Assessing the Quality of Life among Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section versus Emergency Cesarean Section

Abstract Background Cesarean Section was historically performed to save the lives of mothers and infants. Ηowever, in the past decades, a significant increase in Cesarean Section rates have been observed in Greece and worldwide. The purpose of this research was to investigate the contributing factors to the increase in the Cesarean Section rate (emergency and elective) and postoperative complications.Methods A total of births in 6 months (August 2019- February 2020) at the University Hospital of Larisa in Greece was collected. The performed analysis included the available socio-demographic and medical information in the medical records and a socio-demographic and medical questionnaire for women with cesarean deliveries. We also analyzed the importance of the variables in cesarean deliveries compared to vaginal deliveries and postoperative complications.Results Out of the total number of the included 633 births, the vaginal delivery rate was 42% (n = 268), and the cesarean delivery rate was 58% (n = 365); Elective Cesarean Section was performed in 36% (n = 230) of the Cesarean Section cases and Emergency Cesarean Section in 22% (n = 135). Women with a previous Cesarean Section and women with in vitro fertilization showed higher percentages for Elective Cesarean Section (46%) compared to women who underwent an Emergency Cesarean Section for the same reasons (42.2%). Besides, a higher percentage of Emergency Cesarean Sections was observed in women living in urban centers (OR = 4.044, p = 0.002) and those diagnosed with stress disorders (OR = 7.048, p = 0.004). Furthermore, Cesarean Section complications were more common among women having undergone Emergency Cesarean Section (OR = 10.357, p < 0.001).Conclusion The overall high rates of Cesarean Section in Greece demonstrate the lack of national strategies and prevention mechanisms from iatrogenic interventions and lack of promoting good midwifery practices. More specifically, a decrease in iatrogenic factors leading to the primary Cesarean Section will decrease Cesarean Section rates in Greece.

Download Full-text

Psychological impact of emergency Cesarean section in comparison with elective Cesarean section, instrumental and normal vaginal delivery

Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology ◽

10.3109/01674829809025691 ◽

1998 ◽

Vol 19 (3) ◽

pp. 135-144 ◽

Cited By ~ 112

Author(s):

E. L. Ryding ◽

K. Wijma ◽

B. Wijma

Keyword(s):

Cesarean Section ◽

Vaginal Delivery ◽

Psychological Impact ◽

Elective Cesarean Section ◽

Normal Vaginal Delivery ◽

Emergency Cesarean Section ◽

Emergency Cesarean ◽

Elective Cesarean

Download Full-text

Maternal and Fetal Outcome in Elective versus Emergency Cesarean Section

Journal of Nepal Medical Association ◽

10.31729/jnma.2426 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 52 (192) ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Anupama Suwal ◽

Veena R Shrivastava ◽

Amrita Giri

Keyword(s):

Cesarean Section ◽

Teaching Hospital ◽

College Teaching ◽

Fetal Outcome ◽

Elective Cesarean Section ◽

Emergency Cesarean Section ◽

Medical College ◽

Emergency Cesarean ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Elective Cesarean

Introduction: The complications of cesarean section are seen more commonly in emergency than in elective cases. The aim of this study was to find out the incidence of cesarean section in Nepal Medical College Teaching Hospital and to compare the maternal and fetal outcome in elective and emergency cesarean section. Methods: A prospective study of all the cases undergoing cesarean section in Nepal Medical College Teaching Hospital was carried out during the period of six months from Asar 2069 to Mangsir 2069. Results: The incidence of cesarean section was 254 (22.30%) out of which emergency cesarean section accounted for 167 (65.7%) and elective cesarean section for 87 (34.3%). The usual indications of emergency cesarean section were fetal distress, previous cesarean section in labour, non progress of labour and prolonged second stage of labour. The usual indications of elective cesarean section were previous cesarean section, breech, cephalopelvic disproportion and cesarean section on demand. There was found to be no significant difference in age, period of gestation, blood loss and blood transfusion in emergency vs. elective cesarean section. There was significant difference seen in the length of hospital stay, fever, urinary tract infection, wound infection and low APGAR in five minutes indicating that these were more common in emergency cesarean section. Significant difference was also seen in the incidence of postpartum haemorrhage indicating that it was seen more in elective cesarean section. Conclusions: The incidence of cesarean section in Nepal Medical College Teaching Hospital is high and the overall complication rate is higher in emergency cesarean section than in elective cesarean section.Keywords: cesarean section; fetal and maternal outcome.

Download Full-text

Elective versus Emergency Cesarean Sections : Mother and Fetal Outcome

Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology ◽

10.32771/inajog.v9i2.634 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 90-94

Author(s):

Christofer J. H. Ladja ◽

IMS Murah Mano ◽

Andi M. Tahir ◽

St. Maisuri T. Chalid

Keyword(s):

Cesarean Section ◽

Operating Time ◽

Total Duration ◽

Fetal Outcome ◽

Elective Cesarean Section ◽

Cesarean Sections ◽

Emergency Cesarean Section ◽

Emergency Cesarean ◽

Elective Cesarean ◽

History Of

Objective: To compare the outcomes of mothers and newborns in emergency cesarean section and elective cesarean section.Methods: A prospective cohort study included 120 pregnant women consists of 60 women who performed an emergency cesarean section and 60 women who underwent elective cesarean section. Age, education level, occupation, income, history of comorbidities, history of abortion or miscarriage, antenatal care history, decision-making time until surgery is performed along with other components required, duration of operation, outcome of mother and fetal were obtained through interviews and questionnaires. Data were analyzed regarding fetal outcome and cesarean sections indications.Results: The maternal and fetal outcome between emergency and elective cesarean section were not significantly different regarding on hospital stay, dehiscence, NICU admission, Apgar score and newborn status (dead or alive). Blood transfusion is the main difference signifi cant indication for maternal outcome between emergency and elective procedure (p less than 0.05). The total duration of procedure less than 60 or more than 60 minutes and maternal-fetal outcome not signifi cantly different between two type of procedures.Conclusions: Emergency cesarean section at preterm gestational age with an operating time less than equal to 60 minutes leads to greater transfusion blood requirements compared with elective cesarean section.Keywords: emergency cesarean section, elective cesareansection, mother-infant outcome. AbstrakTujuan: Membandingkan luaran ibu dan bayi baru lahir di seksio sesarea emergensi dan elektif.Metode: Penelitian kohort prospektif melibatkan 120 perempuan hamil terdiri atas 60 perempuan yang melakukan operasi seksio sesarea emergensi dan 60 perempuan melakukan operasi elektif. Usia, tingkatpendidikan, pekerjaan, pendapatan, riwayat komorbiditas, riwayat aborsi atau keguguran, riwayat asuhan antenatal, waktu pengambilan keputusan sampai operasi dilakukan bersamaan dengan komponen lain yang diperlukan, lamanya operasi, luaran ibu dan bayi diperoleh melalui wawancara dan kuesioner. Data yang dianalisis mengenai luaran ibu dan bayinya.Hasil: Luaran ibu dan bayi antara seksio sesarea emergensi dan elektif tidak berbeda bermakna dalam hal lama rawat inap, dehisensi, admisi, skor Apgar dan status bayi baru lahir (meninggal atau hidup). Transfusi darah adalah indikasi penting utama yang berbeda untuk luaran ibu antara prosedur emergensi dan elektif (p kurang dari 0,05). Durasi total prosedur kurang dari 60 atau lebih dari 60 menit dan luaran ibu tidak berbeda secara signifikan antara kedua jenis seksio sesarea.Kesimpulan: Tindakan seksio sesarea emergensi pada usia gestasi prematur dengan waktu operasi kurang dari sama dengan 60 menit menyebabkan kebutuhan transfusi darah lebih besar dibandingkan seksio sesarea elektif.Kata kunci: luaran ibu-bayi, seksio sesarea elektif, seksio sesarea emergensi.

Download Full-text

Respiratory Morbidity in Term Infants delivered by Elective Cesarean Section at a Tertiary Care Hospital in India: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal of SAFOG with DVD ◽

10.5005/jp-journals-10006-1520 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 9 (4) ◽

pp. 312-317

Author(s):

Priyankur Roy ◽

Lakshmanan Jeyaseelan ◽

Jose Ruby

Keyword(s):

Cesarean Section ◽

Outcome Measures ◽

Elective Cesarean Section ◽

Respiratory Morbidity ◽

Care Hospital ◽

Emergency Cesarean Section ◽

Emergency Cesarean ◽

Group I ◽

Elective Cesarean ◽

Group Ii

ABSTRACT Objectives (1) To investigate the association between term elective cesarean sections and neonatal respiratory morbidity and the importance of timing of the cesarean. (2) To assess the maternal morbidity when emergency lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) was required. Participants All women with singleton term (37—41 + 6 weeks) pregnancies and planned for elective cesarean section in Christian Medical College, Vellore, India. Outcome measures The primary outcome measures were neonatal morbidities such as transient tachypnea of newborn (TTN) and respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). The secondary outcome measures were emergency cesarean section and maternal morbidities such as scar dehiscence, urinary tract infection (UTI), endometritis, peritonitis, and hemoperitoneum in the mother. Results The percentage of TTN in the infants in group I was 1.3% while there were none in group II. No infants were diagnosed to have RDS. Out of the 150 women who were planned for elective cesarean section, 55 women underwent emergency cesarean section. Among this, 19 (25.3%) of women were from group I as compared with 36 (48.0%) in group II. The difference in proportion between the two groups was –22.7 [95% confidence interval (CI): –37.7, –7.7], which was statistically significant (p < 0.01). The incidence of scar dehiscence, UTI, endometritis, and hemoperitoneum in the mothers of group II was marginally higher than that in the mothers of group I. There was one woman with peritonitis in group I while none was reported in the other group. All the maternal morbidities occurred to women who underwent emergency cesarean section. Out of the 19 women in group I and 36 women in group II who underwent emergency cesarean section, 1 (5.3%) and 6 (16.7%) women had morbidities. Conclusion Women requiring elective cesarean section can safely be done between 37 and 39 weeks with no further significant increase in the rates of neonatal morbidity such as TTN and RDS. How to cite this article Roy P, Jeyaseelan L, Ruby J, Garg R. Respiratory Morbidity in Term Infants delivered by Elective Cesarean Section at a Tertiary Care Hospital in India: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J South Asian Feder Obst Gynae 2017;9(4):312-317.

Download Full-text

Comparing the Experiences of Parturient Women With Remifentanil Analgesia and Elective Cesarean Section and Providing Improver Strategies: A Sequential Explanatory Mixed Method Study

10.21203/rs.3.rs-353880/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

rana dousti ◽

Sevil Hakimi ◽

Hojjat Pourfathi ◽

Roghayeh Nourizadeh ◽

Niloufar sattarzadeh jahdi

Keyword(s):

Cesarean Section ◽

Mixed Method ◽

Elective Cesarean Section ◽

Mixed Method Study ◽

Quality Of Data ◽

Sequential Approach ◽

Private Hospitals ◽

Elective Cesarean ◽

The City

Abstract Background Identifying methods that can effectively and safely improve the childbirth experience and are tailored to mothers' needs are of crucial importance. The current study aimed to compare experiences of parturient women with remifentanil analgesia and elective cesarean section and providing improver strategies for women living in the city of Tabriz, Iran.MethodsThis is a mixed-method study with an explanatory sequential approach. The first stage is quantitative and longitudinal. The study population is all parturient women who will give birth by elective C-section or vaginal painless delivery using remifentanil in private hospitals of the city of Tabriz in 2020-2021. All mothers are free to choose either method. Participants will be selected from all private hospitals using the convenience sampling technique proportioned to the number of eligible women in each hospital. Participants will be followed up to 30 days after delivery to complete the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression questionnaire. The second stage is a qualitative study aimed at exploring the perceptions of parturient women who had either elective C-section or painless delivery (using remifentanil), including factors related to labor experiences. Data will be collected by semi structured interviews with new mothers and important others (if needed).In the third stage, a mixed study will be performed to provide strategies for improving labor experiences. we will use an explanatory Sequential approach in order to increase the accuracy and quality of data and to use the findings to evaluate different methods of delivery.DiscussionBy comparing the experience of parturient women receiving Remifentanil analgesia and elective C-section, evidence-based improving strategies using a culturally sensitive approach can be provided. Presentation of the results obtained from this study using the mixed method may help in better understanding the issue. Also, the obtained results can be used to enhance the quality of midwifery care to be examined by health policymakers and planners.Trial registrationThis study is approved by the ethics committee of the Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (code: IR.TBZMED.REC.1399. 521). Besides, it's evaluated by relevant refers.

Download Full-text

Relation between delivery mode and maternal mental status one month after delivery at a perinatal center in Japan: A cross-sectional study

F1000Research ◽

10.12688/f1000research.20677.3 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 ◽

pp. 1755

Author(s):

Shunji Suzuki

Keyword(s):

Cesarean Section ◽

Mental Status ◽

Depression Scale ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Elective Cesarean Section ◽

Delivery Mode ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Delivery Modes ◽

Emergency Cesarean ◽

Elective Cesarean

Background: Maternal mental status has been thought to be affected by the delivery modes. We examined the relation between delivery modes and the mental status of women who delivered at our institute in Japan. Methods: Data were collected from the medical charts of 643 primiparous women without a history of mental disorders who delivered singleton babies and underwent a 1-month postpartum check-up at our institute from September 2018 to June 2019. The maternal mental status was examined based on the scores of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Mother-Infant Bonding Scale (MIBS). Results: The rate of high scores of the EPDS and the MIBS in women choosing elective cesarean section were higher than in women with vaginal delivery and emergency cesarean section. Conclusion: Mental health care may be necessary for women choosing elective cesarean section.

Download Full-text

Intravertebral Anaesthesia For cesarean section

10.21203/rs.2.9253/v1 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Fangjun Wang ◽

Dan Xie ◽

Chun Hong Xu ◽

Qin Ye

Keyword(s):

Cesarean Section ◽

Spinal Anaesthesia ◽

Motor Block ◽

Epidural Block ◽

Elective Cesarean Section ◽

Complete Regression ◽

Caudal Block ◽

Sensory Blockade ◽

Elective Cesarean

Abstract BACKGROUND: Although epidural and spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing cesarean section is the general choice recently, both of the two anesthesia methods still have imperfects. Caudal anesthesia has been considered more appropriate for gynecological surgery. However, there is a lack of experiments on the effects of epidural block combined with caudal block anaesthesia for cesarean section. METHODS: One hundred and fifty patients undergoing elective cesarean section were recruited to this clinical trial and randomized to receive epidural block, subarachnoid block, and epidural block combined with caudal block. The primary objective was to compare and evaluate the clinical efficacy of three groups. Secondary outcomes included side effects and the quality of intraoperative and postoperative comfort assessment. RESULTS: The times to cryanaesthesia at T10 and time to maximum motor block were shorter in group SAB. The maximal sensory blockade spinal segments of group SAB(15.18±0.90)and EAC (14.74±1.16)were much more than group EPB(10.74±1.77). Compared to group EPB(155.40±13.28) and EAC(160.70±12.58), the duration of complete regression of motor block was longer in group SAB(190.00±13.25). The intraoperative quality of anesthesia was judged by the gynecologist was excellent in group EAC and SAB(P=0.005), and by the parturients was only best in group EAC(P=0.001). The parturients felt more comfortable after surgery in group EPB and group EAC(P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Epidural block combined with caudal block anaesthesia can achieve the same anesthetic effect as spinal anaesthesia which is bettter than epidural anaesthesia for elective cesarean section, and have the highest level of intraoperative and postoperative comfort for parturient.

Download Full-text