scholarly journals Supporting Australian Clinical Learners in a Collaborative Clusters Education Model: A Mixed Methods Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thea van de Mortel ◽  
Lyn Armit ◽  
Brenton Shanahan ◽  
Judith Needham ◽  
Candy Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Nursing Students ◽  
Registered Nurses ◽  
Nursing Student ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Clinical Placements ◽  
New Graduates ◽  
Australian Health ◽  
Evaluation Approach ◽  
Education Model

Abstract Background: Nursing student numbers have risen in response to projected registered nurse shortfalls, increasing numbers of new graduates requiring transitional support and pressure on clinical placements. A Collaborative Clusters Education Model, in which Entry to Practice facilitators coach ward-based registered nurses to support students’ and new graduates’ learning, may address placement capacity. The research aim was to evaluate the acceptability of the Collaborative Clusters Education Model to stakeholders by examining their perceptions of the facilitators and barriers to the model in its implementation. Methods: A convergent mixed methods evaluation approach was adopted. The study took place in a large Australian health service in south-east Queensland. Participants included Bachelor of Nursing students, Entry to Practice facilitators, ward-based registered nurses, academics and new graduates. A mixed methods design was used. Elements included an online survey of nursing students, and interviews with new graduates, Entry to Practice facilitators, ward-based registered nurses, and academics. Descriptive statistics were calculated on quantitative data. Thematic analysis was conducted on qualitative data. Results: Participants included 134 nursing students, five new graduates, seven Entry to Practice facilitators, four registered nurses, and three nurse academics. Students rated facilitators’ effectiveness highly (4.43/5±0.75), although this finding is tempered by a low response rate (13.5%). For learners, the model provided access to learning experiences, although preferences for sources of support differed between students and new graduates, and further clarification of responsibilities was required. For other stakeholders, three themes emerged: students’ and new graduates’ integration into the workplace can promote learning; tensions arise in new ways to approach performance assessment; and aligning expectations requires high levels of communication. Conclusions: This evaluation found that acceptability was good but at risk from limited clarity around roles and responsibilities. Further research into this model is recommended.

scholarly journals Supporting Australian Clinical Learners In A Collaborative Clusters Education Model: A Mixed Methods Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thea van de Mortel ◽  
Lyn Armit ◽  
Brenton Shanahan ◽  
Judith Needham ◽  
Candy Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Nursing Students ◽  
Registered Nurses ◽  
Nursing Student ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Clinical Placements ◽  
New Graduates ◽  
Evaluation Approach ◽  
Education Model

Abstract Background: Nursing student numbers have risen in response to projected registered nurse shortfalls, increasing numbers of new graduates requiring transitional support and pressure on clinical placements. A Collaborative Clusters Education Model, in which Entry to Practice facilitators coach ward-based registered nurses to support students’ and new graduates’ learning, may address placement capacity. The research aim was to evaluate the acceptability of the Collaborative Clusters Education Model to stakeholders by examining their perceptions of the facilitators and barriers to the model in its implementation. Methods: A convergent mixed methods evaluation approach was adopted. The study took place in a large Australian health service in south-east Queensland. Participants included Bachelor of Nursing students, Entry to Practice facilitators, ward-based registered nurses, academics and new graduates. A mixed methods design was used. Elements included an online survey of nursing students, and interviews with new graduates, Entry to Practice facilitators, ward-based registered nurses, and academics. Descriptive statistics were calculated on quantitative data. Thematic analysis was conducted on qualitative data. Results: Participants included 134 (of 990) nursing students (response rate 13.5%), five new graduates, seven Entry to Practice facilitators, four registered nurses, and three nurse academics. Students rated facilitators’ effectiveness highly (4.43/5±0.75), although this finding is tempered by a low response rate (13.5%). For learners, the model provided access to learning experiences, although preferences for sources of support differed between students and new graduates, and further clarification of responsibilities was required. For other stakeholders, three themes emerged: students’ and new graduates’ integration into the workplace can promote learning; tensions arise in new ways to approach performance assessment; and aligning expectations requires high levels of communication. Conclusions: This evaluation found that acceptability was good but at risk from limited clarity around roles and responsibilities. Further research into this model is recommended.

scholarly journals Supporting Australian Clinical Learners in a Collaborative Clusters Education Model: A Mixed Methods Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thea van de Mortel ◽  
Lyn Armit ◽  
Brenton Shanahan ◽  
Judith Needham ◽  
Candy Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Nursing Students ◽  
Registered Nurses ◽  
Nursing Student ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Clinical Placements ◽  
New Graduates ◽  
Evaluation Approach ◽  
Education Model

Abstract Background: Nursing student numbers have risen in response to projected registered nurse shortfalls, increasing numbers of new graduates requiring transitional support and pressure on clinical placements. A Collaborative Clusters Education Model, in which Entry to Practice facilitators coach ward-based registered nurses to support students’ and new graduates’ learning, may address placement capacity. The research aim was to evaluate the acceptability of the Collaborative Clusters Education Model to stakeholders by examining their perceptions of the facilitators and barriers to the model in its implementation. Methods: A convergent mixed methods evaluation approach was adopted. The study took place in a large Australian health service in south-east Queensland. Participants included Bachelor of Nursing students, Entry to Practice facilitators, ward-based registered nurses, academics and new graduates. A mixed methods design was used. Elements included an online survey of nursing students, and interviews with new graduates, Entry to Practice facilitators, ward-based registered nurses, and academics. Descriptive statistics were calculated on quantitative data. Thematic analysis was conducted on qualitative data. Results: Participants included 134 (of 990) nursing students (response rate 13.5%), five new graduates, seven Entry to Practice facilitators, four registered nurses, and three nurse academics. Students rated facilitators’ effectiveness highly (4.43/5±0.75), although this finding is tempered by a low response rate (13.5%). For learners, the model provided access to learning experiences, although preferences for sources of support differed between students and new graduates, and further clarification of responsibilities was required. For other stakeholders, three themes emerged: students’ and new graduates’ integration into the workplace can promote learning; tensions arise in new ways to approach performance assessment; and aligning expectations requires high levels of communication. Conclusions: This evaluation found that acceptability was good but at risk from limited clarity around roles and responsibilities. Further research into this model is recommended.

scholarly journals “Loving Nursing” and “Taking Responsibility”: Strategies for Transitioning to Practice in Lebanon

SAGE Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 215824401882037
Author(s):  
Michael Clinton ◽  
Sawsan Ezzeddine ◽  
Myrna Doumit ◽  
Ursula Rizk ◽  
Murielle Madi
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Students ◽  
Registered Nurses ◽  
Baccalaureate Nursing ◽  
Nurse Managers ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Self Monitoring ◽  
Clinical Placements ◽  
Hospital Administrators ◽  
Baccalaureate Nursing Programs ◽  
Taking Responsibility

Transitioning to practice is challenging for baccalaureate nursing students. In baccalaureate nursing programs, the process typically begins in the junior year. A Successful transition depends on how well students apply their developing knowledge during clinical placements. A cross-sectional, multisite, qualitative study was conducted at four universities in Greater Beirut, Lebanon. In total, 35 junior baccalaureate students participated in audio-recorded focus group discussions. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. Three themes were sufficient to summarize the students experiences: “being unprepared,” “learning unexpected lessons,” and “taking responsibility.” Three subthemes, revising expectations, discovering divergence, and self-monitoring, were used to clarify the unexpected lessons students learned during clinical placements and how students responded. “Loving nursing and protecting yourself,” making the most of every day, and doubting future readiness were subthemes within the “taking responsibility” theme. Students troubled by nursing practices that diverged from their expectations monitored themselves to avoid falling into poor practices and kept track of the nursing procedures they performed. Only by taking responsibility for their learning, could students develop the competencies they will need as registered nurses. Faculty, clinical instructors, hospital administrators, nurse managers, and registered nurses need to do more to support students to take control of their learning.

scholarly journals Attitudes, Practices, and Knowledge About Human Lactation Among Nursing Students

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-65
Author(s):  
Ana Maria Linares ◽  
Angeline Do Nascimento Parente ◽  
Caroline Coleman
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Students ◽  
Nursing Faculty ◽  
Nursing Student ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Nursing Program ◽  
Human Lactation ◽  
A Value ◽  
Attitudes And Knowledge ◽  
College Of Nursing ◽  
Nursing Faculty Members

Nurses are on the front line of the healthcare system and should, therefore, have the evidence-based knowledge to manage breastfeeding. The objective of this study was to assess the attitudes and knowledge about human lactation among a group of nursing students. An anonymous online survey was sent to all College of Nursing students at a local university in Kentucky. Nursing students participating in the survey favored breastfeeding over formula feeding for infants. Lack of knowledge and various misconceptions about breastfeeding were reported. Whether a nursing student has or has not completed a class about human lactation during the nursing program, and has had or not had children, significantly influences their attitudes and knowledge toward breastfeeding. Future studies should focus on identifying if nursing faculty members and nursing students recognize human lactation as a value and central knowledge for nurses.

scholarly journals Experiences of final year nursing students in their preparedness to become registered nurses

Curationis ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Carlson ◽  
W J Kotzé ◽  
D Van Rooyen
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Students ◽  
Registered Nurses ◽  
Research Design ◽  
Nursing Student ◽  
Professional Nurse ◽  
Professional Nursing ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Professional Nurses

The objectives of this study were: firstly, to explore and describe the experiences of final year nursing students relating to how they experience their preparedness to fulfil the role of professional nurse; secondly, to explore and describe the experiences of novice professional nurses in the role of professional nurse; finally, to generate a model which will assist the final year nursing student to become a professional nurse. A theory-generative, qualitative, explorative, descriptive and contextual research design was utilized to reach the objectives of the study. Results indicated that final year nursing students experience a lack of confidence to take on the responsibilities of professional nursing. The results are displayed in table form and discussed in the article. This abstract forms part of a bigger study that addresses the professional maturity of the novice professional nurse for the practice of nursing.

scholarly journals Measuring the quality of nursing clinical placements. Development of the Placement Evaluation Tool (PET): A mixed methods co-design project

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Cooper ◽  
Robyn Cant ◽  
Donna Waters ◽  
Elise Luders ◽  
Amanda Henderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Nursing Students ◽  
Evaluation Tool ◽  
Satisfaction Rating ◽  
Clinical Placements ◽  
Global Satisfaction ◽  
Design Project ◽  
Nursing Clinical ◽  
Quality Of Nursing

Abstract Background: The quality of nursing clinical placements has been found to vary. Placement evaluation tools for nursing students are available but lack contemporary reviews of clinical settings. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a feasible, valid and reliable clinical placement evaluation tool applicable to nursing student placements in Australia.Methods: An exploratory mixed methods co-design project. Phase 1 included a literature review; expert rating of potential question items and Nominal Group Technique meetings with a range of stakeholders for item development. Phase 2 included on-line pilot testing of the Placement Evaluation Tool (PET) with 1,263 nursing students, across all year levels at six Australian Universities and one further education college in 2019-20, to confirm validity, reliability and feasibility. Results: The PET included 19-items (rated on a 5-point agreement scale) and one global satisfaction rating (a 10-point scale). Placements were generally positively rated. The total scale score (19 items) revealed a median student rating of 81 points from a maximum of 95 and a median global satisfaction rating of 9/10. Criterion validity was confirmed by item correlation: Intra-class Correlation Co-efficient ICC = .709; scale total to global score r = .722; and items to total score ranging from .609 to .832. Strong concurrent validity was demonstrated with the Clinical Learning Environment and Supervision Scale (r= .834). Internal reliability was identified and confirmed in two subscale factors: Clinical Environment (Cronbach’s alpha = .94) and Learning Support (alpha = .96). Based on the short time taken to complete the survey (median 3.5 minutes) and students’ comments, the tool was deemed applicable and feasible. Conclusions: The PET was found to be valid, reliable and feasible. Use of the tool as a quality assurance measure is likely to improve education and practice in clinical environments. Further international evaluation of the instrument is required to fully determine its psychometric properties.

scholarly journals NURSING STUDENTS’ BARRIERS IN CARING FOR SCHIZOPHRENIA PATIENTS WITH VIOLENCE RISK

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 140-145
Author(s):  
Erna Erawati
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Students ◽  
Personal Experience ◽  
Nursing Student ◽  
Qualitative Data ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Violence Risk ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Nursing Management ◽  
Clinical Placements ◽  
Content Analysis Method

Background: There is a general consensus that schizophrenia patients have a greater risk to become violent. Caring for schizophrenia patients with risk of violence presents difficult clinical challenges, and it complicates the efforts of nursing student. Analysis of nursing student' barriers may lead to improve nursing management of risk of violence.Objective: The aim of this study is to explore the nursing student barriers in for caring schizophrenia patients with violence risk.Method: A total sample of 22 nursing students completed their experience through reflective diary during clinical placements. The qualitative data were explored by thematic content analysis method using NVivo.Results: Three themes were emerged from the data included: emotions, personal experience, and inadequate communication skills.Conclusion: These themes reflected the barrier of the nursing students when they applied nursing care toward schizophrenia patient with violence risk. Knowing the barriers is very important for successful violence risk management for nursing student.

scholarly journals Measuring the quality of nursing clinical placements. Development of the Placement Evaluation Tool (PET): A mixed methods co-design project

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Cooper ◽  
Robyn Cant ◽  
Donna Waters ◽  
Elise Luders ◽  
Amanda Henderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Nursing Students ◽  
Evaluation Tool ◽  
Satisfaction Rating ◽  
Clinical Placements ◽  
Global Satisfaction ◽  
Design Project ◽  
Nursing Clinical ◽  
Quality Of Nursing

Abstract Background: The quality of nursing clinical placements has been found to vary. Placement evaluation tools for nursing students are available but lack contemporary reviews of clinical settings. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a feasible, valid and reliable clinical placement evaluation tool applicable to nursing student placements in Australia.Methods: An exploratory mixed methods co-design project. Phase 1 included a literature review; expert rating of potential question items and Nominal Group Technique meetings with a range of stakeholders for item development. Phase 2 included on-line pilot testing of the Placement Evaluation Tool (PET) with 1,263 nursing students, across all year levels at six Australian Universities and one further education college in 2019-20, to confirm validity, reliability and feasibility.Results: The PET included 19-items (rated on a 5-point agreement scale) and one global satisfaction rating (a 10-point scale). Placements were generally positively rated. The total scale score (19 items) revealed a median student rating of 81 points from a maximum of 95 and a median global satisfaction rating of 9/10. Criterion validity was confirmed by item correlation: Intra-class Correlation Co-efficient ICC = .709; scale total to global score r = .722; and items to total score ranging from .609 to .832. Strong concurrent validity was demonstrated with the Clinical Learning Environment and Supervision Scale (r= .834). Internal reliability was identified and confirmed in two subscale factors: Clinical Environment (Cronbach’s alpha = .94) and Learning Support (alpha = .96). Based on the short time taken to complete the survey (median 3.5 minutes) and students’ comments, the tool was deemed applicable and feasible.Conclusions: The PET was found to be valid, reliable and feasible. Use of the tool as a quality assurance measure is likely to improve education and practice in clinical environments. Further international evaluation of the instrument is required to fully determine its psychometric properties.

scholarly journals Recognition for registered nurses supporting students on clinical placement: a grounded theory study

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carina Anderson ◽  
Lorna Moxham ◽  
Marc Broadbent
Keyword(s):  
Grounded Theory ◽  
Nursing Students ◽  
Registered Nurses ◽  
Learning Opportunities ◽  
Clinical Placement ◽  
Theory Approach ◽  
Major Category ◽  
Additional Time ◽  
Clinical Placements ◽  
Undergraduate Nursing

Objective: This study examined registered nurses’ perspectives of being supportive of nursing students and providing them with learning opportunities when on clinical placements. Background: In Australia, as part of their three-year Bachelors degree, undergraduate nursing students undertake a minimum of 800 hours of clinical placement. During these clinical placement hours, nursing students are supervised by registered nurses who are required to be supportive of the students and provide them with learning opportunities. Study design and methods: This study used a grounded theory approach. In this qualitative study there were fifteen registered nurse participants. Thirteen participants were female participants and two were male. Participants were individually interviewed. Transcripts from these in–depth interviews were analysed using constant comparative analysis. Results: The major category, an added extra, emerged from this study. An added extra is about registered nurses’ perception that having a student is an added extra to their daily duties. The major category an added extra is informed by three emergent themes. The first theme was time, the second theme was workload and the third theme was wanting recognition. Discussion: Registered nurses perceived that their workloads tend not to be taken into consideration when they have nursing students. The literature suggests that nursing students often miss out on learning opportunities when they are on clinical placement because registered nurses do not have additional time to effectively support students’ clinical learning. Conclusion: Participants in this study believed being supportive of nursing students and providing them with learning opportunities was an added extra to their daily nursing duties. Findings revealed registered nurses want to be recognised for the extra time and effort they dedicate to students’ learning.

scholarly journals Measuring the Quality of Nursing Clinical Placements. Development of the Placement Evaluation Tool (PET): A Mixed Methods Co-design Project

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Cooper ◽  
Robyn Cant ◽  
Donna Waters ◽  
Elise Luders ◽  
Amanda Henderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Nursing Students ◽  
Evaluation Tool ◽  
Satisfaction Rating ◽  
Clinical Placements ◽  
Global Satisfaction ◽  
Design Project ◽  
Nursing Clinical ◽  
Quality Of Nursing

Abstract Background: The quality of nursing clinical placements has been found to vary. Placement evaluation tools for nursing students are available but lack contemporary reviews of clinical settings. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a feasible, valid and reliable clinical placement evaluation tool applicable to nursing student placements in Australia and beyond.Methods: An exploratory mixed methods co-design project. Phase 1 included a literature review; expert rating of potential question items and Nominal Group Technique meetings with a range of stakeholders for item development. Phase 2 included on-line pilot testing of the Placement Evaluation Tool (PET) with 1,263 nursing students, across all year levels at six Australian Universities and one further education college in 2019-20, to confirm validity, reliability and feasibility.Results: The PET included 19-items (rated on a 5-point agreement scale) and one global satisfaction rating (a 10-point scale). Placements were generally positively rated. The total scale score (19 items) revealed a median student rating of 81 points from a maximum of 95 and a median global satisfaction rating of 9/10. Criterion validity was confirmed by item correlation: Intra-class Correlation Co-efficient ICC = .709; scale total to global score r = .722; and items to total score ranging from .609 to .832. Strong concurrent validity was demonstrated with the Clinical Learning Environment and Supervision Scale (r= .834). Internal reliability was identified and confirmed in two subscale factors: Clinical Environment (Cronbach’s alpha = .94) and Learning Support (alpha = .96). Based on the short time taken to complete the survey (median 3.5 minutes) and students’ comments, the tool was deemed applicable and feasible.Conclusions: The PET was found to be valid, reliable and feasible. Use of the tool as a quality assurance measure is likely to improve education and practice in clinical environments. Further international evaluation of the instrument is required to fully determine its psychometric properties.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document