scholarly journals Seniors’ Campus Continuums: Local Solutions for Broad Spectrum Seniors Care

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances Margaret Morton-Chang ◽  
Shilpi Majumder ◽  
Whitney Berta
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Social Needs ◽  
System Level ◽  
Organizational Level ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Housing Options

Abstract Background: As demand and desire to “age-in-place” grows within an aging population, and new areas of need emerge, governments nationally and internationally are focusing effort and attention on innovative and integrative approaches to health and well-being. Seniors’ Campus Continuums are models of care that seek to broaden access to an array of services and housing options to meet growing health and social needs of aging populations. The objective of this study is to increase understanding of this model and factors that influence their evolution, development, ongoing functioning and capacity to integrate care for older adults wishing to age in their own home and community.Methods: This research uses a comparative case study approach across six-bounded cases offering four geographically co-located components (mixed housing options, internal and external community supports, and a long-term care home) in various contexts across Ontario. Onsite in-person and phone interviews with senior campus staff (N=30), and campus partners (N=11), enhanced by direct observation at campuses explored historical and current efforts to offer health, housing and social care continuums for older adults.Results: Analysis highlighted eight key factors. Enabling factors include i. rich historical legacies of helping people in need; ii. organizational vision and readiness to capitalize on windows of opportunity; iii. leveraging organizational structure and capacity; iv. intentional physical and social design; v. broad services mix, amenities and innovative partnerships. Impeding factors include vi. policy hurdles and rigidities; vii. human resources shortages and inequities; and viii. funding limitations. A number of benefits afforded by campuses at different levels were also observed. Conclusion: Findings from this research highlight opportunities to optimize campus potential on many levels. At an individual level, campuses increase local access to a coordinated range of health and social care services, supports and housing options. At an organizational level, campuses offer enhanced collaboration opportunities across providers and partners to improve consistency and coordination of care, access to shared resources, expertise and infrastructure among other benefits. At a system level, campuses can address a diversity of health, social, financial, and housing needs to help seniors avoid premature or inappropriate use of higher intensity care settings.

scholarly journals Seniors’ campus continuums: local solutions for broad spectrum seniors care

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances Morton-Chang ◽  
Shilpi Majumder ◽  
Whitney Berta
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Social Needs ◽  
System Level ◽  
Organizational Level ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Housing Options

Abstract Background As demand and desire to “age-in-place” grows within an aging population, and new areas of need emerge, governments nationally and internationally are focusing effort and attention on innovative and integrative approaches to health and well-being. Seniors’ Campus Continuums are models of care that seek to broaden access to an array of services and housing options to meet growing health and social needs of aging populations. The objective of this study is to increase understanding of this model and factors that influence their evolution, development, ongoing functioning and capacity to integrate care for older adults wishing to age in their own home and community. Methods This research uses a comparative case study approach across six-bounded cases offering four geographically co-located components (mixed housing options, internal and external community supports, and a long-term care home) in various contexts across Ontario, Canada. Onsite in-person and phone interviews with senior campus staff (N = 30), and campus partners (N = 11), enhanced by direct observation at campuses explored historical and current efforts to offer health, housing and social care continuums for older adults. Results Analysis highlighted eight key factors. Enabling factors include i. rich historical legacies of helping people in need; ii. organizational vision and readiness to capitalize on windows of opportunity; iii. leveraging organizational structure and capacity; iv. intentional physical and social design; v. broad services mix, amenities and innovative partnerships. Impeding factors include vi. policy hurdles and rigidities; vii. human resources shortages and inequities; and viii. funding limitations. A number of benefits afforded by campuses at different levels were also observed. Conclusion Findings from this research highlight opportunities to optimize campus potential on many levels. At an individual level, campuses increase local access to a coordinated range of health and social care services, supports and housing options. At an organizational level, campuses offer enhanced collaboration opportunities across providers and partners to improve consistency and coordination of care, and improved access to shared resources, expertise and infrastructure. At a system level, campuses can address a diversity of health, social, financial, and housing needs to help seniors avoid premature or inappropriate use of higher intensity care settings.

scholarly journals Seniors’ Campus Continuums: Local Solutions for Broad Spectrum Seniors Care

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances Margaret Morton-Chang ◽  
Shilpi Majumder ◽  
Whitney Berta
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Social Needs ◽  
System Level ◽  
Organizational Level ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Housing Options

Abstract Background: As demand and desire to “age-in-place” grows within an aging population, and new areas of need emerge, governments nationally and internationally are focusing effort and attention on innovative and integrative approaches to health and well-being. Seniors’ Campus Continuums are models of care that seek to broaden access to an array of services and housing options to meet growing health and social needs of aging populations. The objective of this study is to increase understanding of this model and factors that influence their evolution, development, ongoing functioning and capacity to integrate care for older adults wishing to age in their own home and community.Methods: This research uses a comparative case study approach across six-bounded cases offering four geographically co-located components (mixed housing options, internal and external community supports, and a long-term care home) in various contexts across Ontario. Onsite in-person and phone interviews with senior campus staff (N=30), and campus partners (N=11), enhanced by direct observation at campuses explored historical and current efforts to offer health, housing and social care continuums for older adults.Results: Analysis highlighted eight key factors. Enabling factors include i. rich historical legacies of helping people in need; ii. organizational vision and readiness to capitalize on windows of opportunity; iii. leveraging organizational structure and capacity; iv. intentional physical and social design; v. broad services mix, amenities and innovative partnerships. Impeding factors include vi. policy hurdles and rigidities; vii. human resources shortages and inequities; and viii. funding limitations. A number of benefits afforded by campuses at different levels were also observed. Conclusion: Findings from this research highlight opportunities to optimize campus potential on many levels. At an individual level, campuses increase local access to a coordinated range of health and social care services, supports and housing options. At an organizational level, campuses offer enhanced collaboration opportunities across providers and partners to improve consistency and coordination of care, access to shared resources, expertise and infrastructure among other benefits. At a system level, campuses can address a diversity of health, social, financial, and housing needs to help seniors avoid premature or inappropriate use of higher intensity care settings.

scholarly journals Seniors’ Campus Continuums: Local Solutions for Broad Spectrum Seniors Care

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances Margaret Morton-Chang ◽  
Shilpi Majumder ◽  
Whitney Berta
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Well Being ◽  
System Level ◽  
Integrative Model ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Integration Of Care ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Community Supports ◽  
Housing Options

Abstract Background: As demand and desire to “age-in-place” grows within an aging population, challenges exist to realizing this wish. Changing demographics and new areas of need have governments nationally and internationally calling for more focused attention on integrative approaches to health and well-being. Seniors’ Campus Continuums are models of care that seek to broaden access to an array of services and housing options to meet the growing health and social needs of aging populations in their communities . The objective of this study is to increase understanding of this integrative model through the exploration of factors that influence Campus development, functioning, and scope and extent of integration of care for older adults wishing to remain in their own home and community.Methods: This research uses a comparative case study approach across six bounded cases offering four physically co-located components – mixed independent housing options, internal community supports to residents, external community supports to the broader community, and a long-term care home – to explore how Seniors’ Campus Continuums operating in various contexts across Ontario, Canada integrate health, housing and social care for older adults.Results: Seniors’ Campus Continuums come in different shapes, sizes, and geographies however, they share many influencing factors in their evolution, design, function, and ability to integrate a broad range of supports and services for older adults with different and progressive needs. Enabling factors include i. rich historical legacies of helping people in need; ii. organizational vision and readiness to capitalize on key windows of opportunity; iii. leveraging organizational structure and capacity; iv. intentional physical and social design; v. broad services mix, amenities and innovative partnerships. Impeding factors include vi. policy hurdles and rigidities; vii. human resources shortages and inequities; and viii. funding limitations. A number of benefits afforded by campuses at an individual, organizational and system level were observed. Conclusion: Findings from this research provide detailed descriptions of campus continuums from inception to expansion and highlight opportunities to optimize their potential on many levels. At an individual level, campuses increase local access to a coordinated range of care services, supports and housing options that can be tailored to benefit their health and social care needs. At an organizational level, campuses offer enhanced collaboration opportunities across providers and partners to improve consistency and coordination of care, access to shared resources, expertise and infrastructure, improved economies of scale, and rich environments for training/research, education and volunteering. At a system level, they offer potential to address a diversity of health, social, financial, and housing needs to help seniors avoid premature or inappropriate use of higher intensity care settings. This study fills a gap in evidence-based research on this integrative model and offers lessons to consider for future “age-friendly” policy development.

scholarly journals Seniors’ Campus Continuums: Local Solutions for Broad Spectrum Seniors Care

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances Margaret Morton-Chang ◽  
Shilpi Majumder ◽  
Whitney Berta
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Local Community ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Well Being ◽  
System Level ◽  
Integrative Model ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Community Supports ◽  
Housing Options

Abstract Background As demand and desire to “age-in-place” grows within an aging population, challenges exist to realizing this wish. Changing demographics and new areas of need have governments nationally and internationally calling for more focused attention on integrative approaches to health and well-being. Seniors’ Campus Continuums seek bridge the “divide” between health and social care for residents and local community. This paper investigates factors that influence Campus evolution, ongoing functioning, and ability to offer wrap around care for older adults wishing remain in their own home and community. Methods This research uses a comparative case study approach across multiple bounded cases to explore how Seniors’ Campus Continuums operating in various contexts integrate health, housing and social care around older adults living on the campus and in the local community. Six seniors’ campuses from across Ontario offering four physically co-located components – mixed independent housing options, internal community supports to residents, external community supports to the broader community, and a long-term care home – were studied and compared. Results Eight factors that promote or impede Seniors’ Campus Continuum evolution, design and function, and ability to provide wrap-around care to older adults with progressive needs are identified including: i. historical legacies; ii. windows of opportunity; iii. organizational structure and capacity; iv. intentional physical and social design; v. campus services mix, amenities and partnerships; vi. policy rigidities and enablers; vii. human resources shortages and innovation; viii. funding limitations and opportunities. Together these factors describe opportunities to optimize care on many levels. Conclusion Seniors’ Campus Continuums offer creative boundary-spanning approaches to address a variety of needs while taking into account local contexts. At an individual level, campuses increase access to a range of care supports and housing options to benefit seniors’ health and wellbeing. At an organizational level, they offer consistency and coordination of care, improved economies of scale, and rich environments for training/research, education and volunteering. At a system level, they offer potential to help people avoid ending up in the “wrong places.” This study fills a gap in evidence-based research around understanding of this integrative model and offers lessons learned for future development.

The association of loneliness with health and social care utilisation in older adults in the general population: A systematic review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberley J Smith ◽  
Christina Victor
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
General Population ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Service Utilisation ◽  
Study Quality ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Consistent Finding ◽  
Care Utilisation ◽  
Health And Social Care

Abstract Background and Objectives Loneliness is proposed to be linked with increased service use. This review examined the association of loneliness and health and social care utilisation (HSCU) in older adults from the general population. Research Design and Methods Four databases were screened for studies that examined the association of loneliness (predictor) with HSCU (outcome) in older adults (defined as majority of sample 60 or older). Study quality was assessed with the NIH scale for observational cohorts and cross-sectional studies. Results We identified 32 studies, of which 9 prospective studies were evaluated as being good or good-fair quality. Two good-fair quality studies found loneliness at baseline was associated with subsequent admission to a residential care home. There was emerging evidence that loneliness was associated with emergency department use (n=1), and CVD-specific hospitalisation (n=1). Once adjusted for confounders the highest quality studies found no association of baseline loneliness with physician utilisation, outpatient service utilisation, skilled nursing facility use, and planned or unplanned hospital admissions. The remaining, studies were cross-sectional, or of fair to poor quality, and inadequate to reliably determine whether loneliness was associated with a subsequent change in HSCU. Discussion and implications There was heterogeneity in study design, measurement, and study quality. This generated an inconsistent evidence base where we cannot determine clear inferences about the relationship between loneliness and HSCU. Only one consistent finding was observed between two good-fair quality studies regarding care home admission. To determine clinical implications and make reliable inferences additional good quality longitudinal research is needed.

scholarly journals Identifying and understanding the health and social care needs of older adults with multiple chronic conditions and their caregivers: a protocol for a scoping review

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. e018247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elana Commisso ◽  
Katherine S McGilton ◽  
Ana Patricia Ayala ◽  
Melissa, K Andrew ◽  
Howard Bergman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Family Caregivers ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Multiple Chronic Conditions ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Health And Social Care

IntroductionPeople are living longer; however, they are not necessarily experiencing good health and well-being as they age. Many older adults live with multiple chronic conditions (MCC), and complex health issues, which adversely affect their day-to-day functioning and overall quality of life. As a result, they frequently rely on the support of friend and/or family caregivers. Caregivers of older adults with MCC often face challenges to their own well-being and also require support. Currently, not enough is known about the health and social care needs of older adults with MCC and the needs of their caregivers or how best to identify and meet these needs. This study will examine and synthesise the literature on the needs of older adults with MCC and those of their caregivers, and identify gaps in evidence and directions for further research.Methods and analysisWe will conduct a scoping review of the peer-reviewed and grey literature using the updated Arksey and O’Malley framework. The literature will be identified using a multidatabase and grey literature search strategy developed by a health sciences librarian. Papers, reports and other materials addressing the health and social care needs of older adults and their friend/family caregivers will be included. Search results will be screened, independently, by two reviewers, and data will be abstracted from included literature and charted in duplicate.Ethics and disseminationThis scoping review does not require ethics approval. We anticipate that study findings will inform novel strategies for identifying and ascertaining the health and social care needs of older adults living with MCC and those of their caregivers. Working with knowledge-user members of our team, we will prepare materials and presentations to disseminate findings to relevant stakeholder and end-user groups at local, national and international levels. We will also publish our findings in a peer-reviewed journal.

scholarly journals The Scottish Social Care Survey (SCS) and the Scottish Care Home Census (SCHC)

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Alexander Gunn Henderson ◽  
Jennifer Kirsty Burton ◽  
Ellen Lynch ◽  
David Clark ◽  
Julie Rintoul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Care ◽  
Local Authority ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Population Level ◽  
Probabilistic Methods ◽  
Local Authorities ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Match Rate ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Care Survey

IntroductionLinked health care datasets have been used effectively in Scotland for some time. Use of social care data has been much more limited, partly because responsibility for these services is distributed across multiple local authorities. However, there are substantial interactions between health and social care (also known internationally as long-term care) services, and keen policy interest in better understanding these. We introduce two social care resources that can now be linked to health datasets at a population level across Scotland to study these interdependencies. These data emerge from the Scottish Government’s centralised collation of data from mandatory returns provided by local authorities and care homes. MethodsDeterministic and Probabilistic methods were used to match the Social Care Survey (SCS) and Scottish Care Home Census (SCHC) to the Community Health Index (CHI) number via the National Records of Scotland (NRS) Research Indexing Spine. ResultsFor the years 2010/11 to 2015/16, an overall match rate of 91.2% was achieved for the SCS to CHI from 31 of Scotland’s 32 local authority areas. This rate varied from 76.7% to 98.5% for local authority areas. A match rate of 89.8% to CHI was achieved for the SCHC in years 2012/13 to 2015/16 but only 52.5% for the years 2010/11 to 2011/12. ConclusionIndexing of the SCS and SCHC to CHI offers a new and rich resource of data for health and social care research.

scholarly journals Effects of 1 Year of Lifestyle Intervention on Institutionalized Older Adults

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (14) ◽  
pp. 7612
Author(s):  
Daniele Magistro ◽  
Fabio Carlevaro ◽  
Francesca Magno ◽  
Martina Simon ◽  
Nicola Camp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Lifestyle Intervention ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Term Care

The socio-economic and health consequences of our ageing population are well documented, with older adults living in long-term care facilities amongst the frailest possessing specific and significant healthcare and social care needs. These needs may be exacerbated through the sedentary behaviour which is prevalent within care home settings. Reducing sedentary time can reduce the risk of many diseases and improve functional health, implying that improvements in health may be gained by simply helping older adults substitute time spent sitting with time spent standing or in light-intensity ambulation. This study identified the impact of 1 year of lifestyle intervention in a group of older adults living in a long-term care setting in Italy. One hundred and eleven older adults (mean age, 82.37 years; SD = 10.55 years) participated in the study. Sixty-nine older adults were in the intervention group (35 without severe cognitive decline and 34 with dementia) and 42 older adults were in the control group. Data on physical functioning, basic activities of daily living (BADL) and mood were collected 4 times, before, during (every four months) and after the 1 year of intervention. The lifestyle intervention focused on improving the amount of time spent every week in active behaviour and physical activity (minimum 150 min of weekly activities). All participants completed the training program and no adverse events, related to the program, occurred. The intervention group showed steady and significant improvements in physical functioning and a stable situation in BADL and mood following the intervention in older adults with and without dementia, whilst the control group exhibited a significant decline over time. These results suggest that engagement in a physical activity intervention may benefit care home residents with and without dementia both physically and mentally, leading to improved social care and a reduced burden on healthcare services.

scholarly journals Digital Interventions to Promote Health and Well-Being of Older Adults

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 755-755
Author(s):  
Gloria Gutman ◽  
Marcia Shade
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Internet Technology ◽  
Digital Tool ◽  
Positive Health ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Adoption Of Technology ◽  
Digital Interventions

Abstract The population of older adults is on the rise and so is their adoption of technology. According to the Pew Research Center, growing numbers of older adults are using smartphones, tablets, and the internet. Technology can also be an innovative and accessible way to deliver interventions that promote positive health outcomes. But implementing and evaluating digital interventions, especially those targeted to cognitively frail or otherwise vulnerable older adults, is not easy. The first presentation in this international interdisciplinary symposium sets the stage for discussing some of the barriers encountered. Specifically, it addresses the issue of compliance of adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) while using internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for sleep disturbance. The second presentation described a digital tool to screen and interview older adults in a hospital emergency department who may be experiencing mistreatment. This is followed by a study of use of voice assistant reminders to help aging adults adhere to daily completion of a diary to self-monitor pain symptoms. The fourth presentation describes a feasibility study of a digital screen-based device to calm long-term care home residents exhibiting disruptive Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia. Symposium speakers and participants will be encouraged to dialogue on how some of the implementation and evaluation barriers described might be overcome or avoided as well as to share success stories from their own research on digital interventions for older adults living at home, in congregate housing or in hospital settings.

scholarly journals 138 The Role of Health and Social Care Professional Teams in the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study of Key Stakeholders’ Views

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii1-iii16
Author(s):  
Marica Cassarino ◽  
Katie Robinson ◽  
Rosie Quinn ◽  
Fiona Boland ◽  
Marie E Ward ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
System Level ◽  
Social Care Professional ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Wide Range

Abstract Background Introducing Health and Social Care Professional (HSCP) teams to the emergency department (ED) has increasingly demonstrated benefits for ED patient and process outcomes. However, there is a dearth of research exploring the views of key ED stakeholders on the role of HSCP teams in care delivery the ED. This qualitative study investigated the perspectives of a wide range of ED stakeholders about HSCPs teams working in the ED. Methods A total of 65 participants including older adults who had recently attended the ED and their carers/relatives, ED doctors and nurses, HSCPs and pre-hospital staff participated in four World Café style focus groups and individual interviews across two Irish hospital sites. Written and audio-recorded data were transcribed and thematically analysed. Results Overall, participants expressed positive views on HSCPs working in teams in the ED, with benefits for patients, staff members and the hospital (Theme 1). Having an ED-based HSCP team was described as promoting effective and timely decision-making and a more integrated approach to patient care, particularly for frail older adults with complex needs (Theme 2). Barriers and enablers for effective implementation were identified at multiple levels (Theme 3) including the ED physical environment, (e.g., space and equipment), operational factors (e.g., working hours), and relations (e.g., patient-staff or staff-staff communication); factors at system level included availability of community resources and financial pressures. Conclusion Our study indicates overall acceptability of HSCPs working in teams in the ED and positive views on their contribution to enhance the quality care of older adults. However, a number of operational and relational factors need to be considered to ensure feasibility and effectiveness. This information is crucial to inform implementation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document