scholarly journals Clinical and Economic Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions Reported Among Hospital Inpatients in The Middle East: a Systematic Review Protocol

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Binny Thomas ◽  
Pallivalappila Abdulrouf ◽  
Wessam Elkassem ◽  
Fatema Al Hail ◽  
Zachariah Nazar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Economic Development ◽  
Patient Safety ◽  
Antimicrobial Resistance ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Systematic Review Protocol ◽  
Review Protocol ◽  
Global Concern ◽  
Hospital Inpatients

Abstract Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) is a major global concern, negatively impacting public health outcomes (1-5), patient safety (3,6-8) and poses enormous burden on economic development and security (8-16). Internationally, data suggests, at any given time, approximately one-third of the hospitalized patients and over two-thirds of critically ill patients are prescribed antimicrobials and more than half of these prescribed antimicrobials are deemed inappropriate (5,17,18).

scholarly journals Do sugar-sweetened beverages cause adverse health outcomes in adults? A systematic review protocol

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Candyce Hamel ◽  
Adrienne Stevens ◽  
Kavita Singh ◽  
Mohammed T Ansari ◽  
Esther Myers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Systematic Review Protocol ◽  
Sugar Sweetened Beverages ◽  
Adverse Health ◽  
Adverse Health Outcomes ◽  
Sweetened Beverages ◽  
Review Protocol

scholarly journals Evaluation Instruments for Assessing Back Pain in Athletes: A Systematic Review Protocol

Healthcare ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 574
Author(s):  
Vinicius Diniz Azevedo ◽  
Regina Márcia Ferreira Silva ◽  
Silvia Cristina de Carvalho Borges ◽  
Michele da Silva Valadão Fernandes ◽  
Vicente Miñana-Signes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Health Problem ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Systematic Review Protocol ◽  
Cosmin Checklist ◽  
Adolescents And Adults ◽  
Review Protocol

Back pain is a public health problem that affects adolescents and adults worldwide. However, studies on back pain present inconsistent findings in part due to the use of different instruments, especially for athletes. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review protocol was to map the existing evidence on such tools. The systematic review will be conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Five electronic databases, Embase, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, and Scopus will be searched. This review includes studies that investigated prevalence, incidence, and other variables. Titles and abstracts will be selected. Two independent reviewers will read the articles carefully and discrepancies, if any, will be dealt with by a third reviewer. All steps will be completed with Rayyan for systematic reviews and the methodological quality will be analyzed with a COSMIN checklist. Discussion: This systematic review will gather evidence on tools that assess back pain in athletes. The findings may indicate the most appropriate tools for assessing back pain. They will contribute to better reliability, safe measurements, and help to standardize a comparison tool between different studies. They will also assist in the development of specific tools for athletes. Registration: This review was submitted and registered under CRD42020201299 in PROSPERO.

The efficacy of deprescribing interventions on health outcomes in people aged over 65 years: a systematic review protocol

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 124-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Theresa Page ◽  
Hanan Khalil ◽  
Christopher Etherton-Beer ◽  
Rhonda Clifford ◽  
Kathleen Potter
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Systematic Review Protocol ◽  
Review Protocol
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document