Simulation and Measurement of Fuel Injection Quantity Based on TB4P

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongmin Li ◽  
◽  
Jianzhong Zhang ◽  
Jianjun Yuan ◽  
FancanGuo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Relative Error ◽  
Fuel Injection ◽  
Injection Pressure ◽  
Valve Lift ◽  
Needle Valve ◽  
Fuel Injector ◽  
Injection Pump ◽  
Injection Quantity ◽  
Fuel Injection Pump ◽  
Fuel Injection Pressure

In order to improve the measurement accuracy of fuel injection quantity based on Test Bench for fuel injection Pump (abbr. TB4P), on the basis of the function between needle valve lift and fuel injection quantity, two-level pressure adjustment module, which combines proportional flow rate valve with pressure sensor and takes advantage of spring of fuel injector, is used to control the outlet pressure of fuel injection pump, which results in the fuel injection pressure stably. Fuel injection pump and fuel injector are modeled by use of HCD of AMESim, and the system model of fuel injection quantity measurement is built. Simulation curve of fuel injection quantity is got by AMESim, which is compared with the curve of standard fuel injection quantity according to relative error. The results show that the relative error from the data of simulation system is smaller, so the methods of measurement and simulation in this paper are effective.

Dynamic Analysis of Fluid Flowing Through Micro Porous Filters Using Bondgraph Approach

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Afzaal Malik ◽  
Badar Rashid ◽  
Shahab Khushnood
Keyword(s):  
Flow Rate ◽  
Fuel Injection ◽  
Volume Flow Rate ◽  
Injection Pressure ◽  
Volume Flow ◽  
Injection Pump ◽  
Fuel Injection Pump ◽  
Fuel Filter ◽  
Injection Line ◽  
Fuel Injection Pressure

Delivery of optimized fuel injection pressure to combustion chamber of an engine assembly leads to optimum torque and horsepower. Contaminant free supply of fuel without compromising on volume flow rate is the most important design requirement. Incorporation of very fine fuel filters having less than 10 micron rating reduces volume flow rate at the injection nozzles whereas fuel filter with larger pore size stabilize the injection pressure but may result into failure of fuel injection pump assembly due to scuffing produced by the fuel contaminant between the plunger and sleeve of hydraulic head of fuel injection pump. The fuel flows from fuel tank through low-pressure injection line, primary and secondary fuel filters, fuel transfer pump, fuel injection pump, and high-pressure injection line and injector nozzles. Modeling and simulation of volume flow rate vis-a`-vis fuel injection pressure together with micro-porous fuel filter poses a formidable challenge. Bondgraph method (BGM) is ideally suited for the modeling and simulation of such a multi-domain dynamic system. The aim of this research is to apply BGM to model and simulate the optimized fuel injection pressure and analysis of filters with different micro-porosity and their effect on volume flow rate. Fuel filter porosity, inlet and outlet pressures of transfer pump, fuel injection pump and low/high pressure injection line pressure have been determined experimentally. These experimentally determined parameters are then used as input in our Bondgraph model for the dynamic analysis of fuel injection pressure incorporating micro-porous filters.

scholarly journals Effect of port injection pressure on mixture quality in Homogeneous charges compression ignition (HCCI) engine

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 37-41
Keyword(s):  
Diesel Engine ◽  
Fuel Injection ◽  
Injection Pressure ◽  
The Other ◽  
Emission Characteristics ◽  
Compression Ignition ◽  
Fuel Injector ◽  
Compression Ignition Engine ◽  
Hcci Engine ◽  
Fuel Injection Pressure

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of fuelinjection pressure onhomogeneous charge formation and performanceand emission characteristics of Homogeneous charge compression ignition engine. The fuel injection pressure isone of the primary parameter for improvingthe homogeneity of the mixture and governing the power output and emission characteristics of HCCI engine. In this investigation, diesel fuelwasinjected at different injection pressuresas 2bar, 3bar, 4bar and 5bar respectively throughbyport fuel injector. The experimental investigationsshow that increasing the fuel injection pressure will promote the fuel to penetrate with air and creates well pre mixedair/fuel charge.The result shows, the specific fuel consumption (SFC) of HCCI engine isslightlyhigherthan the SFC of conventional diesel engine.The HCCI engine with 3bar injection pressure operated engine has lower SFC values compared to other injection pressure operated HCCI engine.The brake thermal efficiency of HCCI engine, operated with 3barinjection pressure has maximum BTE values over the other injection pressure operated engine.From theresult, it is observed that HCCI engine has lower smoke density values compared to conventional diesel engine andfurther reducedby increasing the fuel injection pressure. The 3bar injection pressure operated HCCI engine has emitted lower smoke densitycompared to other injection pressure operated HCCI engine. The 3bar injection pressureoperated HCCIengine hasemittedmaximum oxides of nitrogen (NOx) emissions than the other injection pressure operated HCCI engine. Other exhaust emissions of carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrocarbon (HC)emissions are increased when compared toconvention diesel engine

Optimization of operating parameters of an off-road automotive diesel engine running at highway drive conditions using Response Surface Methodology

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinod Babu Marri ◽  
K. Madhu Murthy ◽  
G. Amba Prasad Rao
Keyword(s):  
Response Surface Methodology ◽  
Fuel Injection ◽  
Injection Pressure ◽  
Operating Parameters ◽  
Injection Timing ◽  
Boost Pressure ◽  
Pilot Injection ◽  
Injection Quantity ◽  
Main Injection ◽  
Fuel Injection Pressure

Abstract The typical tradeoff between the two major emissions from compression ignition (CI) engines, smoke and oxides of nitrogen, is the unresolved challenge to the researchers. Techniques like engine downsizing, lowering intake oxygen concentration, multiple injections, use of retarded injection timings and higher injection pressures, etc. are widely employed for the alleviation of these harmful emissions. The influence of variation of fuel injection pressure (FIP), boost pressure, pilot injection timing (PIT), pilot injection quantity (PIQ) and main injection timing (MIT) are experimentally investigated in the present work. Mahindra mHawk four-cylinder diesel engine with provisions of a variable-geometry turbocharger (VGT), exhaust gas recirculation (EGR), and common-rail direct injection (CRDi) is chosen for the experimentation. Test runs are conducted at 1750 rpm and 80.3 N.m (4.6 bar bmep) corresponding to highway drive conditions, using 10 % EGR. Response surface methodology is employed for the design of experiments and to analyze the experimental data. Multi-objective response optimization is carried out to optimize engine-operating parameters that give desired performance and engine-out emissions. Confirmatory tests are conducted at design conditions to validate the results predicted by the model. This study reveals that the optimum performance and emission characteristics could be obtained using 120 kPa boost pressure; 61.1 MPa fuel injection pressure; 11.5 % pilot injection quantity with pilot injection at 332 °CA and main injection at 359 °CA.

scholarly journals Experimental Research on the Measurement of High-Pressure Microflow Based on Momentum Principle

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Hua Xia ◽  
Fuqiang Luo ◽  
Zhong Wang
Keyword(s):  
Fuel Injection ◽  
Flow Coefficient ◽  
Fuel Injector ◽  
Average Flow ◽  
Injection Volume ◽  
Pump Speed ◽  
Injection Pump ◽  
Fuel Injection Pump ◽  
Relative Flow

The fuel injector is an important component of the diesel engine. It has a great influence on the atomization of diesel fuel injection, the formation of mixed gas, and combustion emissions. Due to the current nozzle structure, processing level, and the internal hydraulic conditions of each nozzle, there are certain differences between the injection rules of each hole, and there are few methods to quantify the quality of the injector using mathematical methods in engineering. Based on the principle of spray momentum, this paper measures the injection characteristics of each hole of four five-hole pressureless chamber injectors of the same model and analyzes the circulating fuel injection volume and flow coefficient of each injector and each hole under different working conditions. It is proposed to evaluate the quality of the injector with the average circulating fuel injection volume, average flow coefficient, and nonuniformity as indicators. The test results are as follows: there are differences in the circulating fuel injection volume and flow coefficient between each hole of the same fuel injector. With the increase of the fuel injection pump speed, the average circulating fuel injection volume of each hole differs by 2.8%–47.5%, and the average flow coefficient differs by 3.7%–30%; as the fuel injection volume increases, the average circulating fuel injection volume of each injector differs 1.8%–36%, and the average flow coefficient difference is 2.5%–28.7%. The circulating fuel injection volume and flow coefficient of different fuel injectors of the same model are different. With the increase of the fuel injection pump speed, the average circulating fuel injection volume of each injector differs by 3.5%–9.6%, and the average flow coefficient differs by 1.4%–5.7%; as the fuel injection volume increases, the average circulating fuel injection volume of each injector differs 0.3%–5.5%, and the average flow coefficient difference is 2.8–4.2%. The relative flow coefficient of each hole differs from 0 to 0.02, and the nonuniformity differs from 1.8% to 16.9%. The relative circulating fuel injection amount of each hole differs from 0.02 to 0.1, and the nonuniformity differs from 1.1% to 6.9%. The relative flow coefficient of each hole and its nonuniformity is smaller than the relative circulating fuel injection volume of each hole and its nonuniformity.

The Research of Fuel Pressure Fluctuations within Diesel Injection Pump Cavity on Cam Shaft Rotate Speed

2014 ◽  
Vol 494-495 ◽  
pp. 436-439
Author(s):  
Chao Liang ◽  
Ya Xu Chu ◽  
Jian Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Rotational Speed ◽  
Fuel Injection ◽  
Pressure Fluctuations ◽  
Fuel Pump ◽  
Injection Pump ◽  
Diesel Injection ◽  
Injection Quantity ◽  
Fuel Injection Pump ◽  
Pump Cavity

Fuel pressure fluctuations in a diesel injection pump cavity can affect the injection quantity balance. Among them, the injection pump rotational speed is a major factor affecting fuel pump fuel pressure fluctuations within the cavity. This article through the use of HYDSIM software for different speeds of volatility in fuel injection pump cavity pressures for Simulation.

scholarly journals Combustion chamber geometry and fuel supply system variations on fuel economy and exhaust emissions of GDI engine with EGR

2021 ◽  
pp. 358-358
Author(s):  
Shivakumar Nagareddy ◽  
Kumaresan Govindasamy
Keyword(s):  
Combustion Chamber ◽  
Fuel Consumption ◽  
Fuel Injection ◽  
Injection Pressure ◽  
Gasoline Direct Injection ◽  
Injection Timing ◽  
Fuel Injector ◽  
Combustion Modes ◽  
Crown Shape ◽  
Fuel Injection Pressure

In this study, the combustion chamber geometry for spray-guided, wall-guided, and air-guided combustion strategies were fabricated. The piston crown shape and the cylinder head in each combustion chamber geometry was machined by fixing the fuel injector and spark plug at proper positions to obtain swirl, turbulence, and squish effects for better mixing of fuel with air and superior combustion of the mixture. Conducted tests on all the three modified gasoline direct injection engines with optimized exhaust gas recirculation and electronic control towards fuel injection timing, the fuel injection pressure, and the ignition timing for better the performance and emissions control. It is clear from the results that NOx emissions from all three combustion modes were reduced by 4.9% upto 50% of loads and it increase for higher loads due to increase of in-cylinder pressure. The fuel consumption and emissions showed better at 150 bar Fuel Injection Pressure for wall-guided combustion chamber geometry. Reduced HC emissions by 3.7% and 4.7%, reduced CO emissions by 2% and 3.3%, reduced Soot emissions by 6.12% and 10.6%. Reduces specific fuel consumption by about 10.3% and 13.3% in wall-guided combustion strategy compare with spray-guided and air-guided combustion modes respectively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document