Cone Index Values Diagnostic of Where Subsoiling Can Increase Corn Root Growth

1989 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 1499-1505 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.J. Vepraskas ◽  
M.G. Wagger
Keyword(s):  
1973 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 177-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. Onderdonk ◽  
J. W. Ketcheson

Crop Science ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 725-730 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. L. Freitas ◽  
R. W. Zobel ◽  
V. A. Synder
Keyword(s):  

1987 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 293-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. STYPA ◽  
A. NUNEZ-BARRIOS ◽  
D. A. BARRY ◽  
M. H. MILLER ◽  
W. A. MITCHELL

In a 4-yr study, root growth in the upper 50 cm of a silt loam soil (Gleyed Melanic Brunisol) was equal to or greater than that in a low-density artificial medium (soil:peat:perlite) in spite of a high bulk density in the soil (1.5 Mg m−3 in the 15-to 45-cm depth). We suggest that, due to the natural structure of the Bm horizon, the resistance to root growth is much less than would be expected from bulk density or penetrometer resistance measurements. Marked increases in P and K fertility in the surface soil had only minor effects on either the total length or distribution of roots although the shoot growth was markedly increased. Neither total root length nor root distribution were altered by irrigation during 1981, the only year a moisture variable was included. During a 2-wk dry period in July, prior to anthesis, soil water potential on the nonirrigated plots decreased to −1.5 MPa in the upper 15 cm and to −0.5 MPa in the 15- to 30-cm layer. Leaf water potential, stomatal conductance and rate of growth during the period were lower on the nonirrigated treatment although final dry matter production was not. The results indicate that corn root growth and distribution in the field are not as sensitive to environmental factors as one would expect from short-term laboratory studies. Key words: Corn, root growth, soil bulk density, fertility, soil water


Weed Science ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 604-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideo Hosaka ◽  
Masae (Kubota) Takagi

The physiological responses of corn (Zea maysL. ‘Goldencrossbantam′) and pea (Pisum sativumL. ‘Alaska′) to sethoxydim {2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio) propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one} were investigated. Sethoxydim did not affect excised pea root growth at 1 × 10−4M but inhibited excised corn root growth at concentrations of 1 × 10−8M and above. Treating corn impeded root growth with 1 × 10−7M sethoxydim within 4 h after treatment; however, little histological change of the roots was observed at 48 h. At 1 × 10−6M, growth nearly stopped within 4 h after treatment, and clear cytological changes of the roots were observed at 24 and 48 h. Sethoxydim inhibited both mitosis and DNA synthesis of excised corn root tips between 4 and 48 h after treatment. Respiration of corn roots measured by oxygen uptake and the TTC (2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride) test was not affected by the herbicide directly. Sethoxydim (1 × 10−4M) inhibited IAA-induced cell elongation of corn coleoptile and pea epicotyl by 37 and 12%, respectively. Sethoxydim selectively inhibited the growth of excised root tips of susceptible corn by affecting cell division rather than cell enlargement, and the inhibition mechanism of cell division (inhibition of mitosis) by the herbicide was not by direct inhibition of DNA synthesis or by effects on respiration.


1994 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith A. O'Bryan ◽  
Barry J. Brecke ◽  
Donn G. Shilling ◽  
Daniel L. Colvin

Three corn root bioassays were evaluated for detecting imazaquin in soil. Two techniques, one which utilized a cone-shaped tube as the growth container and another, a petri dish, were compared to a method that utilized a thin layer of soil between two 20 by 20 cm glass plates. Corn root growth responded logarithmically to imazaquin regardless of bioassay method. Corn was most sensitive to low imazaquin concentrations when grown using the glass plate apparatus. At a low concentration (0.5 ng/g) of imazaquin, corn root length was reduced 6% using the cone-tube, 2% using the petri dish, and 24% using the glass plate method. In contrast, the cone-tube method provided a better measure of high imazaquin concentration (200 ng/g) than the other methods.


1988 ◽  
Vol 80 (5) ◽  
pp. 799-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Anghinoni ◽  
S. A. Barber

2013 ◽  
Vol 105 (3) ◽  
pp. 713-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph G. Benjamin ◽  
David C. Nielsen ◽  
Merle F. Vigil ◽  
Maysoon M. Mikha ◽  
Francisco J. Calderon

1993 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 311-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.J. Busscher ◽  
C.R. Camp ◽  
E.J. Sadler ◽  
E.E. Strickland ◽  
J.T. Garrett
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document