A Local Perspective: Experiences And Handling of Mental Health Burden During The COVID-19 Pandemic In Uganda.
Abstract BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has increased the prevalence of mental health illness around the world. While research has espoused these realities from the context of western countries, however, similar evidence from low income countries like Uganda is still missing. This is despite the fact that scholars have pointed out that given inadequate funding, health facilities and personnel to treat people with mental health challenges, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic could be severe. Further, it is still unclear how locals in low income countries like Uganda manage to cope with mental health challenges given the lack of adequate skilled response, especially during a pandemic that has increased the pressure on the healthcare system. Therefore, this study aims to fill this gap by investigating local people’s experience and handling of mental health burden during the COVID-19 pandemic n Uganda. Methods Qualitative primary data was collected from Uganda in November and December 2020. The sample selection involved a two-staged cluster sampling technique via the AfriSight online platform. Our study included a total of 1249 participants picked from the 4 different regions of Uganda. On the basis of this, thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. Results Our study revealed that the COVID-19 pandemic and its associated interventions contributed to the increasing mental health burden in Uganda. The four most pronounced forms of mental health illnesses included stress, anxiety, depression and traumatic disorders with the leading causes being closure of income-generating activities, fear of dying, sexual and domestic abuse. While a few people had access to skilled mantel health care, the majority of the people struggled to access this form of care. Skilled maternal care remained an attractive yet unattainable form of care for many. Thus, most people relied on various forms of local strategies that were feasible. ConclusionOur study revealed that Uganda was home to various local survival strategies that counter the inadequacies presented by the weak health care system. Particularly, a culture of reciprocity, family and community network forms important coping avenues for many left stranded by the lack of adequate skilled care. Thus, in the context of Uganda during the COVID-19 pandemic, it seemed more logical to promote scaling up feasibly and locally-available solutions rather than idealistically focusing on attractive yet unattainable forms of care.