scholarly journals How to improve the safety of bicortical pedicle screw insertion in the thoracolumbar vertebrae: Analysis base on three-dimensional CT reconstruction of patients in the prone position

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Xu ◽  
Qingxian Hou ◽  
Yanchen Chu ◽  
Xiuling Huang ◽  
Wenjiu Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Prone Position ◽  
Vertebral Body ◽  
Supine Position ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Ct Reconstruction ◽  
Screw Insertion ◽  
Pedicle Screw Insertion ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Through the comparison of three-dimensional CT reconstruction between the supine position and the prone position, the relative position of thoracolumbar great vessels and vertebral body was studied, and the shortest safe distance between them was measured to improve the safety of bicortical pedicle screw insertion and reduce the risk of vascular injury. Methods: Forty adults were selected to participate the research. Three-dimensional reconstruction of thoracolumbar (T9-L3) CT was performed in the prone position and the supine position. The relative distance between the Aorta/Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) and vertebral body was obtained as AVD/VVD respectively. The relative angle of the Aorta/ IVC and the vertebral body was calculated as ∠AOY/∠VOY. Self-controlled experiments were carried out in the prone and the supine positions, and the data obtained were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 statistical software. Results: The AVD of the prone position and the supine position was the shortest at T12 (3.18 ±0.68mm), but the difference was not statistically significant. The aorta of the T9-L3 segment was shifted from the anterolateral to the anteromedial. The ∠AOY of the other groups differed significantly between the prone and supine positions in all vertebrae except L1 (P < 0.05), and the aorta in the prone position was more anteromedial than that of supine position. With regard to VVD/∠VOY, there was no significant difference between the prone and supine positions (P≥0.05), and the minimum VVD of L3 segment is greater than 5.4mm. The IVC has no obvious mobility and is fixed in the range of 20 °~ 30 ° near the midline. Conclusion: When using bicortical anchoring of pedicle screws, it is safe to ensure that the protruding tips of the screw is less than 3mm. Due to the mobility of the aorta in different postures and individual differences in anatomy, the prone position CT can help doctors to make better preoperative plans and decisions.

scholarly journals How to improve the safety of bicortical pedicle screw insertion in the thoracolumbar veterbrae with osteoporotic: Analysis base on three-dimensional CT reconstruction of patients in prone position

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Xu ◽  
Qingxian Hou ◽  
Yanchen Chu ◽  
Xiuling Huang ◽  
Wenjiu Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Prone Position ◽  
Vertebral Body ◽  
Supine Position ◽  
Relative Position ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Ct Reconstruction ◽  
Screw Insertion ◽  
Dimensional Reconstruction ◽  
Great Vessels

Abstract Background: Three-dimensional CT reconstruction of prone position could measure the relative position between the Great vessels and the thoracolumbar vertebrae. The Great vessels positions of the thoracic and lumbar segments were studied to improve the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion, reduce the risk of vascular injury. Methods: Twenty-four adults participated in the present study. Three-dimensional reconstruction of thoracolumbar (T9–L3) CT was performed in the prone and supine positions. The relative distance between the arteriovenous vessels and vertebrae distance (AVD/VVD) was obtained, respectively. The relative position angle of the arteriovenous vessel and the vertebral body was calculated as ∠AOY/∠VOY. Self-controlled experiments were carried out in the prone and supine positions. The data obtained were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 statistical software. Results: With regard to AVD, The AVD of the T12 was the smallest,> 3.2 mm. The difference among the T9, T10, L2 level was statistically significant (P < 0.05). And AVD was greater in the prone position than in the supine position; while the value of ∠AOY is the descending from T9-L3 gradually, there were statistically significant differences in ∠AOY between T9-T12, L2 and L3 in prone and supine position (P < 0.05). The aorta in the prone position was closer to the midline than that of the supine position, varying from 0°to 30°near the Y axis. With regard to VVD, there was no significant difference in contrast between the prone and supine positions (P≥0.05), and the VVD was the smallest in the L3 level> 5.4 mm. Conclusion: The pre-vertebral position of the aorta may change from T9 to L3 due to changes in body position. When the T9-L3 thoracolumbar spine disease was treated with pedicle screw double cortical fixation, the screw was safe and reliable within a range of≤ 3 mm when broken the pre-cortex .The three-dimensional reconstruction of prone position CT could be used to more accurately assess the relative position of the vertebral body and the blood vessel.

scholarly journals 727 Robotic Assisted Versus Fluoroscopic Guided Approach in Pedicle Screw Insertion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
T K Tan ◽  
J Y Tan ◽  
K T Ng ◽  
S Ahuja
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Facet Joint ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Robotic Group ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Screw Insertion ◽  
Pedicle Screw Insertion ◽  
Robotic Assisted Surgery ◽  
Surgical Subspecialty ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Aim The robotic assisted surgery has become prevalent in most of the surgical subspecialty. The adaption of such technique in spine surgery has resulted in minimising several issues encountered with fluoroscopic guided approach. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of robotic assisted approach and fluoroscopic guided approach in pedicle screw insertion. Method PUBMED, EMBASE, MEDLINE and CENTRAL database were systematically searched from its inception until November 2020. All the studies comparing robotic assisted surgery and fluoroscopic guided approach in pedicle screw insertion were included for quantitative and qualitative analysis. Results Twenty-eight studies enrolling 2105 patients (robotic group: 1027, fluoroscopic: 1078) and total screws of 8668 screws (robotic group: 4217, fluoroscopic group: 4451) were eligible for inclusion, these studies consisted of 19 observational studies, 7 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 2 cadaveric study. Robotic assisted approach was associated with significantly higher accuracy (Grade A+B) (OR = 2.34; P &lt; 0.0001) and distance between pedicle and screw (MD: 1.69; P = 0.001), lower incident of facet joint violation (OR = 0.22; P &lt; 0.00001), screw revision (OR = 0.38; P = 0.009), intraoperative blood loss (MD: -116.95; P = 0.0006), shorter pedicle screw placement time (MD: -4.66; P &lt; 0.00001), radiation exposure time (MD:-5.27; P = 0.0001), radiation dose (MD:-22.30; P = 0.0002) and postoperative hospital stay (MD: -0.79; P = 0.02) compared to fluoroscopic guided approach. There was no significant difference in operative time and wound infection. Conclusions In this meta-analysis, robotic assisted approach is more effective in achieving better clinical outcomes compared to fluoroscopic guided technique in pedicle screw insertion. However, future adequately powered RCTs are warranted to generate standardised outcomes.

Comparison of the Accuracy of C1 Pedicle Screw Fixation Using Fluoroscopy and Free-Hand Techniques in Patients With Posterior Arch Thickness of Less Than 4 mm

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 429-435
Author(s):  
Byung-Jou Lee ◽  
Myeongjong Kim ◽  
Seong Kyun Jeong ◽  
Subum Lee ◽  
Sang-Ryong Jeon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Atlantoaxial Instability ◽  
Posterior Arch ◽  
Screw Insertion ◽  
Pedicle Screw Insertion ◽  
Insertion Method ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Free Hand Technique ◽  
Patient Radiation Exposure

Abstract BACKGROUND C1 pedicle screw insertion is not easy, and more fluoroscopy can be required for safe insertion. Fluoroscopy is time consuming and increases patient radiation exposure. There have been no studies comparing the accuracy of C1 pedicle screw insertion using the fluoroscopy and free-hand techniques. OBJECTIVE To describe a free-hand C1 pedicle screw insertion method in patients with the posterior arch thickness of less than 4 mm in the thinnest part of the groove, and to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of C1 pedicle screw insertion using fluoroscopy vs using the free-hand technique. METHODS A total of 25 patients who had atlantoaxial instability with a C1 posterior arch &lt;4 mm and were treated with C1 pedicle screw insertion were included. In 10 patients, fluoroscopy was used for C1 pedicle screw insertion, and 15 patients underwent the free-hand technique. We compared the radiologic and clinical outcomes between the 2 groups. RESULTS In patients who underwent the free-hand technique, 96.5% of screws were rated as safe (grade A or B), and 80.0% of screws in the fluoroscopy group were rated as safe. Postoperative occipital neuralgia occurred in one patient in the fluoroscopy group and did not occur in the free-hand technique group. There was no significant difference in the improvement of Nurick grade between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION C1 pedicle screw insertion using the free-hand technique is feasible and safe in patients with a C1 posterior arch &lt;4 mm.

Comparing Cortical Bone Trajectories for Pedicle Screw Insertion using Robotic Guidance and Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Navigation

2020 ◽  
Vol 141 ◽  
pp. e625-e632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asham Khan ◽  
Kyungduk Rho ◽  
Jennifer Z. Mao ◽  
Timothy E. O’Connor ◽  
Justice O. Agyei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cortical Bone ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Screw Insertion ◽  
Pedicle Screw Insertion

Augmented reality–assisted pedicle screw insertion: a cadaveric proof-of-concept study

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilo A. Molina ◽  
Nicholas Theodore ◽  
A. Karim Ahmed ◽  
Erick M. Westbroek ◽  
Yigal Mirovsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Augmented Reality ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
User Experience ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Screw Insertion ◽  
Pedicle Screw Insertion ◽  
Insertion Method ◽  
Comparative Accuracy ◽  
Placement Accuracy ◽  
Surgical Field

OBJECTIVEAugmented reality (AR) is a novel technology that has the potential to increase the technical feasibility, accuracy, and safety of conventional manual and robotic computer-navigated pedicle insertion methods. Visual data are directly projected to the operator’s retina and overlaid onto the surgical field, thereby removing the requirement to shift attention to a remote display. The objective of this study was to assess the comparative accuracy of AR-assisted pedicle screw insertion in comparison to conventional pedicle screw insertion methods.METHODSFive cadaveric male torsos were instrumented bilaterally from T6 to L5 for a total of 120 inserted pedicle screws. Postprocedural CT scans were obtained, and screw insertion accuracy was graded by 2 independent neuroradiologists using both the Gertzbein scale (GS) and a combination of that scale and the Heary classification, referred to in this paper as the Heary-Gertzbein scale (HGS). Non-inferiority analysis was performed, comparing the accuracy to freehand, manual computer-navigated, and robotics-assisted computer-navigated insertion accuracy rates reported in the literature. User experience analysis was conducted via a user experience questionnaire filled out by operators after the procedures.RESULTSThe overall screw placement accuracy achieved with the AR system was 96.7% based on the HGS and 94.6% based on the GS. Insertion accuracy was non-inferior to accuracy reported for manual computer-navigated pedicle insertion based on both the GS and the HGS scores. When compared to accuracy reported for robotics-assisted computer-navigated insertion, accuracy achieved with the AR system was found to be non-inferior when assessed with the GS, but superior when assessed with the HGS. Last, accuracy results achieved with the AR system were found to be superior to results obtained with freehand insertion based on both the HGS and the GS scores. Accuracy results were not found to be inferior in any comparison. User experience analysis yielded “excellent” usability classification.CONCLUSIONSAR-assisted pedicle screw insertion is a technically feasible and accurate insertion method.

Influence of submaximal isometric contractions of the hamstrings on electromyography activity and force while functioning as hip extensors

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Dasom Oh ◽  
Wootaek Lim
Keyword(s):  
Prone Position ◽  
Supine Position ◽  
Isometric Contraction ◽  
Muscle Length ◽  
Biceps Femoris ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Isometric Contractions ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Extension Force ◽  
Long Head

BACKGROUND: Although the medial and lateral hamstrings are clearly distinct anatomically and have different functions in the transverse plane, they are often considered as one muscle during rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to compare the electromyographic (EMG) activity between the prone position and the supine position during maximal isometric contraction and to additionally confirm the effect of submaximal isometric contractions on EMG activity of medial and lateral hamstrings, and force. METHODS: In the prone position, EMG activities of the long head of biceps femoris (BFLH) and semitendinosus (ST) were measured during the maximal isometric contraction. In the supine position, hip extension force with EMG activity were measured during the maximal and the submaximal isometric contractions. RESULTS: EMG activity in the prone position was significantly decreased in the supine position. In the supine position, there was a significant difference between the BFLH and ST during the maximal isometric contraction, but not during the submaximal isometric contractions. CONCLUSIONS: The dependence on the hamstrings could be relatively lower during hip extensions. When the medial and lateral hamstrings are considered separately, the lateral hamstrings may show a more active response, with increased muscle length, in clinical practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document