Impact Investing: A Theory of Financing Social Enterprises

Author(s):  
Benjamin Roth

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (1) ◽  
pp. 10184
Author(s):  
Lena Schätzlein ◽  
Deike Schluetter ◽  
Rüdiger Hahn


Author(s):  
Brian Bolton ◽  
Carolyn Niehaus


Author(s):  
Olena PRUTSKA

The article considers and justifies the approach to the financing of organic production as a component of the concept of impact-investing. The essence, features and tools of impact-investment are considered. Impact-investing differences from social investment, socially responsible investment and social entrepreneurship are considered. It is proved that Impact Investment is the newest financial strategy for social development, provides for investments in business projects that initially focused on profit and positive changes in society or the environment It is noted that scientific consideration of impact investing has not yet been given due attention in Ukraine. The subject of research is at the intersection of financial technology, social entrepreneurship and organic agro-production. Impact investing is considered a separate case of social investing with more clearly defined boundaries. Examples of social enterprises both in agriculture and in the restaurant business and in manufacturing are known in Ukraine. Because social entrepreneurship is a business, it has all the rules of the business: niche search, market research, competition, investment, and more. Impact investments help measure the external effects of doing business. With the introduction of the investment impact criterion, it becomes possible to determine what this business impact is, how to measure, study and understand it. It is emphasized that Impact investing is only beginning to develop in Ukraine. Over the past few years, examples of such investments have emerged in Kyiv, Lviv, Odessa, Ivano-Frankivsk and other cities. Most of them have started their business through local businesses and have relatively small initial investments by global standards. The opinion is grounded that investment in the development of organic production can be considered as a form of impact investment. It is concluded that, given the great social importance of the development of organic production, as well as the positive effects that organic agricultural production can potentially have on the development of rural areas, the use of financial resources of agricultural holdings may be promising. It was proposed to provide a differentiated approach to the collection of a fixed agricultural tax (FAS), taking into account the availability of investments in organic agricultural production, which would have prompted agricultural holdings to include organic production units in their structure. Investments in the development of organic agricultural production, which are proposed to be considered as impact investments, would allow domestic agro-holdings to a certain extent “rehabilitate”, improve their image, give their debt to society, and contribute to the development of rural areas.



2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Clarkin ◽  
Carole L. Cangioni

AbstractOnce viewed at opposite ends of a spectrum, financial investment and philanthropy are becoming partners in social enterprise development. Impact investing (II) is one of the most innovative ways to bring the resources of the world’s financial markets to the world’s seemingly intractable problems. Since its emergence from the socially responsible investment field, interest in II has grown substantially among a wide variety of practitioners and service providers throughout the world, although scholarly work in the field is scarce. To stimulate interest in this topic, this paper provides a primer and review of the current knowledge base in II. Our wide search of resources on the topic revealed potential contributions from the legal, financial, social entrepreneurship, and project management literature. We found several themes in our synthesis of the reports, articles and surveys included in our study, and several areas where gaps were evident. In general, practitioners focused on the opportunities of II and its potential, while few studies addressed the challenges associated with its implementation. Because II is not a panacea and is inappropriate for many social enterprises, opportunities exist for studies that rigorously examine the applicability and efficacy of II initiatives. This review of the literature provides scholars with an overview of II and a large number of potential resources to aid in their efforts to advance the knowledge base in the field.



2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabrina Katz ◽  
Miguel Algarin ◽  
Emanuel Hernandez

Structured financing solutions encompass a range of investment approaches that provide liquidity to investors without the need for a traditional equity exit event, such as a strategic sale, sale to another financial investor, or public market listing. Structuring mechanisms across the debt-to-equity spectrum determine the exit terms of the deal, therefore providing considerable downside protection to investors. Structured financing solutions are an incipient but increasingly important set of tools for investors active in Latin America to address the financing gap for companies that lack access to bank financing and are not attractive targets for traditional PE and VC players. Many investors employing these strategies are in an experimental phase, reporting new lessons learned with each deal completed. Impact investors have been among the top drivers of these structuring innovations, as they have grappled with the additional limitations associated with the straight equity model for environmental or social enterprises. However, the use of structured financing is by no means restricted to the impact investing space. Fund managers have invested USD4b in private credit deals in Latin America since 2018, more than the previous ten years combined. PE and VC investors have also increasingly employed quasi-equity and debt instruments. ACON Investments, for example, has employed mezzanine structures in several deals from its latest funds. Brazil-focused venture capital firm SP Ventures has recently begun investing from its debut venture debt fund. Growing experimentation by fund managers demonstrates the opportunity for investors across ticket sizes, strategies, and the impact-to-commercial spectrum. The structures discussed and the case studies highlighted in this report contain some of the major lessons applicable to a wide group of private capital investors in Latin America targeting certain and timely exits with consistent returns.



2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (15) ◽  
pp. 4117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agrawal ◽  
Hockerts

Impact investing pursues the dual goals of creating socio-economic value for the marginalized, and ensuring net positive financial returns. Impact investing firms achieve their goals through their investments in projects and enterprises which create both social and commercial values. The primary aim of this article is to contribute to our understanding of the process of impact investing, particularly with respect to issues related to aligning impact investing and investee social enterprise goals. The research method employs case-based research methodology. The data consist of six cases of impact investing and their investee social enterprises. In addition, the data involve interviews with experts from the field of impact investing. The findings are that: (1) Social mission plays an important moderating role in the inter-organizational relationship between the impact investor and the investee social enterprise, (2) and an emphasis on due diligence, sector specialization, and communication increases the likelihood of investment while (3) social impact measurement and reporting and frequent engagement increase the likelihood of post-investment alignment. The key contribution of this article is that impact investing (unlike venture capital) is influenced by the ability of its investee to create social value, which plays an important role in the inter-organizational relationship between investor and investee. Furthermore, similar to industry specialization in the for-profit investing, social sector specialization is equally relevant for alignment and returns.



2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrizia Villotti ◽  
Sara Zaniboni ◽  
Marc Corbiere ◽  
Franco Fraccaroli




2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 2207-2216
Author(s):  
D.V. Savrasova ◽  
Keyword(s):  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document