scholarly journals Association between response to triptans and response to erenumab: real-life data

Author(s):  
Ilaria Frattale ◽  
Valeria Caponnetto ◽  
Alfonsina Casalena ◽  
Maurizio Assetta ◽  
Maurizio Maddestra ◽  
...  

Abstract Background. Triptans and erenumab are both migraine-specific agents acting on the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway. Therefore, response to triptans might be associated with response to erenumab. Main body. In our study, consecutive patients referring to the Headache Centers of the Abruzzo region from January 2019 to March 2020 and treated with erenumab were interviewed about past use and efficacy of triptans. Triptan users were classified as ‘triptan responders’ if they were headache-free 2 hours after treating ≥3 migraine attacks with ≥1 triptan. We considered patients as ‘erenumab responders’, if they had a ≥50% mean reduction in monthly migraine days between the 4th and the 6th month from treatment start compared with baseline. Of 91 triptan users, 73 (80.2%) were triptan responders and 58 (63.7%) were erenumab responders. The odds ratio of being erenumab responder was 3.64 (95% CI, 1.25-10.64) for triptan users as compared to non-users. (P=0.014). Besides, starting erenumab improved triptan response in both erenumab responders and non-responders. Conclusions. Our data of an association between response to triptans and response to erenumab can be useful for patient advice and to improve the understanding of migraine pathophysiology and treatment.

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilaria Frattale ◽  
Valeria Caponnetto ◽  
Alfonsina Casalena ◽  
Maurizio Assetta ◽  
Maurizio Maddestra ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Triptans and erenumab are both migraine-specific agents acting on the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway. Therefore, response to triptans might be associated with response to erenumab. Main body In our study, consecutive patients referring to the Headache Centers of the Abruzzo region from January 2019 to March 2020 and treated with erenumab were interviewed about past use and efficacy of triptans. Triptan users were classified as ‘triptan responders’ if they were headache-free 2 h after treating ≥3 migraine attacks with ≥1 triptan. We considered patients as ‘erenumab responders’, if they had a ≥ 50% mean reduction in monthly migraine days between the 4th and the 6th month from treatment start compared with baseline. Of 91 triptan users, 73 (80.2%) were triptan responders and 58 (63.7%) were erenumab responders. The odds ratio of being erenumab responder was 3.64 (95% CI, 1.25–10.64) for triptan users as compared to non-users. (P = 0.014). Besides, starting erenumab improved triptan response in both erenumab responders and non-responders. Conclusions Our data of an association between response to triptans and response to erenumab can be useful for patient advice and to improve the understanding of migraine pathophysiology and treatment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffaele Ornello ◽  
Alfonsina Casalena ◽  
Ilaria Frattale ◽  
Amleto Gabriele ◽  
Giannapia Affaitati ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 233-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Peper ◽  
Simone N. Loeffler

Current ambulatory technologies are highly relevant for neuropsychological assessment and treatment as they provide a gateway to real life data. Ambulatory assessment of cognitive complaints, skills and emotional states in natural contexts provides information that has a greater ecological validity than traditional assessment approaches. This issue presents an overview of current technological and methodological innovations, opportunities, problems and limitations of these methods designed for the context-sensitive measurement of cognitive, emotional and behavioral function. The usefulness of selected ambulatory approaches is demonstrated and their relevance for an ecologically valid neuropsychology is highlighted.


Author(s):  
Eleni Pantazi ◽  
Alexios Travlos ◽  
Evaggelia Vogiatzi ◽  
Ifigenia Kostoglou-Athanassiou

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document