Diffusion and Flow Mechanisms of Shale Gas through Matrix Pores and Gas Production Forecasting

Author(s):  
Juntai Shi ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Yuansheng Li ◽  
Wei Yu ◽  
Xiangnan He ◽  
...  
Energies ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 2329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Tang ◽  
Xiaofan Chen ◽  
Zhimin Du ◽  
Ping Yue ◽  
Jiabao Wei

Aimed at the multi-scale fractures for stimulated reservoir volume (SRV)-fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs, a mathematical model of unsteady seepage is established, which considers the characteristics of a dual media of matrix and natural fractures as well as flow in the large-scale hydraulic fractures, based on a discrete-fracture model. Multi-scale flow mechanisms, such as gas desorption, the Klinkenberg effect, and gas diffusion are taken into consideration. A three-dimensional numerical model based on the finite volume method is established, which includes the construction of spatial discretization, calculation of average pressure gradient, and variable at interface, etc. Some related processing techniques, such as boundedness processing upstream and downstream of grid flow, was used to limit non-physical oscillation at large-scale hydraulic fracture interfaces. The sequential solution is performed to solve the pressure equations of matrix, natural, and large-scale hydraulic fractures. The production dynamics and pressure distribution of a multi-section fractured horizontal well in a shale gas reservoir are calculated. Results indicate that, with the increase of the Langmuir volume, the average formation pressure decreases at a slow rate. Simultaneously, the initial gas production and the contribution ratio of the desorbed gas increase. With the decrease of the pore size of the matrix, gas diffusion and the Klinkenberg effect have a greater impact on shale gas production. By changing the fracture half-length and the number of fractured sections, we observe that the production process can not only pursue the long fractures or increase the number of fractured sections, but also should optimize the parameters such as the perforation position, cluster spacing, and fracturing sequence. The stimulated reservoir volume can effectively control the shale reservoir.


2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 529-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samarth D. Patwardhan ◽  
Fatemeh Famoori ◽  
Suresh Kumar Govindarajan

Purpose This paper aims to review the quad-porosity shale system from a production standpoint. Understanding the complex but coupled flow mechanisms in such reservoirs is essential to design appropriate completions and further, optimally produce them. Dual-porosity and dual permeability models are most commonly used to describe a typical shale gas reservoir. Design/methodology/approach Characterization of such reservoirs with extremely low permeability does not aptly capture the physics and complexities of gas storage and flow through their existing nanopores. This paper reviews the methods and experimental studies used to describe the flow mechanisms of gas through such systems, and critically recommends the direction in which this work could be extended. A quad-porosity shale system is defined not just as porosity in the matrix and fracture, but as a combination of multiple porosity values. Findings It has been observed from studies conducted that shale gas production modeled with conventional simulator/model is seen to be much lower than actually observed in field data. This paper reviews the various flow mechanisms in shale nanopores by capturing the physics behind the actual process. The contribution of Knudson diffusion and gas slippage, gas desorption and gas diffusion from Kerogen to total production is studied in detail. Originality/value The results observed from experimental studies and simulation runs indicate that the above effects should be considered while modeling and making production forecast for such reservoirs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 100022
Author(s):  
JB Montgomery ◽  
SJ Raymond ◽  
FM O’Sullivan ◽  
JR Williams

SPE Journal ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (01) ◽  
pp. 142-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Sun ◽  
Adwait Chawathé ◽  
Hussein Hoteit ◽  
Xundan Shi ◽  
Lin Li

Summary Shale gas has changed the energy equation around the world, and its impact has been especially profound in the United States. It is now generally agreed that the fabric of shale systems comprises primarily organic matter, inorganic material, and natural fractures. However, the underlying flow mechanisms through these multiporosity and multipermeability systems are poorly understood. For instance, debate still exists about the predominant transport mechanism (diffusion, convection, and desorption), as well as the flow interactions between organic matter, inorganic matter, and fractures. Furthermore, balancing the computational burden of precisely modeling the gas transport through the pores vs. running full reservoir scale simulation is also contested. To that end, commercial reservoir simulators are developing new shale gas options, but some, for expediency, rely on simplification of existing data structures and/or flow mechanisms. We present here the development of a comprehensive multimechanistic (desorption, diffusion, and convection), multiporosity (organic materials, inorganic materials, and fractures), and multipermeability model that uses experimentally determined shale organic and inorganic material properties to predict shale gas reservoir performance. Our multimechanistic model takes into account gas transport caused by both pressure driven convection and concentration driven diffusion. The model accounts for all the important processes occurring in shale systems, including desorption of multicomponent gas from the organics' surface, multimechanistic organic/inorganic material mass transfer, multimechanistic inorganic material/fracture network mass transfer, and production from a hydraulically fractured wellbore. Our results show that a dual porosity, dual permeability (DPDP) model with Knudsen diffusion is generally adequate to model shale gas reservoir production. Adsorption can make significant contributions to original gas in place, but is not important to gas production because of adsorption equilibrium. By comparing triple porosity, dual permeability; DPDP; and single porosity, single permeability formulations under similar conditions, we show that Knudsen diffusion is a key mechanism and should not be ignored under low matrix pressure (Pematrix) cases, whereas molecular diffusion is negligible in shale dry gas production. We also guide the design of fractures by analyzing flow rate limiting steps. This work provides a basis for long term shale gas production analysis and also helps define value adding laboratory measurements.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document