Safety Net Model: Grid-Based HSE Risk Management Integration with Twin Orientations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongzhan Zhao ◽  
Yifeng Yang ◽  
Xiaozhen He
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Management System ◽  
Safety Management ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Risk Control ◽  
Production Capacity ◽  
Safety Net ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Basic Unit ◽  
Peak Time

Abstract Although companies systematically introduce management systems to improve performance and reduce major accident risks, gaps remain. The mismatch between HSE management system and practical HSE works, line and HSE departments and HSE requirements and actions exerts significant negative impact on the effectiveness and efficiency of HSE management. Under these circumstances, operational management system (OMS), barrier management system (BMS), process safety management and asset integrity management are all studied and applied in an oilfield. The oilfield experienced nine years of development, and the production capacity increased from 4,000 to 400,000 barrels per day. Almost 7,000 people were working in the oilfield during peak time from around 40 countries. During such a development, HSE management was extremely challengeable, and a practical and integrated HSE risk management model was pursued and established. This paper describes a method of HSE risk management integration called safety net model. The model physically segregates oilfield facilities into individually managed areas or grids. A safety grid is the basic unit of a safety net, and the safety net comprises a series of correlative and interactive safety grids from bottom to up. OMS, HEMP and BMS are the bases of safety net model. Each safety grid complies with the principle of twin orientations: the identification of HSE hazards and assessment of HSE risks and the formulation and substantiation of systematic risk control measures. Specifically, the safety grid has two sets of basic components: hazard, output and time (HOT) and authority, boundary and control (ABC). HOT refers to hazard orientation, and ABC refers to risk control orientation. Two sets of components define attributes of each safety grid. The risk profile is assessed for each grid, in which technical safety and consequence studies are introduced to visually represent at risk locations. Overlaying contours and process boundaries as typical examples result in a simplified model that enables area owners to recognise risks, controls and mitigations so that they can introduce suitable risk reduction measures for safe operations. Through components (HOT ABC) of each safety grid, OMS and BMS are introduced to operational sites and positions directly and easily. Six components are connection points of every safety grid, and all safety grids are knitted to an integrated safety net. The implementation of safety net model contributes to good HSE performance of the oilfield studied, and the resulting performance is recognised and appreciated by local government and funding parties. This paper focuses on how to communicate the information in compliance with the principle of twin orientations from safety studies recorded in OMS and BMS to the safety grid. Comprising safety grids, safety net model is an applicable and practical carrier of integrated HSE risk management.

scholarly journals Upaya Bandara Ngurah Rai Denpasar Dalam Mewujudkan Safety Management System (SMS)

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 481-496
Author(s):  
Ataline Muliasari
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Management System ◽  
Safety Management ◽  
Risk Control ◽  
Management Decision ◽  
Airport Management ◽  
Safety Management System ◽  
International Airport ◽  
Very High ◽  
Wild Life

Each airport management including Denpasar Ngurah Rai International Airport are required tocreate, implement, eunluate and impmue the sustainnble safe~; rruznagement si;stem (SMS) with asafehJ program based on intemntionnl mzd nntionnl flight s. Relnted to the nhaue, ns nn internationalairport located in the center of touris111 lcxatio11 of hzdonesin, Nguralt Rni lntenuztional Airport tnjingto realize its SafehJ Management System (SMS). Ihis condition is certainly important to be realizedconsidering the level of aircraft mauements for both international and national flights is very high atthis airport. Vvhen considering the results of a questionnaire on the indicators of Hazard Identifica.tionand Risk Management, there are variables that are in the position of" risk control/ mitigation requiresa management decision" that is a wild life nrea airports (VVild Life). T77erefore, Denpasar Ngurah RaiAirport management lzas planned safety targets 11~1/ be nc/1iered within 3 (tlzree) years from 2010through 2012.

scholarly journals Development of an algorithm for evaluation of a comprehensive risk management indicator in food safety management systems

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3(58)) ◽  
pp. 31-36
Author(s):  
Yuliia Slyva
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Food Safety ◽  
Management System ◽  
Safety Management ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Management Systems ◽  
Control Points ◽  
Safety Management Systems ◽  
Safety Management System ◽  
Critical Control Points

The object of research is risk management in food safety management systems. The subject of the study is individual indicators, criteria and a comprehensive indicator of risk management for food safety. One of the most problematic areas is the lack of a common methodology for food safety risk assessment for the development, implementation and operation of food safety management systems. This leads to the fact that it is impossible to properly assess the risk groups depending on the object of management: – unintentional threats (HACCP concept – hazard analysis and critical control points); – intentional threats (concepts VACCP – vulnerability analysis and critical control points, TACCP – threat analysis and critical control points). And evaluate the overall effectiveness of the food safety management system. The study used methods of systems analysis and mathematical modeling as the main research method in all fields of knowledge. As well as a scientifically sound method of assessing the characteristics of complex systems used for decision-making in various fields of economic, managerial and social activities. The proposed in the work algorithm allows to quantify the level of risk management in the food safety management system by such groups as unintentional and intentional threats, taking into account the general indicators of the criteria and their factors. The overall criterion for unintentional threats, which are identified using HACCP principles, is determined by three criteria: microbiological threats, chemical threats and control measures, which in turn include a number of factors. The general indicator of the criterion for intentional threats, which are identified using the principles of VAССР and TAССР, is also determined by three criteria: opportunities, motivation and control measures, which in turn have a separate number of factors. The obtained algorithm allows to determine the levels of risk management and serve as an effective tool for obtaining objective information about the effectiveness of the implementation of the food safety management system. In contrast to existing methods of food safety risk assessment, which are based only on the management of unintentional threats, the proposed algorithm allows to take into account the impact of intentional threats – fraud and bioterrorism. And consider food safety risks comprehensively and develop options for improving management measures.

Customs Risk Management System in the Context of Clearance of Customs Procedures

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-63
Author(s):  
Ihor Nestoryshen ◽  
◽  
Ivan Berezhnyuk ◽  
Alina Brendak ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
International Trade ◽  
Economic Activity ◽  
Management System ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
International Treaties ◽  
External Threats ◽  
Risk Management System ◽  
Operational Activities ◽  
International Conventions

Introduction. The article emphasizes that the current features of the implementation of foreign economic activity require consideration of two factors that are contradictory to each other. In particular, on the one hand, the growth of external threats is forcing the governments of many countries to tighten control measures when crossing the state border of goods and commercial vehicles. On the other hand, according to international conventions and agreements (Kyoto Convention, WMO Framework Standards for Security, WTO Facilitation Agreement), measures to reduce the interference of regulatory authorities in the operational activities of economic operators are envisaged. In this context, the use of risk-oriented customs control tools, which allow simplifying business without reducing the level of national security, is becoming especially important. Purpose. The purpose of the article is to generalize and systematize foreign and domestic approaches to simplification of customs procedures through the use of risk-oriented instruments of customs control, as well as to develop their own proposals for simplification of foreign trade entities in the domestic regulatory field by using subject-oriented criteria. Results. The authors analyzed the provisions of the International Convention on the Simplification and Harmonization of Customs Procedures, the Framework Standards for Security and Facilitation of International Trade, the WTO Agreement on Trade Facilitation, which are provided for significant simplification of international trade procedures by reducing the share of customs inspections and controls. Сustoms security, customs clearance of goods and vehicles on the territory of the subjects of foreign economic activity or in another place permitted by the customs, without the direct participation of customs officials. These measures are based on the widespread use of risk-oriented instruments of customs control. It is noted that some of the provisions of international conventions and agreements on the use of risk-oriented instruments of customs control and simplification of economic operators have been implemented in domestic customs legislation, namely Art. 320 of the Customs Code of Ukraine introduced selective customs control, it is determined that the forms and scope of control sufficient to ensure compliance with legislation on state customs and international treaties of Ukraine in customs clearance are selected by customs (customs posts) based on the results of risk management. Conclusion. The study analyzes the peculiarities of the customs risk management system application in customs control in Ukraine, and offers proposals for the use of subject-oriented criteria of customs control as a simplification for honest economic operators to reduce the selectivity of risk profiles ASUR.

Risk management in the healthcare safety management system

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-53
Author(s):  
Yuriy Voskanyan ◽  
Irina Shikina ◽  
Fedor Kidalov ◽  
David Davidov ◽  
Tatiana Abrosimova
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Management System ◽  
Safety Management ◽  
Medical Organization ◽  
Safety Management System ◽  
Risk Management Process ◽  
Iso 31000 ◽  
Main Components ◽  
Processing Subsystem ◽  
To Receive

The paper discusses the main components of the modern system of risk management in medicine. Using the ISO 31000 standard of risk management and the ARIS integrated modeling environment, the authors have built a model of the risk management process in a medical organization, including the accounting subsystem, the risk analysis subsystem, and the risk processing subsystem. The concept of risk management proposed in the article is formulated on the basis of a system safety model, which assumes that adverse events related to the provision of medical care are based on systemic causes that under certain conditions turn into a hazard, and the latter is used to receive active threats and incidents. The risk management system is an executive block of the safety management system in a medical organization, which includes (in addition to risk management) an ideological block (a new safety culture) and an educational block (an organizational learning subsystem).

Enhancing Safety Risk Management with Quantitative Measures

2017 ◽  
Vol 2603 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris Claros ◽  
Carlos Sun ◽  
Praveen Edara
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Management System ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Safety Management ◽  
Multinomial Distribution ◽  
Safety Management System ◽  
Safety Risk ◽  
Safety Risks ◽  
Safety Models ◽  
Runway Incursion

At the airfield in hub airports, many activities occur that involve a range of participants, including various-size aircraft, ground vehicles, and workers. The safety management system is FAA's approach for systematically managing aviation safety. A major component of the safety management system is safety risk management (SRM), which entails analysis, assessment, and control of safety risks, including risks on the airfield. Current SRM has few specific safety models to estimate the likelihood or frequency of risks. This paper presents an example for development and incorporation of safety models into SRM. Specifically, it discusses safety models for runway incursion that use the following variables: total and general aviation operations, length of runway by type, number of taxiway intersections, snowfall, precipitation, number of hot spots, and construction activity. Categorization and processing of data were significant because each variable used could take on multiple forms, and some types of data involved review of airfield diagrams. The data used were from 137 U.S. hub airports for 2009 through 2014. For modeling, the negative multinomial distribution was used because it proved suitable for representing overdispersed data such as runway incursion frequency. Performance of the models was assessed through the goodness-of-fit measures of log likelihood, overdispersion, and cumulative residual plots. Models were developed for five severity categories of runway incursions and three types of surface events. The safety modeling approach presented here can serve as a foundation for development of other safety models that can be integrated into SRM to enable quantitative analysis of safety risks.

scholarly journals Risk management system model to improve the reputation of oil and gas companies in the Java island - Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 276 ◽  
pp. 02014
Author(s):  
Nevila Rodhi Nova ◽  
I Putu Artama Wiguna ◽  
Anwar Nadjadji
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Risk Management ◽  
Management System ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Risk Management System ◽  
Preventive Method ◽  
Iso 31000 ◽  
Social Environmental ◽  
Oil And Gas Companies

Risk management has been widely studied and applied in oil and gas pipeline projects, but the reality is that the impacts still occur. This is due to the ineffectiveness of existing risk management applications, so of course in this case an effective risk management system is needed, in which risk management must pay attention to all aspects that exist, both internal aspects, external aspects, and other aspects that can affect and influenced by existing risks and risk management not only can be used as a preventive method. But it can also support sustainable development targets. This paper presents the application of risk management by oil and gas companies in Indonesia that has been adapted to ISO 31000:2009 as a framework that can integrate various other management processes, including the management of HSE (Health, Safety, and Environment) risk in the hope of that sustainable development can be achieved . But in the reality it can not be denied that the activities that continue to this day still cause negative impact, especially for the environment. International oil and gas companies nowadays place more emphasis on preventive measures than the methods of mitigation. Thus it shows that the concept of sustainable development has not been fully considered in risk management applications. The existence of a continuous negative impact would greatly affect the credibility of oil and gas companies. Based on the results of research conducted with the hybrid method and analyzed with the help of System Dynamics it can be concluded that there are 3 (three) factors that can affect reputation risk, these factors are social, environmental, and economic and the model built in this study shows that it will can help the oil and gas company players to predict and improve the company’s reputation.

RISK MANAGEMENT IN AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES

2020 ◽  
Vol 115 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-89
Author(s):  
Dolores Gracja PIWEK
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Service Provider ◽  
Management System ◽  
Safety Management ◽  
Research Problem ◽  
Air Traffic ◽  
Civil Aviation ◽  
Safety Management System ◽  
Main Research ◽  
Navigation Service

The need to develop and adopt legal standards for safety management was identified at the Conference of General Directors of Civil Aviation dedicated to the global strategy of aviation safety (Montreal, March 20-22, 2006) and additionally supported by the recommendations of the Safety Conference (Montreal, March 29 - April 1, 2010). The year 2006 saw the introduction of issues related to the safety management system to the Convention’s annexes. The existing fundamental rules related to SMS were included in the annexes: 1 - Personnel licensing, 6 - Operation of Aircraft, 8 - Airworthiness of Aircraft, 11 - Air Traffic Services, 13 - Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation, and 14 - Aerodromes. In addition, due to the dynamic development of aviation and, at the same time, the growing need to create the highest standards in the field of safety management systems, the Air Navigation Commission established the Safety Management Panel (SMP) to develop the content of Annex 19. After several years of reconciliation and consultation, this document was finally adopted by the ICAO Council in 2013. It has become the ipso facto document that provides the basis for creating an effective safety management system, as it is compatible and also adapted to the most effective practices indicated in the ICAO Doc 9859 Safety Management Manual. Annex 19 sets out the responsibility of States, the safety management system and the collection of information related to safety. The National Civil Aviation Safety Programme and the structure of this system were also dealt with. The whole idea is to support states in the process of hazard identification and risk management. The purpose of the article was: to highlight selected elements of the risk management process in a practical dimension, to present the principles for assessing the degree of risk by an air navigation service provider, and to identify ways of improving this process. Searching for an answer to the main research problem contributed to achieving this goal. The research problem was expressed in the form of a question: How does the air navigation service provider manage the risk under the air traffic safety management system in order to achieve compliance with regulatory requirements and to achieve the assumed parameters (indicators) in the area of safety? With regard to the main research problem, the following research hypotheses were formulated: 1. I believe that an air navigation service provider undertakes an assessment of the degree of possible danger in civil aviation to identify hazards in air traffic as part of a safety management system. 2. I suppose that the air navigation service provider manages the risk in a manner consistent with the provisions of law and by using procedures included in normative documents.

ESSENTIAL INGREDIENTS OF A SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

2000 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 721
Author(s):  
F. Aquino
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Management System ◽  
Reporting System ◽  
Basic Problem ◽  
Safety Management ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Safety Management System ◽  
Clarity Of Responsibility ◽  
Safety Case ◽  
Management Techniques

A successful Safety Management System is more that just words and numbers on pages. It is the way that human beings cooperate with each other for surviving the hazards around them. The Safety Case concept which arose from the inquiry into Piper Alpha is one of the best attempts made thus far at systematising safety using risk management techniques. Unfortunately the Safety Case and its embedded Safety Management System do not address the basic problem that people are imperfect machines and are wholly unpredictable at a detail level. To counter this, it is essential that managers keep people risk-aware, safety-motivated and improvement-minded. This requires humility, sincerity, good system content, clarity of responsibility, a disinterest in blame, an easy- to-use written reporting system, respect for life and unambiguous priorities of safety, quality and money.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document