Calculation of Imbibition Relative Permeability for Two- and Three-Phase Flow From Rock Properties

1968 ◽  
Vol 8 (02) ◽  
pp. 149-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlon S. Land

Abstract Relative permeability functions are developed for both two- and three-phase systems with the saturation changes in the imbibition direction. An empirical relation between residual nonwetting-phase saturation after water imbibition and initial nonwetting-phase saturations is found from published data. From this empirical relation, expressions are obtained for trapped and mobile nonwetting-phase saturations which are used in connection with established theory relating relative permeability to pore-size distribution. The resulting equations yield relative permeability as a function of saturation having characteristics believed to be representative of real systems. The relative permeability of water-wet rocks for both two- and three-phase systems, with the saturation change in the imbibition direction, may be obtained by this method after properly selecting two rock properties: the residual nonwetting-phase saturation after the complete imbibition cycle, and the capillary pressure curve. Introduction Relative permeability is a function of saturation history as well as of saturation. This fact was first pointed out for two-phase flow by Geffen et al. and by Osaba et al. Hysteresis in the relative permeability-saturation relation also has been reported for three-phase systems. Since saturations may change simultaneously in two directions in a three-phase system, four possible relationships arise between relative permeability and saturation for a water-wet system. The four saturation histories of this system were given by Snell as II, ID, DI and DD. I refer to the direction of saturation change (imbibition and drainage), with the first letter of the symbol indicating the direction of change of the water phase. As used in this paper, the second letter of the symbol refers to the direction of saturation change of the gas phase, i.e., D and I indicate an increase and decrease, respectively, in gas saturation. Only a few three-phase relative permeability curves have been published. Leverett and Lewis published three-phase curves for unconsolidated sand, and Snell reported results of several English authors for both drainage and imbibition three-phase relative permeability of unconsolidated sands. Three-phase relative permeability curves for a consolidated sand were published by Caudle et al. for increasing water and gas saturations (ID). Corey et al. reported drainage (DD) three-phase relative permeability for consolidated sands. Recently, Donaldson and Dean and Sarem calculated three- phase relative permeability curves from displacement data on consolidated sands, also for saturation changes in the drainage direction. The only published three - phase relative permeability curves for consolidated sands with saturation changes in the imbibition direction (II) are those of Naar and Wygal. These curves are based on at theoretical study of the model of Wyllie and Gardner as modified by Naar and Henderson. Interest in three-phase relative permeability has increased recently due to the introduction of new recovery methods and refinements in calculation procedures brought about by the use of large-scale digital computers. The scarcity of empirical relations for three-phase flow, and the experimental difficulty encountered in obtaining such data, have made the theoretical approach to this problem attractive. RELATIVE PERMEABILITY AS A FUNCTION OF PORE-SIZE DISTRIBUTION Purcell used pore sizes obtained from mercury-injection capillary pressure data to calculate the permeability of porous solids. Burdine extended the theory by developing a relative permeability-pore size distribution relation containing the correct tortuosity term. SPEJ P. 149ˆ

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 817-825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Khurram Zahoor

Reservoir surveillance always requires fast, unproblematic access and solution to different relative permeability models which have been developed from time to time. In addition, complex models sometimes require in-depth knowledge of mathematics for solution prior to use them for data generation. For this purpose, in-house software has been designed to generate rigorous relative permeability curves, with a provision to include users own relative permeability models, a part from built-in various relative permeability correlations. The developed software with state-of-the-art algorithms has been used to analyze the effect of variations in residual and maximum wetting phase saturation on relative permeability curves for a porous medium having very high non-uniformity in pore size distribution. To further increase the spectrum of the study, two relative permeability models, i.e., Pirson's correlation and Brooks and Corey model has been used and the obtained results show that the later model is more sensitive to such variations.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subodh Gupta

Abstract The objective of this paper is to present a fundamentals-based, consistent with observation, three-phase flow model that avoids the pitfalls of conventional models such as Stone-II or Baker's three-phase permeability models. While investigating the myth of residual oil saturation in SAGD with comparing model generated results against field data, Gupta et al. (2020) highlighted the difficulty in matching observed residual oil saturation in steamed reservoir with Stone-II and Baker's linear models. Though the use of Stone-II model is very popular for three-phase flow across the industry, one issue in the context of gravity drainage is how it appears to counter-intuitively limit the flow of oil when water is present near its irreducible saturation. The current work begins with describing the problem with existing combinatorial methods such as Stone-II, which in turn combine the water-oil, and gas-oil relative permeability curves to yield the oil relative permeability curve in presence of water and gas. Then starting with the fundamentals of laminar flow in capillaries and with successive analogical formulations, it develops expressions that directly yield the relative permeabilities for all three phases. In this it assumes a pore size distribution approximated by functions used earlier in the literature for deriving two-phase relative permeability curves. The outlined approach by-passes the need for having combinatorial functions such as prescribed by Stone or Baker. The model so developed is simple to use, and it avoids the unnatural phenomenon or discrepancy due to a mathematical artefact described in the context of Stone-II above. The model also explains why in the past some researchers have found relative permeability to be a function of temperature. The new model is also amenable to be determined experimentally, instead of being based on an assumed pore-size distribution. In that context it serves as a set of skeletal functions of known dependencies on various saturations, leaving constants to be determined experimentally. The novelty of the work is in development of a three-phase relative permeability model that is based on fundamentals of flow in fine channels and which explains the observed results in the context of flow in porous media better. The significance of the work includes, aside from predicting results more in line with expectations and an explanation of temperature dependent relative permeabilities of oil, a more reliable time dependent residual oleic-phase saturation in the context of gravity-based oil recovery methods.


1970 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. VAN SCHAIK

Hydraulic properties of three soils were compared using either water or a hydrocarbon oil as the wetting fluid. Equations relating various properties for oil were also valid for water when appropriate values for water were used. As differences in saturated permeability were not consistent, a direct transfer of data obtained with oil to those of water was not possible. The relative permeability for both fluids showed better agreement because bubbling pressures were similar. However, the pore-size distribution index for water was somewhat lower than that for oil.


1969 ◽  
Vol 9 (02) ◽  
pp. 221-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Ehrlich ◽  
F.E. Crane

Abstract A consolidated porous medium is mathematically modeled by networks of irregularly shaped interconnected pore channels. Mechanisms are described that form residual saturations during immiscible displacement both by entire pore channels being bypassed and by fluids being isolated by the movement of an interface within individual pore channels. This latter mechanism is shown to depend strongly on pore channel irregularity. Together, these mechanisms provide an explanation for the drainage-imbibition-hysteresis effect. The calculation of steady-state relative permeabilities, based on a pore-size distribution permeabilities, based on a pore-size distribution obtained from a Berea sandstone, is described. These relative permeability curves agree qualitatively with curves that are generally accepted to be typical for highly consolidated materials. In situations where interfacial effects predominate over viscous and gravitational effects, the following conclusions are reached.Relative permeability at a given saturation is everywhere independent of flow rate.Relative permeability is independent of viscosity ratio everywhere except at very low values of wetting phase relative permeability.Irreducible wetting-phase saturation following steady-state drainage decreases with increasing ratio of nonwetting- to wetting-phase viscosity.Irreducible wetting-phase saturation following unsteady-state drainage is lower than for steady-state drainage.Irreducible nonwetting-phase saturation following imbibition is independent of viscosity ratio, whether or not the imbibition is carried out under steady- or unsteady-state conditions. Experiments qualitatively verify the conclusions regarding unsteady-state residual wetting-phase saturation. Implications of these conclusions are discussed. Introduction Natural and artificial porous materials are generally composed of matrix substance brought together in a more or less random manner. This leads to the creation of a network of interconnected pore spaces of highly irregular shape. Since the pore spaces of highly irregular shape. Since the geometry of such a network is impossible to describe, we can never obtain a complete description of its flow behavior. We can, however, abstract those properties of the porous medium pertinent to the type of flow under consideration, and thus obtain an adequate description of that flow. Thus, the Kozeny-Carmen equation, by considering a porous medium as a bundle of noninterconnecting capillary tubes, provides an adequate description of single-phase provides an adequate description of single-phase flow. With the addition of a saturation-dependent tortuosity parameter in two-phase flow to account for flow path elongation, the Kozeny-Carmen equation has been used to predict relative permeabilities for the displacement of a wetting permeabilities for the displacement of a wetting liquid by a gas. It has long been recognized that relative permeability depends not only on saturation but permeability depends not only on saturation but also on saturation history as well. Naar and Henderson described a mathematical model in which differences between drainage and imbibition behavior are explained in terms of a bypassing mechanism by which oil is trapped during imbibition. Fatt proposed a model for a porous medium that consisted of regular networks of cylindrical tubes of randomly distributed radii. From this he calculated the drainage relative permeability curves. Moore and Slobod, Rose and Witherspoon, and Rose and Cleary each considered flow in a pore doublet (a parallel arrangement of a small and pore doublet (a parallel arrangement of a small and large diameter cylindrical capillary tube). They concluded that, because of the different rates of flow in each tube, trapping would occur in one of the tubes; the extent of which would depend upon viscosity ratio and capillary pressure. SPEJ p. 221


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document