scholarly journals Long-term outcomes of fluoroscopy-guided tracheal stents removal under fluoroscopy guidance: comparison of tracheal fistulas and tracheal stenosis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonghua Bi ◽  
Jindong Li ◽  
Liangliang Bai ◽  
Xinwei Han ◽  
Jianzhuang Ren
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Tracheal Stenosis ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Stent Removal ◽  
Total Incidence ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Endoscopic removal is the most common method for removal of tracheal stents. Few studies have reported the technique of fluoroscopy-guided stent removal for tracheal fistula and tracheal stenosis. We aimed to study the safety and efficacy of fluoroscopy-guided stent removal as well as the optimal duration for stent usage.Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 152 patients who underwent fluoroscopy-guided stent removal from January 2011 to June 2017. Reasons for stent implantation were tracheal fistula in 85 patients (TF group), and tracheal stenosis in 67 patients (TS group). All patients underwent tracheal CT scans before stent removal and during follow up. The technical success rate, complications, and survival rate were compared between the two groups.Results: The technical success rate of stent removal was 98.9% and 97.4%, respectively for the TF and TS group. Removal was routine for half of patients, and in the remainder, excessive granulation tissue was the common indications for stent removal, which was found after stenting at 142.1±25.9 days in the TF group, and at 89.9±15.0 day in the TS group. The total incidence of complications was 21.1% and 22.4%, respectively, for the TF and TS groups. Perioperative death occurred in one patient in the TF group, and two patients in the TS group. Recurrence of fistula or stenosis requiring re-stenting was the most comment complication in both groups. The 0.5-, 3-, 6-year survival rates were 90.3%, 59.6%, and 36.1% for TF group, and 80.4%, 75.7%, 75.7% for TS group.Conclusions: Fluoroscopic removal of tracheal stents is safe and effective for both tracheal fistula and tracheal stenosis, with no significant difference in outcomes. Recurrence of fistula or stenosis requiring re-stenting was the most common complication.

scholarly journals Long-term outcomes of tracheal stents removal under fluoroscopy guidance: comparison of tracheal fistulas and tracheal stenosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonghua Bi ◽  
Jindong Li ◽  
Liangliang Bai ◽  
Xinwei Han ◽  
Jianzhuang Ren
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Tracheal Stenosis ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Stent Removal ◽  
Total Incidence ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Endoscopic removal is the most common method for removal of tracheal stents. Few studies have reported the technique of fluoroscopy-guided stent removal for tracheal fistula and tracheal stenosis. We aimed to study the safety and efficacy of fluoroscopy-guided stent removal as well as the optimal duration for stent usage. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of 152 patients who underwent fluoroscopy-guided stent removal from January 2011 to June 2017. Reasons for stent implantation were tracheal fistula in 85 patients (TF group), and tracheal stenosis in 67 patients (TS group). All patients underwent tracheal CT scans before stent removal and during follow up. The technical success rate, complications, and survival rate were compared between the two groups. Results The technical success rate of stent removal was 98.9 and 97.4%, respectively for the TF and TS group. Removal was routine for half of patients, and in the remainder, excessive granulation tissue was the common indications for stent removal, which was found after stenting at 142.1 ± 25.9 days in the TF group, and at 89.9 ± 15.0 day in the TS group. The total incidence of complications was 21.1 and 22.4%, respectively, for the TF and TS groups. Perioperative death occurred in one patient in the TF group, and two patients in the TS group. Recurrence of fistula or stenosis requiring re-stenting was the most comment complication in both groups. The 0.5-, 3-, 6-year survival rates were 90.3, 59.6, and 36.1% for TF group, and 80.4, 75.7, 75.7% for TS group. Conclusions Fluoroscopic removal of tracheal stents is safe and effective for both tracheal fistula and tracheal stenosis, with no significant difference in outcomes. Clinicians should pay attention to the risk of hemoptysis for patients with malignant tumors and a combination with endoscopic hemostasis may help improve its safety.

scholarly journals Long-term outcomes of fluoroscopy-guided tracheal stents removal under fluoroscopy guidance: comparison of tracheal fistulas and tracheal stenosis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonghua Bi ◽  
Jindong Li ◽  
Liangliang Bai ◽  
Xinwei Han ◽  
Jianzhuang Ren
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Tracheal Stenosis ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Stent Removal ◽  
Total Incidence ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Endoscopic removal is the most common method for removal of tracheal stents. Few studies have reported the technique of fluoroscopy-guided stent removal for tracheal fistula and tracheal stenosis. We aimed to study the safety and efficacy of fluoroscopy-guided stent removal as well as the optimal duration for stent usage.Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 152 patients who underwent fluoroscopy-guided stent removal from January 2011 to June 2017. Reasons for stent implantation were tracheal fistula in 85 patients (TF group), and tracheal stenosis in 67 patients (TS group). All patients underwent tracheal CT scans before stent removal and during follow up. The technical success rate, complications, and survival rate were compared between the two groups.Results: The technical success rate of stent removal was 98.9% and 97.4%, respectively for the TF and TS group. Removal was routine for half of patients, and in the remainder, excessive granulation tissue was the common indications for stent removal, which was found after stenting at 142.1±25.9 days in the TF group, and at 89.9±15.0 day in the TS group. The total incidence of complications was 21.1% and 22.4%, respectively, for the TF and TS groups. Perioperative death occurred in one patient in the TF group, and two patients in the TS group. Recurrence of fistula or stenosis requiring re-stenting was the most comment complication in both groups. The 0.5-, 3-, 6-year survival rates were 90.3%, 59.6%, and 36.1% for TF group, and 80.4%, 75.7%, 75.7% for TS group.Conclusions: Fluoroscopic removal of tracheal stents is safe and effective for both tracheal fistula and tracheal stenosis, with no significant difference in outcomes. Clinicians should pay attention to the risk of hemoptysis for patients with malignant tumors and a combination with endoscopic hemostasis may help improve its safety.

scholarly journals Long-term outcomes of fluoroscopy-guided tracheal stents removal under fluoroscopy guidance: comparison of tracheal fistulas and tracheal stenosis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonghua Bi ◽  
Jindong Li ◽  
Liangliang Bai ◽  
Xinwei Han ◽  
Jianzhuang Ren
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Tracheal Stenosis ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Stent Removal ◽  
Total Incidence ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Endoscopic removal is the most common method for removal of tracheal stents. Few studies have reported the technique of fluoroscopy-guided stent removal for tracheal fistula and tracheal stenosis. We aimed to study the safety and efficacy of fluoroscopy-guided stent removal as well as the optimal duration for stent usage. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 152 patients who underwent fluoroscopy-guided stent removal from January 2011 to June 2017. Reasons for stent implantation were tracheal fistula in 85 patients (TF group), and tracheal stenosis in 67 patients (TS group). All patients underwent tracheal CT scans before stent removal and during follow up. The technical success rate, complications, and survival rate were compared between the two groups. Results: The technical success rate of stent removal was 98.9% and 97.4%, respectively for the TF and TS group. Removal was routine for half of patients, and in the remainder, excessive granulation tissue was the common indications for stent removal, which was found after stenting at 142.1±25.9 days in the TF group, and at 89.9±15.0 day in the TS group. The total incidence of complications was 21.1% and 22.4%, respectively, for the TF and TS groups. Perioperative death occurred in one patient in the TF group, and two patients in the TS group. Recurrence of fistula or stenosis requiring re-stenting was the most comment complication in both groups. The 0.5-, 3-, 6-year survival rates were 90.3%, 59.6%, and 36.1% for TF group, and 80.4%, 75.7%, 75.7% for TS group. Conclusions: Fluoroscopic removal of tracheal stents is safe and effective for both tracheal fistula and tracheal stenosis, with no significant difference in outcomes. Clinicians should pay attention to the risk of hemoptysis for patients with malignant tumors and a combination with endoscopic hemostasis may help improve its safety.

scholarly journals Long-term outcomes of tracheal stents removal under fluoroscopy guidance: comparison of tracheal fistulas with tracheal stenosis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonghua Bi ◽  
Jianzhuang Li ◽  
Liangliang Bai ◽  
Gang Wu ◽  
Xinwei Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Tracheal Stenosis ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Stent Removal ◽  
Total Incidence ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Routine Removal ◽  
Fluoroscopy Guidance

Abstract Background: No study compared the techniques and complications of stent removal under fluoroscopy guidance for tracheal fistula and tracheal stenosis.Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 152 patients who underwent fluoroscopy-guided stent removal from January 2011 to June 2017. Eighty-five patients underwent stent removal for tracheal fistula (TF group), and 67 patients for tracheal stenosis (TS group). All patients underwent tracheal CT scans before stent removal and during follow up. The technical success rate, complications, survival rate were compared between the two groups.Results: The technical success rate of stent removal was 98.9% and 97.4% for tracheal fistula and tracheal stenosis, respectively. Except for the routine removal for half of patients, excessive granulation tissue was the common indications for stent removal, which was found 142.1±25.9 days later for tracheal fistula, and 89.9±15.0 day for tracheal stenosis. The total incidence of complications was 21.1% and 22.4% for tracheal fistula and tracheal stenosis, respectively. One perioperative death of asphyxia was found in TF group, and 2 deaths in TS group. Recurrence of fistula or stenosis requiring stenting was the most comment complication in both groups. The 0.5-, 3-, 6-year survival rates were 90.3%, 59.6%, and 36.1% for TF group, and 80.4%, 75.7%, 75.7% for TS group.Conclusions: Fluoroscopic removal of tracheal stent is safe and effective for both tracheal fistula and tracheal stenosis, with no significant difference. Recurrence of fistula or stenosis requiring stenting was the most comment complication.

scholarly journals Irreversible electroporation (IRE) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC): a mid-term clinical experience

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tze Min Wah ◽  
James Lenton ◽  
Jonathan Smith ◽  
Paul Bassett ◽  
Satinder Jagdev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Renal Cancer ◽  
Tumour Size ◽  
Irreversible Electroporation ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Renal Dialysis ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Ct Guided ◽  
Technical Success Rate

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the safety and efficacy of CT-guided IRE of clinical T1a (cT1a) renal tumours close to vital structures and to assess factors that may influence the technical success and early oncological durability. Methods CT-guided IRE (2015–2020) was prospectively evaluated. Patients’ demographics, technical details/success, Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification of complications (I–V) and oncological outcome were collated. Statistical analysis was performed to determine variables associated with complications. The overall 2- and 3-year cancer-specific (CS), local recurrence-free (LRF) and metastasis-free (MF) survival rates are presented using the Kaplan-Meier curves. Results Thirty cT1a RCCs (biopsy-proven/known VHL disease) in 26 patients (age 32–81 years) were treated with IRE. The mean tumour size was 2.5 cm and the median follow-up was 37 months. The primary technical success rate was 73.3%, where 22 RCCs were completely IRE ablated. Seven residual diseases were successfully ablated with cryoablation, achieving an overall technical success rate of 97%. One patient did not have repeat treatment as he died from unexpected stroke at 4-month post-IRE. One patient had CD-III complication with a proximal ureteric injury. Five patients developed > 25% reduction of eGFR immediately post-IRE. All patients have preservation of renal function without the requirement for renal dialysis. The overall 2- and 3-year CS, LRF and MF survival rates are 89%, 96%, 91% and 87%. Conclusion CT-guided IRE in cT1a RCC is safe with acceptable complications. The primary technical success rate was suboptimal due to the early operator’s learning curve, and long-term follow-up is required to validate the IRE oncological durability. Key Points • Irreversible electroporation should only be considered when surgery or image-guided thermal ablation is not an option for small renal cancer. • This non-thermal technique is safe in the treatment of small renal cancer and the primary technical success rate was 73.3%. • This can be used when renal cancer is close to important structure.

scholarly journals Simultaneous Stenting for Symptomatic Tandem Extracranial and Intracranial Posterior Circulation Stenoses: Long-Term Outcomes and Procedural Experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zichang Jia ◽  
Yanqing Zhao ◽  
Peng Wang ◽  
Jintao Han ◽  
Shilu Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Clinical Success Rate ◽  
Posterior Circulation ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Stent Restenosis

Few studies have reported on simultaneous endovascular stenting for tandem posterior circulation (PC) stenoses and its long-term outcomes. Thus, our aim was to investigate the safety and efficacy of simultaneous stenting in patients with symptomatic tandem extra- and intracranial PC stenoses. From September 2014 to June 2018, 16 such patients with symptomatic stenoses who underwent simultaneous stent placement were analyzed. The primary outcome was occurrence of any stroke, TIA, or death within 30 days after the procedure. The secondary outcomes were technical success, clinical success, and the occurrence of in-stent restenosis ≥50% during follow-up. Technical success was defined as stent coverage of all tandem lesions and residual stenosis <30%. Clinical success was determined based on any occurrence of neurological events or death within 3 months after the procedure. All stents (19 intracranial and 14 extracranial) were placed with a technical success rate of 100%. One patient experienced a pontine ischemic stroke 2 days after the procedure and had recovered well at discharge. One patient experienced a minor complication of groin hematoma. The clinical success rate was 93.75% (15/16). During a median follow-up of 36.0 ± 11.0 months, two patients developed ISR ≥50% at the 1-year follow-up. None of the patients experienced stroke, TIA, or death after discharge during follow-up. Simultaneous stenting for symptomatic tandem extra- and intracranial PC stenoses is safe and feasible. Its impact on long-term stroke prevention is promising, and further study of a larger patient population is needed.

scholarly journals Long-term outcomes after endoscopic retrograde pancreatic drainage for symptomatic pancreaticojejunal anastomotic stenosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihiko Kida ◽  
Yukihiro Shirota ◽  
Taro Kawane ◽  
Hitoshi Omura ◽  
Tatsuo Kumai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Anastomotic Stenosis ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Clinical Trial Register

AbstractThere is limited evidence supporting the usefulness of endoscopic retrograde pancreatic drainage (ERPD) for symptomatic pancreaticojejunal anastomotic stenosis (sPJS). We examined the usefulness of ERPD for sPJS. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 10 benign sPJS patients. A forward-viewing endoscope was used in all sessions. Following items were evaluated: technical success, adverse events, and clinical outcome of ERPD. The technical success rate was 100% (10/10) in initial ERPD; 9 patients had a pancreatic stent (no-internal-flap: n = 4, internal-flap: n = 5). The median follow-up was 920 days. Four patients developed recurrence. Among them, 3 had a stent with no-internal-flap in initial ERPD, the stent migrated in 3 at recurrence, and a stent was not placed in 1 patient in initial ERPD. Four follow-up interventions were performed. No recurrence was observed in 6 patients. None of the stents migrated (no-internal-flap: n = 1, internal-flap: n = 5) and no stents were replaced due to stent failure. Stenting with no-internal-flap was associated with recurrence (p = 0.042). Mild adverse events developed in 14.3% (2/14). In conclusions, ERPD was performed safely with high technical success. Recurrence was common after stenting with no-internal-flap. Long-term stenting did not result in stent failure.Clinical trial register and their clinical registration number: Nos. 58-115 and R2-9.

scholarly journals Packing Technique with or without Remodeling for Endovascular Coil Embolization of Renal Artery Aneurysms: Safety, Efficacy and Mid-Term Outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 326
Author(s):  
Grégory Secco ◽  
Olivier Chevallier ◽  
Nicolas Falvo ◽  
Kévin Guillen ◽  
Pierre-Olivier Comby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Artery ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Coil Embolization ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Parent Artery ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Endovascular Coil Embolization ◽  
Lower Morbidity

The endovascular treatment of renal artery aneurysms (RAAs) has lower morbidity and shorter stay lengths compared to surgical repair. Here, we describe coil packing with or without remodeling and assess outcomes and complications. We retrospectively identified the 19 consecutive preventive endovascular RAA coil embolizations done in 18 patients at our center in 2010–2020. Patient and aneurysm characteristics, technical success rate, complications, and recurrences were recorded. Mean patient age was 63 ± 13 years. The RAA was >1.5 cm in 11 cases, and in four cases, the aneurysm-to-parent artery size ratio was >2. Simple coiling was performed for 11 (57.9%) aneurysms, stent-assisted coiling for seven (36.8%) aneurysms, and balloon-assisted coiling for one (5.3%) aneurysm. Technical success rate was 100%. Complete definitive RAA exclusion was achieved with a single procedure for 17 (89.5%) aneurysms, whereas two (10.5%) aneurysms required a repeat procedure. Four minor complications occurred but resolved with no long-term consequences. No major complications occurred during the mean follow-up of 41.1 ± 29.7 months. Coil embolization by sac packing or remodeling proved very safe and effective. Together with the known lower morbidity and shorter stay length compared to open surgery, these data indicate that this endovascular procedure should become the preventive treatment of choice for RAAs.

scholarly journals Long-Term Management of Recurrent Cholecystitis after Initial Conservative Treatment: Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Stenting

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Hideki Kamada ◽  
Hideki Kobara ◽  
Naohito Uchida ◽  
Kiyohito Kato ◽  
Takayuki Fujimori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Clinical Success Rate ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

Background. Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting (ETGBS) is an effective procedure for treating high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis and severe comorbidities. However, the efficacy of ETGBS for recurrent cholecystitis (RC) remains unclear. This study aimed to explore its efficacy in patients with RC for whom cholecystectomy is contraindicated because of its high surgical risk.Methods. Data on 19 high-risk patients who had undergone ETGBS for RC after initial conservative therapy in our institution between June 2006 and May 2012 were retrospectively examined. The primary outcome was the clinical success rate, which was defined as no recurrences of acute cholecystitis after ETGBS until death or the end of the follow-up period. Secondary outcomes were technical success rate and adverse events (AEs).Results. The clinical success rate of ETGBS was 100%, the technical success rate 94.7%, and AE rate 5%: one patient developed procedure-related mild acute pancreatitis. The clinical courses of all patients were as follows: four died of nonbiliary disease, and the remaining 15 were subsequently treated conservatively. The median duration of follow-up was 14.95 months (range 3–42 months).Conclusions. ETGBS is an effective alternative for managing RC in high-risk patients with severe comorbidities.

Long-term outcomes after endoscopic retrograde pancreatic drainage for symptomatic pancreaticojejunal anastomotic stenosis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihiko Kida ◽  
Taro Kawane ◽  
Hitoshi Omura ◽  
Tatsuo Kumai ◽  
Masaaki Yano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Stent Placement ◽  
Stent Migration ◽  
Anastomotic Stenosis ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Technical Success Rate

Abstract 【Background】 There is limited evidence demonstrating the usefulness of endoscopic retrograde pancreatic drainage (ERPD) for symptomatic pancreaticojejunal anastomotic stenosis (sPJS). We examined the usefulness of ERPD for sPJS. 【Methods】 We conducted a retrospective analysis of 10 benign sPJS patients. Following items were evaluated: technical success, adverse events and clinical outcome of ERPD. 【Results】 Technical success rate was 100% (10/10); 9 patients had a pancreatic stent (no-internal-flap: n=4, internal-flap: n=5). Median follow-up was 920 days. Four patients developed recurrence. Among them, 3 patients had a stent with no-internal-flap in initial ERPD and the stent migrated in 3 patients at recurrence, and a stent was not placed in 1 patient in initial ERPD. Four follow-up ERPD were performed. No recurrence was observed in 6 patients. Among them, none of the stents migrated (no-internal-flap: n=1, internal-flap: n=5), and none were replaced stents due to stent failure. A stent placement with no-internal-flap was associated with recurrence (p=0.042). Mild adverse events developed in 14.3% (2/14). 【Conclusions】 ERPD was performed safely with high technical success. Recurrence was common in a stent placement with no-internal-flap, which was associated with stent migration. Long-term stent placement didn’t result in stent failure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document