Modern well logs can play an important, often decisive role in the evaluation of carbonate reservoirs, and in well completions therein. To do so however, the logs must be selected and interpreted with due regard for the specific rock “types” and pore structures encountered by each well. Indeed, the basic condition stated applies to all evaluation and completion techniques now in use or conceivable. It becomes vitally important in carbonate reservoirs, however, because of their extraordinary heterogeneity. Characteristically, these reservoirs exhibit significant, often extreme, and always unpredictable variations in pore structure, pore size distribution and fluid content, within very short distances, in any direction. To cope with such a reservoir, an evaluation and logging program adhering to certain principles is most likely to yield valid results and insure better completions and greater ultimate recovery, at minimum cost. First, in every well, the cuttings or cores should be described precisely as to rock types and depths. Second, any techniques used should permit the largest possible number of determinations through the reservoir, so that any existing relationships between pore size distribution, porosity and water saturation may be established on a sound statistical basis. Among logging devices, “focusing” tools meet this requirement best. Third, starting very early in the development of the reservoir, the latter should be cored and logged in key wells, the cores subjected to capillary pressure and other petrophysical tests, and all potentially diagnostic logs run and analyzed in the light of all other data. Fourth, in non‐key wells, the logging program should include only those logs proved most reliable in the key wells for the pore structures encountered and the data desired (usually porosity, water saturation, net ft of pay).
