scholarly journals PENYEBUTAN DAN PENGGUNAAN H}ADI>>>N: Sudut Pandang Kajian H}adi>th Warga NU Desa Gadingmangu Kecamatan Perak Kabupaten Jombang

Dialogia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Khamim Khamim

Abstract: This article scrutinize the habits of '(Nahd}iyyi>n) people in Gadingmangu Village, Perak District, Jombang Regency, related to the meaning of h}adi>th. Besides the NU community, LDII people who have more or less different points of view in the study of h}adith in this area. Consequesntly, Nahd} iyyi> n community in this region has considerable responsibility in delivering hadith studies to their next generation. This studyindicsted that in the way to declare hadith, the people of Nahd}iyyi>n are accustomed to mention the first narrator / final sanad, the narrator of the h}adi>th (Rasu> l Alla> h), and matn of hadith in Arabic speaking or even only with translations from matn. They frequently refer to the statement "al-h}adi>th aw kama> qa>l". Furthermore, the declaration of hadith is often derived from the books of fiqh and it isn’t from the books of hadith. In terms of the understanding of h}adi>th, Nahd} iyyi> n people are accustomed to starting by explaining the meaning of vocabulary, followed by the meaning of short sentences. The translation of the matn of  hadith is mostly done by the tafsi tarjamat model> riyyah. The content of the hadith is briefly explained, then the related verses of the Qur'an and other h}adi>th are referred. The sharh} al-h} adi are rarely used> th in understanding the hadit, and i’s usage is directed as a reinforcement of ta'bi> r. It is occurred due to  the limited knowledge of the community regarding the hadith and their belief in the books of the ulama '.الملخص: يتناول هذا البحث عادات نهضة العلماء (النهضيين) في قرية Gadingmangu، Perak، Jombang Regency، في تفسير الحديث. بجانب مجتمع نهضة العلماء، توجد فرقة المجتمع LDII لديهم وجهات النظر المختلفة في دراسة الحديث. ولهذا السبب، للنهضيين عاتقها مسؤولية كبيرة في نقل دراسات الحديث إلى جيلهم القادم. تتضح هذه الدراسة أنه فيما يتعلق بذكر الحديث، اعتاد أهل النهضة أن يذكروا الراوي الأول/سند النهائي ، راوي الحديث (رسول الله) ، ومتن الحديث باللغة العربية أو ترجمة المتن. وهم يشيرون أيضًا إلى العبارة "الحديث أو كما قال". لا يكتفى إلى هذا الحد، فذكر الحديث في كثير من الأحيان لا يستمد على كتب الحديث بل من كتب الفقه. ومن حيث فهم الحديث، اعتاد النهضييون بشرح معنى المفردات ثم الجمل القصيرة. تتم ترجمة متن الحديث في الغالب بالترجمة التفسيرية. ويتم شرح محتوى الحديث باختصار، ثم ترتبط آيات القرآن والحديث الآخر. في فهم الحديث، يقل استخدام كتب شرح الحديث. من حيث استخدامه، يتم توجيه الحديث المدرسي كتعزيز للتعبير. وهذا بسبب معرفة لمجتمع المحدودة بالحديث واعتقادهم بكتب العلماء.Abstrak: Artikel ini mengkaji kebiasaan masyarakat Nahdlotul Ulama’ (Nahd}iyyi>n) Desa  Gadingmangu Kecamatan Perak Kabupaten Jombang, terkait dengan pemaknaan mereka terhadap h}adi>th . Disamping masyarakat NU, di daerah ini juga terdapat masyarakat LDII yang sedikit banyak memiliki perbedaan sudut pandang dalam kajian h}adi>th. Karena itu, Nahd}iyyi>n di wilayah ini memiliki tanggung jawab yang cukup besar dalam mewariskan kajian-kajian h}adi>th  kepada generasi penerus mereka. Kajian ini menunjukkan bahwa dalam hal penyebutan h}adi>th , masyarakat Nahd}iyyi>n terbiasa menyebutkan periwayat pertama/sanad akhir, nara sumber h}adi>th (Rasu>l Alla>h), dan matn h}adi>th  yang berbahasa arab atau bahkan hanya dengan terjemahan dari matn. Biasanya mereka juga menyebut pernyataan “al-h}adi>th aw kama> qa>l”. tidak hanya itu, penyebutan h}adi>th tidak jarang bersumber dari kitab-kitab fiqh, bukan dari kitab h}adi>th . Dari segi penggunaannya, h}adi>th  yang dikaji diarahkan sebagai penguat terhadap ta’bi>r. Ini terjadi karena keterbatasan pengetahuan masyarakat terkait dengan h}adi>th  dan kepercayaan mereka terhadap buku-buku karya para ulama’.

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Iim Imadudin

AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan mengungkap kiprah dan pemikiran dari salah seorang ulama terkemuka yang berasal dari Lampung, yaitu H.M. Arief Mahya. Ulama Lampung kelahiran Gedungasin Liwa 6 Juni 1926 ini adalah saksi dari peralihan kolonialisme ke zaman revolusi kemerdekaan, terus berlanjut ke masa pembangunan dan reformasi. Penelitian ini mempergunakan metode sejarah yang terdiri dari heuristik, kritik, interpretasi, dan historiografi. Hasil penelitianmemperlihatkan bahwa H.M. Arief Mahya bukan hanya ulama yang mengembangkan dakwah di kalangan umat, namun juga pendidik yang telah melahirkan generasiLampung berikutnya. Selain itu, ia turut berjuang dalam upaya mempertahankan kemerdekaan. Ia pernah menjadi pimpinan Hizbullah melawan kolonialisme yang hendak merebut kemerdekaan. Selain berjuang secara fisik, ia juga mencurahkan pemikiran melalui media publik, seperti surat kabar. Ciri pokok dari tokoh Lampung ini adalah konsistensinya untuk terus berjuang di jalan yang diyakininya. Betapapun dunia sudah berubah dan terjadi krisis nilai, ia terus istiqomah melanjutkan kiprahnya mendidik umat. AbstractThis study aims to reveal the gait and the thought of one of the leading scholars from Lampung, namely KH M. Arief Mahya. Theologian Lampung who was born at Gedungasin Liwa on June 6, 1926 is the witness of the transition era of colonialism to independence revolution and continues to the development and reformation era. This study uses historical method consists of heuristics, criticism, interpretation, and historiography. The results showed that KH M. Arief Mahya was not only a scholar who developed the message among the people, but also an educator who had bridged to the next generation of Lampung. In addition, he participated in the effort tomaintain the independence struggle. He was once the leader of Hizbullah against colonialism who want to snatch the independence. Besides physically struggling, he also devoted ideas through public media, such as newspapers. The main characteristic of this Lampung figure was the consistency to keep fighting in the way he believed. No matter how the world has changed and there was a crisis of value, he persistently continued to educate people.


1958 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 972-988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anatol Rapoport

So many discussions go astray because the same words are used in different senses by adherents of different points of view that it seems imperative to start practically every discussion by clarifying the meanings of terms. Yet this problem is easier posed than solved. We in academic life owe understandable allegiance to erudition and to elegance of expression, and all too often we take a definition to be adequate (in the sense of clarifying meaning) if it sounds well. More is required, of course. Clarification of meaning (whether couched in formal definitions or in illustrative examples) takes place only if the terms defined are actually geared to the experience of the people concerned. This is a serious problem, because the experiences of people, although they overlap, can be widely disparate. Particularly among us in academic life the disparity may be quite wide. For our experience is very largely the experience of thinking, and thinking is tempered by language in the broadest sense, that is, by the way ideas are organized. And various ways of organizing ideas are imposed on us by our disciplines. Discipline means constraint. Discipline is essential for any organized activity. And so in academic disciplines, “discipline” means constraint on the mode of thought. It prescribes the repertoire of concepts, the patterns of classification, the rules of evidence, and the etiquette of discourse.


2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-166
Author(s):  
Yves T’Sjoen

The première of Claus’ play Het leven en de werken van Leopold II (The Life and Works of Leopold II), in November 1970 (by the company Nederlandse Comedie), was directed by the author himself. After a second and again rather unsuccessful run (1972–1973, Arena, director: J. Tummers) it disappeared from the stage for nearly thirty years: there was no other production of Claus’ play in the Low Countries until the autumn of 2002 (KVS, director: R. Ruëll). Undoubtedly Het leven en de werken van Leopold II is one of the lesser-known plays by the Flemish author Hugo Claus (1929–2008). While writing it, at the end of the sixties, Claus was simultaneously working on two poetry collections. Van horen zeggen contains accessible poems, sometimes rather anecdotal, with many references to the contemporary political situation. These poems show a clear affinity with the neo-realistic poetry that was dominant in Dutch-language literature in the sixties. Also in 1970, on the same day as Van horen zeggen, Claus published Heer Everzwijn (Lord Wild Boar), manneristic poetry showing another poeta faber. Given Claus’ interest in the history of the Congo Free State (see also the novel De geruchten [The rumours]) and the way he caricatures King Leopold II and his government in Het leven en de werken, it is worth investigating the political and social perspectives articulated in both his drama and his poetry. What are the similarities between the poet and the playwright? How can we explain his interest in the way Leopold mistreated the people of the Congo? In this essay I present the ideological and social points of view adopted by Claus in a broad literary and political context, studying his play on Leopold’s atrocities in what would later (in 1908) become a Belgian colony, alongside the poetry he produced in the same period. 


2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 657-677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilhelm J. Wessels

The book of Jeremiah reflects a particular period in the history of Judah, certain theological perspectives and a particular portrayal of the prophet Jeremiah. Covenant theology played a major role in Jeremiah’s view of life and determined his expectations of leaders and ordinary people. He placed high value on justice and trustworthiness, and people who did not adhere to this would in his view bear the consequences of disobedience to Yahweh’s moral demands and unfaithfulness. The prophet expected those in positions of leadership to adhere to certain ethical obligations as is clear from most of the nouns which appear in Jeremiah 5:1–6. This article argues that crisis situations in history affect leaders’ communication, attitudes and responses. Leaders’ worldviews and ideologies play a definitive role in their responses to crises. Jeremiah’s religious views are reflected in his criticism and demands of people in his society. This is also true as seen from the way the people and leaders in Judah responded to the prophet’s proclamation. Jeremiah 5:1–6 emphasises that knowledge and accountability are expected of leaders at all times, but in particular during unstable political times.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-226
Author(s):  
Ricardo M. Piñeyro Prins ◽  
Guadalupe E. Estrada Narvaez

We are witnessing how new technologies are radically changing the design of organizations, the way in which they produce and manage both their objectives and their strategies, and -above all- how digital transformation impacts the people who are part of it. Even today in our country, many organizations think that digitalizing is having a presence on social networks, a web page or venturing into cases of success in corporate social intranet. Others begin to invest a large part of their budget in training their teams and adapting them to the digital age. But given this current scenario, do we know exactly what the digital transformation of organizations means? It is necessary? Implying? Is there a roadmap to follow that leads to the success of this process? How are organizations that have been born 100% digital from their business conception to the way of producing services through the use of platforms? What role does the organizational culture play in this scenario? The challenge of the digital transformation of businesses and organizations, which is part of the paradigm of the industrial revolution 4.0, is happening here and now in all types of organizations, whether are they private, public or third sector. The challenge to take into account in this process is to identify the digital competences that each worker must face in order to accompany these changes and not be left out of it. In this sense, the present work seeks to analyze the main characteristics of the current technological advances that make up the digital transformation of organizations and how they must be accompanied by a digital culture and skills that allow their successful development. In order to approach this project, we will carry out an exploratory research, collecting data from the sector of new actors in the world of work such as employment platforms in its various areas (gastronomy, delivery, transportation, recreation, domestic service, etc) and an analysis of the main technological changes that impact on the digital transformation of organizations in Argentina.


1995 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 393-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joost de Jong ◽  
Peter T. J. C. van Rooy ◽  
S. Harry Hosper

Until the last two decades, the global perception of how to control our various water bodies was remarkably similar – water management was organised on a sectoral basis, as it always had been. It was only in the 1970s that the people actually responsible for implementing water management began to become aware of the serious implications of such an approach: water quality deterioration, desiccation and an alarming loss of the flora and fauna that characterised their local water environment. It was a growing awareness that led to the formation of the concept of integrated water management, a concept almost universally accepted today as the way forward. However, despite the fact that few dispute the validity of the concept, a number of obstacles remain before this theoretical agreement can be transformed into practical action. Three main bottlenecks stand in the way of implementation: institutional, communicational and socio-political. Whilst solutions to these are available, the key question still to be answered is whether society is really prepared to accept the consequent changes in the way we live that will result from putting the theory of integrated water management into practice. It was this issue that dominated the “Living with water” conference held in Amsterdam in September 1994. The following is a summary of the discussions held there and the various papers that were submitted.


Author(s):  
Zoran Oklopcic

As the final chapter of the book, Chapter 10 confronts the limits of an imagination that is constitutional and constituent, as well as (e)utopian—oriented towards concrete visions of a better life. In doing so, the chapter confronts the role of Square, Triangle, and Circle—which subtly affect the way we think about legal hierarchy, popular sovereignty, and collective self-government. Building on that discussion, the chapter confronts the relationship between circularity, transparency, and iconography of ‘paradoxical’ origins of democratic constitutions. These representations are part of a broader morphology of imaginative obstacles that stand in the way of a more expansive constituent imagination. The second part of the chapter focuses on the most important five—Anathema, Nebula, Utopia, Aporia, and Tabula—and closes with the discussion of Ernst Bloch’s ‘wishful images’ and the ways in which manifold ‘diagrams of hope and purpose’ beyond the people may help make them attractive again.


2003 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne P. Crick

Tourism is the mainstay of the Caribbean and the attitude of the people in the region may have a significant impact on the success of the industry. This paper analyzes the way in which tourism authorities of three Caribbean destinations have internally marketed tourism to their host populations in order to encourage the desired attitudinal expressions. A matrix of five possible responses to tourism was developed and each of the three countries was found to occupy different positions in the matrix. An analysis of the internal marketing strategies determined that the countries adopted different approaches based on their particular challenges but none of the approaches had achieved lasting success. The study concludes with recommendations for future research.


2010 ◽  
Vol 196 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Stein

Like any prophet, Ezekiel hears the voice of God and it is his prophetic task to relay God's message onto the people. He hears the voice of God more often (93 times) than any other prophet, and the way God addresses him as ‘son of man’ or ‘mortal’ is also unique. Ezekiel experiences a variety of other auditory phenomena, including command hallucinations which are not described in any other prophet, 3:3 ‘He said to me; mortal eat this scroll that I give to you and fill your stomach with it. Then I ate it; and in my mouth it was as sweet as honey.’


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document