scholarly journals Molecular Profiling and Minimal Residual Disease Monitoring in Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Literature Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 436-443
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Vladimirovna Semyanikhina ◽  
E.E. Tolstykh
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Molecular Genetic ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Malignant Neoplasm ◽  
Current Treatment ◽  
Genetic Profile ◽  
Minimal Residual

A personalized approach is a promising tool for malignant neoplasm (MN) treatment. Gaining success and benefit assessment of this approach were considerably facilitated by the implementation of omix techniques which allow to obtain comprehensive information on the tumor genome and transcriptome state with identifying potential biomarkers and targets for directed drug action. Despite the exponential growth in the number of sequenced tumor genomes, some of them are not subject of active clinical studies, although obviously and increasingly require optimization of current treatment regimens. One of these pathologies is multiple myeloma (MM). Considerable advances in its diagnosis and treatment have substantially increased survival rates. However, MM cannot be removed from the list of fatal diseases, yet. It is a neoplasm which needs to be further studied and explored for implementation of new treatment strategies, most of which would be based on pheno- and genotypic characteristics of tumor cells. The present review deals with the state of the art in the study of the MM molecular genetic profile, minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring as well as potentials of the new generation sequencing for MRD diagnosis, prognosis, estimation, and search for predictors aimed at chemotherapy optimization.

A comparison between next-generation sequencing and ASO-qPCR for minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8601-8601
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Takamatsu ◽  
Ryoichi Murata ◽  
Jianbiao Zheng ◽  
Martin Moorhead ◽  
Yasushi Terasaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Universal Primer ◽  
Generation Sequencing ◽  
Minimal Residual

8601 Background: Although molecular CR in multiple myeloma (MM) can be assessed by allele-specific oligonucleotide (ASO)-PCR, this technique requires preparation of clonotype-specific primers for each individual which is laborious and time-consuming. The usage of the LymphoSIGHT method, a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based platform, may overcome these challenges and increase sensitivity and specificity. We compared the LymphoSIGHT approach with ASO-qPCR for minimal residual disease (MRD) detection in autografts in the autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (ASCT) setting. Methods: Seventeen Japanese patients with newly diagnosed MM who received various induction regimens prior to ASCT were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had achieved a PR or CR after ASCT. Bone marrow (BM) slides from 13 MM patients and fresh BM cells from 4 MM patients at diagnosis as well as autografts were obtained for DNA extraction. Using universal primer sets, we amplified IGH variable (V), diversity (D), and joining (J) gene segments, IGH-DJ, and IGK from genomic DNA. Amplified products were subjected to deep sequencing using NGS. Reads were analyzed using standardized algorithms for clonotype determination. Myeloma-specific clonotypes were identified for each patient based on their high frequency in BM samples. The presence of the myeloma clonotype was then assessed in follow-up samples. Results: MRD in autografts was detected in 6 of 17 (35%) by ASO-qPCR and 13 of 17 (76%) by NGS. When MRD was assessed by NGS, 6 MRD (+) cases received post-ASCT therapy while 4 MRD (-) cases and 7 MRD (+) cases were followed without post-ASCT therapy. The MRD (-) cases tended to show a better PFS than the MRD (+) cases with post-ASCT therapy (P = 0.26) and those without post-ASCT therapy (P = 0.09) although overall survival rates were comparable among the three groups. There was no difference in PFS between MRD (-) and MRD (+) cases when MRD was assessed by ASO-qPCR (P = 0.6). These studies will be extended in 30 additional MM patients, and results will be presented. Conclusions: MRD-negativity in autografts revealed by NGS may be more closely associated with durable remission of MM than that revealed by ASO-qPCR.

Post-transplant minimal residual disease assessment in Multiple myeloma

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. e180
Author(s):  
Anjali Mookerjee ◽  
Meetu Dahiya ◽  
Ritu Gupta ◽  
Rakesh Kumar ◽  
Atul Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Disease Assessment ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Minimal Residual

Depth of response and minimal residual disease status in ultra high-risk multiple myeloma and plasma cell leukemia treated with daratumumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (Dara-CVRd): Results of the UK optimum/MUKnine trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8001-8001
Author(s):  
Martin F. Kaiser ◽  
Andrew Hall ◽  
Katrina Walker ◽  
Ruth De Tute ◽  
Sadie Roberts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Cell Leukemia ◽  
Ultra High Risk ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Minimal Residual

8001 Background: Patients with ultra high-risk (UHiR) newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) and patients with plasma cell leukemia (PCL) continue to have dismal outcomes and are underrepresented in clinical trials. Recently, improved responses with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody combination therapy have been reported for NDMM patients. We report here outcomes for NDMM UHiR and PCL patients treated in the OPTIMUM/MUKnine (NCT03188172) trial with daratumumab, cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (Dara-CVRd) induction, augmented high-dose melphalan (HDMEL) and ASCT. With final analysis follow-up surpassed in Feb 2021, we report here early protocol defined endpoints from induction to day 100 post ASCT. Methods: Between Sep 2017 and Jul 2019, 107 patients with UHiR NDMM by central trial genetic (≥2 high risk lesions: t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), gain(1q), del(1p), del(17p)) or gene expression SKY92 (SkylineDx) profiling, or with PCL (circulating plasmablasts > 20%) were included in OPTIMUM across 39 UK hospitals. Patients received up to 6 cycles of Dara-CVRd induction, HDMEL and ASCT augmented with bortezomib, followed by Dara-VR(d) consolidation for 18 cycles and Dara-R maintenance. Primary trial endpoints are minimal residual disease (MRD) status post ASCT and progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints include response, safety and quality of life. Data is complete but subject to further data cleaning prior to conference. Results: Median follow-up for the 107 patients in the safety population was 22.2 months (95% CI: 20.6 – 23.9). Two patients died during induction due to infection. Bone marrow aspirates suitable for MRD assessment by flow cytometry (10-5 sensitivity) were available for 81% of patients at end of induction and 78% at D100 post ASCT. Responses in the intention to treat population at end of induction were 94% ORR with 22% CR, 58% VGPR, 15% PR, 1% PD, 5% timepoint not reached (TNR; withdrew, became ineligible or died) and at D100 post ASCT 83% ORR with 47% CR, 32% VGPR, 5% PR, 7% PD, 10% TNR. MRD status was 41% MRDneg, 40% MRDpos and 19% not evaluable post induction and 64% MRDneg, 14% MRDpos and 22% not evaluable at D100 post ASCT. Responses at D100 post ASCT were lower in PCL with 22% CR, 22% VGPR, 22% PR, 22% PD, 12% TNR. Most frequent grade 3/4 AEs during induction were neutropenia (21%), thrombocytopenia (12%) and infection (12%). Grade 3 neuropathy rate was 3.7%. Conclusions: This is to our knowledge the first report on a trial for UHiR NDMM and PCL investigating Dara-CVRd induction and augmented ASCT. Response rates were high in this difficult-to-treat patient population, with toxicity comparable to other induction regimens. However, some early progressions highlight the need for innovative approaches to UHiR NDMM. Clinical trial information: NCT03188172.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document