scholarly journals Comparison of the Antibacterial Efficacy of Ibuprofen Versus Triple Antibiotic Paste Against Enterococcus Faecalis in Single Rooted Teeth

2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 1693-1700
Author(s):  
Ahmed Rezk ◽  
alaa elbaz ◽  
fatma abu naeem
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 3469
Author(s):  
Khalid H. Almadi ◽  
Muhammad Adeel Ahmed ◽  
Tuba Ghazal ◽  
Rizwan Jouhar ◽  
Mazen F. Alkahtany ◽  
...  

Propolis is proposed to possess antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties, which can be used in endodontic applications. However, evidence on its efficacy in comparison to chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) is controversial. The aim of the current study was to compare the antibacterial efficacy of Propolis and chlorhexidine as an intracanal medicament against E. faecalis in extracted human permanent teeth. The focused question was, “Does Propolis show better antibacterial efficacy than Chlorhexidine (CHX) as an intracanal medicament against E. faecalis in extracted human permanent teeth?”. Databases including PubMed/Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, ISI-Web of Science were searched from 1990 to August 2020 using different combinations of the following keywords: “Propolis”, “Intracanal medicament”, “E. faecalis”, “Antibacterial activity” and “Chlorhexidine”. Ten studies fulfilling inclusion criteria were considered for qualitative analysis, followed by quantitative analysis of eight studies. Heterogeneity was calculated for colony forming units (CFU) of E. Faecalis using the Chi-square test and I2 statistics. Forest plots were computed reporting standard mean difference (SMD) of outcomes and 95% confidence intervals. The overall mean difference for CFU of E. faecalis showed a statistically significant difference between the antibacterial efficacy of Propolis and CHX (SMD = 3.20 [1.70, 4.69] Z = 4.20; p < 0.001). CHX showed superior antibacterial efficacy against E. faecalis compared to Propolis.


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Recai Zan ◽  
Tayfun Alacam ◽  
Ihsan Hubbezoglu ◽  
Tutku Tunc ◽  
Zeynep Sumer ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 237 ◽  
Author(s):  
KiranRahul Halkai ◽  
JayashreeA Mudda ◽  
Vasundhara Shivanna ◽  
Vandana Rathod ◽  
Rahul Halkai

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Mewan Salahalddin A. Alrahman ◽  
Bestoon Muhammed Faraj ◽  
Kawa F. Dizaye

Background and Objectives. Multiple antibacterial agents have been mixed and used as an intracanal medicament-like modified triple antibiotic paste (MTAP) to eliminate Enterococcus faecalis (EF), which has been most frequently identified in the cases of failed root canal treatment and periapical lesions. This study is aimed at using a single antibacterial agent, nitrofurantoin (Nit), as an experimental intracanal medicament paste against different clinical isolates of EF bacteria and at comparing its antimicrobial efficacy with MTAP. Materials and Methods. Three strains of EF (S1, S2, and S3) were clinically isolated. A total of 198 straight single-rooted human teeth were collected and divided randomly into three main groups: group N (Nit) (n=90), group M (MTAP) (n=90), and group W (distilled water) (n=18). The main groups were subdivided into three subgroups according to the strain of EF: in groups N and M, subgroups S1, S2, and S3 (n=30), while in group W, subgroups S1, S2, and S3 (n=6). Then, each subgroup of N and M was divided into five groups (n=6) according to the concentrations of Nit or MTAP (6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 mg/mL). The colony-forming unit (CFU) of EF from the canal lumen and dentinal chips was measured. Results. Nit could eradicate S1, S2, and S3 completely with concentrations of 6.25, 12.5, and 25 mg/mL, respectively, while MTAP showed complete eradication of the three strains only at 25 mg/mL. In all the groups, it was found that the CFU counts of EF in the dentinal chips were higher than those in the root canal lumen. Conclusion. At the concentration of 25 mg/mL, the Nit paste is effective in eradicating EF completely when it is used as an intracanal medicament.


Cureus ◽  
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Preethi Varadan ◽  
Arathi Ganesh ◽  
Rudra Konindala ◽  
Venkateshbabu Nagendrababu ◽  
Rupa Ashok ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document