scholarly journals New Classification Based on CT and Its Value Evaluation for Fractures of the Lateral Process of the Talus

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuchuan Wang ◽  
Xiangtian Deng ◽  
Yanbin Zhu ◽  
Zhongzheng Wang ◽  
Lei Fu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Classification System ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Intraobserver Reliability ◽  
Kappa Statistics ◽  
Type I ◽  
New Classification ◽  
Concomitant Injuries ◽  
Lateral Process ◽  
Comprehensive Classification

Abstract Background : The common classifications of the fractures of the lateral process of the talus（LTPFs）are based on radiographs and may underestimate the complexity of LTPF, therefore. The aim of this study was to propose a comprehensive CT-based classification system, and to evaluate its prognostic value, reliability and reproducibility.Material and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 42 patients involving LTPF and clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed at an average follow-up of 35.9 months. In order to create a comprehensive classification, a panel of experienced orthopedic surgeons discussed the cases. All fractures were classified according to Hawkins, McCrory-Bladin and new proposed classification system by four surgeons. The analysis of interobserver and intraobserver agreements was done using kappa statistics.Results: This new classification included two types based on presence of concomitant injuries or not, with type I consisting of three subtypes and type II of five subtypes. Average AOFAS score was 91.5 in the type Ia of new classification proposed, 86 in type Ib, 90.5 in type Ic, 89 in type IIa, 76.7 in type IIb, 76.6 in type IIc, 91.3 in type IId, and 83.5 in type IIe. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the new classification system were almost perfect (κ=0.846 and 0.823, respectively)，showing a higher interobserver and intraobserver reliability compared to the Hawkins classification (κ=0.737 and 0.689, respectively) as well as McCrory-Bladin classification (κ=0.748 and 0.714, respectively). Conclusion: The new classification system is a comprehensive one that takes into account concomitant injuries and it shows good prognostic value with clinical outcomes. It is more reliable and reproducible and could be a useful tool for decision-making on treatment options for LTPFs.

scholarly journals Fractures of the Lateral Process of the Talus: A New Classification Based on CT

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuchuan Wang ◽  
Yanbin Zhu ◽  
Xiangtian Deng ◽  
Zhongzheng Wang ◽  
Siyu Tian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Classification System ◽  
Intraobserver Reliability ◽  
Kappa Statistics ◽  
Type I ◽  
New Classification ◽  
Concomitant Injuries ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Lateral Process ◽  
Comprehensive Classification

Abstract Background: The common classifications of the fractures of the lateral process of the talus（LTPFs）are based on radiographs and may underestimate the complexity of LTPF, therefore, requiring a comprehensive classification based on CT(Computed tomography) scan. The aim of this study is to propose a such classification system, and to evaluate its reliability and reproducibility.Methods: On the basis of the most widely recognized classifications of Hawkins as well as McCrory-Bladin, we proposed a new and comprehensive classification based on CT scan for the LTPF. We retrospectively reviewed 42 patients involving LTPF. All fractures were classified according to Hawkins, McCrory-Bladin and new proposed classification system by three surgeons. The analysis of interobserver and intraobserver agreements was done using kappa statistics.Results: This new classification included two types based on presence of concomitant injuries or not, with type I consisting of three subtypes and type II of five subtypes. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the new classification system were almost perfect (κ=0.846 and 0.823, respectively)，showing a higher interobserver and intraobserver reliability compared to the Hawkins classification (κ=0.737 and 0.689, respectively) as well as McCrory-Bladin classification (κ=0.748 and 0.714, respectively). Conclusion: This new classification system for the LTPF based on CT is a comprehensive classification considering concomitant injuries. It is more reliable and reproducible and can potentially become a useful instrument for decision making of treatment options for LTPFs. Further studies on the evaluation of their clinical relevance (especially the long-term outcome) are warranted.

Comprehensive classification system for multirod constructs across three-column osteotomies: a reliability study

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-109
Author(s):  
Mostafa H. El Dafrawy ◽  
Owoicho Adogwa ◽  
Adam M. Wegner ◽  
Nicholas A. Pallotta ◽  
Michael P. Kelly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Classification System ◽  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Kappa Coefficient ◽  
Intraobserver Reliability ◽  
Osteotomy Site ◽  
New Classification ◽  
Good Reliability ◽  
Kappa Value ◽  
Comprehensive Classification ◽  
High Degree

OBJECTIVEIn this study, the authors’ goal was to determine the intra- and interobserver reliability of a new classification system that allows the description of all possible constructs used across three-column osteotomies (3COs) in terms of rod configuration and density.METHODSThirty-five patients with multirod constructs (MRCs) across a 3CO were classified by two spinal surgery fellows according to the new system, and then were reclassified 2 weeks later. Constructs were classified as follows: the number of rods across the osteotomy site followed by a letter corresponding to the type of rod configuration: “M” is for a main rod configuration, defined as a single rod spanning the osteotomy. “L” is for linked rod configurations, defined as 2 rods directly connected to each other at the osteotomy site. “S” is for satellite rod configurations, which were defined as a short rod independent of the main rod with anchors above and below the 3CO. “A” is for accessory rods, defined as an additional rod across the 3CO attached to main rods but not attached to any anchors across the osteotomy site. “I” is for intercalary rod configurations, defined as a rod connecting 2 separate constructs across the 3CO, without the intercalary rod itself attached to any anchors across the osteotomy site. The intra- and interobserver reliability of this classification system was determined.RESULTSA sample estimation for validation assuming two readers and 35 subjects results in a two-sided 95% confidence interval with a width of 0.19 and a kappa value of 0.8 (SD 0.3). The Fleiss kappa coefficient (κ) was used to calculate the degree of agreement between interrater and intraobserver reliability. The interrater kappa coefficient was 0.3, and the intrarater kappa coefficient was 0.63 (good reliability). This scenario represents a high degree of agreement despite a low kappa coefficient. Correct observations by both observers were 34 of 35 and 33 of 35 at both time points. Misclassification was related to difficulty in determining connectors versus anchors.CONCLUSIONSMRCs across 3COs have variable rod configurations. Currently, no classification system or agreement on nomenclature exists to define the configuration of rods across 3COs. The authors present a new, comprehensive MRC classification system with good inter- and intraobserver reliability and a high degree of agreement that allows for a standardized description of MRCs across 3COs.

scholarly journals A New Classification of Talocalcaneal Coalitions Based On Computed Tomography For Operative Planning

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anhong Wang ◽  
Weili Shi ◽  
Linxin Chen ◽  
Xing Xie ◽  
Feng Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Classification System ◽  
Subtalar Joint ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
New Classification ◽  
Type Iv ◽  
Talocalcaneal Coalition ◽  
Operative Planning ◽  
Accessory Ossicle

Abstract Background Current classifications emphasize the morphology of the coalition, however, subtalar joint facets involved should also be emphasized.Objective The objective of this study was to develop a new classification system based on the articular facets involved to cover all coalitions and guide operative planning.Methods Patients were diagnosed with talocalcaneal coalition using a CT scan, between January 2009 and February 2021. We classified the coalition into four main types according to the shape and nature of the coalition: I, inferiorly overgrown talus or superiorly overgrown calcaneus; II, both talus and calcaneus overgrew; III, coalition with an accessory ossicle; (I-III types are non-osseous coalition) IV, complete osseous coalition. Then each type was further divided into three subtypes according to the articular facets involved. A, the coalition involving the anterior facets; M, the coalition involving the middle facets, and P, the coalition involving the posterior facets.Results There were 106 patients (108 feet) included in this study. Overall, 8 feet (7.5%) were classified as type I, 75 feet (69.4%) as type II, 7 feet (6.5%) as type III, and 18 feet (16.7%) as type IV. Twenty-nine coalitions (26.9%) involved the posterior facets only (subtype-P), 74 coalitions (68.5%) involved both the middle and posterior facets (subtype-MP), and five coalitions (4.6%) simultaneously involved the anterior, middle, and posterior facets (subtype-AMP). Type II-MP coalition was the most common.Conclusion A new classification system of the talocalcaneal coalition to facilitate operative planning was developed.

Type I Dentinal Dysplasia—Proposal of A New Classification System Combined with A Variant Case Presentation

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 109
Author(s):  
Nettem Sowmya ◽  
S Venkatachalapathi ◽  
Nettemu Sunil Kumar ◽  
K Kameswari ◽  
Siva Kumar Pendyala
Keyword(s):  
Classification System ◽  
Type I ◽  
New Classification ◽  
Case Presentation

scholarly journals The Buttazzoni Classification of Distal Radial Fractures in Adults: Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability

Hand ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 283-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mats Å. Wadsten ◽  
Arkan S. Sayed-Noor ◽  
Gùran O. Sjù;dén ◽  
Olle Svensson ◽  
Gunnar G. Buttazzoni
Keyword(s):  
Classification System ◽  
Kappa Coefficient ◽  
Intraobserver Reliability ◽  
Classification Systems ◽  
Distal Radial Fracture ◽  
Radial Fracture ◽  
New Classification ◽  
Distal Radial Fractures ◽  
Orthopedic Surgeons ◽  
Fracture Types

Despite the fact that distal radial fracture is the commonest fracture, there is a little evidence-based knowledge about the value of its classification to guide management and predict prognosis. The available classification systems are either complicated or weakly applicable in clinical practice. Older's classification is the most reliable, but does not cover all radial fracture types. We evaluated the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of a new classification system which is a modification of Older's classification covering all radial fracture types. Two hundred and thirty-two consecutive adult patients with acute distal radial fractures were blindly evaluated according to the new classification by three orthopedic surgeons twice with 1-year interval. The interobserver reliability was measured using the Fleiss kappa coefficient, and the intraobserver reliability was measured using the Cohen's kappa coefficient. The new classification showed fair to substantial interobserver and intraobserver reliability, i.e., results comparable to the reliability of commonly used classification systems. The reliability was better for younger patients and when evaluation was carried out by hand-surgery-interested orthopedic surgeons. The new classification system is simple, covers all radial fracture types, and has an acceptable reliability. Further studies are needed to judge its ability to direct management and predict prognosis.

scholarly journals A new classification of talocalcaneal coalitions based on computed tomography for operative planning

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anhong Wang ◽  
Weili Shi ◽  
Lixiang Gao ◽  
Linxin Chen ◽  
Xing Xie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Classification System ◽  
Main Type ◽  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Weighted Kappa ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
New Classification ◽  
Type Iv ◽  
Talocalcaneal Coalition ◽  
Operative Planning

Abstract Background Current classifications emphasize the morphology of the coalition, however, subtalar joint facets involved should also be emphasized. Objective The objective of this study was to develop a new classification system based on the articular facets involved to cover all coalitions and guide operative planning. Methods Patients were diagnosed with talocalcaneal coalition using a CT scan, between January 2009 and February 2021. The coalition was classified into four main types according to the shape and nature of the coalition: I, inferiorly overgrown talus or superiorly overgrown calcaneus; II, both talus and calcaneus overgrew; III, coalition with an accessory ossicle; IV, complete osseous coalition (I-III types are non-osseous coalition). Then each type was further divided into three subtypes according to the articular facets involved. A, the coalition involving the anterior facets; M, the coalition involving the middle facets, and P, the coalition involving the posterior facets. Interobserver reliability was measured at the main type (based on nature and shape) and subtype (articular facet involved) using weighted Kappa. Results There were 106 patients (108 ft) included in this study. Overall, 8 ft (7.5%) were classified as type I, 75 ft (69.4%) as type II, 7 ft (6.5%) as type III, and 18 ft (16.7%) as type IV. Twenty-nine coalitions (26.9%) involved the posterior facets only (subtype-P), 74 coalitions (68.5%) involved both the middle and posterior facets (subtype-MP), and five coalitions (4.6%) simultaneously involved the anterior, middle, and posterior facets (subtype-AMP). Type II-MP coalition was the most common. The value of weighted Kappa for the main type was 0.93 (95%CI 0.86–0.99) (p<0.001), and the value for the subtype was 0.78 (95%CI 0.66–0.91) (p<0.001). Conclusion A new classification system of the talocalcaneal coalition to facilitate operative planning was developed.

scholarly journals CLASSIFICATION OF ACL TEARS IN THE PEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT POPULATION

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0025
Author(s):  
I Kushare ◽  
M Beran ◽  
K Klingele ◽  
E Ettia ◽  
A Elabd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Classification System ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Meniscus Tear ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Kappa Statistics ◽  
Type I ◽  
Tissue Quality ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Observer Reliability

Background: There have been previous imaging classification schemes in the literature that described ACL tears in adults and pediatric patients. More recent publications have described the epidemiology, injury mechanisms, and repair versus reconstruction techniques. None have proposed an arthroscopic classification for pediatric patients. Purpose: To describe our experience with a novel arthroscopic classification using 4 patterns of ACL tears depending on the type of tear and the tissue quality. Methods: An IRB approved prospective with 2 parts to this study: Part 1: Single center prospective case series using descriptive statistics of intraoperative findings. We included children ≤18 years old with an ACL tear who underwent surgery within 8 weeks of injury. Those with associated ligamentous injuries or revision surgery were excluded. We proposed a 4-stage classification as follows: I. Avulsion off femur II. <10% tear from femoral end III. Midsubstance tear IV. Single bundle tear. Part 2: Four fellowship-trained surgeons from two tertiary children’s hospitals classified ACL injury based on intraoperative video of 33 randomly selected surgeries. 2 rounds of classification were performed. Inter and intra-observer reliability studies were calculated using Kappa statistics. Results: 120 patients (73 males and 47 females) with mean age of 16 (9-20) years and mean BMI 26 (16-51) were included in this study. 59 patients (49%) had left sided injury while 61 (51%) had right sided injury. 29 (24%) patients reported contact injury while 91 (76%) reported non-contact. Isolated ACL injury was recorded in 49 patients only (41%) while concomitant injuries were recorded in 71 patients (59%). The most common associated injury was the lateral meniscus tear (33%), followed by lateral and medial meniscus tear (13.4%). According to our classification, 23 (19.2%) patients were type I, 15 (12.5%) were type II, 65 (54.2%) were type III, and 17 (14.2%) were type IV. The intra-rater reliability was excellent for 2 reviewers, good for 1 and marginal for another. The overall inter rater reliability for all 4 reviewers was marginal for both readings (k=0.35, 95% CI: 0.23-0.44; k=0.26, 95%CI: 0.16-0.35 respectively). Conclusion: With renewed interest in ACL repairs and techniques, a classification system for ACL tears can guide a proper surgical plan. Our classification system provides a step to achieve this goal. It showed overall good intra-observer reliability, with marginal inter-observer reliability.

scholarly journals Cystic Duct Carcinoma: A New Classification System and the Clinicopathological Features of 62 Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingxi Nan ◽  
Changcheng Wang ◽  
Yajie Dai ◽  
Jie Wang ◽  
Xiaobo Bo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cystic Duct ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Vascular System ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Imaging Data ◽  
New Classification ◽  
Duct Carcinoma ◽  
Cystic Duct Carcinoma

BackgroundCystic duct carcinoma (CDC) is a rare biliary malignancy with a low incidence and poor prognosis. However, the clinical landscape of the disease has not been clarified and no widely applicable classification system has been developed.MethodsSixty-two patients with CDC were included in this retrospective study, and a new classification system was established using imaging data. Blood indices, radiological characteristics, pathological features, surgical procedures, and overall survival data were collected. The efficacy of the new classification in predicting resectability was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and K-means clustering and t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding were applied to verify the conclusion.ResultsThe pT stage of patients with type II CDC was significantly worse than that of type I. Patients with type II CDC were more likely to experience distant metastasis and invasion of the nervous system, vascular system, and liver. The resectability of patients with type II CDC was significantly worse than that of patients with type I CDC. Patients with type II CDC had worse prognoses. ROC curve analysis and K-means clustering revealed that the new classification could better categorize patients with CDC than currently available systems.ConclusionPatients with type II CDC have significantly worse clinicopathological outcomes. The new classification system has better accuracy in grouping patients with CDC.

scholarly journals Assessing the reliability of the modified Gartland classification system for extension-type supracondylar humerus fractures

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 569-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. L. Teo ◽  
E. K. Schaeffer ◽  
E. Habib ◽  
A. Cherukupalli ◽  
A. P. Cooper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Classification System ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Weighted Kappa ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Type I ◽  
Elbow Fracture ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Supracondylar Humerus Fractures ◽  
Paediatric Orthopaedic

Purpose The Gartland extension-type supracondylar humerus (SCH) fracture is the most common paediatric elbow fracture. Treatment options range from nonoperative treatment (taping or casting) to operative treatments (closed reduction and percutaneous pinning or open reduction). Classification variability between surgeons is a potential contributing factor to existing controversy over treatment options for type II SCH fractures. This study investigated levels of agreement in extension-type SCH fracture classification using the modified Gartland classification system. Methods A retrospective review was conducted on 60 patients aged between two and 12 years who had sustained an extension-type SCH fracture and received operative or nonoperative treatment at a tertiary children’s hospital. Baseline radiographs were provided, and surgeons were asked to classify the fractures as type I, IIA, IIB or III according to the modified Gartland classification. Respondents were then asked to complete a second round of classifications using reshuffled radiographs. Weighted kappa values were calculated to assess interobserver and intraobserver levels of agreement. Results In all, 21 paediatric orthopaedic surgeons responded to the survey and 15 completed a second round of ratings. Interobserver agreement for classification based on the Gartland criteria between surgeons was substantial with a kappa of 0.679 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.501 to 0.873). Intraobserver agreement was substantial with a kappa of 0.796, (95% CI 0.628 to 0.864) Conclusion Radiographic classification of extension-type SCH fractures demonstrated substantial agreement both between and within surgeon raters. Therefore, classification variability may not be a major contributing factor to the treatment controversy for type II SCH fractures and treatment variability may be due to differences in surgeon preferences. Level of Evidence III

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document