scholarly journals Benefit of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Node-Negative T1a Versus T1b and T1c Triple Negative Breast Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Genevieve A Fasano ◽  
Solange Bayard ◽  
Yalei Chen ◽  
Leticia Varella ◽  
Tessa Cigler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
The United States ◽  
Adjuvant Radiation ◽  
Node Negative ◽  
Cancer Network

Abstract Purpose: National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy in node-negative triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) if the tumor is > 1 cm and consideration of adjuvant chemotherapy for T1b but not T1a disease. These recommendations are based upon sparse data regarding the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in T1a and T1b node-negative TNBC. Our objective was to clarify the benefits of chemotherapy for patients with T1N0 TNBC, stratified by tumor size.Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of survival outcomes in an IRB-approved prospectively-maintained database of TNBC patients treated at two academic institutions in the United States from 1999-2018. Primary tumor size, histology, and nodal status were based upon definitive surgical pathology. Mean follow-up was 5.3 years.Results: 756 TNBC cases were analyzed; 258 T1N0 TNBC patients were identified. Adjuvant chemotherapy was delivered to 30.5% of T1a, 64.7% T1b, and 83.9% T1c (p < 0.0001). Factors associated with delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy were age, histology, high-grade disease, and postoperative adjuvant radiation therapy. At a mean follow-up of 5.3 years, increase in overall survival was associated with use of chemotherapy in patients with T1c disease (93.2% v. 75.2% p = 0.008) but not in those with T1a (100% v. 100% p = 0.3778) or T1b (100% v. 95.8% p = 0.2362) disease.Conclusion: Our data support current guidelines indicating benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in node-negative TNBC associated with T1c tumors but excellent outcomes were observed in cases of T1a and T1b disease, regardless of whether adjuvant chemotherapy was delivered.

scholarly journals Locally Advanced Breast Cancer (LABC): Real-World Outcome of Patients From Cancer Institute, Chennai

2021 ◽  
pp. 767-781
Author(s):  
Manikandan Dhanushkodi ◽  
Velusamy Sridevi ◽  
Viswanathan Shanta ◽  
Ranganathan Rama ◽  
Rajaraman Swaminathan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Locally Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced

PURPOSE There are sparse data on the outcome of patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). This report is on the prognostic factors and long-term outcome from Cancer Institute, Chennai. METHODS This is an analysis of untreated patients with LABC (stages IIIA-C) who were treated from January 2006 to December 2013. RESULTS Of the 4,577 patients with breast cancer who were treated, 2,137 patients (47%) with LABC were included for analysis. The median follow-up was 75 months (range, 1-170 months), and 2.3% (n = 49) were lost to follow-up at 5 years. The initial treatment was neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation (NACR) (77%), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (15%), or others (8%). Patients with triple-negative breast cancer had a pathologic complete response (PCR) of 41%. The 10-year overall survival was for stage IIIA (65.1%), stage IIIB (41.2%), and stage IIIC (26.7%). Recurrence of cancer was observed in 27% of patients (local 13% and distant 87%). Multivariate analysis showed that patients with a tumor size > 10 cm (hazard ratio [HR], 2.19; 95% CI, 1.62 to 2.98; P = .001), hormone receptor negativity (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.22 to 1.72; P = .001), treatment modality (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.73; P = .001), lack of PCR (HR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.85 to 3.02; P = .001), and the presence of lymphovascular invasion (HR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.60 to 2.44; P = .001) had decreased overall survival. CONCLUSION NACR was feasible in inoperable LABC and gave satisfactory long-term survival. PCR was significantly higher in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. The tumor size > 10 cm was significantly associated with inferior survival. However, this report acknowledges the limitations inherent in experience of management of LABC from a single center.

Outcomes with neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy for T1-2 node negative triple negative breast cancer.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1092-1092 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priyanka Sharma ◽  
Bruce F. Kimler ◽  
Jennifer R. Klemp ◽  
Claire Ward ◽  
Carol Sue Connor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Node Negative

Adjuvant chemotherapy in small node-negative triple-negative breast cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 66-74
Author(s):  
Tessa G. Steenbruggen ◽  
Erik van Werkhoven ◽  
Mette S. van Ramshorst ◽  
Vincent O. Dezentjé ◽  
Marleen Kok ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Node Negative

scholarly journals Impact of estrogen receptor levels on outcome in non-metastatic triple negative breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Vittoria Dieci ◽  
Gaia Griguolo ◽  
Michele Bottosso ◽  
Vassilena Tsvetkova ◽  
Carlo Alberto Giorgi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Neo Adjuvant Chemotherapy

AbstractAlthough 1% is the recommended cut-off to define estrogen receptor (ER) positivity, a 10% cut-off is often used in clinical practice for therapeutic purposes. We here evaluate clinical outcomes according to ER levels in a monoinstitutional cohort of non-metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. Clinicopathological data of 406 patients with ER < 10% HER2-negative BC treated with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy between 01/2000 and 04/2019 were collected. Patients were categorized in ER-negative (ER < 1%; N = 364) and ER-low positive (1–9%, N = 42). At a median follow-up of 54 months, 88 patients had relapsed and 64 died. No significant difference was observed in invasive relapse-free survival (iRFS) and overall survival (OS) according to ER expression levels, both at univariate and multivariate analysis (5-years iRFS 74.0% versus 73.1% for ER-negative and ER-low positive BC, respectively, p = 0.6; 5-years OS 82.3% versus 76.7% for ER-negative and ER-low positive BC, respectively, p = 0.8). Among the 165 patients that received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pathological complete response rate was similar in the two cohorts (38% in ER-negative, 44% in ER-low positive, p = 0.498). In conclusion, primary BC with ER1–9% shows similar clinical behavior to ER 1% BC. Our results suggest the use of a 10% cut-off, rather than <1%, to define triple-negative BC.

scholarly journals Benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in node-negative T1a versus T1b and T1c triple-negative breast cancer

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Genevieve A. Fasano ◽  
Solange Bayard ◽  
Yalei Chen ◽  
Leticia Varella ◽  
Tessa Cigler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Node Negative

scholarly journals Recurrence in Stage I and II Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Analysis of Clinicopathologic and Imaging Factors

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hye Joung Eom ◽  
Joo Hee Cha ◽  
Woo Jung Choi ◽  
Eun Young Chae ◽  
Hee Jung Shin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Nodal Status ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Clinicopathologic Factors

Abstract Background To describe the outcomes of patients with early stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and to investigate whether certain imaging and clinicopathologic factors were associated with recurrence in patients with early stage TNBC. Methods We identified stage I and II TNBC patients treated between 2009 and 2011. Data included patient and tumor characteristics, time of recurrence, and findings on mammography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate recurrence free survival and Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the association between imaging and clinicopathologic factors and recurrence. Results The study included 702 patients with mean age of 49.0 years (range, 24–82 years) and mean follow-up of 61 months (range, 6 - 93 months). Overall, 115 (115/702, 16.4%) had recurrence. Clinicopathologic factors associated with recurrence included increasing tumor size, positive nodal status, ki-67 index more than 14, presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI), mastectomy, and neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Imaging factors associated with recurrence included moderate or marked background parenchymal enhancement on MRI. After controlling for all potential confounders, tumor size, nodal status, LVI, and adjuvant chemotherapy were independently associated with recurrence. Conclusion Sixteen percent of patients with early stage TNBC experienced recurrence, with 3 and 5 year recurrence rates being 12.4% and 15.3%, respectively. Tumor size, nodal status, LVI, and adjuvant chemotherapy were independently associated with recurrence, while none of the imaging factors showed association.

scholarly journals The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in Korean patients with node negative T1c, triple negative breast cancer

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. e0197523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung Taek Lim ◽  
Chan Heun Park ◽  
Sung Yong Kim ◽  
Seok Jin Nam ◽  
Eun Young Kang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Node Negative ◽  
Korean Patients

scholarly journals Staging Investigations in Asymptomatic Early Breast Cancer Patients at the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 2190-2198
Author(s):  
Dalia Kamel ◽  
Veronica Youssef ◽  
Wilma M. Hopman ◽  
Mihaela Mates
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Early Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Receptor Status ◽  
Cancer Centre ◽  
Radiological Staging

Background: In 2012, the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) identified five key opportunities in oncology to improve patient care, recommending against imaging tests for the staging of patients with early breast cancer (EBC) at low risk for metastases. Similarly, the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) guideline does not support radiological staging in asymptomatic EBC (aEBC). The purpose of this study was to assess local practice and outcomes of staging investigations (SIs) in aEBC at the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario (CCSEO). Methods: A retrospective electronic and paper chart review was undertaken to identify all aEBC patients treated at our institution between January 2012 and December 2014. Patients with pathological staging of T1-T2 and N0-1 with any receptor status were included. We collected patient demographics, treatment and pathologic tumor characteristics. The use and outcomes of initial and follow-up SIs were recorded. Data were analyzed to determine associations between the use of SIs and clinical characteristics (chi-square tests, independent samples t-tests and Mann–Whitney U tests). Results: From 2012 to 2014, 295 asymptomatic EBC patients were identified. The mean age was 64, 81% were postmenopausal and 76% had breast conserving surgery. Stage distribution was as follows: stage I 42%, stage IIA 37% and stage IIB 21%. Receptor status was as follows: ER+ 84%, HER2+ 13% and triple negative 12%. Adjuvant chemotherapy was received by 36%, Trastuzumab by 10% and endocrine therapy by 76% of patients. Baseline SIs were performed in 168 patients (57%) for a total of 332 tests. Overt metastatic disease was found in five patients (one bone scan and four CT scans). Seventy-one out of the 168 patients (42%) who received initial staging imaging underwent 138 follow-up imaging tests, none of which were diagnostic for metastases. Nine patients with suspicious CT findings underwent biopsies, of which four were malignant (one metastatic breast cancer and three new primaries). Factors significantly associated with SI were as follows: younger age (p = 0.001), premenopausal status (p = 0.01), T2 stage (p < 0.001), N1 stage (p < 0.001), HER2 positive (p < 0.001), triple negative status (p = 0.007) and use of adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Over a 3-year period at our institution, more than 50% of aEBC patients underwent a total of 470 initial and follow-up staging tests, yielding a cancer diagnosis (metastatic breast cancer or second primary cancer) in four patients. We, therefore, conclude that routine-staging investigations in aEBC patients have low diagnostic value, supporting current guidelines that recommend against the routine use of SI in this population.

scholarly journals Pharmacologic profiling of patient-derived xenograft models of primary treatment-naïve triple-negative breast cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Reid T. Powell ◽  
Abena Redwood ◽  
Xuan Liu ◽  
Lei Guo ◽  
Shirong Cai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Human Tumor ◽  
The United States ◽  
Glutathione Metabolism ◽  
Subtype Selectivity ◽  
Patient Derived Xenograft ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Xenograft Models

Abstract Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 15–20% of breast cancer cases in the United States, lacks targeted therapeutic options, and is associated with a 40–80% risk of recurrence. Thus, identifying actionable targets in treatment-naïve and chemoresistant TNBC is a critical unmet medical need. To address this need, we performed high-throughput drug viability screens on human tumor cells isolated from 16 patient-derived xenograft models of treatment-naïve primary TNBC. The models span a range of TNBC subtypes and exhibit a diverse set of putative driver mutations, thus providing a unique patient-derived, molecularly annotated pharmacologic resource that is reflective of TNBC. We identified therapeutically actionable targets including kinesin spindle protein (KSP). The KSP inhibitor targets the mitotic spindle through mechanisms independent of microtubule stability and showed efficacy in models that were resistant to microtubule inhibitors used as part of the current standard of care for TNBC. We also observed subtype selectivity of Prima-1Met, which showed higher levels of efficacy in the mesenchymal subtype. Coupling pharmacologic data with genomic and transcriptomic information, we showed that Prima-1Met activity was independent of its canonical target, mutant p53, and was better associated with glutathione metabolism, providing an alternate molecularly defined biomarker for this drug.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document