scholarly journals Making implementation programmes better.  Mixed-m​ethods case study of an implementation process for two evidence-based brief psychotherapies

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars H. Lindholm ◽  
Jorma Komulainen ◽  
Antero Lassila ◽  
Olli Kampman
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Implementation Process ◽  
Hybrid Design ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Implementation Outcomes ◽  
Evidence Based Treatments ◽  
Case Consultation

Abstract Background The Ostrobothnia Depression Programme (ODP) had a hybrid-design incorporating an implementation programme for two evidence-based treatments (EBTs), behavioural activation and motivational interviewing, and a study on their effectiveness. It was carried out regionally in secondary psychiatric care in a Finnish district. We evaluated the ODP through a mixed-methods analysis to extract organization- and programme-related knowledge to make future programmes more effective in terms of sustaining and scaling up the desired programme outcomes. Methods A cross-sectional mixed-methods survey was conducted with the programme addressees 4-5 months after the end of the ODP. The realization of case consultation groups analysed further by interviewing those responsible for them and making use of attendance lists. Results Out of 72 original programme addressees 33 completed the survey. The results showed that the ODP succeeded in initiating the desired change in clinical practices. Case consultations and training videos intended as reinforcers were underutilized. Deficits in the implementation plan and the hybrid design of the ODP jeopardized the maintenance of the implementation outcomes in the long term. Conclusions We discuss our results in light of the Normalization Process Theory (NPT) related sub-processes ‘implementation’, ‘embedding’ and ‘integration’. The complete training intervention in the target EBTs should comprise both workshops and non-optional case consultations. Access to case consultations should be made as convenient as possible. Means to decentralize the clinical support in everyday work should be elaborated in collaboration with the teams. Coaching team leaders to employ evidence-based active managerial practices that are connected e.g. to the concept of ‘transformational leadership’ would likely be fruitful. The original programme plan should be checked for means to sustain and scale up the implementation outcomes after the active programme phase.

scholarly journals Team functioning and implementation of innovations in healthcare and human service settings: a systematic review protocol

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. McGuier ◽  
David J. Kolko ◽  
Mary Lou Klem ◽  
Jamie Feldman ◽  
Grace Kinkler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Human Service ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Bibliographic Databases ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Implementation Outcomes ◽  
Services Implementation ◽  
Team Functioning

Abstract Background Healthcare and human services increasingly rely on teams of individuals to deliver services. Implementation of evidence-based practices and other innovations in these settings requires teams to work together to change processes and behaviors. Accordingly, team functioning may be a key determinant of implementation outcomes. This systematic review will identify and summarize empirical research examining associations between team functioning and implementation outcomes in healthcare and human service settings. Methods We will conduct a comprehensive search of bibliographic databases (e.g., MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC) for articles published from January 2000 or later. We will include peer-reviewed empirical articles and conference abstracts using quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods. We will include experimental or observational studies that report on the implementation of an innovation in a healthcare or human service setting and examine associations between team functioning and implementation outcomes. Implementation outcomes of interest are acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, cost, feasibility, fidelity, penetration, and sustainability. Two reviewers will independently screen all titles/abstracts, review full-text articles, and extract data from included articles. We will use the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool to assess methodological quality/bias and conduct a narrative synthesis without meta-analysis. Discussion Understanding how team functioning influences implementation outcomes will contribute to our understanding of team-level barriers and facilitators of change. The results of this systematic review will inform efforts to implement evidence-based practices in team-based service settings. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42020220168

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Implementation Process of the Mobile Health Platform ‘WelTel’ in Six Sites in East Africa and Canada Using the Modified Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (mCFIR)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samia El Joueidi ◽  
Kevin Bardosh ◽  
Richard Musoke ◽  
Binyam Tilahun ◽  
Maryam Abo Moslim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Implementation Research ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Implementation Process ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
User Friendliness ◽  
Domain 3 ◽  
And Performance

Abstract Background: Health systems globally are investing in integrating secure messaging platforms for virtual care in clinical practice. Implementation science is essential for adoption, scale-up, spread and maintenance of complex evidence-based solutions in clinics with evolving priorities. In response, the mHealth Research Group modified the existing Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (mCFIR) to evaluate implementation of virtual health tools in clinical settings. WelTel® is an evidence-based digital health platform widely deployed in various geographical and health contexts. Objectives: To identify the facilitators and barriers for implementing WelTel and to assess the application of the mCFIR tool in facilitating focus groups in different geographical and health settings. Methodology: Both qualitative and semi-quantitative approaches were employed. Six mCFIR sessions were held in three countries with 51 key stakeholders surveyed. The mCFIR tool consists of 5 Domains and 25 Constructs and was built and distributed through Qualtrics XM. “Performance ” and “Importance” scores were valued on a scale of 0 to 10 (Mean + SD). Descriptive analysis was conducted using R computing software. NVivo 12 Pro software was used to analyze mCFIR responses and to generate themes from the participants’ input. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the focus group facilitators to understand their experience using the mCFIR tool. Results: We observed a parallel trend in the scores for Importance and Performance. Of the five Domains, Domain 4 (End-user Characteristics) and Domain 3 (Inner Settings) scored highest in Importance (8.9 + 0.5 and 8.6 + 0.6, respectively) and Performance (7.6 + 0.7 and 7.2 + 1.3, respectively) for all sites. Domain 2 (Outer Setting) scored the lowest in both Importance and Performance for all sites (7.6 + 0.4 and 5.6 + 1.8). Areas of strengths included timely diagnosis, immediate response, cost-effectiveness, user-friendliness, and simplicity. Areas for improvement included training, phone accessibility, health authority’s engagement, and literacy. Conclusion: The mCFIR tool allowed for a comprehensive understanding of the barriers and facilitators to the implementation, reach, and scale-up of digital health tools. Participants emphasized the importance of creating partnerships with external organizations and health authorities in order to achieve sustainability and scalability.Trial Registration: NCT02603536 – November 11, 2015NCT01549457 – March 9, 2012

Factors influencing evidence-based practice in prosthetics and orthotics

2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Andrysek ◽  
James Christensen ◽  
Annie Dupuis
Keyword(s):  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Internet Survey ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Principal Component Factor Analysis ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Relevant Evidence

Background: The importance of evidence-based practice is being recognized across a broad range of healthcare disciplines as a means for improving patient outcomes and also efficiently managing healthcare resources.Objective: The objective of this work was to obtain information from clinicians about the underlying barriers and facilitators relating to evidence-based practice in prosthetics and orthotics.Study design: Cross sectional survey.Methods: An internet survey was developed and distributed to 300 prosthetists and orthotists currently practicing in Canada.Results: A principal component factor analysis of the survey results revealed ten primary factors affecting evidence-based practice. These include time constraints, workload and system demands, limited relevant evidence from research, and gaps in skills and knowledge required to perform evidence-based practice.Conclusions: Clinicians value research as a means of improving clinical practice, but they are faced with a number of practical barriers in performing evidence-based practice.Clinical relevanceThis study provides empirical data about the underlying barriers and facilitators relating to evidence-based practice in prosthetics and orthotics. Such data are essential in order to inform those involved in improving existing clinical practices, including educators, professional organizations, and governing bodies.

Evidence-based training in treatment treatments: The case of pediatric psychopharmacology

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 2048-2048
Author(s):  
P.S. Jensen
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Health Care Practitioners ◽  
Evidence Based Treatments

IntroductionDespite major research advances in pediatric psychopharmacology and psychotherapy over the last 20 years, the lack of well-trained specialists has posed almost insurmountable barriers to many children and families from receiving high-quality, evidence-based assessment and treatments. The REACH Institute, an international non-profit organization dedicated to disseminating evidence-based treatments, has developed portable, effective methods to train primary care and specialty health providers in pediatric psychopharmacology and psychotherapies.ObjectivesTo develop effective, scientifically-proven methods for teaching and disseminating evidence-based treatments.AimsTo develop, disseminate, and evaluate high quality approaches for teaching primary care and specialty mental health practitioners in pediatric psychopharmacology.MethodsUsing novel approaches grounded in scientific behavioral change technologies, over 700 health care providers have been trained in evidence-based pediatric psychopharmacology in sites across multiple countries, including the US, Canada, and Norway. All trainings are rigorously evaluated for changes in health care practitioners' behaviors and clinical practices, including within an NIH-funded randomized controlled trial (RCT).ResultsTrainings have been very well-received across multiple countries, requiring only minor adaptations. These trainings have been effective in yielding changes in health care practitioners abilities and actual clinical practices, enabling more children to access appropriate pediatric psychopharmacology.ConclusionsEffective and disseminable methods for changing health care practitioners behaviors in applying pediatric psychopharmacology treatments are possible, and can be adapted to different countries, languages, and cultural contexts.

scholarly journals Process evaluation of a pre-adolescent transdisciplinary health intervention for inter-generational outcomes

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. e0261632
Author(s):  
Keshni Arthur ◽  
Nicola Christofides ◽  
Gill Nelson
Keyword(s):  
South African ◽  
Process Evaluation ◽  
Primary Schools ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Implementation Process ◽  
School Curriculum ◽  
Cultural Backgrounds ◽  
Implementation Outcomes ◽  
Rural And Urban ◽  
Intervention Impact

Background The CIrCLE of Life Initiative was implemented to 537 grade 6 learners and their parents, in five Government-run South African primary schools. The transdisciplinary intervention was intended to increase knowledge and skills on HIV and obesity. The study aim was to assess and report on the implementation process. Methods Data was collected on an adapted Proctor’s taxonomy of implementation outcomes, and to assess participants’ experiences. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected through educator logbooks, researcher observations, and learner-parent workbooks. Results Differentiations between the various school contexts were observed. The process evaluation revealed high learner penetration (97.2%), but lower learner and parent exposure (44.3% and 55.5%, respectively). All educators thought that the intervention was a fit for both rural and urban schools, different socio-economic groups, and people of different ethnic and cultural backgrounds. The intervention was perceived to be sustainable, and there were recommendations for adoption into the school curriculum and scale-up if found to be effective. Conclusion The process evaluation facilitated the assessment of the implementation outcomes, described its processes, and acknowledged fundamental characteristics that could justify variability in the intervention impact and outcomes. The value of process evaluations and their benefit to the science of implementation were demonstrated.

Improving the dissemination of evidence-based treatments: Facilitators and barriers to participating in case consultation.

2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 225-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rochelle M. Fritz ◽  
Ashley B. Tempel ◽  
Benjamin A. Sigel ◽  
Nicola A. Conners-Burrow ◽  
Karen B. Worley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Treatments ◽  
Case Consultation ◽  
Facilitators And Barriers

scholarly journals Implementation of Evidence-Based Patient Safety Practices: 4-Years’ Follow-up of a Nationwide Regulatory Intervention in Brazilian Hospitals

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magda Machado de Miranda Costa ◽  
Heiko Thereza Santana ◽  
André Anderson de Carvalho ◽  
Ana Clara Ribeiro Bello dos Santos ◽  
Cleide Felicia de Mesquita Ribeiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Implementation Process ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Good Tool ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Safety Practices ◽  
Process Indicators ◽  
Regulatory Interventions ◽  
Regulatory Intervention

Abstract Background: Regulatory interventions are widely recommended to improve the quality of health services, but there are few studies on the possible models and their effects. The aim of this study is to describe the implementation process and analyse the results of a nationwide regulatory intervention for the implementation of patient safety practices.Methods: Four nationwide annual cross-sectional assessments were conducted in Brazilian hospitals with Intensive Care Unit beds. The participants involved all facilities operating during 2016-2019 (average N=1,989). The regulatory intervention theory aimed to increase adherence to safe evidence-based practices through national annual assessment involving a set of 21 validated structure and process indicators related to patient safety practices. At moment 1(Risk assessment), data were collected to classify hospitals according to the risk. In the sequence, the Sanitary Surveillance Centers (VISAS) carried out the analysis of the information sent by the hospitals. VISAS classified services into three groups according to compliance with the composite adherence indicator: High (67-100%); Medium (34-66%); and Low Compliance (0-33%). Moment 2 (Risk management) used responsive actions according to the hospital’s classification. Results: The intervention resulted in six annual cyclic stages and, between 2016-2019, 782 (40.1%), 980 (49.0%), 1,093 (54.3%) and 1,255 (61.8%) hospitals participated, respectively. 17 of the 20 indicators with at least two measurements had a significant improvement after national interventions (p<0.05). The overall percentage of compliance increased from 70.7 to 84.1 (p<0.001) and the percentage of hospitals with high compliance increased from 59.1 to 83.0 (p<0.001).Conclusion: The regulatory intervention used was a good tool to strengthen the information system and government actions to promote patient safety. The set of low-cost interventions seems to be useful to prioritise hospitals at higher risk and to induce responsive measures to implement patient safety practices in the evaluated context, promoting the efficiency of the regulatory process.

scholarly journals Using Implementation Science Strategy Mapping on the Age-Friendly Health System's 4Ms Journey

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 365-365
Author(s):  
Mary Dolansky ◽  
Anne Pohnert ◽  
Sherry Greenberg
Keyword(s):  
Implementation Science ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Mapping Method ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Systematic Process ◽  
Implementing Change ◽  
Implementation Outcomes ◽  
Adoption And Implementation ◽  
And Performance

Abstract Background Implementation science is the study of methods to promote the adoption and integration of evidence-based practices into routine health care to improve the quality of care. The purpose of this study was to use Implementation Mapping to guide the implementation of The John A. Hartford evidence-based Age-Friendly Health Systems (AFHS) 4Ms Framework: What Matters, Medications, Mentation, and Mobility. Methods Implementation Mapping, a systematic process for planning implementation strategies, guided the 9-month integration of the 4Ms Framework in the 1,100 MinuteClinics across the US. Implementation Mapping includes five tasks: (1) conduct an implementation needs assessment and identify program adopters and implementers; (2) state adoption and implementation outcomes and performance objectives, identify determinants, and create matrices of change objectives; (3) choose theoretical methods (mechanisms of change) and select or design implementation strategies; (4) produce implementation protocols and materials; and (5) evaluate implementation outcomes. Results The implementation plan, developed by the implementation mapping method, was carried out over 9-months. Seven implementation strategies were identified from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project including the provision of education, electronic health record integration, internal champion facilitation, cues to action, and a dashboard to monitor progress. To date, the implementation mapping has resulted in the adoption of the 4Ms by 1145 providers (37%). Monitoring of the adoption of the 4Ms Framework and consideration of future implementation strategies is ongoing. Conclusions Implementation Mapping provided a systematic process to develop strategies to improve the adoption, implementation, sustainment, and scale-up of the evidence-based 4Ms Framework.

scholarly journals Promoting evidence-based clinical practice for women in abortion situations after the implementation of a surveillance network: a situational analysis in a Brazilian university hospital

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelio N. Veiga-Junior ◽  
Caroline Eugeni ◽  
Beatriz D. Kajiura ◽  
Priscilla B. F. Dantas ◽  
Caroline B. Trabach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Abortion ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Situational Analysis ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Surveillance Network ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Vacuum Aspiration

Abstract Background Manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) and medical abortion (MA) can be used to treat women with abortion complications and the choice of the evacuation method is essential for the safe management of abortion. Objective to evaluate the frequency of use of MVA and MA and investigate the associated factors after the installation of a surveillance network of good practices (MUSA Network) in a university hospital in Brazil. Methods A cross-sectional study of women admitted for abortion at UNICAMP Women’s Hospital, Brazil, between July 2017 and November 2020. The dependent variables were the rates of MVA and MA. The independent variables were clinical and sociodemographic data. The Cochran-Armitage test, chi-square test, Mann–Whitney test and multiple logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. Results 474 women were included. Most women (91.35%) had undergone uterine evacuation: uterine curettage (78.75%), MVA (9.46%) and MA (11.54%). We observed a significant tendency toward an increase in the use of MVA (Z = 9.85; P <0.001). Factors independently associated with performance of MVA were admission in 2020 (OR 64.22; 95% CI 3.79–1086.69) and lower gestational age (OR 0.837; 95% CI 0.724–0.967). The only factor independently associated with MA was a higher level of education (OR 2.66; 95% CI 1.30-5.46). Conclusion the use of MVA increased after the installation of a surveillance network for good clinical practices. Being part of networks that encourage the use of evidence-based practices is an opportunity for health facilities to increase access to safe abortions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document