scholarly journals LEGITYMACJA PROCESOWA UMOWNEGO ZARZĄDCY NIERUCHOMOŚCI

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 203
Author(s):  
Grzegorz Jędrejek

Judicial Ticket of a Contractual Real Estate ManagerSummary The aim of this article is to explain all doubts referring to a judicial ticket of a contractual real estate manager, which has been legislated in a co-owners’ contract. The issue mentioned above arouses controversy in doctrine but also in judicature. One has adopted a stance in the article, that the real estate manager has got the title to bring the action before the court, which is based on the article 201 of the civil code. A contract connected with entrusting management does not deprive the owners of the rights, including claims consisting of property law. Co-owners allow third parties to carry out entitlements connected with management of a common property. The article consists of three parts. The first one contains concise deliberations about the notion of legitimization. The problem of a judicial ticket of a manager, who was legislated in a contract by co-owners of a common property (article 199-202 of the civil code) was discussed in the second part. The third part of the article is connected with a judicial ticket of a real estate manager, which was mentioned in an act of proprietorship of premises.

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-106
Author(s):  
Victor Klyushnichenko ◽  
Nikolai Kaverin ◽  
Nikita Lebedev

Characteristic of the main reasons for emergence of the register mistakes causing suspension of carrying out the state cadastral registration of real estate is given. It constrains processes of fixing of the rights for objects of natural and legal entities and also formation of taxable base. Sources of emergence of register mistakes and possible ways of their elimination or weakening of influence are described. This type of mistakes is made mainly by cadastral engineers in the course of cadastral activity. If the materials containing such mistakes are entered in the Unified state register of the real estate, then as the defendant both the cadastral engineer, and body of registration of the rights can act as the third party. In the course of elimination of register mistakes the court appoints the cadastral engineer who on the catalog of coordinates submitted by court fixes the problem taking place between the adjacent land plots. The practice of elimination of this sort mistakes in foreign countries which is that the cadastral engineer and also his close relatives in case of his death, bear responsibility within thirty years is shown. Recommendations about decrease in the causes of register mistakes are provided in the boundary and technical plans prepared by cadastral engineers.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-118
Author(s):  
Viktor N. Klyushnichenko ◽  
Anastasia O. Kiseleva ◽  
Dana A. Naumenko

Currently, issues of rational and environmentally friendly environmental management are of particular relevance. For these purposes, a system of eco-products and eco-industries is developing. The main institute for accounting for land plots and capital construction facilities is Rosreestr. Minerals in the Earth's bowels are also real estate by law, but are not taken into account in the modern cadastre, which leads to their unsystematic use and destruction. The negative aspects of the use of natural resources are reflected. The need to record all types of natural resources provided for in the Civil Code in the Unified State Register of Real Estate is justified.


2021 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-128
Author(s):  
Marek Novák

It follows from the case law of the Supreme and Constitutional Court that everyone has the right to leave immovable property if they do not illegally avoid liability for non-fulfilment of their own obligations. The legal institute of dereliction has its origins in Roman law, which emphasized the free will of the owner deciding to abandon property. The dereliction of real estate according to the Civil Code in effect takes place by the legal action itself, by which the owner expresses the will to abandon the thing. Declaratory nature of property registration in the real estate cadastre might follow the recodification work in the 1920s and 1930s, as it differs from the General civil code (ABGB) regulation. Moreover, the Civil Code is influenced by socialist legislation when it transfers abandoned real estate to state ownership automatically. Although this was originally considered a measure in favour of the society, it is likely to cause difficulties. In recent years, laconic provisions of the Civil Code have provoked a discussion on the requisites of the application for the registration of state ownership in the real estate cadastre. The cadastral offices and some courts initially considered that the application must be accompanied by a consent statement from the original owner and the state, which, however, contradicts the characteristic of dereliction as a unilateral act. The Supreme Court strongly opposed this practice and interpreted the nature of dereliction in its decisions in detail.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afsaneh Narimisa ◽  
Alireza Entezari

Considering that Articles 47 and 48 of the Registration Law have stated that registration of the document of settlement contract is obligatory and its sanction is the non-acceptability of unofficial documents in courts and departments. However, it must be said that these articles do not declare the invalidity of normal documents absolutely, but the meaning of the non-acceptability of such documents is that they cannot be referred to in relation to third parties, while such documents are valid and authentic for the parties to the contract, and because of the fact that the document is a normal contract, the parties to the contract cannot refuse to fulfill their commitment and execute the contract by the excuse that such documents must have been registered in accordance with the law. Therefore, referring to ordinary settlement agreement, the grantee cannot claim the propriety of some property against persons other than grantor, but in the case of denial of the occurrence of a transaction between the parties to the settlement, the beneficiary can refer to the ordinary document of that transaction to prove the occurrence of the transaction between themself and the other person, and such a reference is reviewable by the court. In addition to that the grantor and grantee can refer to ordinary document and any provable evidence in their controversy and dispute about the settlement subject and prove the occurrence of settlement, the grantee can bring an action against the grantor and obligate them to arrange an official settlement document by proving the settlement and by invoking to Article 220 of the Civil Code, because according to the mentioned article, transactors are not only committed to what is stated in the contract, but are also committed to all the results of the contract in accordance with customs or law. However, if a dispute occurs between the grantee and a third party about the settlement subject and an action is brought, then if the grantee presents the ordinary settlement document to prove their ownership, the court according to the Registration Law will not consider that document effective, and the grantee may even be convicted against the third party. The settlement is not correct if its provisions arecontrary to the law, order and the general rules, and if the settlement document arranged in a notary office has a substantive, procedural or legal problem then the competent legal authorities such as the High Council of Registry investigate the issue and the provisions applicable will be issued.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document