scholarly journals Sore throat: justification of the optimal drug selection

2016 ◽  
pp. 128-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. N. Slavsky ◽  
I. Y. Meytel
CNS Spectrums ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (S3) ◽  
pp. 3-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Mrazek

AbstractAlthough most patients with depression ultimately respond to antidepressant therapy, >50% have inadequate response to an individual antidepressant trial. The desire to avoid adverse drug reactions is common among patients, and is an important determinant of drug selection among psychiatrists. However, since the major classes of antidepressants and antipsychotics appear to be comparable in efficacy, clinicians have little basis for selecting the most effective agent for an individual patient. Pharmacogenetics, often described as the study of genetic variation that explains differential response to medication, represents an important new avenue toward improving treatment outcomes. Genetic variation in drug-metabolizing enzymes has been recognized for decades. The main focus of current psychiatric pharmacogenetic testing is on the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 and, to a somewhat lesser extent, on the 2C19 genes. Data suggest that poor metabolizer status can be associated with an increased risk of adverse drug reactions with certain medications, and that ultra-rapid metabolizers may require higher-than-usual doses to achieve a therapeutic response. The importance of CYP enzymes in the metabolism of several antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs suggest that genetic variation may aid in medication selection or dosing. Advances in pharmacogenetic research may facilitate the development of personalized medicine in which genetic information can inform drug selection, leading to optimal drug effectiveness and minimal drug toxicity.


CNS Spectrums ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (S3) ◽  
pp. 8-12 ◽  

AbstractAlthough most patients with depression ultimately respond to antidepressant therapy, >50% have inadequate response to an individual antidepressant trial. The desire to avoid adverse drug reactions is common among patients, and is an important determinant of drug selection among psychiatrists. However, since the major classes of antidepressants and antipsychotics appear to be comparable in efficacy, clinicians have little basis for selecting the most effective agent for an individual patient. Pharmacogenetics, often described as the study of genetic variation that explains differential response to medication, represents an important new avenue toward improving treatment outcomes. Genetic variation in drug-metabolizing enzymes has been recognized for decades. The main focus of current psychiatric pharmacogenetic testing is on the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 and, to a somewhat lesser extent, on the 2C19 genes. Data suggest that poor metabolizer status can be associated with an increased risk of adverse drug reactions with certain medications, and that ultra-rapid metabolizers may require higher-than-usual doses to achieve a therapeutic response. The importance of CYP enzymes in the metabolism of several antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs suggest that genetic variation may aid in medication selection or dosing. Advances in pharmacogenetic research may facilitate the development of personalized medicine in which genetic information can inform drug selection, leading to optimal drug effectiveness and minimal drug toxicity.In this monograph, David A. Mrazek, MD, provides an overview of the context of genetic testing in clinical psychiatric practice. Next, Jordan W. Smoller, MD, ScD, discusses some of the practical issues related to medication selection. Finally, Jose de Leon, MD, presents a comprehensive review of antidepressant and antipsychotic treatment based on drug metabolism, and reviews the available testing methods for CYP 2D6 and 2C19 genotypes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 247-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chloé Petit ◽  
Audrey Croisetière ◽  
Flora Chen ◽  
Isabelle Laverdière

Aim: The pharmacists are identified as one of the best positioned health professionals to lead intercollaborative efforts in tailoring medication based on pharmacogenetic information. As pharmacotherapy specialists, they can take on a prominent role in ordering and interpreting pharmacogenetic test results and then guiding optimal drug selection and dose based on those results. Participants & methods: To assess the readiness of pharmacists and trainees in the province of Quebec to assume this role, we surveyed their knowledge in (pharmaco)genetics, their confidence in their ability to use pharmacogenetics and their attitude toward the integration of this tool in clinical practice. Results: A total of 99 pharmacists (community: 67.7%, hospital: 24.2% and other: 8.1%) and 36 students volunteered in a self-administered online survey. About 50% of the questions on the participants’ knowledge are answered correctly, with a stepwise increase of right answers with hours of education in (pharmaco)genetics (51.2, 63.8 and 76.7% for <5, 5–25 and >25 h respectively; p < 0.0001). While the majority of participants believe that pharmacogenetics will gain more room in their future practice (80.7%), the overall rate of confidence in their ability to use pharmacogenetics information is low (22%) and 90.3% desire more training. Conclusion: The limited experience of pharmacists in pharmacogenetics appears to be a barrier for its integration in clinical practice.


CNS Spectrums ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (S3) ◽  
pp. 5-7

AbstractAlthough most patients with depression ultimately respond to antidepressant therapy, >50% have inadequate response to an individual antidepressant trial. The desire to avoid adverse drug reactions is common among patients, and is an important determinant of drug selection among psychiatrists. However, since the major classes of antidepressants and antipsychotics appear to be comparable in efficacy, clinicians have little basis for selecting the most effective agent for an individual patient. Pharmacogenetics, often described as the study of genetic variation that explains differential response to medication, represents an important new avenue toward improving treatment outcomes. Genetic variation in drug-metabolizing enzymes has been recognized for decades. The main focus of current psychiatric pharmacogenetic testing is on the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 and, to a somewhat lesser extent, on the 2C19 genes. Data suggest that poor metabolizer status can be associated with an increased risk of adverse drug reactions with certain medications, and that ultra-rapid metabolizers may require higher-than-usual doses to achieve a therapeutic response. The importance of CYP enzymes in the metabolism of several antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs suggest that genetic variation may aid in medication selection or dosing. Advances in pharmacogenetic research may facilitate the development of personalized medicine in which genetic information can inform drug selection, leading to optimal drug effectiveness and minimal drug toxicity.In this monograph, David A. Mrazek, MD, provides an overview of the context of genetic testing in clinical psychiatric practice. Next, Jordan W. Smoller, MD, ScD, discusses some of the practical issues related to medication selection. Finally, Jose de Leon, MD, presents a comprehensive review of antidepressant and antipsychotic treatment based on drug metabolism, and reviews the available testing methods for CYP 2D6 and 2C19 genotypes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. 02001
Author(s):  
Mayumi Kamada

In genome medicine, which is now being implemented in medical care, variants detected by genome analysis such as next-generation sequencers are clinically interpreted to determine the diagnosis and treatment plan. The clinical interpretation is performed based on the detailed clinical background and the information from journal papers and public databases, such as frequencies in the population and their relationship to the disease. A large amount of genomic data has been accumulated so far, and many genomic variant databases related to diseases have been developed, including ClinVar. On the other hand, the genes and variants involved in diseases are different between populations with different genetic backgrounds. Furthermore, it has been reported that there is a racial bias in the information shared in current public databases, which affects clinical interpretation. Therefore, increasing the diversity of genomic variant data has become an important issue worldwide. In Japan, the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) launched a project to develop an integrated clinical genome information database in 2016. This project targeted “Cancer,” “Rare/Intractable diseases,” “Infectious diseases,” “Dementia,” and “Hearing loss”, and in collaboration with research institutes that provide genomic medicine in Japan, we developed an integrated database named MGeND (Medical Genomics Japan Database). The MGeND is a freely accessible database, which provides disease-related genomic information detected from the Japanese population. The MGeND widely collects variant data for monogenic diseases represented by rare diseases and polygenic diseases such as dementia and infectious disease. The genome variant data are integrated by genomic position for these diseases and can be searched across diseases. The useful genome analysis methods differ depending on the disease area. Therefore, in addition to “SNV, short indel, SV, and CNV” data handled by ClinVar, MGeND includes GWAS (Genome-Wide Association Study) data, which is widely used in studies of polygenic diseases, and HLA (Human Leukemia Virus) allele frequency data, which is used in immune-related diseases such as infectious diseases. As of September 2021, more than 150,000 variants have been registered in MGeND, and 60,000 unique variants have been made public. Of these variants, about 70% were variants registered only in MGeND and not registered in ClinVar. This fact shows the importance of the efforts to collect genomic information by each ethnic group. On the other hands, many variants have not been annotated with any clinical interpretation because the effects on molecular function and the mechanisms of disease are not clear at this time. These variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are a bottleneck for genomic medicine because they cannot be used for diagnosis or treatment selection. The evaluation of VUS requires detailed experimental validation and a vast amount of knowledge integration, which is costly. In order to understand the molecular function and disease relevance of VUS and to enable optimal drug selection, we have been developing a machine learning-based method for predicting the pathogenicity of variants and a computational platform for estimating the effect of variants on drug sensitivity. Many methods for predicting the pathogenicity of genomic variants using machine learning have been developed. Most of them use the conservation of amino acid or nucleotide sequences among closely related species, physicochemical properties of proteins as features for prediction. There are also many prediction methods based on ensemble learning that aggregate the predicted scores by existing tools. These approaches focus on individual genes and variants and evaluate their effects. However, in many diseases, multiple molecules play a complex role in the pathogenesis of the disease. In other words, to assess the pathological significance of variants more accurately, it is necessary to consider the molecular association. Therefore, we constructed a knowledge graph based on molecular networks, genomic variants, and predicted scores by existing methods and proposed a prediction model using Graph Convolutional Network (GCN). The prediction performance evaluation using a benchmark set showed that the GCN-based method outperformed existing methods. It is known that variants can affect the interaction between a molecule and a drug. For optimal drug selection, it is necessary to clarify the effect of the variant on drug affinity. It is time-consuming and costly to perform experiments on a large number of VUSs. Our previous studies show that molecular dynamics calculation can evaluate the affinity between mutants and drugs energetically and estimate with high accuracy. We are currently working on a project to estimate the effects of a large number of VUSs using the supercomputer Fugaku. To realize calculations for many VUS in this project, we are developing a data platform for seamlessly performing molecular dynamics simulation from genome information. Moreover, we are constructing a database to publish calculation results and their outcomes for contributing a selection of optimal drugs. In the presentation, I will introduce the development of the databases and prediction methods to improve the efficiency of genomic medicine.


2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny D Xiong ◽  
Youssef M Roman ◽  
Kathleen Culhane-Pera ◽  
Jeremiah S Menk ◽  
Robert J Straka

Introduction: Standard of care for Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS) includes dual antiplatelet therapy (e.g. aspirin and clopidogrel). CYP2C19 loss of function (*2, *3) or gain of function (*17) alleles are associated with clopidogrel’s bioactivation, antiplatelet effectiveness and clinical outcomes leading to the development of Clinical Pharmacogenomic Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines. Currently the prevalence of CYP2C19 variants in the Hmong - a unique Asian population numbering over 60,000 in Minnesota - is unknown. Given that they are experiencing a surge in CVD, including ACS, we sought to compare their Minor Allele Frequencies (MAFs) for CYP2C19 *2, *3, and *17 with White Non-Hispanic and Han-Chinese. We evaluated the prevalence of *2 (rs4244285) or *3 (rs4986893), or *17 (rs12248560) alleles between the Hmong and those observed in 1) White Non-Hispanics and 2) Han-Chinese. To achieve this, DNA from Hmong was genotyped for the relevant Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and compared to published (PMID: 21716271) MAFs for White Non-Hispanic and Han-Chinese cohorts Methods: Salivary DNA from 235 Hmong residing in either Minnesota or Wisconsin was genotyped for relevant SNPs by Sequenom iPlex Gold assay. MAFs between groups were compared by Chi-Square or Fisher’s exact test. A Bonferroni corrected significance level of 0.017 was considered statistically significant. Results: Hmong MAFs were higher for *2 (37%, p=0.0001) but lower for *17 (0.2%, p=0.0001) compared to the White Non-Hispanic cohort (13% and 23% respectively). Hmong MAFs were higher for *2 (37%, p=0.0001) but lower for *3 (0.2%, p=0.0001) compared to the Han-Chinese cohort (25% and 3%, respectively). Conclusions: Hmong have a higher prevalence of the loss of function allele, *2, compared to both reference cohorts. Hmong also have significantly different MAFs for both loss of function alleles, *2 and *3, compared to the Han-Chinese cohort. Both conclusions suggest that drug selection cannot be guided by race alone. Our data further underscores the importance of genotyping unique sub-populations as a means to mitigate existing health disparities in the availability of data which facilitate optimal drug selection.


1970 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-28
Author(s):  
Nadeem Parvez Ali ◽  
Md Tauhid-ul-Mulck ◽  
Mahbub Noor ◽  
Md Torab Mollick ◽  
Masud Ahmed ◽  
...  

A prospective study was carried on 120 patients undergoing surgical operations lasting less than 90 minutes. The incidence of postoperative sore throat, dysphasia and hoarseness of voice with 2% lidocaine (Group L) as endotracheal cuff inflating agent was compared with that with distilled water (Group D) and air (Group A). Seventy two percent of lidocaine group in comparison to 60% distilled water group and 37% air group experienced none of the above complications during the entire study period. Only 5% in lidocaine group had sore throat after 22-24 hours compared to 20% in the distilled water group and 45% in the air group. Twenty three percent complained of dysphasia in both lidocaine and distilled water group after 1-3 hours compared to 45% in air group. After 22-24 hours it completely resolved in lidocaine group compared to 20% persisting in the other two groups. Twenty three percent complained of hoarseness in lidocaine group as compared to 35% and 55% in distilled water and air groups respectively after 1-3 hours. This completely resolved in lidocaine group but persisted in 20% and 45% in the distilled water and air group respectively after 22-24 hours. The results showed an advantage in using lidocaine as an endotracheal tube cuff inflating agent in reducing postoperative sore throat, dysphasia and hoarseness in comparison to distilled water and air. Key Words: Lidocain, Endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff inflating agent.   doi: 10.3329/jafmc.v5i1.2847 JAFMC Bangladesh. Vol 5, No 1 (June) 2009 pp.25-28


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document