scholarly journals Hemodynamic changes of anesthesia, pneumoperitoneum, and head-down tilt during laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Dongyuan Jin ◽  
Hui Yu ◽  
Hai Li ◽  
Nannan Zhao ◽  
Ying Zhang ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 3890-3897 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Ishibe ◽  
Mitsuyoshi Ota ◽  
Shoichi Fujii ◽  
Yusuke Suwa ◽  
Shinsuke Suzuki ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haruhiko Kanasaki ◽  
Aki Oride ◽  
Kohji Miyazaki

Objectives. The study was conducted to characterize the use of the laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients. Methods. The medical records of elderly patients aged ≥65 years who underwent laparoscopic surgery were retrospectively reviewed for diseases, surgical procedures, histological diagnosis, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and reasons for presentation. Results. Of the 405 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery between January 2005 and March 2012, 41 (10.1%) were aged ≥65 years. The most common disease treated by surgery was ovarian tumor, followed by uterine prolapse. Histological diagnosis of ovarian tumor specimens obtained from 23 patients included serous cystadenoma (44.0%), mature cystic teratoma (20.0%), mucinous cystadenoma (20.0%), and endometrioma (4%). In contrast, in the non-elderly group, the most common histological diagnosis was endometrioma (42.9%), followed in order by mature cystic teratoma (28.3%), serous cystadenoma (18.0%), and mucinous cystadenoma (4.7%). While 23.7% of the non-elderly patients required emergency laparoscopic surgery, none of the elderly patients required emergency surgery. Only 1 of 27 patients who underwent surgery for an ovarian or adnexal mass presented with abdominal pain. No one developed serious intraoperative or postoperative complications. Conclusion. Laparoscopic surgery can be safely performed in elderly patients. It should be noted, however, that few elderly patients with benign pelvic mass manifest symptoms before undergoing surgery.


2011 ◽  
Vol 58 (109) ◽  
pp. 1200-1204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takatoshi Nakamura ◽  
Hiroyuki Mitomi ◽  
Wataru Onozato ◽  
Takeo Sato ◽  
Atsushi Ikeda ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 897-901 ◽  
Author(s):  
YASUHIRO INOUE ◽  
AYA KAWAMOTO ◽  
YOSHINAGA OKUGAWA ◽  
JUNICHIRO HIRO ◽  
SUSUMU SAIGUSA ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 1595-1601
Author(s):  
Mitsunobu Takeda ◽  
Masayoshi Tokuoka ◽  
Hajime Hirose ◽  
Yoshihito Ide ◽  
Yasuji Hashimoto ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshitake Ueda ◽  
Norio Shiraishi ◽  
Takahide Kawasaki ◽  
Tomonori Akagi ◽  
Shigeo Ninomiya ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Recently, colorectal cancer has increased in elderly patients worldwide, with laparoscopic colorectal surgery increasing in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. However, whether laparoscopic colorectal surgery is an optimal procedure for colorectal cancer in the elderly remains unclear.Objective This study aimed to verify safety and curability of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients ≥80 years old.Methods Patients undergoing curative colorectal surgery from 2006 to 2014 were enrolled and classified into the laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients aged ≥80 years (LAC-E) group, open surgery in elderly patients (OC-E) group, and laparoscopic surgery in non-elderly patients (LAC-NE) group. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between these groups.Results The LAC-E, OC-E, and LAC-NE groups comprised 85, 25, and 358 patients, respectively. Intraoperative blood loss and incidence of postoperative complications were significantly lower in the LAC-E versus OC-E group (97 vs. 440 mL, p<.01 and 14% vs. 32%, p<.05, respectively). Long-term outcomes were not different between these two groups. Operation time was significantly shorter in the LAC-E versus LAC-NE group (249 vs. 288 min, p<.01). Intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications were similar between the groups. Although the 5-year overall survival rate in the LAC-E group was lower than that in the LAC-NE group (64% vs. 80%, p<.01), there was no difference in 5-year disease-specific survival between the groups.Conclusions Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is technically and oncologically safe for colorectal cancer in the elderly as well as the non-elderly and can be an optimal procedure for colorectal cancer in the elderly.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshitake Ueda ◽  
Norio Shiraishi ◽  
Takahide Kawasaki ◽  
Tomonori Akagi ◽  
Shigeo Ninomiya ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Recently, colorectal cancer has increased in elderly patients worldwide, with laparoscopic colorectal surgery increasing in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. However, whether laparoscopic colorectal surgery is an optimal procedure for colorectal cancer in the elderly remains unclear. This study aimed to verify safety and curability of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients ≥80 years old. Methods Patients undergoing curative colorectal surgery from 2006 to 2014 were enrolled and classified into the laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients aged ≥80 years (LAC-E) group, open surgery in elderly patients (OC-E) group, and laparoscopic surgery in non-elderly patients (LAC-NE) group. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between these groups. Results The LAC-E, OC-E, and LAC-NE groups comprised 85, 25, and 358 patients, respectively. Intraoperative blood loss and incidence of postoperative complications were significantly lower in the LAC-E versus OC-E group (97 vs. 440 mL, p < .01 and 14% vs. 32%, p < .05, respectively). Long-term outcomes were not different between these two groups. Operation time was significantly shorter in the LAC-E versus LAC-NE group (249 vs. 288 min, p < .01). Intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications were similar between the groups. Although the 5-year overall survival rate in the LAC-E group was lower than that in the LAC-NE group (64% vs. 80%, p < .01), there was no difference in 5-year disease-specific survival between the groups. Conclusion Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is technically and oncologically safe for colorectal cancer in the elderly as well as the non-elderly and can be an optimal procedure for colorectal cancer in the elderly.


2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 5550-5557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Nishikawa ◽  
Soichiro Ishihara ◽  
Keisuke Hata ◽  
Koji Murono ◽  
Koji Yasuda ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A56
Author(s):  
R Scilletta ◽  
A Pesce ◽  
MA Trovato ◽  
A Branca ◽  
TR Portale ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document