scholarly journals Feasibility and safety of modified inverted T-shaped method using linear stapler with movable cartridge fork for esophagojejunostomy following laparoscopic total gastrectomy

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 50-50
Author(s):  
Kenoki Ohuchida ◽  
Eishi Nagai ◽  
Taiki Moriyama ◽  
Koji Shindo ◽  
Tatsuya Manabe ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Van Huong Nguyen

TÓM TẮT Đặt vấn đề: Báo cáo kinh nghiệm về kỹ thuật phẫu thuật nội soi cắt toàn bộ dạ dày qua 126 bệnh nhân điều trị ung thư dạ dày tại Bệnh viện Hữu nghị Đa khoa Nghệ An. Đối tượng và phương pháp nghiên cứu: Nghiên cứu mô tả hồi cứu, các bệnh nhân được phẫu thuật nội soi cắt toàn bộ dạ từ 2014 đến 05/2021. Kết quả: Có 126 bệnh nhân, tuổi trung bình 60,6 ± 11,1 tuổi. 15,9% ung thư 1/3 trên dạ dày và 81,7% là 1/3 giữa. Ung thư ở giai đoạn I, II, III là 19,0%, 49,2%, 31,7%. 71,4% PTNS hoàn toàn cắt TBDD và nối lưu thông tiêu hóa bằng máy cắt nối thẳng. 3,2% trường hợp có tai biến trong mổ và 2,4% có biến chứng sau mổ, không có trường hợp nào tử vong. Số hạch nạo vét được trung bình 22,06 ± 7,6 hạch, lượng máu mất trung bình là 32,14 ± 10,4 ml, thời gian phẫu thuật trung bình là 210,4 ± 34,3 phút, thời gian nằm viện trung bình là 8,3 ± 2,5 ngày và thời gian sống thêm toàn bộ sau mổ trung bình là 36,9 ± 2,25 tháng. Kết luận: PTNS cắt TBDD là kỹ thuật an toàn và hiệu quả trong điều trị UTDD, nối thực quản hỗng tràng bằng máy cắt nối thẳng không cắt thực quản và hỗng tràng trước là kỹ thuật an toàn, tiết kiệm. Từ khóa: Kỹ thuật phẫu thuật nội soi dạ dày, ung thư dạ dày. ABSTRACT EXPERIENCE IN 126 PATIENTS OF LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL GASTRECTOMY FOR THE TREATMENT OF GASTRIC CANCER Background: The goal of this study was to report on the experience of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) in 126 patients with gastric cancer Materials and Methods: Retrospective descriptive study of 126 patients who underwent LTG for gastric cancer between 2014 and May 2021. Results: Mean age 60,6 ± 11,1; gastric cancer at stage I, II, III was 19,0%, 49,2%, 31,7% respectively. 71,4% patients underwent totally LTG and functional end-to-end esophagojejunostomy by linear stapler without previous resection of esophagus and jejunum. 3.2% of cases had complications during surgery and 2,4% of cases had complications after surgery. There was no postoperative deaths. The average number of dredged lymph nodes was 22.06 ± 7.6 lymph nodes. The mean blood loss was 32.14 ± 10.4 ml. The mean operative time was 210.4 ± 34.3 minutes. The mean time for beginning oral feeding was 4.4 ± 1.9 days. The mean hospital stay was 8.3 ± 2.5 days. The mean overall survival was 36.9 ± 2,25 months. Conclusions: LTG is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of gastric cancer. The technique functional end-to-end esophagojejunostomy by linear stapler without previous resection of esophagus and jejunum was safe and saving. Keywords: Technique of laparoscopic gastrectomy, gastric cancer


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 3614
Author(s):  
Dinh Van Chien ◽  
Nguyen Van Huong ◽  
Dang Dinh Khoa ◽  
Nguyen Van Thuy ◽  
Ha Van Quyet ◽  
...  

Background: The technique of esophagojejunostomy in totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy is difficult and had a high frequency of incidents during surgery and anastomotic leakage. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of the technique of functional end-to-end esophagojejunostomy by linear stapler without previous resection of the esophagus and jejunum in the totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection in the treatment of gastric cancer.Methods: A prospective observational study on patients received technique of functional end-to-end esophagojejunostomy by linear stapler without previous resection of esophagus and jejunum between July 2017 to July 2020.Results: We included 70 patients with a mean age of 62.5. There were 80% of patients having tubular adenocarcinoma and papillary adenocarcinoma, 11.4% of patients having tumors in the upper third of the stomach, and 81.4% of patients having tumors in the middle of the stomach. There were 4.2% of cases having incidents during the surgery and 2.8% of cases having complications after the surgery. No anastomotic leakage or death was observed after the surgery. The mean lymph node was 23, and the mean metastatic lymph node was 2.7. The operation time was 203.8 minutes. The mean hospital stay was 8.0 days. The one year survival after the surgery was 97.9%, and two year survival was 93.1%. The mean survival was 35.3 months.Conclusions: TLTG with D2 lymph node dissection using functional end-to-end esophagojejunostomy by linear stapler without previous resection of esophagus and jejunum was safe and effective in gastric cancer treatment. 


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (18) ◽  
pp. 4709
Author(s):  
Alexandros Charalabopoulos ◽  
Spyridon Davakis ◽  
Panorea Paraskeva ◽  
Nikolaos Machairas ◽  
Αlkistis Kapelouzou ◽  
...  

Laparoscopic total gastrectomy is on the rise. One of the most technically demanding steps of the approach is the construction of esophago-jejunal anastomosis. Several laparoscopic anastomotic techniques have been described, like linear stapler side-to-side or circular stapler end-to-side anastomosis; limited data exist regarding hand-sewn esophago-jejunal anastomosis. The study took place between January 2018 and June 2021. Patients enrolled in this study were adults with proximal gastric or esophago-gastric junction Siewert type III tumors that underwent 3D-assisted laparoscopic total gastrectomy. A hand-sewn esophago-jejunal anastomosis was performed in all cases laparoscopically. Forty consecutive cases were performed during the study period. Median anastomotic suturing time was 55 min, with intra-operative methylene blue leak test being negative in all cases. Median operating time was 240 min, and there were no conversions to open. The anastomotic leak rate and postoperative stricture rate were zero. The 30- and 90-day mortality rates were zero. Laparoscopic manual esophago-jejunal anastomosis utilizing a 3D platform in total gastrectomy for cancer can be performed with excellent outcomes regarding anastomotic leak and stricture rate. This anastomotic approach, although technically challenging, is safe and reproducible, with prominent results that can be disseminated in the surgical community.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e028216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianyou Liao ◽  
Leilei Deng ◽  
Xueqing Yao ◽  
Manzhao Ouyang

IntroductionTotal gastrectomy is often recommended for upper body gastric cancer, and totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) is deemed to be a promising surgical method with the well-known advantages such as less invasion and fast recovery. However, the anastomosis between oesophagus and jejunum is the difficulty of TLTG. Although staplers have promoted the development of TLTG, the choice of suitable staplers to complete oesophagojejunostomy is controversial and unclear. Therefore, a higher level of research evidence is needed to compare the two types of staplers in terms of safety and efficacy for oesophagojejunostomy in TLTG among patients with gastric cancer.Methods and analysisPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang Databases will be comprehensively searched from January 1990 to July 2019. All eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs or observational studies comparing the two types of staplers will be included. A meta-analysis will be performed using Review Manager V.5.3 software to compare the safety and efficacy of linear and circular staplers for oesophagojejunostomy in TLTG. The primary outcomes are anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stricture, anastomotic haemorrhage. The secondary outcomes include time to first instance of passing gas after surgery, first feeding time, total operation time, reconstruction time, estimated blood loss. The heterogeneity of this study will be assessed by p values and I2statistic. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses will be used to explore and explain the heterogeneity. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane tool or the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval will not be required because this proposed systematic review and meta-analysis is based on previously published data, which does not include intervention data on patients. The findings of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and will be presented at a relevant congress.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018111680.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document