COMMINUTED RADIAL HEAD FRACTURES TREATED WITH A MODULAR METALLIC RADIAL HEAD ARTHROPLASTY

2006 ◽  
Vol 88 (10) ◽  
pp. 2192-2200 ◽  
Author(s):  
RUBY GREWAL ◽  
JOY C. MACDERMID ◽  
KENNETH J. FABER ◽  
DARREN S. DROSDOWECH ◽  
GRAHAM J.W. KING
Keyword(s):  
Radial Head ◽  
Radial Head Fractures ◽  
Radial Head Arthroplasty

scholarly journals Outcome of Radial Head Arthroplasty in Comminuted Radial Head Fractures: Short and Midterm Results

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arash Moghaddam ◽  
Tim Friedrich Raven ◽  
Eike Dremel ◽  
Stefan Studier-Fischer ◽  
Paul Alfred Grutzner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radial Head ◽  
Midterm Results ◽  
Radial Head Fractures ◽  
Radial Head Arthroplasty

scholarly journals Radial head fractures

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 212-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
RP van Riet ◽  
MPJ van den Bekerom ◽  
A Van Tongel ◽  
C Spross ◽  
R Barco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radial Head ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Valgus Stress ◽  
Proximal Ulna ◽  
Radial Head Fractures ◽  
Radial Head Arthroplasty ◽  
Radial Head Replacement ◽  
Treatment Type ◽  
Radial Head Resection ◽  
Type 3

The shape and size of the radial head is highly variable but correlates to the contralateral side. The radial head is a secondary stabilizer to valgus stress and provides lateral stability. The modified Mason–Hotchkiss classification is the most commonly used and describes three types, depending on the number of fragments and their displacement. Type 1 fractures are typically treated conservatively. Surgical reduction and fixation are recommended for type 2 fractures, if there is a mechanical block to motion. This can be done arthroscopically or open. Controversy exists for two-part fractures with >2 mm and <5 mm displacement, without a mechanical bloc as good results have been published with conservative treatment. Type 3 fractures are often treated with radial head replacement. Although radial head resection is also an option as long-term results have been shown to be favourable. Radial head arthroplasty is recommended in type 3 fractures with ligamentous injury or proximal ulna fractures. Failure of primary radial head replacement may be due to several factors. Identification of the cause of failure is essential. Failed radial head arthroplasty can be treated by implant removal alone, interposition arthroplasty, revision radial head replacement either as a single stage or two-stage procedure.

scholarly journals Retrospective cohort study on radial head arthroplasty comparing long-term outcomes between valgus type injury and fracture dislocation

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvin Chao-Yu Chen ◽  
Chun-Jui Weng ◽  
Chih-Hao Chiu ◽  
Shih-Sheng Chang ◽  
Chun-Ying Cheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radial Head ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Periprosthetic Osteolysis ◽  
Radial Head Fractures ◽  
Radial Head Arthroplasty ◽  
Injury Group ◽  
Motion Range

Abstract Background Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) has been commonly adopted for irreparable radial head fractures while little information is addressed on valgus type injury. The purpose of this study is to report long-term outcomes and radiographic analysis in RHA for valgus type injury with comparison to fracture dislocation injury. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients receiving unilateral RHA with loose-fit, modular metal prosthesis for irreparable radial head fractures between 2004 and 2012. Totally, 33 patients with a mean follow up of 9 years (range, 7 to 15 years) were enrolled and divided into two groups including 14 valgus injuries and 19 fracture-dislocations. Demographics of the patients, injury details, clinical and radiographic outcomes, and correlation analysis were investigated and compared between two groups. Results In patient demographics, significant difference was noted in sex distribution (p = 0.001), lateral collateral ligament involvement (p = 0.000) and time from injury to RHA (p = 0.031) between two groups. No patient underwent subsequent removal or revision of prosthesis. Good to excellent results according to Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was achieved in 13 and 14 patients in group A and B respectively. Final motion range and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was significantly better in valgus injury group. Radiographic analysis demonstrated fewer patients in valgus injury group presented periprosthetic osteolysis with weak to moderate negative correlation between radiolucency score and MEPS. Conclusions With an average of 9 years follow-up, RHA using loose-fit, modular metal prosthesis achieves encouraging outcomes for both valgus injury and fracture dislocation. In valgus type injury, better motion range, lower disability score and lower incidence of periprosthetic osteolysis is noted while correlation analysis of radiolucency score suggests extended, long-term investigation.

scholarly journals Operative Management of Unstable Radial Head Fractures in a Young Active Population

Hand ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 473-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Kusnezov ◽  
Emmanuel Eisenstein ◽  
John C. Dunn ◽  
Austin Fares ◽  
Justin Mitchell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Radial Head ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Elbow Fracture ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Radial Head Fractures ◽  
Radial Head Arthroplasty ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Ligamentous Repair

Background: Radial head and neck fractures are the most common elbow fracture in the general adult population; however, the optimal treatment for radial head fractures remains a topic of ongoing clinical controversy. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of return to function, complications, and reoperation following operative management of unstable radial head fractures in a young, active patient population with intense upper extremity demands. Methods: A military health care database was queried for all US military servicemembers undergoing open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF; Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] code: 24665) and radial head arthroplasty (RHA; CPT code: 24666) between 2010 and 2015. All patients with minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Univariate and chi-square analyses were performed to evaluate the association between potential risk factors and the primary outcome measures. Results: A total of 67 ORIF (n = 69 elbows) and 10 RHA patients were included. The average age was 31 ± 8.0 years. At mean follow-up of 3.5 ± 1.1 years, 90% of patients overall were able to return to active military service, 96% of which with unrestricted upper extremity function. Nearly one-third (31.2%) of patients developed at least 1 postoperative complication. RHA has higher overall complication rates (70% vs 48%) when compared with ORIF, but this finding did not reach statistical significance ( P = .073). However, RHA had significantly higher rates of implant failure (20% vs 2.9%, P = .0498). Seventeen (21%) individuals required reoperation, 5 of which (6.3%) were revision procedures. Dislocation, coronoid fracture, and concomitant ligamentous repair portended a significantly increased risk of sustaining 1 or more complications ( P < .05), while dislocation and requirement for ligamentous repair independently predicted revision surgery ( P < .05). Conclusions: Arthroplasty and ORIF are both viable options for treating unstable radial head fractures in a young, athletic population, offering comparable return to function despite increased complications with RHA.

scholarly journals Radial Head Resection versus Arthroplasty in Unrepairable Comminuted Fractures Mason Type III and Type IV: A Systematic Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Catellani ◽  
Francesca De Caro ◽  
Carlo F. De Biase ◽  
Vincenzo R. Perrino ◽  
Luca Usai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Radial Head ◽  
Stability Range ◽  
Radial Head Fractures ◽  
Radial Head Arthroplasty ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Type Iv ◽  
Radial Head Resection ◽  
Comminuted Fractures ◽  
Poor Outcomes

Unrepairable comminuted fractures of the radial head Mason type III or type IV have poor outcomes when treated by open reduction and internal fixation. Radial head resection has been proposed as good option for surgical treatment, while in the last decades, the development of technology and design in radial head prosthesis has increased efficacy in prosthetic replacement. The present review was conducted to determine the best surgical treatment for comminuted radial head when ORIF is not possible. Better outcomes are reported for radial head arthroplasty in terms of elbow stability, range of motion, pain, and fewer complications compared to radial head excision. Nevertheless, radial head resection still can be considered an option of treatment in isolated radial head fractures with no associated ligament injuries lesion of ligaments or in case of older patients with low demanding function.

scholarly journals Retrospective cohort study on radial head arthroplasty comparing long-term outcomes between valgus type injury and fracture dislocation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvin Chao-Yu Chen ◽  
Chun-Jui Weng ◽  
Chih-Hao Chiu ◽  
Shih-Sheng Chang ◽  
Chun-Ying Cheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radial Head ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Periprosthetic Osteolysis ◽  
Radial Head Fractures ◽  
Radial Head Arthroplasty ◽  
Injury Group ◽  
Motion Range

Abstract Background: Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) has been commonly adopted for irreparable radial head fractures while little information is addressed on valgus type injury. The purpose of this study is to report long-term outcomes and radiographic analysis in RHA for valgus type injury with comparison to fracture dislocation injury.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients receiving unilateral RHA with loose-fit, modular metal prosthesis for irreparable radial head fractures between 2004 and 2012. Totally, 33 patients with a mean follow up of nine years (range, 7 to 15 years) were enrolled and divided into two groups including 14 valgus injuries and 19 fracture-dislocations. Demographics of the patients, injury details, clinical and radiographic outcomes, and correlation analysis were investigated and compared between two groups.Results: In patient demographics, significant difference was noted in sex distribution, lateral collateral ligament involvement and time from injury to RHA between two groups. No patient underwent subsequent removal or revision of prosthesis. Good to excellent results according to Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was achieved in 13 and 14 patients in group A and B respectively. Final motion range and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was significantly better in valgus injury group. Radiographic analysis demonstrated fewer patients in valgus injury group presented periprosthetic osteolysis with weak to moderate negative correlation between radiolucency score and MEPS.Conclusions: With an average of nine years follow-up, RHA using loose-fit, modular metal prosthesis achieves encouraging outcomes for both valgus injury and fracture dislocation. In valgus type injury, better motion range, lower disability score and lower incidence of periprosthetic osteolysis is noted while correlation analysis of radiolucency score suggests extended, long-term investigation.

scholarly journals Functional Outcome of Elbow Kinematics in Radial Head Excision Versus Radial Head Replacement: A Comparative Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 1505-1508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayush Kumar Singh ◽  
Aswini Jidge ◽  
Ujwal Ramteke ◽  
Nivedhitha Venkateswaran ◽  
Hemlata Rokade ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Radial Head ◽  
Radial Head Fractures ◽  
Radial Head Arthroplasty ◽  
Radial Head Replacement ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Type Of Injury ◽  
Radial Head Excision

BACKGROUND: Radial head fractures are quite common with incidence 1.5-4% of all adult fractures. The treatment for these fractures depends upon age, type of injury and whether the physics is closed or not. AIM: Comparison between radial head excision versus radial head replacement based on mayo elbow scoring in comminuted radial head fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We did a prospective comparative study comprising 32 patients between age 22-60 years with Mason type II/III radial head fractures at Sir J.J Group of Hospitals, Mumbai. The patients were randomised using the admission day of the week placing 17 patients in the arthroplasty group and 15 patients in the excision group. The patients were followed up for 18-24 months (average 20 months) postoperatively. Results were analysed by the Mayo’s elbow performance score at 6 months and 18 months and were statistically evaluated by unpaired t-test. RESULTS: At 6 months, radial head arthroplasty gave excellent results in 2 patients, good in 5 patients and fair in 8 patients. In excision, there were 5 patients with excellent results at 6 months, 7 with good results and 2 with fair results. At 18 months, of the 17 patients who had undergone head arthroplasty, 2 had excellent results, and the same number had poor results. 7 (46.7%) of the 15 cases who had undergone radial head excision had excellent results. Good results were obtained in 7 cases of each. There was 6 cases (35.3%) of radial head arthroplasty which fell into the fair group. As per Mayo’s score at 6 months follow up, mean and standard deviation (SD) of the scores in arthroplasty was 68.82 and 18.66 respectively & for excision, it was 85.66 and 10.66. At 18 months follow up, it was 75 and 14.89 for arthroplasty & 90.66 and 7.98 for excision. The difference between the results was statistically significant (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that long and short-term results of radial head excision are better as compared to arthroplasty in comminuted radial head fractures based on mayo elbow scoring, particularly for dominant upper limbs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document