scholarly journals A standardized framework to evaluate the quality of studies using TDABC in healthcare: The TDABC in Healthcare Consortium Consensus Statement

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Paula Beck da Silva Etges ◽  
Carisi Anne Polanczyk ◽  
Richard D. Urman
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
Future Development ◽  
Group Process ◽  
Consensus Statement ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Healthcare Systems ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Consensus Group

Abstract Background: This Consensus Statement introduces a standardized framework, in a checklist format, to support future development and report of TDABC studies in healthcare, and to encourage their reproducibility. Additionally, it establishes the first formal networking of TDABC researchers through the creation of the TDABC for Health Care Consortium.Methods: A consensus group of researchers reviewed the most relevant TDABC studies available in Medline and Scopus databases to identify the initial elements of the checklist. Using a Focus Group process, each element received a recommendation regarding where in the scientific article section it should be placed and whether the element was required or suggested. A questionnaire was circulated with expert researchers in the field to provide additional recommendations regarding the content of the checklist and the strength of recommendation for each included element. Results: The TDABC standardized framework includes 32 elements, provides recommendations where in the scientific article to include each element, and the strength of each recommendation. All 32 elements were validated, with 21 elements classified as mandatory and 11 as suggested but not mandatory. Conclusions: This is the first standardized framework to support the development and reporting of TDABC research in healthcare and to stablish a community of experts in TDABC methodology. We expect that it can contribute to scale strategies that would result in cost-savings outcomes and in value-oriented strategies that can be adopted in healthcare systems and institutions.

scholarly journals A standardized framework to evaluate the quality of studies using TDABC in healthcare: The TDABC in Healthcare Consortium Consensus Statement

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Paula Beck da Silva Etges ◽  
Carisi Anne Polanczyk ◽  
Richard D. Urman
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
Future Development ◽  
Group Process ◽  
Consensus Statement ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Healthcare Systems ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Consensus Group

Abstract Background: This Consensus Statement introduces a standardized framework, in a checklist format, to support future development and report of TDABC studies in healthcare, and to encourage their reproducibility. Additionally, it establishes the first formal networking of TDABC researchers through the creation of the TDABC for Health Care Consortium.Methods: A consensus group of researchers reviewed the most relevant TDABC studies available in Medline and Scopus databases to identify the initial elements of the checklist. Using a Focus Group process, each element received a recommendation regarding where in the scientific article section it should be placed and whether the element was required or suggested. A questionnaire was circulated with expert researchers in the field to provide additional recommendations regarding the content of the checklist and the strength of recommendation for each included element. Results: The TDABC standardized framework includes 32 elements, provides recommendations where in the scientific article to include each element, and the strength of each recommendation. All 32 elements were validated, with 21 elements classified as mandatory and 11 as suggested but not mandatory. Conclusions: This is the first standardized framework to support the development and reporting of TDABC research in healthcare and to stablish a community of experts in TDABC methodology. We expect that it can contribute to scale strategies that would result in cost-savings outcomes and in value-oriented strategies that can be adopted in healthcare systems and institutions.

scholarly journals A standardized framework to evaluate the quality of studies using TDABC in healthcare: The TDABC in Healthcare Consortium Consensus Statement

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Paula Beck da Silva Etges ◽  
Carisi Anne Polanczyk ◽  
Richard D. Urman
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
Future Development ◽  
Group Process ◽  
Consensus Statement ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Healthcare Systems ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Consensus Group

Abstract Background: This Consensus Statement introduces a standardized framework, in a checklist format, to support future development and report of TDABC studies in healthcare, and to encourage their reproducibility. Additionally, it establishes the first formal networking of TDABC researchers through the creation of the TDABC for Health Care Consortium.Methods: A consensus group of researchers reviewed the most relevant TDABC studies available in Medline and Scopus databases to identify the initial elements of the checklist. Using a Focus Group process, each element received a recommendation regarding where in the scientific article section it should be placed and whether the element was required or suggested. A questionnaire was circulated with expert researchers in the field to provide additional recommendations regarding the content of the checklist and the strength of recommendation for each included element.Results: The TDABC standardized framework includes 32 elements, provides recommendations where in the scientific article to include each element, and the strength of each recommendation. All 32 elements were validated, with 21 elements classified as mandatory and 11 as suggested but not mandatory.Conclusions: This is the first standardized framework to support the development and reporting of TDABC research in healthcare and to stablish a community of experts in TDABC methodology. We expect that it can contribute to scale strategies that would result in cost-savings outcomes and in value-oriented strategies that can be adopted in healthcare systems and institutions.

scholarly journals A standardized framework to evaluate the quality of studies using TDABC in healthcare: the TDABC in Healthcare Consortium Consensus Statement

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Paula Beck da Silva Etges ◽  
Carisi Anne Polanczyk ◽  
Richard D. Urman
Keyword(s):  
Focus Group ◽  
Future Development ◽  
Group Process ◽  
Consensus Statement ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Healthcare Systems ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Consensus Group ◽  
The Creation

Abstract Background This Consensus Statement introduces a standardized framework, in a checklist format, to support future development and reporting of TDABC studies in healthcare, and to encourage their reproducibility. Additionally, it establishes the first formal networking of TDABC researchers through the creation of the TDABC in Healthcare Consortium. Methods A consensus group of researchers reviewed the most relevant TDABC studies available in Medline and Scopus databases to identify the initial elements of the checklist. Using a Focus Group process, each element received a recommendation regarding where in the scientific article section it should be placed and whether the element was required or suggested. A questionnaire was circulated with expert researchers in the field to provide additional recommendations regarding the content of the checklist and the strength of recommendation for each included element. Results The TDABC standardized framework includes 32 elements, provides recommendations where in the scientific article to include each element, and comments on the strength of each recommendation. All 32 elements were validated, with 21 elements classified as mandatory and 11 as suggested but not mandatory. Conclusions This is the first standardized framework to support the development and reporting of TDABC research in healthcare and to stablish a community of experts in TDABC methodology. We expect that it can contribute to scale strategies that would result in cost-savings outcomes and in value-oriented strategies that can be adopted in healthcare systems and institutions.

scholarly journals A standardized framework to evaluate the quality of studies using TDABC in healthcare: The TDABC in Healthcare Consortium Consensus Statement

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Paula Beck da Silva Etges ◽  
Carisi Anne Polanczyk ◽  
Richard D. Urman
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Future Development ◽  
Consensus Statement ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Healthcare Systems ◽  
Delphi Process ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Consensus Group ◽  
The Creation

Abstract Background This Consensus Statement introduces a standardized framework, in a checklist format, to support future development and report of TDABC studies in healthcare, and to encourage their reproducibility. Additionally, it establishes the first formal networking of TDABC researchers through the creation of the TDABC for Health Care Consortium. Methods A consensus group of researchers reviewed the most relevant TDABC studies available in Medline and Scopus databases to identify the initial elements of the checklist. Using a Delphi process, each element received a recommendation regarding where in the scientific article section it should be placed and whether the element was required or suggested. A questionnaire was circulated with expert researchers in the field to provide additional recommendations regarding the content of the checklist and the strength of recommendation for each included element. Results The TDABC standardized framework includes 32 elements, provides recommendations where in the scientific article to include each element, and the strength of each recommendation. All 32 elements were validated, with 21 elements classified as mandatory and 11 as suggested but not mandatory. Conclusions This is the first standardized framework to support the development and reporting of TDABC research in healthcare and to stablish a community of experts in TDABC methodology. We expect that it can contribute to scale strategies that would result in cost-savings outcomes and in value-oriented strategies that can be adopted in healthcare systems and institutions.

Can the health care system be effective? - The research results

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (14) ◽  
pp. 01-06
Author(s):  
Joanna Jasińska
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Personalized Medicine ◽  
Healthcare System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Basic Problem ◽  
Economic Value ◽  
Healthcare Systems ◽  
Scientific Databases ◽  
Concepts Of Health

The different definitions of efficiency (in their medical meanings) are presented as the result of meta-reviews found in scientific databases. Efficacy and efficiency are often mismatched with effectiveness in the research of healthcare systems in different countries. In addition to the classic Bismarck’s and Beveridge’s models the modern concepts of health systems include personalized medicine, recognition of health as economic value. However, the basic problem in the Polish healthcare system is the low quality of overly specific and often changed legislation.

scholarly journals Quality of patient, family, caregiver and public engagement in decision-making in healthcare systems: a scoping review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e032788
Author(s):  
Clayon Hamilton ◽  
M Elizabeth Snow ◽  
Nancy Clark ◽  
Shannon Gibson ◽  
Maryam Dehnadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Family Caregiver ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Healthcare Systems ◽  
Evaluation Framework ◽  
Bibliographic Databases ◽  
Scientific Article

IntroductionTo advance person- and family-centred healthcare, government initiatives have supported the engagement of patients and family caregivers in decision-making in healthcare systems. There is, however, no consensus on how to define success for such initiatives. This scoping review aims to identify the key elements for defining the quality of patient and family caregiver engagement in decision-making across the engagement domains (individual, community/organisation, system) of British Columbia’s healthcare system. We will use those elements to develop a conceptual evaluation framework.Methods and analysisThis scoping review follows Arskey and O’Malley’s methodology. (1) The research question was identified through team discussions. (2) Articles for data source will be identified using a librarian-informed search strategy for seven bibliographic databases as well as grey literature sources. (3) Selected articles will be relevant to the evaluation of patient and family caregiver engagement in healthcare systems. (4) Two researchers will independently extract data into predefined and emerging categories. (5) The researchers will reconcile and organise the identified elements. The research team’s collective perspective will then refine the elements, and select, interpret and summarise the results. (6) Persons from key stakeholder groups will be consulted to refine the emergent conceptual framework.Ethics and disseminationWe will seek ethics approval for the stakeholder consultation. This study follows an integrated knowledge translation approach. The results will inform evaluation of the Patients as Partners Initiative of the British Columbia Ministry of Health, and will be disseminated as a scientific article, a research brief, and presentations at conferences and stakeholder meetings.

PD28-03 COST-SAVINGS PROTOCOL IN THE ENDOUROLOGY SUITE DECREASES HEALTH CARE EXPENDITURES WITHOUT COMPROMISING QUALITY OF CARE

2014 ◽  
Vol 191 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dilan Gupta ◽  
August Matteis ◽  
Fotima Askarova ◽  
Chad Ritch ◽  
Mantu Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Health Care Expenditures

scholarly journals Research priorities in bronchiectasis: a consensus statement from the EMBARC Clinical Research Collaboration

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 632-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Aliberti ◽  
Sarah Masefield ◽  
Eva Polverino ◽  
Anthony De Soyza ◽  
Michael R. Loebinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Research ◽  
Research Collaboration ◽  
Consensus Statement ◽  
Research Priorities ◽  
Healthcare Systems ◽  
Important Research ◽  
European Respiratory Society ◽  
High Quality Research ◽  
Modified Delphi

Bronchiectasis is a disease of renewed interest in light of an increase in prevalence and increasing burden on international healthcare systems. There are no licensed therapies, and large gaps in knowledge in terms of epidemiology, pathophysiology and therapy. The European Multicentre Bronchiectasis Audit and Research Collaboration (EMBARC) is a European Respiratory Society (ERS) Clinical Research Collaboration, funded by ERS to promote high-quality research in bronchiectasis. The objective of this consensus statement was to define research priorities in bronchiectasis. From 2014 to 2015, EMBARC used a modified Delphi process among European bronchiectasis experts to reach a consensus on 55 key research priorities in this field. During the same period, the European Lung Foundation collected 711 questionnaires from adult patients with bronchiectasis and their carers from 22 European countries reporting important research priorities from their perspective. This consensus statement reports recommendations for bronchiectasis research after integrating both physicians and patients priorities, as well as those uniquely identified by the two groups. Priorities identified in this consensus statement provide the clearest possible roadmap towards improving our understanding of the disease and the quality of care for patients with bronchiectasis.

scholarly journals P.013 Needs assessment of rural telemedicine care for Parkinson disease in British Columbia

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (s1) ◽  
pp. S17
Author(s):  
DJ Peacock ◽  
PA Baumeister ◽  
A Monaghan ◽  
JE Siever ◽  
D Wile
Keyword(s):  
Focus Group ◽  
Parkinson Disease ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Office Visits ◽  
Physician Density ◽  
Large Cities ◽  
Interdisciplinary Healthcare ◽  
Deep Brain

Background: People with Parkinson disease (PD) face progressive mobility loss, but medical treatment is dependent on clinical assessment and examination. Regional patient and physician density patterns pose further problems to accessing care. Telehealth may improve access particularly among rural populations, but an approach to this problem should consider patient perspectives. Methods: We surveyed and conducted a focus group for people with PD and their caregivers. Questions assessed perceptions of barriers to neurological care and use of telehealth for PD management. Thematic analysis was performed to classify qualitative data. Results: 18 individuals completed the survey and 7 parties joined the focus group. 52% of participants travel >50km for neurologist appointments (range = 59 to 842km). Perceived barriers include cost and difficulty of travel, wait times, lack of interdisciplinary healthcare and deep brain stimulation outside large cities. 80% of participants (95% C.I. 64-96%) would likely or very likely use telehealth for follow-up neurologist appointments if proven as good as in-office visits. Participants associated telehealth with improved quality of care, improved access to care, and cost savings. Conclusions: This sample of people with PD and their caregivers report willingness to access care via telehealth to reduce perceived cost and travel for specialty care.

scholarly journals ANALYSIS OF MANAGEMENT RISKS IN THE ORGANIZATION OF CORPORATIVE HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS IN THE UNFAVORABLE EPIDEMIC SITUATION IN RUSSIA AND GERMANY (2020-2021)

2021 ◽  
pp. 14-21
Author(s):  
S. V. Mironov
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Risk Management ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Health Management ◽  
Healthcare Systems ◽  
Management Systems ◽  
Improve Quality ◽  
Management Decisions ◽  
Corporate Health Management

Risk management in healthcare is studied insufficiently. Risk management will provide more accurate forecasting and planning, it will improve quality of management decisions and increase the efficiency of medical organizations. The necessity of developing health systems has become relevant both in Russia and abroad in the context of the coronavirus pandemic 2020-2021. There is an increased interest in reviving and improving of corporate health management systems of large enterprises. The author was consistently engaged in the organization of health care in 3 large federal companies in Russia, as well as in Germany during the pandemic. The specific tasks of corporate health care in the context of a pandemic, the criteria of management errors and typical management errors were identified and classified, their primary causes were established. General recommendations were given based on the analysis, directions for the development for the further study were formulated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document