Criteria for the choice of anticoagulant therapy for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation early after the marketing of direct oral anticoagulants in Italy

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. e12-e14 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Marzona ◽  
M.C. Roncaglioni ◽  
F. Avanzini ◽  
M.G. Franzosi ◽  
M. Moia
Author(s):  
В. И. Потиевская ◽  
А. А. Ахобеков ◽  
М. Ф. Баллюзек

Рассматривается современное состояние вопроса выбора антикоагулянтной терапии при фибрилляции предсердий (ФП) у онкологических больных. Отмечается, что сложность выбора антикоагулянта при злокачественных новообразованиях (ЗНО) определяется такими факторами, как коморбидные сердечно-сосудистые заболевания, нарушения функции печени и почек, метаболические дисфункции, свойственные, прежде всего, пациентам старшей возрастной группы. Приводятся актуальные данные по оценке риска геморрагических и тромбоэмболических осложнений ФП при ЗНО в аспекте возраста. Обсуждаются возможные причины увеличения риска развития ФП во время и после лечения ЗНО, в том числе и в связи с возраст-ассоциированностью этих патологий. Рассмотрены вопросы выбора антикоагулянтов у пациентов, находящихся на активной противоопухолевой терапии, особенно на препаратах из группы прямых оральных антикоагулянтов (ПОАК). Согласно данным обсервационных исследований, именно ПОАК являются перспективным, относительно безопасным и эффективным выбором для онкологических пациентов с ФП, в связи с чем их применение должно активно изучаться в рандомизированных клинических исследованиях с учетом фактора возраста. Подчеркивается, что подбор схемы антикоагулянтной терапии у пациентов с ФП и ЗНО требует междисциплинарного участия кардиологов и онкологов, а часто и гериатров, чтобы индивидуализировать лечение и предложить наиболее эффективную терапию. The current issue of the choice of anticoagulant therapy of atrial fibrillation (AF) in cancer patients is considered. It is noted that the difficulty of choosing an anticoagulant in malignancies is largely determined by age-related factors, such as comorbid cardiovascular diseases, liver and kidney dysfunction, metabolic disorders common for in elderly patients. Current data on the risk assessment of hemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications of AF in cancer patients in the aspect of age presented. During and after cancer treatment, the risk of developing AF can increase, also in connection with the age-associated pathology. Possible reasons of it are discussed. The choice of different anticoagulants groups in patients treated with anticancer therapy, including direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) is considered. According to available data from observational studies, it is the DOAC that is a promising, relatively safe and effective choice for cancer patients with AF, and therefore their use should be actively studied in randomized trials, considering the factor of age. It is particularly noted that solving this problem requires the interdisciplinary involvement of cardiologists, oncologists, and sometimes, geriatrics, to individualize treatment for each case and to offer the most effective therapy.


Kardiologiia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 61 (10) ◽  
pp. 81-88
Author(s):  
T. N. Novikova

This review focuses on issues of anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Such patients are at high risk of stroke whereas the choice of an anticoagulant is difficult. A wealth of information about a negative effect of warfarin on the kidney function has accumulated. A need for an alternative therapy to warfarin for patients with stage 3-4 CKD has become imminent. In this regard, rivaroxaban seems to be an appropriate replacement for warfarin in such patients. In randomized, controlled studies that evaluated the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants in comparison with warfarin, the efficacy and safety profile of a “kidney” dose in moderate disorders of kidney function has been studied only for rivaroxaban. Moreover, both randomized, controlled studies and studies performed in the conditions of clinical practice, have demonstrated a more favorable effect of rivaroxaban on kidney function compared to warfarin. Patients with AF associated with CKD require a comprehensive protection, which, according to results of clinical studies, may be provided by rivaroxaban. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-53
Author(s):  
V. I. Petrov ◽  
O. V. Shatalova ◽  
A. S. Gerasimenko ◽  
V. S. Gorbatenko

Aim. To study the frequency of prescribing antithrombotic agents in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) who were hospitalized in the cardiology department of a multidisciplinary hospital.Material and methods. A retrospective one-time study of medical records of 765 patients with non-valvular AF treated in the cardiology department of a multidisciplinary hospital in 2012 and 2016 was performed.Results. All patients were stratified in three groups depending on the CHA2DS2-VASc score. The frequency of prescribing antithrombotic agents was evaluated in each group. A low risk of thromboembolic complications was found in 1% (n=3) of patients in 2012 and 0.6% (n=3) in 2016. All these patients received antithrombotic agents. CHA2DS2-VASc=1 was found in 6% (n=15) of patients with AF in 2012 and in 3.4% (n=17) in 2016. A significant number of patients in this group received anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists (warfarin) or with direct oral anticoagulants. A high risk of thromboembolic complications (CHA2DS2-VASc≥2) was found in 93% of patient (n=245) in 2012 and in 96% (n=482) in 2016. Anticoagulant therapy was prescribed in 70.2% (n=172) patients with high risk in 2012 and 80% (n=387) in 2016. However, some patients with high risk of thromboembolic complications did not have the necessary therapy.Conclusion. Positive changes in the structure and frequency of prescribing anticoagulant drugs in patients with AF and a high risk of thromboembolic complications were found during the years studied. 


2021 ◽  
pp. 106-126
Author(s):  
Т. N. Novikova

This review is devoted to the safety issues of anticoagulant therapy prescribed for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. Direct oral anticoagulants are considered worldwide in accordance with the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of atrial fibrillation as the preferred anticoagulant choice for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism. Direct oral anticoagulants in comparison with vitamin K antagonists generally have similar efficacy, but different safety profiles, primarily, this concerns the risk of large extracranial and, primarily, gastrointestinal hemorrhages. To minimize the risk of bleeding during therapy with direct oral anticoagulants, an individual approach to the choice of the drug for each individual patient is required after assessing the risk of bleeding, searching for a potential bleeding substrate, correcting existing risk factors and eliminating, if possible, the substrate. When choosing an anticoagulant therapy, special attention should be paid to the most vulnerable categories of patients, such as patients of older age groups and patients with concomitant chronic kidney disease. Among the direct oral anticoagulants registered in the Russian Federation, according to meta-analyzes of key randomized clinical trials and real clinical trials, apixaban has the most optimal benefit: risk ratio in a wide range of patients, including vulnerable populations. Dynamic observation, including regular assessment of renal function, control of clinical blood analysis, erythrocyte and platelet levels, after prescribing an individually selected anticoagulant to the patient, ensures the maximum safety of therapy. Small, so-called, annoying bleeding is not a reason for canceling the anticoagulant, but requires a careful search for the causes of bleeding and their correction.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
O Dzhioeva ◽  
E Resnik ◽  
I Nikitin

Abstract Surgery in patients with atrial fibrillation is always an additional risk of thromboembolic complications. In the modern era of direct oral anticoagulants, the risk of bleeding is much lower, due to the lack of need for a Bridge, but at the same time, there is no clear position on the strategy of management of patients with long-term current atrial fibrillation in the tactics of rhythm control or heart rate control. In our clinic we examined 772 before surgical intervention high risk. Of these, atrial fibrillation was diagnosed in 366 patients. 121 patients had a persistent or long-persistant form of arrhythmia. To determine the tactics, we performed a transesophageal echocardiographic study to assess intracardiac hemorheology. 109 studies were performed. 35 patients received rivaroxaban, 29 dabigatran, 19 apixaban, 26 patients did not receive anticoagulant therapy. Disorders of intracardiac hemorheology that do not allow to perform a planned cardioversion, such as blood clots and spontaneous contrast 3–4 degrees, were detected in 78% of patients not receiving anticoagulant therapy, 56% of patients receiving dabigatran, 52% of patients receiving rivaroxaban and 38% of patients receiving apixaban. Among patients with disorders of intracardiac hemorheology, unreasonably reduced doses were taken by 78% of patients. Patients with thrombotic disorders proposed to enter the perioperative period in accordance with the strategy of heart rate control and correction doses of anticoagulant therapy. Thus, based on our observations, we recommend transesophageal echocardiography before elective surgery in all patients with persistant AF to determine the feasibility of restoring the sinus rhythm before surgery.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-34
Author(s):  
Dmitry A. Napalkov ◽  
◽  
Anastasiya A. Sokolova ◽  
Alena I. Skripka ◽  
◽  
...  

This publication is devoted to the tactics of management of patients with atrial fibrillation during the pandemic of new coronavirus infection (COVID-19). Among the key issues of relevance during this period, we thought it possible to consider the epidemiology, prevalence, and pathophysiological mechanisms of atrial fibrillation in patients with COVID-19, as well as treatment strategies with regard to obvious hospitalization, rhythm control/restoration and prevention of thromboembolic events. A separate issue is the tactics regarding the prescription or continuation of therapy aimed at the prevention of thromboembolic events and possible drug interactions in patients treated for COVID-19 and receiving anticoagulant therapy with direct oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation. Keywords: atrial fibrillation, COVID-19, thromboembolic events, anticoagulant therapy For citation: Napalkov DA, Sokolova AA, Skripka AI. Features of the management of patients with atrial fibrillation during the COVID-19 pandemic: current questions and possible answers, Consilium Medicum. 2021; 23 (1): 32–34. DOI: 10.26442/20751753.2021.1.200669


2020 ◽  
pp. 40-43
Author(s):  
M. A. Gabitova ◽  
P. M. Krupenin ◽  
A. A. Sokolova ◽  
D. A. Napalkov ◽  
V. V. Fomin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common arrhythmias in patients ≥75 years of age. The increased risk of thrombosis due to age and the large number of concomitant diseases makes it evident that anticoagulant therapy is necessary. However, the same factors increase the risk of hemorrhagic complications, which are among the most dangerous side effects of anticoagulant therapy. That is why it is very important to identify patients with the highest probability of bleeding, whether large or small clinically significant and minor. The purpose of our study was to study the prognostic value of laboratory methods of examination with regard to the development of hemorrhagic events in elderly patients with AF taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). The study enrolled 102 patients ≥75 years of age with AF of non-valve etiology taking dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban at full or reduced doses. Anticoagulants were administered by outpatient and inpatient physicians. Both previous experience with DOAC prior to inclusion in the trial (if DOAC was previously prescribed) and prospective patient monitoring after inclusion in the trial were analyzed. The minimum analyzed period of DOAC intake was 18 months. Patients who underwent (n = 19) and did not undergo (n = 83) hemorrhagic events (all events were considered small by ISTH criteria) did not differ in any of the laboratory indicators potentially considered as predictors of hemorrhagic events.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noriko Tsuji ◽  
Yoshimitsu TAKAHASHI ◽  
Michi Sakai ◽  
Shosuke Ohtera ◽  
Junji Kaneyama ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and aim: The introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has greatly changed the use of anticoagulant therapy in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (Af). However, few studies have reported on the current state of anticoagulant therapy at the national level. This study aimed to examine changes in the proportions of oral anticoagulant (OAC) prescriptions (4 DOACs and a vitamin K antagonist: VKA) in patients with non-valvular Af aged ≥65 years, taking into consideration the risk of cerebral infarction and bleeding.Methods: Anticoagulant prescriptions in outpatients with Af were temporally analyzed using the nationwide claims database in Japan. The proportion of anticoagulants prescribed to Af patients aged ≥65 years was determined. Trends in anticoagulant prescriptions were examined according to cerebral infarction and bleeding risk.Results: The proportion of anticoagulant prescriptions for 12,076 Af patients aged ≥65 years in Japan increased from 41% in 2011 to 56% in 2015. The proportion of prescriptions for DOACs surpassed that of VKA. An increase in DOAC prescriptions was accompanied by an increase in the proportion of anticoagulant prescriptions in each group according to the CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores. The proportion of anticoagulant prescriptions for patients with a high risk of developing cerebral infarction and bleeding showed a marked increase.Conclusion: Trends in anticoagulant prescriptions in patients with non-valvular AfAf in Japan showed a marked increase in DOAC prescriptions. The widespread use of DOACs greatly changes the profiles of cerebral infarction and bleeding risks, which are related to the prescription of anticoagulant therapy in patients with non-valvular Af.


2020 ◽  
pp. 17-26
Author(s):  
E. S. Kropacheva ◽  
E. P. Panchenko

This review focuses on some aspects of anticoagulant therapy in the updated clinical guidelines for atrial fibrillation of the European society of cardiology, published in 2020. Atrial fibrillation is a polymorbid continuously developing syndrome, and therefore the treatment strategy is based on a comprehensive assessment of the patient, including the risk of stroke, the presence and severity of symptoms, and an assessment of structural heart disease and comorbidities. The review describes the principles of the proposed integrated approach, abbreviated “ABC pathway”, as reflecting the three main directions of the treatment strategy. According to experts, the clinical picture of AF (i.e. first detected, paroxysmal, persistent, long-term persistent or permanent) should not determine the indications for the appointment of anticoagulant therapy. The CHA2DS2-VASc scale continues to be the basis for stratification of thromboembolic risk. The role of dabigatran in primary and secondary prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation is described. Changes in the position of experts regarding the assessment of bleeding risk are highlighted in order to help identify unmodified and eliminate modifiable risk factors for bleeding, as well as to identify AF patients who are potentially at high risk of bleeding for more frequent monitoring and monitoring of their condition. Questions about the use of direct oral anticoagulants in the choice of rhythm control tactics are highlighted separately. The use of dabigatran in patients undergoing cardioversion and catheter ablation is justified. Practical questions about the continuous strategy of anticoagulant therapy during ablation are highlighted separately. Changes related to multicomponent therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention are highlighted. The main measure to improve the safety of combined antithrombotic therapy is to minimize the duration of triple therapy. The updated recommendations supportlimiting the duration of triple antithrombotic therapy to 1 month, and also provide for early discontinuation of aspirin (≤1 week) and continuation of double antithrombotic therapy in cases of uncomplicated stenting and low risk of thrombosis, or when the risk of bleeding exceeds the risk of thrombotic events.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document