scholarly journals Local and Systemic Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients with Central Nervous System Metastases

Author(s):  
Ninke Elisabeth Aster Wellerdieck ◽  
Peter Wessels ◽  
Maartje Los ◽  
Gabe S Sonke ◽  
Ellen Tromp ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose As survival of patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases from breast cancer is poor and incidence rates are increasing, there is a growing need for better treatment strategies. In the current study, the efficacy of local and systemic therapies was analyzed in breast cancer patients with CNS metastases.Methods Medical records from patients with breast cancer and brain and/or leptomeningeal metastases treated at a tertiary referral center and a teaching hospital between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively studied. Main outcomes of interest were overall survival and CNS progression free survival. Analyses were performed for the different systemic and local therapies for CNS metastases, and subgroups based on breast cancer subtypes and brain metastases vs leptomeningeal metastases were tested.Results We identified 155 patients, 44 HER2-positive, 68 hormone receptor positive/HER2-negative and 43 triple negative. Median overall survival was 5.9 months for all 155 analyzed patients. Survival differed significantly between breast cancer subtypes (HER2-positive 22.8 months, hormone receptor positive/HER2-negative 2.4 months, triple negative 4.2 months, P<0.001). Patients receiving a combination of local and systemic therapy demonstrated prolonged median overall survival (18.5 months) as compared to local therapy only (5.7 months) or systemic therapy only (4.3 months, P<0.001). No significant difference in overall survival was observed between different systemic treatment regimens.Conclusion Breast cancer patients with CNS metastases show longest median overall survival when the subtype is HER2-positive and when they are treated with both local and systemic therapy.

The Breast ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. S89
Author(s):  
S. Nikolov ◽  
E. Enchev ◽  
G. Minkov ◽  
M. Galabova ◽  
T. Vlaykova ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11092-11092
Author(s):  
K. Leitzel ◽  
H. Y. Hou ◽  
V. Shrivastava ◽  
U. Anyanwu ◽  
S. M. Ali ◽  
...  

11092 Background: Approximately half of HER2-positive breast cancer patients will respond to first-line trastuzumab-containing therapy. However, in those patients with an initial trastuzumab response, most will progress within a year with acquired resistance. Since trastuzumab treatment is also now used in the HER2-positive adjuvant breast cancer setting, trastuzumab resistance will continue to be a vexing clinical problem, and better predictive and prognostic biomarkers are urgently needed. Methods: Serum HER2, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1), urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), CA9, VEGF-165, and endoglin were measured using ELISA assays in 66 metastatic breast cancer patients before starting first-line trastuzumab-containing therapy. The HER2, TIMP-1, uPA, CA9, and VEGF-165 ELISAs were from Oncogene Science/Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Cambridge, MA; and the endoglin ELISA was from R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox modeling with continuous pretreatment serum biomarker variables. Results: Pretreatment serum HER2 (p= 0.005), TIMP-1 (p< 0.0001), uPA (p= 0.006), endoglin (p= 0.008), and CA9 (p <0.0001) were all significant as univariate continuous biomarkers for predicting PFS to first-line trastuzumab-containing therapy, but VEGF was not. In multivariate analysis for PFS with all six biomarkers, only serum CA9 (p= 0.002) was a significant independent covariate. For OS, pretreatment serum HER2 (p= 0.018), TIMP-1 (p< 0.0001), uPA (p< 0.0001), endoglin (p= 0.002), and CA9 (p< 0.0001) were all significant as univariate continuous biomarkers for prognosis, but serum VEGF was not. In multivariate analysis for OS with all six biomarkers, only serum CA9 was a significant independent prognostic covariate (p= 0.001). Conclusions: Elevated pretreatment serum CA9 (a marker of hypoxia) predicts reduced progression-free survival and overall survival in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with first-line trastuzumab-containing therapy. These serum biomarkers deserve further study in larger trials of HER2-targeted breast cancer treatment. Supported by a grant from Komen for the Cure. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey E. Johnson ◽  
Paula D Strassle ◽  
Guilherme C de Oliveira ◽  
Chris B. Agala ◽  
Philip M. Spanheimer ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To assess potential disparities in guideline-concordant care delivery among women with early stage triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer treated with breast conserving therapy. Methods Women ≥40 years old diagnosed with pT2N0M0 triple-negative or HER2-positive breast cancer treated with primary surgery and axillary staging between 2012 and 2017 were identified using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). The primary outcome was receipt of adjuvant systemic therapy and radiation concordant with current guidelines. Multivariable log binomial regression was used to assess the prevalence of optimal therapy use across patient and cancer characteristics. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess 5-year overall survival. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare the impact of optimal therapy on 5-year mortality. Results 11,785 women were included with 7,843 receiving optimal therapy. Receipt of optimal therapy decreased with age even after adjusting for comorbidities and cancer characteristics; other sociodemographic factors were not associated with differences in receipt of optimal therapy. Among patients who did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy, most were not offered the treatment (49%) or refused (40%). Overall 5-year survival was higher among women who received optimal therapy (89% [95% CI 88.0-89.3] vs. 66% [95% CI 62.9-68.5]). Patients who received suboptimal therapy were over twice as likely to die within 5-years of their diagnosis (adjusted HR 2.44, 95% CI 2.12-2.82). Conclusion Age is the primary determinant of the likelihood of a woman to receive optimal adjuvant therapies in high-risk early stage breast cancer. Patients who did not receive optimal therapy had significantly diminished survival.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12024-e12024
Author(s):  
Z. Atassi ◽  
D. Varga ◽  
K. Plotzki ◽  
C. Kurzeder ◽  
R. Kreienberg

e12024 Background: Distant spread from breast cancer is commonly found in bones, lungs, liver, and central nervous system. Metastatic involvement of peritoneum and retroperitoneum is unusual and unexpected. The aim of the study was to perform a comprehensive analysis of breast cancer patients with peritoneal metastases and to compare survivals depending on biological subtypes. Methods: 44 breast cancer pts with peritoneal metastases were detected out of a database of 2,500 breast cancer patients treated in one institution between 1995 and 2005. Clinical characteristics such as estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor as well as survivals were analized based on breast cancer subtypes. Results: Mean patient age was 54 years, 25 patients (56%) had ductal invasive carcinoma while 19 (44%) were diagnosed lobular invasive carcinoma. 30 (68%) patients had endocrine responsive tumors. A HER-2 percentage is not provided due to the lack of data before the year 2000. Median survival calculated from peritoneal metastases in histologic subgroups was as follows: Median progression free survival was 36.5 months for ductal invasive carcinoma, and 23.5 months for lobular invasive breast cancer. Median overall survival was 46 (Std 38.5) months for ductal invasive breast cancer and 32 (Std 54.5) months for lobular invasive breast cancer. Conclusions: Patients with peritoneal metastases are a heterogenous group with a different outcome. The histologic subtype seems to be an important predictive factor as lobular invasive breast cancer is associated with worsened progression free an overall survival rates. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 152-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerome Martin-Babau ◽  
Yves Eusen ◽  
Cedric Verveur ◽  
Fanny Trouboul ◽  
Caroline Cheneau ◽  
...  

152 Background: Trastuzumab is widely used in Her2 positive metastatic esophageal and gastric cancers along with chemotherapy. Cardiotoxicity of trastuzumab has been described precisely in Her2 positive breast cancers and occurs with asymptomatic lowering of LVEF (Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction) in up to 10% of cases. Esogastric cancer patients are usually older and have more comorbidities than patients followed for breast cancer. Methods: This monocentric retrospective study measured the incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic cardiotoxicity in patients treated for metastatic esogastric cancers and its potential impact regarding overall survival from October 2009 to September 2015. Patients should receive trastuzumab with chemotherapy during the period of study for treatment of Her2 positive metastatic esogastric cancer as first-line chemotherapy. Results: 27 patients received trastuzumab along with chemotherapy during the period of study. Median age was 62.3 years, sex ratio 21 M/6 W. The median number of cycles of trastuzumab was 5 cycles. The asymptomatic cardiotoxicity rate, defined by a drop of more than 10% of LVEF between the enrollment echocardiogram and the third month treatment echocardiogram, was of 22%. Symptomatic cardiotoxicity was observed in two patients (7.4%), with one cardiac failure and one myocardial infarction, with no associated death. Cardiovascular comorbidities and cardiac irradiation which is recurrent in this indication did not appear as a predictive factor of cardiotoxicity (p = 1). Overall survival of patients was not statistically modified by the occurring of cardiotoxicity even if we noted a trend to better outcome of the patients presenting an asymptomatic LVEF lowering. Conclusions: This study is to our knowledge the first to focus specifically on the cardiotoxicity of trastuzumab in esogastric metastatic Her2 positive cancer in the real world. These patients seem to be at a higher asymptomatic cardiac risk than breast cancer patients. However cardiovascular comorbidities didn’t appear as predictive factors of trastuzumab induced cardiotoxicity and should not prevent patient from benefiting of this treatment.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 557-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Fitzal ◽  
Marija Balic ◽  
Vesna Bjelic-Radisic ◽  
Michael Hubalek ◽  
Christian F. Singer ◽  
...  

557 Background: The ABCSG 28 Posytive trial compared primary surgery versus primary systemic therapy without surgery in stage IV breast cancer patients. The primary aim was to investigate whether immediate resection of the primary tumor followed by standard systemic therapy improves median survival compared with no surgical resection (NCT01015625). The trial had to be stopped early due insufficient recruitment. Methods: Untreated stage IV breast cancer patients with the primary in situ were randomly assigned to either surgery of the primary versus no surgery followed by systemic therapy between 2011 and 2015 in 15 breast health centers in Austria. Systemic therapy included endocrine therapy or chemotherapy. Patients were routinely followed every 3-6 months. Primary endpoint was median survival. Results: 90 patients (45 with surgery, 45 with primary systemic therapy without surgery) were randomized. Stratification criteria were age, endocrine responsiveness, her2 expression, planned first line therapy and bone only versus other metastases. Patients in the surgery arm had more cT3 breast cancer (22% versus 7%) and more cN2 staging (16% versus 4%) as well as more her2 positive breast cancer cases (27% versus 18%). The median follow up was 37.5 months and immunohistochemical subtype analysis showed 9% basal like, 22% her2 positive, 51% luminal A and 13% luminal B cancers. Both groups were well balanced regarding first line treatment (endocrine versus chemotherapy) however, there were more taxane treated patients in the no surgery group (24.4 versus 15.6%). The median survival in the surgery arm was 34.6 months versus 54.8 months in the no surgery arm without statistical significance (HR 0.691 CI 0.358 – 1.333; p=0.267). Time to distant progression was insignificantly longer in the no surgery arm (surgery arm 13.9 versus no surgery arm 29.0 months). Conclusions: This first analysis of the prospective randomized phase III trial POSYTIVE-ABCSG-28 demonstrated no benefit in overall survival for immediate surgery of the primary in de novo stage IV breast cancer patients. Clinical trial information: NCT01015625.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document