Comparison Between Ranibizumab Biosimilar, Innovator Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab in a Real World Situation
Abstract PurposeTo analyze the efficacy of biosimilar ranibizumab as compared to innovator ranibizumab and bevacizumab.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients treated with biosimilar ranibizumab for wet age related macular degeneration (AMD) and macular edema (ME) and compared them with ranibizumab and bevacizumab treated patients.ResultsOut of 202 patients, 67 (33.2%) received biosimilar ranibizumab (BSR), 69 (34.2%) ranibizumab (RBZ) and 66 (32.7%) bevacizumab (BEV). All patients received 3 consecutive injections followed by pro re nata dosing. The follow up ranged from 3 -24 months. The mean number of injections were 6.68 RBZ, 6.4 BEV and 4.7 BSR. At 3 months, nAMD (n=115, 56.9%) and ME (n= 87, 43.1%) groups showed significant improvement in vision and central foveal thickness (CFT) across all 3 agents. After ≥ 6 months, the effects were maintained in AMD group but not in ME group. Maximum effect was seen at 1 month. At no point of time, significant difference was noted among the 3 anti VEGF agents. No major safety concerns were noted.ConclusionsBiosimilar ranibizumab is comparable to innovator ranibizumab and bevacizumab in efficacy and safety. It can be added to the list of available anti VEGF agents for the treatment of vascular disorders.