scholarly journals CT-guided localization techniques of small pulmonary nodules: a prospective non-randomized controlled study on pulmonary nodule localization needle and methylene blue staining with surgical glue

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 6826-6835
Author(s):  
Jian Kong ◽  
Jianxi Guo ◽  
Hua Zhang ◽  
Yong Li ◽  
Guangsuo Wang ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (05) ◽  
pp. 387-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Demiröz ◽  
Selma Apaydın ◽  
Hakan Ertürk ◽  
Suzan Biri ◽  
Funda Incekara ◽  
...  

Background Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is widely used for thoracic surgery operations, and day by day it becomes routine for the excision of undetermined pulmonary nodules. However, it is sometimes hard to reach millimetric nodules through a VATS incision. Therefore, some additional techniques were developed to reach such nodules little in size and which are settled on a challenging localization. In the literature, coils, hook wires, methylene blue, lipidol, and barium staining, and also ultrasound guidance were described for this aim. Herein we discuss our experience with CT-guided methylene blue labeling of small, deeply located pulmonary nodules just before VATS excision. Method From April 2013 to October 2016, 11 patients with millimetric pulmonary nodules (average 8, 7 mm) were evaluated in our clinic. For all these patients who had strong predisposing factors for malignancy, an 18F-FDG PET-CT scan was also performed. The patients whose nodules were decided to be excised were consulted the radiology clinic. The favorable patients were taken to CT room 2 hours prior to the operation, and CT-guided methylene blue staining were performed under sterile conditions. Results Mean nodule size of 11 patients was 8.7 mm (6, 2–12). Mean distance from the visceral pleural surface was 12.7 mm (4–29.3). Four of the nodules were located on the left (2 upper lobes, 2 lower lobes), and seven of them were on the right (four lower lobes, two upper lobes, one middle lobe). The maximum standardized uptake values (SUV max) on 18F-FDG PET/CT scan ranged between 0 and 2, 79. Conclusion CT-guided methylene blue staining of millimetric deeply located pulmonary nodules is a safe and feasible technique that helps surgeon find these undetermined nodules by VATS technique without any need of digital palpation.


2011 ◽  
Vol 201 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xun Zhu ◽  
Chungen Xing ◽  
Tao Jin ◽  
Lichun Cai ◽  
Juncheng Li ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 1860-1867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikhail Y. Kirov ◽  
Oleg V. Evgenov ◽  
Natalia V. Evgenov ◽  
Elena M. Egorina ◽  
Mikhail A. Sovershaev ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsin-Yueh Fang ◽  
Kuei-An Chen ◽  
Yu-Wen Wen ◽  
Chih-Tsung Wen ◽  
Kuang-Tse Pan ◽  
...  

Background: Thoracoscopic removal of small pulmonary nodules is traditionally accomplished through a two-step approach—with lesion localization in a CT suite as the first step followed by lesion removal in an operating room as the second step. While the advent of hybrid operating rooms (HORs) has fostered our ability to offer a more patient-tailored approach that allows simultaneous localization and removal of small pulmonary nodules within a single-step, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the two techniques (two- vs. single-step) are still lacking.Methods: This is a RCT conducted in an academic hospital in Taiwan between October 2018 and December 2019. To compare the outcomes of traditional two-step preoperative CT-guided small pulmonary nodule localization followed by lesion removal vs. single-step intraoperative CT-guided lesion localization with simultaneous removal performed by a dedicated team of thoracic surgeons. The analysis was conducted in an intention-to-treat fashion. The primary study endpoint was the time required for lesion localization. Secondary endpoints included radiation doses, other procedural time indices, and complication rates.Results: A total of 24 and 25 patients who received the single- and two-step approach, respectively, were included in the final analysis. The time required for lesion localization was significantly shorter for patients who underwent the single-step procedure (median: 13 min) compared with the two step-procedure (median: 32 min, p < 0.001). Similarly, the radiation dose was significantly lower for the former than the latter (median: 5.64 vs. 10.65 mSv, respectively, p = 0.001).Conclusions: The single-step procedure performed in a hybrid operating room resulted in a simultaneous reduction of both localization procedural time and radiation exposure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document