Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Mild Ischemic Stroke Patients: Higher ABCD2 Score Associated with Better Outcome
Abstract Background: Up to 30% of patients with mild ischemic stroke suffer neurologic deterioration. However, optimal medical approaches of such patients remain controversial given the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether patients with acute mild stroke stratified with ABCD2 score (the risk of stroke on basis of age, blood pressure, clinical features, duration of symptoms, and presence of diabetes mellitus) could benefit from IVT. Methods: Among 3321 patients with a final diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, we retrospectively included 227 patients identified with acute mild neurologic deficits (National Institution of Health Stroke Scale, NIHSS ≤5) treated with or without IVT. Odds ratios (OR) with their confidence intervals (CI) for outcomes between groups were assessed by using multivariable binary logistic regression analyses. And the heterogeneity of treatment effect magnitude for excellent outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-1) was estimated in different subgroups. Results: A total of 227 cases were enrolled, 108 receiving IVT and 119 treated with secondary stroke prevention strategies alone. Patients receiving IVT had more history of atrial fibrillation. At 7 days, 32 (29.6%) patients with IVT treatment versus 17 (14.3%) patients not receiving IVT achieved significant improvement (≥4-point NIHSS score decrease; OR, 2.57; 95%CI, 1.29-5.12; P=0.007). At 90 days, excellent outcome was achieved in 85 (78.7%) patients treated with IVT versus 78 (65.5%) patients without IVT treatment (OR: 2.95; 95% CI, 1.44-6.03; P=0.003), especially in those with ABCD2 score≥4 (78.4% versus 64.6%; OR, 2.81; 95%CI, 1.31-6.03; P=0.008). Besides, 7(6.5%) IVT-treated patients versus 2 (1.7%) non-IVT-treated patients developed intracranial hemorrhage (ICH; OR, 4.05; 95%CI, 0.82-19.96; P=0.085), among these only 1 (0.9%) was symptomatic ICH with IVT treatment. Conclusions: For acute mild ischemic stroke patients, we reassured the safety and especially the efficacy of IVT at 7- and 90-days. Patients with 4 or more of ABCD2 score might benefit more from IVT. Keywords: Prognosis, risk scores, stroke, intravenous thrombolysis.