scholarly journals Aspects of anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation in the light of updated guidelines of the European society of cardiology 2020: the position of dabigatran

2020 ◽  
pp. 17-26
Author(s):  
E. S. Kropacheva ◽  
E. P. Panchenko
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
European Society ◽  
Treatment Strategy ◽  
Antithrombotic Therapy ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Integrated Approach ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
European Society Of Cardiology

This review focuses on some aspects of anticoagulant therapy in the updated clinical guidelines for atrial fibrillation of the European society of cardiology, published in 2020. Atrial fibrillation is a polymorbid continuously developing syndrome, and therefore the treatment strategy is based on a comprehensive assessment of the patient, including the risk of stroke, the presence and severity of symptoms, and an assessment of structural heart disease and comorbidities. The review describes the principles of the proposed integrated approach, abbreviated “ABC pathway”, as reflecting the three main directions of the treatment strategy. According to experts, the clinical picture of AF (i.e. first detected, paroxysmal, persistent, long-term persistent or permanent) should not determine the indications for the appointment of anticoagulant therapy. The CHA2DS2-VASc scale continues to be the basis for stratification of thromboembolic risk. The role of dabigatran in primary and secondary prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation is described. Changes in the position of experts regarding the assessment of bleeding risk are highlighted in order to help identify unmodified and eliminate modifiable risk factors for bleeding, as well as to identify AF patients who are potentially at high risk of bleeding for more frequent monitoring and monitoring of their condition. Questions about the use of direct oral anticoagulants in the choice of rhythm control tactics are highlighted separately. The use of dabigatran in patients undergoing cardioversion and catheter ablation is justified. Practical questions about the continuous strategy of anticoagulant therapy during ablation are highlighted separately. Changes related to multicomponent therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention are highlighted. The main measure to improve the safety of combined antithrombotic therapy is to minimize the duration of triple therapy. The updated recommendations supportlimiting the duration of triple antithrombotic therapy to 1 month, and also provide for early discontinuation of aspirin (≤1 week) and continuation of double antithrombotic therapy in cases of uncomplicated stenting and low risk of thrombosis, or when the risk of bleeding exceeds the risk of thrombotic events.

scholarly journals The risk of bleeding minimization with direct oral anticoagulants

2021 ◽  
pp. 106-126
Author(s):  
Т. N. Novikova
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Blood Analysis ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Wide Range

This review is devoted to the safety issues of anticoagulant therapy prescribed for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. Direct oral anticoagulants are considered worldwide in accordance with the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of atrial fibrillation as the preferred anticoagulant choice for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism. Direct oral anticoagulants in comparison with vitamin K antagonists generally have similar efficacy, but different safety profiles, primarily, this concerns the risk of large extracranial and, primarily, gastrointestinal hemorrhages. To minimize the risk of bleeding during therapy with direct oral anticoagulants, an individual approach to the choice of the drug for each individual patient is required after assessing the risk of bleeding, searching for a potential bleeding substrate, correcting existing risk factors and eliminating, if possible, the substrate. When choosing an anticoagulant therapy, special attention should be paid to the most vulnerable categories of patients, such as patients of older age groups and patients with concomitant chronic kidney disease. Among the direct oral anticoagulants registered in the Russian Federation, according to meta-analyzes of key randomized clinical trials and real clinical trials, apixaban has the most optimal benefit: risk ratio in a wide range of patients, including vulnerable populations. Dynamic observation, including regular assessment of renal function, control of clinical blood analysis, erythrocyte and platelet levels, after prescribing an individually selected anticoagulant to the patient, ensures the maximum safety of therapy. Small, so-called, annoying bleeding is not a reason for canceling the anticoagulant, but requires a careful search for the causes of bleeding and their correction.

scholarly journals Estudo FATA: Prevalência de Fibrilhação Auricular e Terapêutica Antitrombótica nos Cuidados de Saúde Primários de um Concelho do Norte de Portugal

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Gomes ◽  
Rui Campos ◽  
Renata Morais ◽  
Marta Fernandes
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
European Society ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Antithrombotic Therapy ◽  
Thrombotic Risk ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
European Society Of Cardiology

<strong>Introduction:</strong> Atrial fibrillation is the most prevalent sustained arrhythmia. The efficacy of oral anticoagulation has been proved in prevention stroke in these patients. However, this seems to be an underutilized treatment.<br />Objectives: to determine the prevalence of known atrial fibrillation in a Primary Health Care population; to identify major comorbidities, current antithrombotic therapy and evaluate their suitability according to the European Society of Cardiology guidelines.<br /><strong>Material and Methods:</strong> Observational cross-sectional analytical study. Population: all patients aged 30 or above, enrolled in eight Family Health Units of Vila Nova de Gaia and diagnosed with atrial fibrillation.<br /><strong>Results:</strong> Prevalence of atrial fibrillation was 1.29% (n = 940), being higher in males (p = 0.01) and increasing with age (p &lt; 0.001). The most common comorbidities were hypertension (76.4%), heart failure (32.0%) and diabetes mellitus (28.2%). A total of 52% was performing anticoagulant therapy, 29% antiplatelet agents and 4% both therapies. Of those with low thrombotic risk, 63.6% was wrongly performing some kind of antithrombotic therapy; among patients with high risk or valvular disease 56.8% was properly undergoing anticoagulant therapy.<br /><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The prevalence of atrial fibrillation as well as the frequency of the main comorbidities associated with it are in line with the majority of studies. Although most patients are undergoing oral anticoagulation, only 56.8% of those with atrial fibrillation was performing adequate antithrombotic therapy as recommended by the European Society of Cardiology guidelines, which denote a marked underutilization of this treatment.<br /><strong>Keywords:</strong> Atrial Fibrillation; Fibrinolytic Agents; Stroke; Primary Health Care; Portugal.

scholarly journals ANTICOAGULATION BEFORE AND AFTER CARDIOVERSION OR ABLATION. CHALLENGES, PROBLEMS AND MISTAKES

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-70
Author(s):  
Agnė Česnauskaitė ◽  
Andrius Montrimas ◽  
Diana Rinkūnienė ◽  
Aras Puodžiukynas
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
European Society ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Esc Guidelines ◽  
European Society Of Cardiology

Background: Limited data exists addressing the daily use of anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) patients before and after electrical cardioversion (ECV) or catheter ablation procedures. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the appropriateness of anticoagulant therapy. Methods: We evaluated the prescribed dosage of anticoagulant therapy for 257 non-valvular AF and AFL patients scheduled for ECV or catheter ablation and the appropriateness of periprocedural anticoagulation according to European Society of Cardiology (ESC) AF Guidelines. The statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics software (v.26.0). Results: The majority of the patients (84%) used nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for pre-procedural anticoagulation. An intervention was not performed for 12.2% of warfarin users because of insufficient hypocoagulation, while anamnesis of patients’ missed doses with a possibility of inadequate hypocoagulation occurred only in 1.9% of patients on NOACs. The odds of having insufficient pre-procedural hypocoagulation were 7.4 times higher for warfarin users compared to the NOACs group (p=0.001, OR=7.4). An incorrect NOAC dose was assigned to 22 (8.6%) patients. Rivaroxaban was the most prescribed NOAC and this group of patients had the highest percentage of incorrect dosage according to the ESC guidelines. Conclusions: Mistakes of prescribing the dosage of anticoagulant therapy are common. The majority of the patients in the study were prescribed with NOACs before and after ECV or catheter ablation procedures. Warfarin users had higher odds of the intervention not being performed and not reaching sufficient hypocoagulation prior to the procedure compared to NOACs users.

ANTICOAGULANT THERAPY IN CANCER PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION. CONSIDERING AGE FACTOR

2020 ◽  
pp. 99-106
Author(s):  
В. И. Потиевская ◽  
А. А. Ахобеков ◽  
М. Ф. Баллюзек
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Liver And Kidney ◽  
After Cancer

Рассматривается современное состояние вопроса выбора антикоагулянтной терапии при фибрилляции предсердий (ФП) у онкологических больных. Отмечается, что сложность выбора антикоагулянта при злокачественных новообразованиях (ЗНО) определяется такими факторами, как коморбидные сердечно-сосудистые заболевания, нарушения функции печени и почек, метаболические дисфункции, свойственные, прежде всего, пациентам старшей возрастной группы. Приводятся актуальные данные по оценке риска геморрагических и тромбоэмболических осложнений ФП при ЗНО в аспекте возраста. Обсуждаются возможные причины увеличения риска развития ФП во время и после лечения ЗНО, в том числе и в связи с возраст-ассоциированностью этих патологий. Рассмотрены вопросы выбора антикоагулянтов у пациентов, находящихся на активной противоопухолевой терапии, особенно на препаратах из группы прямых оральных антикоагулянтов (ПОАК). Согласно данным обсервационных исследований, именно ПОАК являются перспективным, относительно безопасным и эффективным выбором для онкологических пациентов с ФП, в связи с чем их применение должно активно изучаться в рандомизированных клинических исследованиях с учетом фактора возраста. Подчеркивается, что подбор схемы антикоагулянтной терапии у пациентов с ФП и ЗНО требует междисциплинарного участия кардиологов и онкологов, а часто и гериатров, чтобы индивидуализировать лечение и предложить наиболее эффективную терапию. The current issue of the choice of anticoagulant therapy of atrial fibrillation (AF) in cancer patients is considered. It is noted that the difficulty of choosing an anticoagulant in malignancies is largely determined by age-related factors, such as comorbid cardiovascular diseases, liver and kidney dysfunction, metabolic disorders common for in elderly patients. Current data on the risk assessment of hemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications of AF in cancer patients in the aspect of age presented. During and after cancer treatment, the risk of developing AF can increase, also in connection with the age-associated pathology. Possible reasons of it are discussed. The choice of different anticoagulants groups in patients treated with anticancer therapy, including direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) is considered. According to available data from observational studies, it is the DOAC that is a promising, relatively safe and effective choice for cancer patients with AF, and therefore their use should be actively studied in randomized trials, considering the factor of age. It is particularly noted that solving this problem requires the interdisciplinary involvement of cardiologists, oncologists, and sometimes, geriatrics, to individualize treatment for each case and to offer the most effective therapy.

scholarly journals Changes in Antithrombotic Therapy of Atrial Fibrillation in the Hospital in 2011-2012 and 2016-2017 (Pharmacoepidemiological Analysis)

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 686-692
Author(s):  
O. V. Reshetko ◽  
A. V. Sokolov ◽  
N. V. Furman ◽  
V. V. Agapov
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Antithrombotic Therapy ◽  
Heart Defects ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Prosthetic Heart Valve ◽  
Saratov Region ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding

Aim. To study the changes that have occurred in the pharmacotherapy of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the Saratov Region for 5 years by analyzing the antithrombotic therapy of patients who were admitted in a specialized department of the multidisciplinary hospital in Saratov in 2011-2012 and in 2016-2017.Material and methods. A pharmacoepidemiological retrospective study was conducted. The object of the study was the medical records of inpatients (Form 003/y) with the diagnosis “Atrial fibrillation” (ICD-X code I48), that consecutively admitted to the cardiology department of the multidisciplinary hospital in Saratov from January 1, 2011 to December, 31, 2012 (n=211) and from January 1, 2016 to December, 31, 2017 (n=227). Criteria for inclusion in the study: patients over 18 years of age, established diagnosis of non-valvular AF of ischemic genesis. Exclusion criteria from the study: non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, thyrotoxicosis, congenital heart defects, rheumatic heart damage, acute coronary syndrome, endocarditis, myocarditis, pericarditis, pulmonary thromboembolism, the presence of prosthetic heart valve. Pharmacoepidemiological analysis was carried out for the drugs prescribed during hospitalization and given by doctors at discharge of patients from the hospital. The risk of ischemic stroke was assessed using the CHA2DS2-VASc score, and the risk of bleeding – according to the HAS-BLED score.Results. When analyzing the risk of ischemic stroke, it was found that 100% of patients in 2011-2012 years and 98.2% in 2016-2017 years had indications for the prescription of oral anticoagulants (OAСs). In 2011-2012 there were no patients with a low risk of stroke (CHA2DS2-VASc=0). High risk of bleeding (HAS-BLED≥3) occurred in 4.7% of patients in 2011-2012 and in 10.6% in 2016-2017, however, due to the high risk of stroke, the refusal to prescribe OAC in these patients was inappropriate in accordance with the recommendations for the treatment of AF. In the group of patients with CHA2DS2-VASc=0 in 2016-2017 antiplatelet therapy was prescribed in 100% at the hospital stage and at discharge, which contradicts the guidelines, according to which antithrombotic therapy is not recommended to patients with CHA2DS2-VASc=0. In patients with CHA2DS2-VASc=1, a low percentage of anticoagulants prescription was noted. In 2016-2017 OACs were prescribed only in 12.5% of patients at all stages of observation. In 2011-2012 OAC alone was prescribed only to 1 person (20%) at the hospital stage, which does not comply with modern guidelines for the treatment of patients with AF, according to which patients with a risk score CHA2DS2-VASc=1 are recommended to receive OACs in the absence of contraindications. OACs prescription in group CHA2DS2-VASc≥2 occurred only in 15% of patients in 2011-2012 and in a third of patients in 2016-2017 (p<0.05). The frequency of isolated use of OACs significantly increased in 2016-2017 compared to 2011-2012 mainly due to the increase in the spectrum of direct OACs (DOACs) (p<0.05).Conclusion. For 5 years there have been significant changes in the antithrombotic therapy of AF in the Saratov Region. The frequency of prescribing OACs according to indications has increased mainly due to the introduction of the DOACs into clinical practice. However, prevention of stroke remains insufficient.

scholarly journals Changes in Prescribing Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in the Multidisciplinary Hospital in Volgograd from 2012 to 2020

2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 831-836
Author(s):  
A. S. Gerasimenko ◽  
O. V. Shatalova ◽  
V. S. Gorbatenko ◽  
V. I. Petrov
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Clinical Guidelines ◽  
Antithrombotic Therapy ◽  
Heart Valves ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
Prosthetic Heart Valves ◽  
Discharge From Hospital

Aim. To study the frequency of prescribing antithrombotic agents in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) in real clinical practice, to evaluate changes of prescriptions from 2012 till 2020.Material and methods. The medical records of inpatients (Form 003/y) with the diagnosis AF, hospitalized in the cardiological department were analyzed. According to the inclusion criteria, the patients were over 18 years of age, established diagnosis of non-valvular AF. There were two exclusion criteria: congenital and acquired valvular heart disease and prosthetic heart valves. In retrospective analysis we have included 263 case histories in 2012, 502 ones in 2016 and 524 in 2020. CHA2DS2-VASc score was used for individual stroke risk assessment in AF. The rational use of the antithrombotic therapy was evaluated according with current clinical practice guidelines at analyzing moment.Results. During period of observation the frequency of antiplatelet therapy significantly decreased from 25,5% to 5,5% (р<0.001), decreased the frequency of administration of warfarin from 71,9% to 18,3% (р<0.001). The frequency of use of direct oral anticoagulants increased in 2020 compared to 2016 (р<0.001). For patients with a high risk of stroke anticoagulant therapy was administered in 71.8% of cases in 2012, 88.5% in 2016 and 92.5% in 2020. Before discharge from hospital majority of patients (72%) achieved a desired minimum international normalized ratio (INR) from 2.0 to 3.0 in 2012. In 2016 and 2020 an only 33% and 40.6% of patients achieved INR (2.0-3.0).Conclusion. Doctors have become more committed to following clinical guidelines during the period of the investigation. In 2020 antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation was suitable according to current clinical guidelines.

scholarly journals Features of anticoagulant therapy of atrial fibrillation in combination with impaired renal function

Kardiologiia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 61 (10) ◽  
pp. 81-88
Author(s):  
T. N. Novikova
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Kidney Function ◽  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Alternative Therapy ◽  
Favorable Effect ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Randomized Controlled Studies ◽  
Negative Effect

This review focuses on issues of anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Such patients are at high risk of stroke whereas the choice of an anticoagulant is difficult. A wealth of information about a negative effect of warfarin on the kidney function has accumulated. A need for an alternative therapy to warfarin for patients with stage 3-4 CKD has become imminent. In this regard, rivaroxaban seems to be an appropriate replacement for warfarin in such patients. In randomized, controlled studies that evaluated the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants in comparison with warfarin, the efficacy and safety profile of a “kidney” dose in moderate disorders of kidney function has been studied only for rivaroxaban. Moreover, both randomized, controlled studies and studies performed in the conditions of clinical practice, have demonstrated a more favorable effect of rivaroxaban on kidney function compared to warfarin. Patients with AF associated with CKD require a comprehensive protection, which, according to results of clinical studies, may be provided by rivaroxaban. 

Abstract 15396: Atrial Fibrillation Bleeding Risk and Prediction While Treated With Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Warfarin Naïve and Experienced Patients

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander C Perino ◽  
Krishna Pundi ◽  
Jun Fan ◽  
Susan K Schmitt ◽  
Mitra Kothari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Warfarin Therapy ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Warfarin Treatment ◽  
Treatment Analysis ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Favorable Safety

Introduction: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are guideline-recommended over warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). However, patients who are DOAC eligible are commonly maintained on warfarin. We sought to evaluate bleeding risk and prediction while on DOAC treatment (both for warfarin-naïve and -experienced patients) as compared to warfarin. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the Veteran Affairs health care system. We included patients with a prescription for warfarin and/or DOAC from 10/1/2010 to 9/30/2017 with an AF encounter in the 90 days prior to 30 days after prescription. We categorized DOAC treated patients as warfarin-naïve or -experienced and performed an on-treatment analysis to determine bleeding incidence and HAS-BLED score discrimination. In adjusted analyses, we compared risk of bleeding while treated with DOAC (both for warfarin-naïve and -experienced patients) to warfarin. Results: The analysis cohort included 99,143 patients treated with warfarin (71±10 years, HAS-BLED 2.6±1.2) and 73,732 and 26,760 patients treated with DOAC who were warfarin-naïve (74±10 years, HAS-BLED 2.4±1.0) and -experienced (71±9 years, HAS-BLED 2.8±1.1), respectively. DOAC patients with warfarin experience had more prior bleeds (DOAC, warfarin-experienced: 11.9%; DOAC, warfarin-naïve: 4.5%; warfarin: 6.2%; p<0.001 for both). Risk of intracranial bleeding was substantially lower while on DOAC treatment (both for warfarin-naïve and -experienced patients) as compared to warfarin ( Table ). HAS-BLED discrimination for bleeding outcomes, intracranial or any bleeding, was modest ( Table ). Conclusion: DOAC treatment had a favorable safety profile compared to warfarin treatment, even for DOAC treated patients with warfarin-experience who had more prior bleeds. These data argue against maintaining DOAC eligible patients on warfarin therapy regardless of HAS-BLED score.

scholarly journals Comparative Analysis of Antithrombotic Therapy in In-Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-53
Author(s):  
V. I. Petrov ◽  
O. V. Shatalova ◽  
A. S. Gerasimenko ◽  
V. S. Gorbatenko
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Thromboembolic Complications ◽  
Antithrombotic Agents ◽  
Cardiology Department ◽  
Number Of Patients

Aim. To study the frequency of prescribing antithrombotic agents in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) who were hospitalized in the cardiology department of a multidisciplinary hospital.Material and methods. A retrospective one-time study of medical records of 765 patients with non-valvular AF treated in the cardiology department of a multidisciplinary hospital in 2012 and 2016 was performed.Results. All patients were stratified in three groups depending on the CHA2DS2-VASc score. The frequency of prescribing antithrombotic agents was evaluated in each group. A low risk of thromboembolic complications was found in 1% (n=3) of patients in 2012 and 0.6% (n=3) in 2016. All these patients received antithrombotic agents. CHA2DS2-VASc=1 was found in 6% (n=15) of patients with AF in 2012 and in 3.4% (n=17) in 2016. A significant number of patients in this group received anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists (warfarin) or with direct oral anticoagulants. A high risk of thromboembolic complications (CHA2DS2-VASc≥2) was found in 93% of patient (n=245) in 2012 and in 96% (n=482) in 2016. Anticoagulant therapy was prescribed in 70.2% (n=172) patients with high risk in 2012 and 80% (n=387) in 2016. However, some patients with high risk of thromboembolic complications did not have the necessary therapy.Conclusion. Positive changes in the structure and frequency of prescribing anticoagulant drugs in patients with AF and a high risk of thromboembolic complications were found during the years studied. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document