Tension Pneumocephalus from Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery: A Case Series and Literature Review

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wanpeng Li ◽  
Quan Liu ◽  
Hanyu Lu ◽  
Huan Wang ◽  
Huankang Zhang ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 16 ◽  
pp. 531-538
Author(s):  
Wanpeng Li ◽  
Quan Liu ◽  
Hanyu Lu ◽  
Huan Wang ◽  
Huankang Zhang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Michael M. McDowell ◽  
Michael Chiang ◽  
Hussam Abou-Al-Shaar ◽  
Georgios A. Zenonos ◽  
Eric W. Wang ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) has been slower to gain popularity in early childhood due to anatomical challenges. We sought to describe the safety and efficacy of EES in early childhood. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> All patients younger than 7 years who underwent EES at a large Cranial Base Center from 2002 to 2019 were reviewed as a retrospective cohort study. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Thirty-six patients underwent EES before the age of 7 years. Four patients had two-stage EES. Two patients required combined transcranial and endonasal approaches. The mean age at the time of initial surgery was 4 years (range: 1–6). Twenty patients were male, and 16 were female. Of 21 tumors intended for resection, 11 patients had gross total resections, and 10 had near total (&#x3e;95% tumor removed) resections. Nine patients (43%) had recurrences, of which 6 were craniopharyngiomas (<i>p</i> = 0.01). There was no difference in recurrence rates based on the degree of resection (<i>p</i> = 0.67). Three cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks occurred following primary EES (8%). Following an increase in nasoseptal flap usage (31–52%) and CSF diversion (15–39%) in 2008, there was only one CSF leak out of 23 patients (4 vs. 15%; <i>p</i> = 0.54). Postoperatively, 1 patient developed a permanent new cranial neuropathy, and 1 patient developed a permanent visual field cut. Six patients developed permanent postoperative panhypopituitarism, of which all were craniopharyngiomas (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). The mean follow-up was 64 months. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Early childhood EES is both safe and technically feasible for a variety of pathologies.


2017 ◽  
Vol 106 ◽  
pp. 331-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Zoli ◽  
Laura Milanese ◽  
Marco Faustini-Fustini ◽  
Federica Guaraldi ◽  
Sofia Asioli ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. E6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sauson Soldozy ◽  
Michelle Yeghyayan ◽  
Kaan Yağmurlu ◽  
Pedro Norat ◽  
Davis G. Taylor ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEThe goal of this study was to systematically review the outcomes of endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) for pediatric craniopharyngiomas so as to assess its safety and efficacy.METHODSA systematic literature review was performed using the PubMed and MEDLINE databases for studies published between 1986 and 2019. All studies assessing outcomes following EES for pediatric craniopharyngiomas were included.RESULTSOf the total 48 articles identified in the original literature search, 13 studies were ultimately selected. This includes comparative studies with other surgical approaches, retrospective cohort studies, and case series.CONCLUSIONSEES for pediatric craniopharyngiomas is a safe and efficacious alternative to other surgical approaches. Achieving gross-total resection with minimal complications is feasible with EES and is comparable, if not superior in some cases, to traditional means of resection. Ideally, a randomized controlled trial might be implemented in the future to further elucidate the effectiveness of EES for resection of craniopharyngiomas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document