scholarly journals Application of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction (DLIR) Algorithm to Improve Image Quality in CT Angiography of Children with Takayasu Arteritis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jihang Sun ◽  
Haoyan Li ◽  
Jianying Li ◽  
Haiyun Li ◽  
Michelle Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Image Reconstruction ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Takayasu Arteritis ◽  
Image Noise ◽  
Slice Thickness ◽  
Reconstruction Algorithms ◽  
Diagnostic Confidence ◽  
Ct Number ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract purpose: To evaluate the image quality improvement in CTA of children with Takayasu arteritis (TAK) using a Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) in comparison to other reconstruction algorithms.Methods: 32 patients (9.14±4.51 years old) with TAK underwent neck, chest and abdominal CTA with 100kVp were enrolled. Images were reconstructed at 0.625mm slice thickness using Filtered Back-Projection (FBP), 50% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V), 100%ASIR-V and DLIR with high setting (DLIR-H). The CT number and standard deviation (SD) of the descending aorta and back muscle were measured and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for aorta was calculated. The vessel visualization, overall image noise and diagnostic confidence were evaluated using a 5-point scale (5, excellent; 3, acceptable) by 2 observers.Results: There was no significant difference in CT number across all reconstructions. The image noise values (in HU) were 31.36±6.01, 24.96±4.69, 18.46±3.91 and 15.58±3.65, and CNR values for aorta were 11.93±2.12, 15.66±2.37, 22.54±3.34 and 24.02±4.55 with FBP, 50%ASIR-V, 100%ASIR-V and DLIR-H, respectively. The 100%ASIR-V and DLIR-H images had similar noise and CNR (all P>0.05), and both had lower noise and higher CNR than FBP and 50%ASIR-V images (all P<0.05). The subjective evaluation suggested that all images were diagnostic for large arteries, but only 50%ASIR-V and DLIR-H met the diagnostic requirement for small arteries (3.03±0.18 and 3.53±0.51). Conclusions: DLIR-H improves the CTA image quality and diagnostic confidence for TAK patients compared with 50%ASIR-V, and best balances image noise and spatial resolution compared with 100%ASIR-V.

Application of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm to improve image quality in CT angiography of children with Takayasu arteritis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Jihang Sun ◽  
Haoyan Li ◽  
Haiyun Li ◽  
Michelle Li ◽  
Yingzi Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Image Reconstruction ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Ct Angiography ◽  
Takayasu Arteritis ◽  
Image Noise ◽  
Diagnostic Confidence ◽  
Ct Number ◽  
Laboratory Test Results ◽  
Significant Difference

BACKGROUND: The inflammatory indexes of children with Takayasu arteritis (TAK) usually tend to be normal immediately after treatment, therefore, CT angiography (CTA) has become an important method to evaluate the status of TAK and sometime is even more sensitive than laboratory test results. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate image quality improvement in CTA of children diagnosed with TAK using a deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) in comparison to other image reconstruction algorithms. METHODS: hirty-two TAK patients (9.14±4.51 years old) underwent neck, chest and abdominal CTA using 100 kVp were enrolled. Images were reconstructed at 0.625 mm slice thickness using Filtered Back-Projection (FBP), 50%adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V), 100%ASIR-V and DLIR with high setting (DLIR-H). CT number and standard deviation (SD) of the descending aorta and back muscle were measured and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for aorta was calculated. The vessel visualization, overall image noise and diagnostic confidence were evaluated using a 5-point scale (5, excellent; 3, acceptable) by 2 observers. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in CT number across images reconstructed using different algorithms. Image noise values (in HU) were 31.36±6.01, 24.96±4.69, 18.46±3.91 and 15.58±3.65, and CNR values for aorta were 11.93±2.12, 15.66±2.37, 22.54±3.34 and 24.02±4.55 using FBP, 50%ASIR-V, 100%ASIR-V and DLIR-H, respectively. The 100%ASIR-V and DLIR-H images had similar noise and CNR (all P >  0.05), and both had lower noise and higher CNR than FBP and 50%ASIR-V images (all P <  0.05). The subjective evaluation suggested that all images were diagnostic for large arteries, however, only 50%ASIR-V and DLIR-H met the diagnostic requirement for small arteries (3.03±0.18 and 3.53±0.51). CONCLUSION: DLIR-H improves CTA image quality and diagnostic confidence for TAK patients compared with 50%ASIR-V, and best balances image noise and spatial resolution compared with 100%ASIR-V.

scholarly journals Application of a deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm in head CT imaging for children to improve image quality and lesion detection

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jihang Sun ◽  
Haoyan Li ◽  
Bei Wang ◽  
Jianying Li ◽  
Michelle Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
White Matter ◽  
Image Reconstruction ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Image Noise ◽  
Lesion Detection ◽  
Slice Thickness ◽  
Head Ct ◽  
Similar Image ◽  
Subjective Score

Abstract Background To evaluate the performance of a Deep Learning Image Reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm in pediatric head CT for improving image quality and lesion detection with 0.625 mm thin-slice images. Methods Low-dose axial head CT scans of 50 children with 120 kV, 0.8 s rotation and age-dependent 150–220 mA tube current were selected. Images were reconstructed at 5 mm and 0.625 mm slice thickness using Filtered back projection (FBP), Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-v at 50% strength (50%ASIR-V) (as reference standard), 100%ASIR-V and DLIR-high (DL-H). The CT attenuation and standard deviation values of the gray and white matters in the basal ganglia were measured. The clarity of sulci/cisterns, boundary between white and gray matters, and overall image quality was subjectively evaluated. The number of lesions in each reconstruction group was counted. Results The 5 mm FBP, 50%ASIR-V, 100%ASIR-V and DL-H images had a subjective score of 2.25 ± 0.44, 3.05 ± 0.23, 2.87 ± 0.39 and 3.64 ± 0.49 in a 5-point scale, respectively with DL-H having the lowest image noise of white matter at 2.00 ± 0.34 HU; For the 0.625 mm images, only DL-H images met the diagnostic requirement. The 0.625 mm DL-H images had similar image noise (3.11 ± 0.58 HU) of the white matter and overall image quality score (3.04 ± 0.33) as the 5 mm 50% ASIR-V images (3.16 ± 0.60 HU and 3.05 ± 0.23). Sixty-five lesions were recognized in 5 mm 50%ASIR-V images and 69 were detected in 0.625 mm DL-H images. Conclusion DL-H improves the head CT image quality for children compared with ASIR-V images. The 0.625 mm DL-H images improve lesion detection and produce similar image noise as the 5 mm 50%ASIR-V images, indicating a potential 85% dose reduction if current image quality and slice thickness are desired.

scholarly journals Improved image quality in abdominal computed tomography reconstructed with a novel Deep Learning Image Reconstruction technique – initial clinical experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 205846012110083
Author(s):  
Tormund Njølstad ◽  
Anselm Schulz ◽  
Johannes C Godt ◽  
Helga M Brøgger ◽  
Cathrine K Johansen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Image Reconstruction ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Iterative Reconstruction ◽  
High Strength ◽  
Image Noise ◽  
Slice Thickness ◽  
Visual Grading ◽  
Abdominal Computed Tomography

Background A novel Deep Learning Image Reconstruction (DLIR) technique for computed tomography has recently received clinical approval. Purpose To assess image quality in abdominal computed tomography reconstructed with DLIR, and compare with standardly applied iterative reconstruction. Material and methods Ten abdominal computed tomography scans were reconstructed with iterative reconstruction and DLIR of medium and high strength, with 0.625 mm and 2.5 mm slice thickness. Image quality was assessed using eight visual grading criteria in a side-by-side comparative setting. All series were presented twice to evaluate intraobserver agreement. Reader scores were compared using univariate logistic regression. Image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio were calculated for quantitative analyses. Results For 2.5 mm slice thickness, DLIR images were more frequently perceived as equal or better than iterative reconstruction across all visual grading criteria (for both DLIR of medium and high strength, p < 0.001). Correspondingly, DLIR images were more frequently perceived as better (as opposed to equal or in favor of iterative reconstruction) for visual reproduction of liver parenchyma, intrahepatic vascular structures as well as overall impression of image noise and texture (p < 0.001). This improved image quality was also observed for 0.625 mm slice images reconstructed with DLIR of high strength when directly comparing to traditional iterative reconstruction in 2.5 mm slices. Image noise was significantly lower and contrast-to-noise ratio measurements significantly higher for images reconstructed with DLIR compared to iterative reconstruction (p < 0.01). Conclusions Abdominal computed tomography images reconstructed using a DLIR technique shows improved image quality when compared to standardly applied iterative reconstruction across a variety of clinical image quality criteria.

Clinical Implementation of Deep Learning MR reconstruction for TSE Sequences: Reduction of Acquisition Time and Maintenance

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Herrmann ◽  
Sebastian Gassenmaier ◽  
Thomas Kuestner ◽  
Matthias Kuendel ◽  
Dominik Nickel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Image Reconstruction ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Acquisition Time ◽  
Clinical Implementation ◽  
Clinical Workflow ◽  
Diagnostic Confidence ◽  
Clinical Routine ◽  
Time Saving ◽  
Reconstruction Process

Abstract Background: The application of Deep Learning (DL) in MR image reconstruction is increasingly gaining attention due to its potential of increasing image quality and reducing acquisition time. However, the technology hasn’t been yet implemented in clinical routine. The aim of this study was therefore to describe the implementation of this novel DL image reconstruction for turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences in clinical workflow including a thorough explanation of the required steps and an evaluation of the obtainable image quality compared to conventional TSE.Methods: DL image reconstruction using a variational network was clinically implemented to enable acquisition of accelerated TSE sequences. After internal review board’s approval and informed consent, 30 examinations for knee, shoulder, and lumbar spine in 15 volunteers at 3 T were included in this prospective study. Conventional TSE sequences (TSE) and TSE with deep learning reconstruction (TSEDL) were compared regarding overall image quality, noise, sharpness, and subjective signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR), as well diagnostic confidence and image impression. Comparative analyses were conducted to assess the differences between the sequences. A survey on technologists’ acceptance was performed for DL image reconstruction. Results: DL image reconstruction was successfully implemented in a clinical workflow and TSEDL allowed a remarkable time saving of more than 50%. Overall image quality, diagnostic confidence and image impression for TSEDL were rated as excellent (median 4, IQR 4-4) and comparable to TSE (image quality: p=0.059, diagnostic confidence: p=0.157, image impression: p=0.102). Noise, sharpness, artifacts, and subjective SNR for TSEDL reached significantly superior levels to TSE (noise: p<0.001, sharpness: p=0.001, artifacts: p=0.014, subjective SNR: p<0.001). Technologists reported high levels of acceptance for DL image reconstruction. Required time for the reconstruction process was rated moderate and longer than standard sequences (median 2, IQR 2-3). Required time and effort for the implementation in daily workflow was rated as low effort (median 4, IQR 3-4). General applicability of DL reconstruction as well as acceptance of DL sequences in clinical routine were rated excellent (median 4, IQR 3-4). Conclusion: DL image reconstruction for TSE sequences can be implemented in clinical workflow and enables a remarkable time saving (>50%) in image acquisition while maintaining excellent image quality.Trial registration: Your clinical trial is officially registered at the German DRKS with the registration number: DRKS00023278.

scholarly journals Image quality assessment of deep learning image reconstruction in computed tomography using tube current modulation: a phantom study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
kazuhiro takeuchi ◽  
Yasuhiro Ide ◽  
Yuichiro Mori ◽  
Yusuke Uehara ◽  
Hiroshi Sukeishi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Image Reconstruction ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Quality Characteristics ◽  
Image Noise ◽  
Tube Current Modulation ◽  
Current Modulation ◽  
Tube Current ◽  
The Impact

Abstract The novel deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) is known to change its image quality characteristics according to object contrast and image noise. In clinical practice, computed tomography (CT) image noise is usually controlled by tube current modulation (TCM) to accommodate changes in object size. This study aimed to evaluate the image quality characteristics of DLIR for different object sizes when in-plane noise is controlled by TCM. We used Mercury 4.0 phantoms with different object sizes. Phantom image acquisition was performed on a GE Revolution CT system to investigate the impact of the DLIR algorithm compared to standard reconstructions: filtered back projection (FBP) and hybrid iterative reconstruction (hybrid-IR). For image quality evaluation, the noise power spectrum (NPS), task-based transfer function (TTF), and detectability index (d') were determined. The NPS of DLIR was very similar to that of FBP, and the information in the high-frequency region was maintained. In terms of TTF, DLIR showed higher resolution than hybrid-IR at low- to medium-contrast (Δ50, Δ90HU), but not necessarily higher than FBP. At the simulated contrast and lesion size, DLIR showed higher detectability than hybrid-IR, regardless of the phantom size. In this study, we evaluated a novel DLIR algorithm by reproducing clinical behaviors. The findings indicate that DLIR produces higher image quality than hybrid-IR regardless of the phantom size, although it depends on the reconstruction strength.

A feasibility study of realizing low-dose abdominal CT using deep learning image reconstruction algorithm

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Lu-Lu Li ◽  
Huang Wang ◽  
Jian Song ◽  
Jin Shang ◽  
Xiao-Ying Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Image Reconstruction ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Image Noise ◽  
Arterial Phase ◽  
Abdominal Ct ◽  
Reconstruction Methods

OBJECTIVES: To explore the feasibility of achieving diagnostic images in low-dose abdominal CT using a Deep Learning Image Reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm. METHODS: Prospectively enrolled 47 patients requiring contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scans. The late-arterial phase scan was added and acquired using lower-dose mode (tube current range, 175–545 mA; 80 kVp for patients with BMI ≤24 kg/m2 and 100 kVp for patients with BMI >  24 kg/m2) and reconstructed with DLIR at medium setting (DLIR-M) and high setting (DLIR-H), ASIR-V at 0% (FBP), 40% and 80% strength. Both the quantitative measurement and qualitative analysis of the five types of reconstruction methods were compared. In addition, radiation dose and image quality between the early-arterial phase ASIR-V images using standard-dose and the late-arterial phase DLIR images using low-dose were compared. RESULTS: For the late-arterial phase, all five reconstructions had similar CT value (P >  0.05). DLIR-H, DLIR-M and ASIR-V80% images significantly reduced the image noise and improved the image contrast noise ratio, compared with the standard ASIR-V40% images (P <  0.05). ASIR-V80% images had undesirable image characteristics with obvious “waxy” artifacts, while DLIR-H images maintained high spatial resolution and had the highest subjective image quality. Compared with the early-arterial scans, the late-arterial phase scans significantly reduced the radiation dose (P <  0.05), while the DLIR-H images exhibited lower image noise and good display of the specific image details of lesions. CONCLUSIONS: DLIR algorithm improves image quality under low-dose scan condition and may be used to reduce the radiation dose without adversely affecting the image quality.

scholarly journals Deep learning versus iterative image reconstruction algorithm for head CT in trauma

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zlatan Alagic ◽  
Jacqueline Diaz Cardenas ◽  
Kolbeinn Halldorsson ◽  
Vitali Grozman ◽  
Stig Wallgren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Image Reconstruction ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Reconstruction Algorithm ◽  
Weighted Kappa ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Reconstruction Algorithms ◽  
Head Ct ◽  
Image Reconstruction Algorithm ◽  
Experienced Reader

Abstract Purpose To compare the image quality between a deep learning–based image reconstruction algorithm (DLIR) and an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm (ASiR-V) in noncontrast trauma head CT. Methods Head CT scans from 94 consecutive trauma patients were included. Images were reconstructed with ASiR-V 50% and the DLIR strengths: low (DLIR-L), medium (DLIR-M), and high (DLIR-H). The image quality was assessed quantitatively and qualitatively and compared between the different reconstruction algorithms. Inter-reader agreement was assessed by weighted kappa. Results DLIR-M and DLIR-H demonstrated lower image noise (p < 0.001 for all pairwise comparisons), higher SNR of up to 82.9% (p < 0.001), and higher CNR of up to 53.3% (p < 0.001) compared to ASiR-V. DLIR-H outperformed other DLIR strengths (p ranging from < 0.001 to 0.016). DLIR-M outperformed DLIR-L (p < 0.001) and ASiR-V (p < 0.001). The distribution of reader scores for DLIR-M and DLIR-H shifted towards higher scores compared to DLIR-L and ASiR-V. There was a tendency towards higher scores with increasing DLIR strengths. There were fewer non-diagnostic CT series for DLIR-M and DLIR-H compared to ASiR-V and DLIR-L. No images were graded as non-diagnostic for DLIR-H regarding intracranial hemorrhage. The inter-reader agreement was fair-good between the second most and the less experienced reader, poor-moderate between the most and the less experienced reader, and poor-fair between the most and the second most experienced reader. Conclusion The image quality of trauma head CT series reconstructed with DLIR outperformed those reconstructed with ASiR-V. In particular, DLIR-M and DLIR-H demonstrated significantly improved image quality and fewer non-diagnostic images. The improvement in qualitative image quality was greater for the second most and the less experienced readers compared to the most experienced reader.

scholarly journals Deep Learning CT Image Reconstruction in Clinical Practice

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clemens Arndt ◽  
Felix Güttler ◽  
Andreas Heinrich ◽  
Florian Bürckenmeyer ◽  
Ioannis Diamantis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Image Reconstruction ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Emergency Services ◽  
Ct Image ◽  
Reconstruction Algorithms ◽  
Key Points ◽  
Ct Image Reconstruction ◽  
Medical Subspecialty ◽  
Image Reconstruction Algorithms

Background Computed tomography (CT) is a central modality in modern radiology contributing to diagnostic medicine in almost every medical subspecialty, but particularly in emergency services. To solve the inverse problem of reconstructing anatomical slice images from the raw output the scanner measures, several methods have been developed, with filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR) subsequently providing criterion standards. Currently there are new approaches to reconstruction in the field of artificial intelligence utilizing the upcoming possibilities of machine learning (ML), or more specifically, deep learning (DL). Method This review covers the principles of present CT image reconstruction as well as the basic concepts of DL and its implementation in reconstruction. Subsequently commercially available algorithms and current limitations are being discussed. Results and Conclusion DL is an ML method that utilizes a trained artificial neural network to solve specific problems. Currently two vendors are providing DL image reconstruction algorithms for the clinical routine. For these algorithms, a decrease in image noise and an increase in overall image quality that could potentially facilitate the diagnostic confidence in lesion conspicuity or may translate to dose reduction for given clinical tasks have been shown. One study showed equal diagnostic accuracy in the detection of coronary artery stenosis for DL reconstructed images compared to IR at higher image quality levels. Consequently, a lot more research is necessary and should aim at diagnostic superiority in the clinical context covering a broadness of pathologies to demonstrate the reliability of such DL approaches. Key Points:  Citation Format

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document