AOA ophthalmology and otolaryngology program closures as a model to highlight challenges of maintaining GME in high need areas

Context While 90% of former American Osteopathic Association (AOA) residency programs transitioned to Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accreditation, surgical subspecialty programs such as ear, nose, and throat (ENT, 62%) and ophthalmology (47%) struggled to gain accreditation. Doctors of Osteopathic Medicine (DOs) actively participate in serving underserved communities, and the loss of AOA surgical specialty programs may decrease access to surgical care in rural and nonmetropolitan areas. Objectives To determine the challenges faced by former AOA-accredited surgical subspecialty programs during the transition to ACGME accreditation, particularly ENT and ophthalmology programs in underresourced settings. Methods A directory of former AOA ENT and Ophthalmology programs was obtained from the American Osteopathic Colleges of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AOCOO-HNS). A secured survey was sent out to 16 eligible ENT and ophthalmology program directors (PDs). The survey contained both quantitative and qualitative aspects to help assess why these programs did not pursue or failed to receive ACGME accreditation. Results Twelve of 16 eligible programs responded, com-prising six ophthalmology and six ENT PDs. Among the respondents, 83% did not pursue accreditation (6 ophthalmology and 4 ENT programs), and 17% were unsuccessful in achieving accreditation despite pursuing accreditation (2 ENT programs). Across 12 respondents, 7 (58%) cited a lack of hospital/administrative support and 5 (42%) cited excessive costs and lack of faculty support as reasons for not pursuing or obtaining ACGME accreditation. Conclusions The survey results reflect financial issues associated with rural hospitals. A lack of hospital/administrative support and excessive costs to transition to the ACGME were key drivers in closures of AOA surgical specialty programs. In light of these results, we have four recommendations for various stakeholders, including PDs, Designated Institutional Officials, hospital Chief Medical Officers, and health policy experts. These recommendations include expanding Teaching Health Center Graduate Medical Education to surgical subspecialties, identifying and learning from surgical fields such as urology that fared well during the transition to ACGME, addressing the lack of institutional commitment and the prohibitive costs of maintaining ACGME-accredited subspecialty programs in underresourced settings, and reconsidering the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) pool approach to physician reimbursement.

Crossmatch to Transfusion Ratios in the Operating Room with an Expanding Hospital Footprint

Introduction/Objective The crossmatch to transfusion (CT) ratio is one of several metrics used to assess the efficiency of blood product utilization. A ratio of 2:1 has been suggested as a hospitalwide limit that indicates appropriate use of red blood cells (RBCs), and the Q Probe Study found that the average CT ratio for hospitals in the United States is 1.85:1. This ratio can vary widely from one patient location to another due to anticipatory or unknown needs within the operating room (OR) compared to laboratory or symptomatic based orders for patients on the floor. Following a recent hospital expansion at Stanford University Hospital that led to the creation of multiple adult OR locations and a move of our blood bank, we monitored the CT ratios of various OR locations and surgical subspecialties to assess the drivers of increased blood product utilization and interventions that could improve these metrics. Methods/Case Report This quality improvement project involved the collection of blood product order information through our LIS (SafeTrace) and clinical system (EPIC), creation of an on-demand report to provide constant updates to that data, qualitative interviews with OR staff, and process mapping for multiple subspecialties. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) Prior to our hospital expansion there was an appropriate CT ratio of 2.1:1 in our adult ORs. Post-expansion, this ratio has been between 3-5:1, depending on the OR location. This led us to focus our efforts on the OR locations that were furthest from the blood bank and existed prior to the hospital expansion. In discussions with our OR colleagues, we found that the major driver for this increased ratio was a longer travel path for blood products and delays in delivery which led to larger amounts of anticipatory orders. In addition, these concerns caused duplicative efforts in the OR with surgical teams and Anesthesiologists placing pre-operative orders for the same cases. To address this concern, remote blood product dispensing was implemented. To address duplicative ordering workflows, we partnered with Anesthesiology to determine the blood ordering workflow agreements with each surgical subspecialty to ensure appropriate division of roles and responsibilities. Evaluation of CT ratios after these interventions is ongoing, but early data suggests a significant reduction. Conclusion Post-intervention phase ongoing and will be updated with additional data & conclusions prior to conference.

SP3.1.1Research Priorities in Emergency General Surgery

Aims Delphi methodology can be used to achieve consensus opinion amongst experts in a particular field. This study used a modified Delphi approach to identify research priorities in emergency general surgery (EGS). The aim was to establish a research agenda using a formal consensus-based approach in an effort to identify questions relevant to EGS that have been prioritised by relevant stakeholders with an equal voice. Methods Three rounds were conducted using an electronic questionnaire and involved health care professionals, research personnel, patients and their relatives. In the first round stakeholders were invited to submit clinical research questions that they felt were priorities for future research. In rounds two and three, participants were asked to score individual questions in order of priority using a 5-point Linkert scale. Between rounds an expert panel were asked to analyse results before forwarding questions to subsequent rounds. Results Ninety-two EGS research questions were proposed in Phase 1. Following the first round of prioritisation, 47 questions progressed to the final phase. A final list of 17 research questions were identified from the final round of prioritisation. These included questions on peri-operative strategies, EGS outcomes in elderly and frail patients as well as non-technical and technical influences on EGS outcomes. Conclusion Our study provides a consensus delivered framework that should determine the research agenda for future EGS projects. It may also assist setting priorities for research funding and multi-centre collaborative strategies within the surgical subspecialty of EGS.

727 Robotic Assisted Versus Fluoroscopic Guided Approach in Pedicle Screw Insertion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aim The robotic assisted surgery has become prevalent in most of the surgical subspecialty. The adaption of such technique in spine surgery has resulted in minimising several issues encountered with fluoroscopic guided approach. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of robotic assisted approach and fluoroscopic guided approach in pedicle screw insertion. Method PUBMED, EMBASE, MEDLINE and CENTRAL database were systematically searched from its inception until November 2020. All the studies comparing robotic assisted surgery and fluoroscopic guided approach in pedicle screw insertion were included for quantitative and qualitative analysis. Results Twenty-eight studies enrolling 2105 patients (robotic group: 1027, fluoroscopic: 1078) and total screws of 8668 screws (robotic group: 4217, fluoroscopic group: 4451) were eligible for inclusion, these studies consisted of 19 observational studies, 7 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 2 cadaveric study. Robotic assisted approach was associated with significantly higher accuracy (Grade A+B) (OR = 2.34; P < 0.0001) and distance between pedicle and screw (MD: 1.69; P = 0.001), lower incident of facet joint violation (OR = 0.22; P < 0.00001), screw revision (OR = 0.38; P = 0.009), intraoperative blood loss (MD: -116.95; P = 0.0006), shorter pedicle screw placement time (MD: -4.66; P < 0.00001), radiation exposure time (MD:-5.27; P = 0.0001), radiation dose (MD:-22.30; P = 0.0002) and postoperative hospital stay (MD: -0.79; P = 0.02) compared to fluoroscopic guided approach. There was no significant difference in operative time and wound infection. Conclusions In this meta-analysis, robotic assisted approach is more effective in achieving better clinical outcomes compared to fluoroscopic guided technique in pedicle screw insertion. However, future adequately powered RCTs are warranted to generate standardised outcomes.

Globalization in Pediatric Surgical Training: The Benefit of an International Fellowship in a Low-to-Middle–Income Country Academic Hospital

Objective A relative oversupply of pediatric surgeons led to increasing difficulties in surgical training in high-income countries (HIC), popularizing international fellowships in low-to-middle–income countries (LMIC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit of an international fellowship in an LMIC for the training of pediatric surgery trainees from HICs. Methods We retrospectively reviewed and compared the prospectively maintained surgical logbooks of international pediatric surgical trainees who completed a fellowship at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital in the last 10 years. We analyzed the number of surgeries, type of involvement, and level of supervision in the operations. Data are provided in mean differences between South Africa and the respective home country. Results Seven fellows were included. Operative experience was higher in South Africa in general (Δx̅ = 381; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 236–656; p < 0.0001) and index cases (Δx̅ = 178; 95% CI: 109–279; p < 0.0001). In South Africa, fellows performed more index cases unsupervised (Δx̅ = 71; 95% CI: 42–111; p < 0.0001), but a similar number under supervision (Δx̅ = –1; 95% CI: –25–24; p = 0.901). Fellows were exposed to more surgical procedures in each pediatric surgical subspecialty. Conclusion An international fellowship in a high-volume subspecialized unit in an LMIC can be highly beneficial for HIC trainees, allowing exposure to higher caseload, opportunity to operate independently, and to receive a wider exposure to the different fields of pediatric surgery. The associated benefit for the local trainees is some reduction in their clinical responsibilities due to the additional workforce, providing them with the opportunity for protected academic and research time.

Development of the National Otolaryngology Interest Group: Conception to Implementation

Otolaryngology is a small and highly sought-after surgical subspecialty with sparse residency positions, making it competitive to match into. Allopathic (MD) students without home otolaryngology residency programs, osteopathic (DO) medical students, and underrepresented minorities have historically faced additional challenges in matching into otolaryngology. These specific populations generally experience limited opportunities in establishing mentors, engaging in scholarly activity, and gaining early exposure to clinical settings. Even though the American Osteopathic Association and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education merger was in part established to create equity among applicants, there remains a substantial disparity among the match rates of medical students of various educational and cultural backgrounds. The National Otolaryngology Interest Group is a student-led interest group created to provide all medical students, especially those facing barriers, with the resources needed to best prepare for matching into an otolaryngology residency program and ultimately a career in otolaryngology.

Antimicrobial Prescribing in the Emergency Department; Who Is Calling the Shots?

Objective: Inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing in the emergency department (ED) can lead to poor outcomes. It is unknown how often the prescribing clinician is guided by others, and whether prescriber factors affect appropriateness of prescribing. This study aims to describe decision making, confidence in, and appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing in the ED. Methods: Descriptive study in two Australian EDs using both questionnaire and medical record review. Participants were clinicians who prescribed antimicrobials to patients in the ED. Outcomes of interest were level of decision-making (self or directed), confidence in indication for prescribing and appropriateness (5-point Likert scale, 5 most confident). Appropriateness assessment of the prescribing event was by blinded review using the National Antibiotic Prescribing Survey appropriateness assessment tool. All analyses were descriptive. Results: Data on 88 prescribers were included, with 61% making prescribing decisions themselves. The 39% directed by other clinicians were primarily guided by more senior ED and surgical subspecialty clinicians. Confidence that antibiotics were indicated (Likert score: 4.20, 4.35 and 4.35) and appropriate (Likert score: 4.07, 4.23 and 4.29) was similar for juniors, mid-level and senior prescribers, respectively. Eighty-five percent of prescriptions were assessed as appropriate, with no differences in appropriateness by seniority, decision-making or confidence. Conclusions: Over one-third of prescribing was guided by senior ED clinicians or based on specialty advice, primarily surgical specialties. Prescriber confidence was high regardless of seniority or decision-maker. Overall appropriateness of prescribing was good, but with room for improvement. Future qualitative research may provide further insight into the intricacies of prescribing decision-making.

Pattern and Outcome Dermatological Admission at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital Rivers State

Introduction: Dermatology is primarily an outpatient clinical and surgical subspecialty, but a substantial number of patients need in patient care for adequate management. In recent years, there is a rise in the number of inpatient dermatological admissions and an increase in spending. Rarely, skin diseases can be fatal. Aims and Objectives: To analyze the disease patterns and clinical outcomes of dermatological patients admitted on the medical wards of a tertiary institution in southern Nigeria. Materials and Methods: This study involves a retrospective analysis of the admission records of consecutive in patients with a dermatological diagnosis admitted at the university of Port Harcourt teaching hospital from January 2014 to July 2020. The data obtained were statistically analysed with emphasis on the patient’s demographic profile, clinical diagnosis, final outcome, and duration of admission. Results: A total of 68 patients were admitted into our center during this time. Female outnumbered males with male female ratio of 1: 2.2. Infections (53 patients, 77.9%) were the most frequent reason for admission, followed by autoimmune disorders (5 patients, 7.4%), inflammatory causes, drug reactions and cutaneous manifestation of inter diseases had 3 patients each (4.4%). A patient was classed as idiopathic (1.5%).

Inserción laboral del cirujano joven en la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Necesidad de reestructuración del sistema de formación del cirujano general

Background: Training in surgery has remained relatively uniform since the residency programs were introduced. The continuous advances in science have led to the progressive super-specialization of surgeons; 70% of them continue their training with a subspecialty. Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify the proportion of surgeons who dedicate hours of their practice in another activity and to analyze how surgeons enter the workforce. Material and methods: We conducted a prospective and descriptive cross-sectional study with data from a survey, records of the General Directorate of Teaching and Research, and records of competitive selection processes and professional profiles available online. Results: Of 435 survey respondents, 73.3% of the resident graduates continued postresidency training in a surgical subspecialty. Only 24.7% immediately started working in general surgery. Among the graduate trainees in general surgery, only 17.4% were exclusively dedicated to general surgery. Conclusions: The lack of confidence to perform procedures independently and the need for completing 4 years of training in the residency program in general surgery to start training in the professional field of interest, appear as the issued to be solved. We propose a 5-year program with a 2+3 model. The initial period comprises 24 months of basic training covering the general aspects of surgical practice. The second period of advanced training will provide thorough training in the subspecialty chosen. In the last year of the 5-year program trainees will have the opportunity to act as attending surgeons. General surgery, conceived as a subspecialty, would regain its status as an objective and no longer a pathway to become a subspecialist.