scholarly journals Surface EMG-based Quantification of Inspiratory Effort: A Quantitative Comparison with Pes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Graßhoff ◽  
Eike Petersen ◽  
Franziska Farquharson ◽  
Max Kustermann ◽  
Hans-Joachim Kabitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Surface Electromyography ◽  
Conversion Factor ◽  
Balloon Catheter ◽  
Respiratory Muscles ◽  
Inspiratory Effort ◽  
Transdiaphragmatic Pressure ◽  
Assisted Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Four Levels

Abstract Background Inspiratory patient effort under assisted mechanical ventilation is an important quantity for assessing patient-ventilator interaction and recognizing over and under assistance. An established clinical standard is respiratory muscle pressure Pmus, derived from esophageal pressure (Pes), which requires the correct placement and calibration of an esophageal balloon catheter. Surface electromyography (sEMG) of the respiratory muscles represents a promising and straightforward alternative technique, enabling non-invasive monitoring of patient activity. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted with patients under assisted mechanical ventilation, who were scheduled for elective bronchoscopy. Airway flow and pressure, esophageal/gastric pressures and sEMG of the diaphragm and intercostal muscles were recorded at four levels of pressure support ventilation. Patient efforts were quantified via the Pmus–time product (PTPmus), the transdiaphragmatic pressure–time product (PTPdi) and the EMG–time products (ETP) of the two sEMG channels. To improve the signal-to-noise ratio, a method for automatically selecting the more informative of the sEMG channels was investigated. Correlation between ETP and PTPmus was assessed by determining a neuromechanical conversion factor KEMG between the two quantities. Moreover, it was investigated whether this scalar can be reliably determined from airway pressure during occlusion maneuvers, thus allowing to quantify inspiratory effort based solely on sEMG measurements. Results In total, 62 patients with heterogeneous pulmonary diseases were enrolled in the study, 43 of wich were included in the data analysis. The ETP of the two sEMG channels was well correlated with PTPmus (r=0.79±0.25 and r=0.84±0.16 for diaphragm and intercostal recordings, respectively). The proposed automatic channel selection method improved correlation with PTPmus (r=0.87±0.09). The neuromechanical conversion factor obtained by fitting ETP to PTPmus varied widely between patients (KEMG=4.32±3.73 cmH2O/μV) and was highly correlated with the scalar determined during occlusions (r=0.95, p<.001). The occlusion-based method for deriving PTPmus from ETP showed a breath-wise deviation to PTPmus of 0.43±1.73 cmH2Os across all datasets. Conclusion These results support the use of surface electromyography as a reliable non-invasive alternative for monitoring breath-by-breath inspiratory effort of patients under assisted mechanical ventilation.

scholarly journals Involvement of Respiratory Muscles During the Timed Inspiratory Effort Index Measurement With Surface Electromyography

2020 ◽  
pp. respcare.07465
Author(s):  
Helson Lino Leite de Souza Costa ◽  
Leonardo Cordeiro de Souza ◽  
Arthur Evangelista da Silva Neto ◽  
Bruno Leonardo da Silva Guimarães ◽  
Leandro Miranda de Azeredo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Electromyography ◽  
Respiratory Muscles ◽  
Inspiratory Effort ◽  
Index Measurement

Ventilator Liberation Strategies

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Nava ◽  
Luca Fasano
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Muscles ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Fully Integrated ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Increased Risk

The weaning process should ideally begin as soon as the patient is intubated and continue through the treatment of the cause inducing acute respiratory failure. Weaning includes the assessment of readiness to extubate, extubation, and post-extubation monitoring; it also includes consideration of non-invasive ventilation which has been shown to reduce the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation in selected patients. Weaning accounts for approximately 40% of the total time spent on mechanical ventilation and should be achieved rapidly, since prolonged mechanical ventilation is associated with increased risk of complications and mortality and with increased costs. During mechanical ventilation, medical management should seek to correct the imbalance between respiratory load and ventilatory capacity (reducing the respiratory and cardiac workload, improving gas exchange and the ventilatory pump power). Ventilator settings delivering partial ventilatory pump support may help prevent ventilator-induced respiratory muscles dysfunction. Daily interruption of sedation has been associated with earlier extubation. Critically ill patients should be repeatedly and carefully screened for readiness to wean and readiness to extubate, and objective screening variables should be fully integrated in clinical decision making.

Ambulatory care of non-invasive mechanical ventilation in COPD patients with global decompensated respiratory acidosis

Pneumologie ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 71 (S 01) ◽  
pp. S1-S125
Author(s):  
EJ Soto Hurtado ◽  
P Gutiérrez Castaño ◽  
JJ Torres ◽  
MD Jiménez Fernández ◽  
M Pérez Soriano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Ambulatory Care ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Acidosis ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Copd Patients

scholarly journals Non-invasive duo positive airway pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arash Malakian ◽  
Mohammad Reza Aramesh ◽  
Mina Agahin ◽  
Masoud Dehdashtian
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Airway Pressure ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation

Abstract Background The most common cause of respiratory failure in premature infants is respiratory distress syndrome. Historically, respiratory distress syndrome has been treated by intratracheal surfactant injection followed by mechanical ventilation. In view of the risk of pulmonary injury associated with mechanical ventilation and subsequent chronic pulmonary lung disease, less invasive treatment modalities have been suggested to reduce pulmonary complications. Methods 148 neonates (with gestational age of 28 to 34 weeks) with respiratory distress syndrome admitted to Imam Khomeini Hospital in Ahwaz in 2018 were enrolled in this clinical trial study. 74 neonates were assigned to duo positive airway pressure (NDUOPAP) group and 74 neonates to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) group. The primary outcome in this study was failure of N-DUOPAP and NCPAP treatments within the first 72 h after birth and secondary outcomes included treatment complications. Results there was not significant difference between DUOPAP (4.1 %) and NCPAP (8.1 %) in treatment failure at the first 72 h of birth (p = 0.494), but non-invasive ventilation time was less in the DUOPAP group (p = 0.004). There were not significant differences in the frequency of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), pneumothorax, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), apnea and mortality between the two groups. Need for repeated doses of surfactant (p = 0.042) in the NDUOPAP group was significantly lower than that of the NCPAP group. The duration of oxygen therapy in the NDUOPAP group was significantly lower than that of the NCPAP group (p = 0.034). Also, the duration of hospitalization in the NDUOPAP group was shorter than that of the NCPAP group (p = 0.002). Conclusions In the present study, DUOPAP compared to NCPAP did not reduce the need for mechanical ventilation during the first 72 h of birth, but the duration of non-invasive ventilation and oxygen demand, the need for multiple doses of surfactant and length of stay in the DUOPAP group were less than those in the CPAP group. Trial registration IRCT20180821040847N1, Approved on 2018-09-10.

scholarly journals Oxygen administration for patients with ARDS

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinichiro Ohshimo
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Lung Injury ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Respiratory Drive ◽  
Severe Hypoxemia ◽  
Airway Occlusion ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Oxygen Administration ◽  
Essential Interventions ◽  
Invasive Techniques

AbstractAcute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a fatal condition with insufficiently clarified etiology. Supportive care for severe hypoxemia remains the mainstay of essential interventions for ARDS. In recent years, adequate ventilation to prevent ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI) as well as lung-protective mechanical ventilation has an increasing attention in ARDS.Ventilation-perfusion mismatch may augment severe hypoxemia and inspiratory drive and consequently induce P-SILI. Respiratory drive and effort must also be carefully monitored to prevent P-SILI. Airway occlusion pressure (P0.1) and airway pressure deflection during an end-expiratory airway occlusion (Pocc) could be easy indicators to evaluate the respiratory drive and effort. Patient-ventilator dyssynchrony is a time mismatching between patient’s effort and ventilator drive. Although it is frequently unrecognized, dyssynchrony can be associated with poor clinical outcomes. Dyssynchrony includes trigger asynchrony, cycling asynchrony, and flow delivery mismatch. Ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction (VIDD) is a form of iatrogenic injury from inadequate use of mechanical ventilation. Excessive spontaneous breathing can lead to P-SILI, while excessive rest can lead to VIDD. Optimal balance between these two manifestations is probably associated with the etiology and severity of the underlying pulmonary disease.High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) are non-invasive techniques for supporting hypoxemia. While they are beneficial as respiratory supports in mild ARDS, there can be a risk of delaying needed intubation. Mechanical ventilation and ECMO are applied for more severe ARDS. However, as with HFNC/NPPV, inappropriate assessment of breathing workload potentially has a risk of delaying the timing of shifting from ventilator to ECMO. Various methods of oxygen administration in ARDS are important. However, it is also important to evaluate whether they adequately reduce the breathing workload and help to improve ARDS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document