the eu Treaties, the Court of Justice of the eu (cjeu) came up with a rather controversial Opinion. It ruled that the Draft Agreement is incompliant with the eu Treaties in several respects. One of the core concerns in Opinion 2/13 relates to the management of horizontal relationship between the eu Charter of Fundamental Rights (ChFR) and echr, namely Article 53 ChFR and Article 53 echr. The article examines the Opinion 2/13’s specific concerns on the relationship between Article 53 ChFR and Article 53 echr from a post-accession perspective. It starts by considering the question of the two 53s’ relationship from the eu-law autonomy viewpoint, indicating the main gaps that may present a danger to the latter. While questioning from a number of perspectives the plausibility of the cjeu’s arguments in relation to the two 53s, the article argues that the Court was both controversial and argued against itself when it drew harshly upon these concerns. The article also presents three options to address the cjeu’s requirements on this issue. The article concludes that the cjeu’s statements on the two 53s will seriously hurt the accession project, while critically limiting the possibility of Member States to provide broader protection.

scholarly journals The Experience of the Inter-American Human Rights System

2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe González
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
American System ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
State Behaviour

This article is one of four which provide a useful comparative paradigm to any discussion of a Pacific human rights charter or regional mechanism. The article describes the Inter-American system of human rights protection, which stretches across the Americas.  After an historical introduction, the article analyses the advances that took place after 1990.  The discussion focuses mainly on the roles of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. The article concludes that the system is able to influence state behaviour and has made significant contributions to the protection of human rights in the region.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document